Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
    • Just to update this. I did apply to strikeout and they did not attend the hearing. I won by defualt and the hearing lasted 5 minutes (court only allocated 15). The judge simply explained that the only matter he was really considering is if the Defendant could have any oral evidence to defend the claim. However he said he had decided that based on their defence, and their misunderstanding of law, and their non attendence he did not think they had any reasonsable chance so he awarded me SJ + Costs on the claim form + the strikeout fee. Luckily when I sent the defendant the order I woke up the next day to a wire trasnfer for the full sum of the judgement
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mackenzie Hall & BoxClever


N.P
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6044 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi people,

 

Back again, this time a letter to my girlfriend from some fools called Mackenzie Hall.

 

She received this during the week and I found it in a draw, she says she was going to tell me about it, but forgot to.

 

Anyway, her ex-husband, who, shall we say was a wife beater, ran up all kinds of debts, some using her name instaed of his own.

 

She insists she has never rented anything from BoxClever in the past and has never even heard of the Company, although her and address are on the letter, but the name starts with `Mrs`. She divorced years ago, and has been using Miss from then. I have been with her for around 7 years now and I`ve never known her buy anything from, or mention BoxClever before.

 

The letter reads :

 

 

Her Name:

Address:

Varde Investment (Ireland) Limited V Mrs our lass.

Original Creditor: BoxClever TV and Video Rental Agreement

Account Reference: Our lass

Principal Sum: £300 something.

You have been written to on numerous occasions however the debt above remains outstanding. To avoid further action, a monthly repayment plan must be in place within the next 7 days.

Therefore, as a gesture of goodwill, our client will accept the account to be paid by monthly installements providing the Standing Order Mandate is completed, signed and returned to Mackenzie Hall within the next 7 days.

On receipt of the Mandate being returned, Mackenzie Hall will not take any firther action against you providing you do not default on your payments.

Then a Standing Order Mandate form is included.

 

Since we don`t know anything about this and the fact they are offering us a Goodwill Gesture, I think they are just trying it on.

 

Should I CCA these losers or send them a cleverley word from Curly Bens or Rory32`s arsenal?

 

I appreciate and suggestions and look forward to hearing from you.

 

Regards

 

 

N.P.

If I have helped or made you laugh in any way in your hour of need, then please click my scales <<<<<<<<<< ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think CCA will work in this case.

Go for a simple "prove it" instead.

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Thanks for the replies CB, BB and SG.

 

I have copied and pasted CB`s letter and also SG`s line regarding the last bill.

 

`I would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my liability for the debt in question, i.e. the last bill at the address you hold.`

Could I add a line that this letter could be seen as a possible phising (even though phising is a computer term) trip and the Police could also be involved due to their attempted fraud by deception?

I`m not sure how to word it but it was just a thought. What do you think? Any idea`s?

Thanks again people.

I look forward to hearing from you again soon.

Regards

N.P.

If I have helped or made you laugh in any way in your hour of need, then please click my scales <<<<<<<<<< ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi CB,

 

Thanks for the reply. Ok, I`ll send it as it is first thing in the morning, either Recorded or Special Delivery.

 

Thanks again.

 

Regards

 

 

N.P.

If I have helped or made you laugh in any way in your hour of need, then please click my scales <<<<<<<<<< ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ODC,

 

Heh heh, have you had a silly experience with them or are you just being sarcastic?

 

Regards

 

 

N.P.

If I have helped or made you laugh in any way in your hour of need, then please click my scales <<<<<<<<<< ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ODC,

 

Heh heh, have you had a silly experience with them or are you just being sarcastic?

 

Regards

 

 

N.P.

Muck Hall is one of the few DCAs I dont recall having had the displeasure of dealing with. Im surprised because I always thought they were the bottom feeders who picked up the debts that others could not enforce.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again,

 

Thanks for the posts firstwithit and ODC.

 

Radio Rental, you say, wow! that name is quite old now, but not as old as D.E.R (The people who invite you in to play), remember them?

 

I`ve asked my girlfriend is she has had any dealings with Radio Rentals in the past and she say`s she has never had anything from them either.

 

I`m starting to wonder if her ex-husband (wife beater) has possibly rented something in her name at some time. The letter had on Mrs, but she has been a Miss for a number of years now. Either that of the morons are phising about.

 

Thanks again, I`ll keep you posted.

 

Regards

 

 

N.P.

If I have helped or made you laugh in any way in your hour of need, then please click my scales <<<<<<<<<< ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

NP

 

Try contacting Varde. I had the same the same thing with Mac Hall. I just phoned up Varde and explained that i knew nothing of this debt and they just wrote it off after 1 phone call...If i can find the contact details i will PM them to you...

FOR THE BENEFIT OF OUR FRIENDS IN THE NSA USING THE PRISM SYSTEM. HELLO FROM THE UK.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again,

 

Thanks for the posts t-star and ODC.

 

Wouldn`t it be more fun to wind these bummers up for a while?

 

I`ll see what the other half has to say.

 

Thanks again.

 

Regards

 

 

N.P

If I have helped or made you laugh in any way in your hour of need, then please click my scales <<<<<<<<<< ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi boys and girls,

 

Right, the other half said she forgot to post Curly`s letter this morning, so I have just faxed a copy through to them ding dong`s at Macky Hall.

 

She said she`ll post the letter in the morning (I think she`s scared of these witless wonders).

 

I`ll keep you all posted as events unfold, ha ha.

 

Thanks again for all the posts from everyone.

 

Regards

 

 

N.P

If I have helped or made you laugh in any way in your hour of need, then please click my scales <<<<<<<<<< ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...