Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have they actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
    • Am in the middle of selling my house but it's been held up as still showing a change on the property from welcome finance, have not had any contact from them for years or prime credit and need this sorting asap
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Telephone Harassment Letters Not Respected.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4257 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 271
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Any complaints regarding Debt Collection should be raised to the FOS, this has already been done with the FOS siding with Barclays First Plus, according to them they are entitled to do this.

 

Barclays also received complaint from me direct, their legals say they are entirely within their rights!!!!

Don\'t let the B**tards grind you down

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well FOS have replied, and I quote:-

 

I have noted the legal clauses that you have quoted, but as we are not a legislative body, we do not have the power to judge if businesses may have acted outside of the law.

 

This shower are needing shut down, complete waste of space.

Don\'t let the B**tards grind you down

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well FOS have replied, and I quote:-

 

I have noted the legal clauses that you have quoted, but as we are not a legislative body, we do not have the power to judge if businesses may have acted outside of the law.

 

This shower are needing shut down, complete waste of space.

 

 

Sounds familiar their response to any complaint.

Edited by Old Cogger
:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

They are correct of course the FOS is their to

decide on fairness not to judge breaches of law.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Put all the information you have into a submission to

your MP and the OFT.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct, they dont deal with individual cases. But they do act if theres a lot of complaints against one company. Thats why time and time again we have said to ALWAYS complain. Your complaint could be the one that pushes the OFT/FOS to actually do something.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

OFT do not deal with individual cases, regulatory body is the FOS.

The OFT is the issuer and comptroller of licences in the Consumer Credit arena and issues regulation

and guidance as such the FOS is as suggested by its' title a mediatory body set up to make assessment

and decisions on financial disputes.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

OFT do not deal with individual cases, regulatory body is the FOS.

The Financial Ombudsman Service is there to investigate individual complaints on possible

infringements of the regulations and guidance made or given by the regulators.

THE FOS IS NOT A LEGISLATIVE BODY>

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have made complaint to OFT, got their standard response, also complained to OFCOM at the same time, and had their standard response.

Just going round in circles it would appear.

Don\'t let the B**tards grind you down

Link to post
Share on other sites

They dont deal with complaints individually but they do collate all information. Once they have a lot of complaints about a certain company THEN they get involved, unless they suspect a serious breach of code. Then they will investigate sooner. Thats why it is so important that if people have any issues with a creditor, they MUST complaint to the relevant regulatory body asap.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Sent a recorded delivery letter to Santander Cards two weeks ago, with a copy to their complaints dept.( they had already acknowledged a previous request to only communicate in writing)

I still get daily 'phone calls, which are upsetting and stressful for my wife, who is convalescing from cancer.

If I answer, before they ask any security questions, I ask for the caller's full name and date of birth, which, of course, they refuse to give. I then tell them that I am unable to speak to them and hang up.

They still call again the following day. These people can't read, or think they are above the law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mike,

 

Thanks for your interest and reply.

 

Yes I have tried it, and sent it recorded delivery, also a copy to Complaints, this is what I actually wrote:

 

 

Collections Dept.

Santander Cards Ltd

2, Triton Square,

Regent’s Place,

London,

NW1 3AN 22nd August 2012

 

 

Dear Sir,

 

Credit Card Number: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx Re: Harassment by telephone

 

I am writing in relation to the quantity and frequency of telephone calls that I have received from your company, which I deem to be personally harassing.

 

I have verbally requested that these stop, but I am still receiving calls. I have written confirmation of my request that all communication should be in writing, in a letter, dated 20th July 2012 (your ref: xxxxxx) from Amanda Brown, Complaints Investigation Officer.

 

I was under the impression that I had made quite clear to several members of your staff that my wife is recovering from cancer surgery and chemo-therapy, and finds your harassing telephone calls, both stressful and not conducive to her convalescence.

 

I therefore repeat my request that all further correspondence from your company be made in writing only.

 

I am of the view that your continued harassment of me by telephone puts you in breach of Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

 

If you continue to harass me by telephone, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to OFCOM, Trading Standards and The Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you will be liable to a substantial fine.

 

Be advised that any further telephone calls from your company will be recorded, logged and monitored.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

pipandjackadncol

 

Result, no acknowledgement from either set of morons and total non-compliance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed. Get a full complaint into all regulators and also ofcom.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep a diary of their telephone harassment, then take that to your local police station and lodge a formal complaint against them for the criminal offence of harassment, inform your local MP also, have them raise the continued criminal offence these clowns commit in the commons.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...