Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just a typo change that I'd make for the last line. Maybe also add something that says "I assume you will be fully aware that you cannot rely on a clause of a contract that you do not produce."
    • Hello, Firstly, and most importantly I am sorry for your loss. I would go back to the bank with the death certificate and ask them to step in. Remind them firmly but politely that there is no limit for DD claims   Please let us know how you get on.
    • My wife is the named person to his bank account with him having Dementia being his daughter (I say named person she still is but he recently passed away and the deputyship application has now being stopped by the solicitor as it's no longer needed) We've only just got the Death Certificate so the bank will be the next step informing them. She went to the bank and explained the situation but even being his named person the bank said she didn't have the power to stop DD without any legal documents (virgin money) was the bank. She could have copies of bank statements that was about it.
    • I see you said you tried to stop the DD but it seems that didn't work. May I please ask why that didn't work? You should be asking your bank to cancel the DD and I don't see why they would have objected, hopefully you can clarify this. I agree that you should be making a claim here against your bank and ask them for a DD refund. There is no timeframes for this.
    • JK: Yeah That's correct. We left rent payment coming out of his bank account from January 2023 - August 2023 until we could find somewhere to sort out his belongings which was fine. I tried to give notice a few times from August 2023 asking for advice from Sanctuary housing how we went about this explaining his condition and that he was in a Nursing home from December 2022. I explained we don't have any legal powers to his account like POT but were in the process of going for Deputyship and that I was the named person to act on his behalf to speak with Santuary housing. I said we could provide details of his condition and proof he was now in a nursing home with date he moved in. This went ignored despite repeated attempts to contact them until a housing manager contacted us end of February 2024 and notice was finally accepted with his tenancy coming to an end March 22 2024. Although they have continued to take rental payments for the flat despite someone else living in it from the 1st April. I wasn't aware payments were still being taken till I checked his May banks statements. I had asked them to back date rental payments to August 2023 when I gave notice rather than just giving notice in March 2024 but they've ignored that bit. I don't see why they shouldn't give it back they've taken money they shouldn't have. Thanks DX, I wasn't aware we could do that for that length of time. I'll ask my wife to check with the bank this week
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Finance Agreements


postggj
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5952 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

quick comment

 

if an agreement does not contain all the prescribed terms, a creditor cannot enforce the agreement.

 

if it goes to court what are the chances of a judge making it enforceble where its the creditors cock up

Link to post
Share on other sites

If there is no CCA and the judge agrees there is a debt, surely they cannot include interest and charges in the debt as only the basic debt, sum borrowed, would be the debt enforceable if you can understand what I am trying to say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

check my halifax no cca thread

they have addmitted they have no cca

 

my agreements ref welcome finance do not contain the prescribed terms and have not been filled out properly, plus using wilson case

what is the likely outcome

worried court might enforce the not properly executed agreement

waiting for court date with welcome

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I Was Accepted For A Capital 1 Card, I Must Say The Intrest Was 29.9%

Six Months Ago They Put It Up To 35%

The Credit Limit Was £200

My Point Being Is I Have Had This Card For 1.5 Years And The Credit Limit Has Never Gone Up.

The Only Reason I Use This Card Is The Positive Markers With The Cra As I Have Never Missed A Payment

I Have 2 Defaults Outstanding Which Is Going Through The Courts To Be Removed, Do You Think This Is The Reason For No Increase

I Am Now Very Careful With Money Now As I Have Learned My Lesson And Would Be Good 2 Know If My Credit Standing Has Improved And When The Credit Limit Increases Will The Apr Reduce

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Post,

 

I got a capital one card for improving my credit rating too, they told me they would increase credit limit after 4 monthly payments, I have made 3 so not sure if they will or not yet.

Are you making the minimum payment only? Your balance never really goes down with min payments so that could be why they are not increasing your credit limit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

its only £200, and pay in full each month

good to hear from you again

one more month and my dealings with welcome are over, mind you they are getting rather nasty

how are you getting on with them

 

pm me

Link to post
Share on other sites

My Point Being Is I Have Had This Card For 1.5 Years And The Credit Limit Has Never Gone Up.

 

I've had mine for 3 years and not seen an increase despite being told that the account is regularly reviewed. However, the SAR shows no sign of automated or manual review. Waiting for a response to my letter now.

The advice I give in relation to benefits should be viewed as general advice and not specific to your individual claim circumstances. I cannot give specific advice on your claim as I cannot access the claim.

 

If you find the advice useful please click on my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

postggj

 

I lived in Florida for 5 years and had a Capitol One card there. After 18 months they increased my APR from 12.8 to 35% for 2 LATE..not missed, payments, over a 12 month period. I cut the card up after settling the bill.

 

Simple.

 

Just~Me

Please dont think the picture is me.!!! I couldnt find one of myself so decided to use one of the wife. :):)

Link to post
Share on other sites

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

on wed i was involved with a very minor bump with a invalid scooter

the facts are i was revearsing out of my drive. i checked that it was clear, looking over my left shoulder started to revearse, very slowly i felt a slight bump and stopped.

when i got to the rear of my car there was an old lady on one of these scooters. thank god she was all right and no harm done. i did the right think and left my contact details and she rode off.

yesterday i got a phone call from the police asking about the accident. the copper just advised me to call my insurance company and take my insurance cirtificate to her.

what i would like to know is as there was no personel injury why did the warden at the sheltered accomodation call the police.

they are saying the steering rack is damaged.

when i drive on the road i have to have insurance, what is the legal position whith people driving these things on the highway

apparentl;y she has insurance but this is for theft as i believe

as the highway was clear when i reversed she must have been moveing at some speed or had stopped directly behind me. these things are so low down it would have been impossible to see through my rear mirror.

i am just glad no harm done but what are the legal postion involving these vehicles on the highway

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is legal to ride them either on the road or pavement.

 

From the Highway Code:

 

Remember although it is legal to ride all vehicles on the road, it is not always safe or sensible to do so. You are responsible for your own safety and that of other road users. The normal rules of the road apply - but modified.

Observe the law

Never drive against the traffic

Give way where cars would give way. Give way to pedestrians

Obey Traffic lights and all other road signs and signals and remember the car you can see when you look behind you is almost certainly moving faster then you, It could well be upon you before you complete your manoeuvre and it may not be able to stop in time.

 

Having said the above, there seems to be conflicting advice. This is from the law center at Exeter University:

 

Class 2: Scooters in this class are to be used on the pavement only and have a maximum speed of 4mph.

 

So you will need to have a look at the 'definative' regulations. I don't have time now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...