Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for the welcome honeybee!  Grateful to have found this place! Just busy reading other excellent threads!
    • Hello, welcome to CAG. I expect people will be along later to advise you. Weekends are always quieter here so please bear with us until they're able to get here. HB
    • Hope I'm posting in the correct forum. I am confused about procedure regarding going to civil court next week. The claimant (Erudio/Drydens) responded to my defence but I did not realise that I have to respond back.  I'd be grateful if you could answer:  Was I supposed to send them my updated defence and when?  If I ask the court to do it now,, if they agree, can I just send it to the court or must I also send it to Drydens?  I spoke to the court helpline and the lady said I can submit evidence even if it's a bit late (to go with my defence) so I've done that - I emailed it only to the court. I'm wondering if I need to submit this evidence to Drydens as well? THis is the situation;  I have a civil court case with Erudio/Drydens regarding a pre-1998 student loan. The amount is "£2500. I did not defer as I didn't get the forms. My argument was that they mismanaged my account as they did not send me annual statements (I have proof - 2018 remediation pack) so I believe the same happened with the forms. I was eligible to defer and only three years away from 50 so no reason not to. I have not moved. I've submitted my defence in July 2019 after which the case was stayed. But as I failed to communicate with them to settle the matter (I didn't know I had to reply to their offers to settle as I did not think what they were offering was fair) so they have filed an Application in Sept 2023 to lift the stay and a week ago I received a pack in the post with the court date which is next week. The package arrived 6 working days before the hearing, not seven as it says in the rules. Drydens then sent me the same package in the post four working days before the hearing with a letter saying they are waiting for the Order to be lifted.  I'm worried now that they will not allow it to go to trial as Drydens claim that I have not submitted sufficient evidence. They although produced the copy of the deferement letters which they claim they sent. I didn't realise that I can amend my defence based on their reply to my defence. I thought the court was again going to send me a form to do that, like they did the first time.  I'm basically clueless and have no money for a legal representation as I'm not working at the moment.  Any help would be much appreciated!
    • Is elphicke still with labour or has she jumped into the frankly far more apt 'reformatory yet? Sure that her move is just intended to destabilise Sunack for the poopy right   I hear rumors Boris and Doris have tested the water through proxies - not sure if its true - and they probably happy to (are?) chance-it with all/any
    • HB - they don't ask why. Karalius - just note these dates on the form and you'll be safe, they will not fix the hearing date when you're away. How to fill in the DQ/N180 is on just about every claim form thread here, such as Andy's post 81 here  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/458783-parkingeye-anpr-pcn-paploc-now-claimform-new-directions-holdings-lambourne-crescent-llanishen-cardiff-cf14-5gl-claim-discontinued/page/4/#comments  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sparkler V Barclays


sparkler
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6325 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello fellow claimers

 

I sent my LBA to Barclays on the 20th september and recieved an offer exactly 14 days after. The offer was for £600 when im claiming for £1750. Tossers.

 

I havent been at work since then so havent had access to the internet but i'm just trying to figure out what to do. Obviously i'm not accepting it so shall i just go ahead and start my claim on the moneyclaim site. Or do i need to send a rejection letter aswell. (The one in the templates) I would guess that i need to send the rejection letter first but how long do i give them now? a further 14 days before i do the moneyclaim form?...

 

I don't particularly want to extend the time they have seeing as they probably wont reply to me anyway...but i don't think i can send rejection letter then do money claim form straight after as they may argue that i havent given them enough time to change the offer or whatever, what do you think?

 

god i hope that made sense!

 

Thanks for your help

Jane :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 119
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest littlesally

I think I'm right in saying you could accept their offer and inform them you will be still claiming the rest. That way you have some spare cash, bearing in mind xmas isn't that far away.

Check first though

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I'm right in saying you could accept their offer and inform them you will be still claiming the rest. That way you have some spare cash, bearing in mind xmas isn't that far away.

Check first though

 

Hi stick to th time table, they can send you an offer at any time. i would inform them that you accept the cash as a part settlement and that you are continuing to seek the balance.:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sparkle

sent a rejection letter asking them for the full amount again,give them 14 days ,they will probably reply saying unfortunately we can come to no agreement,then file to moneyclaim,thats what i did.

 

There's no need to give another 14 days. The LBA was sent on the 20th of September and that clearly states that they have 14 days to comply otherwise you will file at court.

 

You can send the rejection letter and carry on and file for the lot.

 

After I sent the rejection letter, they sent me a letter back expressing their disappointment that I was pursuing them for the full amount but they did not withdraw the offer. It's still there should I wish to settle out of court.

 

You will not get the amount they're offering and claim the rest in court. It's a package deal, all or nothing.

To follow my case progress, click here to see where I'm at right now.

 

Welshman

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone for your replies...

 

So in a nutshell should i use the template in the library which says:

 

Thank you for your letter dated xx/xx/xx

I respectfully decline your offer of settlement and request, once again, that you return to me all charges imposed on this account, totalling £1505

 

I will accept the sum offered only as part settlement and on the clear understanding that I will pursue recovery of the remainder, with a County Court claim if necessary.

 

My letter before action sent previously indicates that you have until xx/xx/xx to respond before Court action commences. You are reminded that there will be no extension to this timescale.

 

I trust this clarifies my position.

 

or should i reword it slightly?...it also says about the LBA but im guessing as this date has now been and gone that i should delete this part?

Thanks very much for your help

Jane :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your replies...

 

do i need to include a new schedule of charges in with this letter (i have been charged again since i sent the LBA so i have now added this on, so the figure has gone up by £65 - every little helps!)

 

I have just completly deleted the line: "My letter before action sent previously indicates that you have until xx/xx/xx to respond before Court action commences. You are reminded that there will be no extension to this timescale"

 

I'm going to send this today, is it ok to do my moneyclaim form today aswell?, im concious that im not giving them enough time...actually no f**k em, they've had planty of time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jane.

 

It's true the OFT are looking into bank charges however with regards to the banks waiting on the contents of the report, i think they will have quite a wait.

As the OFT indicated that they expect their findings to be released in about 6 months.

 

Argyle.

Story So Far:

Pre letter sent 14th August.

Barclays Reply 18th August.

Barclays Reply 5th Sept.

Lba sent 30th August.

Rejection letter sent 9th Sept.

Barclays reply 13th Sept.

Mcol submitted 15/09/2006.

AQ received 21/10/2006.

AQ returned 23 /10/2006.

Court Date:25/01/07 10.30am

Phoned Barclays 08/01/07 Said they would contact me shortly.

15/01/07 Received letter offering a full settlement however figure was short.

22/01/07 Received telephone call from Barclays asking for a settlement figure.

CLAIM SETTLED IN FULL!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah i see...

 

Is it likely that things will change once the OFT release their findings?, as in do you think the banks will stop paying out?, sorry i know this is probably a million dollar questoin but i was curious really...i'm trying to speed things up as much as i can as i was worried that the findings might be in the banks favour!

 

Thanks for your reply Argyle :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

they can't stop paying out - they are only paying out to stop themselves having to go to court which they don't want to do as they would have to disclose the true costs involved in the charges.

JKop Vs Barclays SETTLED

JKop Vs Cahoot SETTLED

Jkop V Capital One SETTLED

Jkop V Marbles SETTLED

Jkop V MBNA £422 MCOL

Jkop V Egg SETTLED

Jkop V Cahoot Credit Card SETTLED

Jkop V HSCB £1500 W.I.P!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sparkler.

 

Is it likely that things will change once the OFT release their findings?,

 

It could have some bearing on future claims against the banks if the findings of the OFT rule that bank charges are excessive.

i.e Read a thread on Barclaycard someone trying to claim their charges and Barclays reply was they would only accept a claim of the difference between their charges and the OFT's charge of £12.

 

If the same ruling applied to Bank charges then i think it could get quite difficult to claim those £30 charges if the OFT said bank charges should be set at no more than £12.

However what is also interesting if the OFT said charges as they are now are fair where would that leave consumers?:confused:

Personally then i would think you will find that claims against banks would stop.

 

Argyle.

Story So Far:

Pre letter sent 14th August.

Barclays Reply 18th August.

Barclays Reply 5th Sept.

Lba sent 30th August.

Rejection letter sent 9th Sept.

Barclays reply 13th Sept.

Mcol submitted 15/09/2006.

AQ received 21/10/2006.

AQ returned 23 /10/2006.

Court Date:25/01/07 10.30am

Phoned Barclays 08/01/07 Said they would contact me shortly.

15/01/07 Received letter offering a full settlement however figure was short.

22/01/07 Received telephone call from Barclays asking for a settlement figure.

CLAIM SETTLED IN FULL!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, I stand corrected:rolleyes:

 

I'm not saying that every offer is still on the table, I read mine which stated that if I wish to reconsider, I should send the form back duly signed.

 

They tend to deal with some claimants differently so it pays to read all correspondence from them carefully.

 

Good Luck

To follow my case progress, click here to see where I'm at right now.

 

Welshman

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am also at the same stage. Just highlighted all the statements and have sent off the first letter along with the schedule of charges and am already nervous about a reply! Must say thought, I only phoned up on Friday and the statements arrived today, very impressive. I was expecting them to take the full 40 days.....

Ordered Statements: 06/10/06

Statements Received: 11/10/06

Prelim letter posted: 11/10/06

Standard Reply Received: 19/10/06

LBA posted: 25/10/06

MCOL filed 09/11/06

Offer of Part payment letter received 09/11/06

Rejection letter sent to Barclays 13/11/06

Amendments sent to MCOL 21/11/06

Sealed claim received from MCOL 25/01/07

Claim received by Barclays 29/01/07

2 weeks to defend - deadline 13/02/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya,

 

I am just about to post my rejection letter to the toss pots at barclays and include another schedule of charges as i always do. This afternoon i will then fill out the money claim form aswell. My question is this. Do i need to include the 8% interest in my rejection letter or only when i do the money claim form? (this is my understanding)

 

please help somebody!

 

thanks lots

 

Jane ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Up to the highlighter stage, nice green one!!

I really riled by Barclays over the years and pursuing this action with a vengeance, not just personal accounts but business accounts been shafted over too. Also messed me up with other banksl.

 

Good luck everyone.

Barclays -

- initial letter sent

- LBA sent 30/10/06

- settlement "good will" offer 10/11/06

- rejection letter sent 11/11/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

i'm filling in the money claim form on line and i have come to the particulars of claim page. Its asking "does or will your claim include any issues under the human rights act 1998"

 

I have no idea what this is or if it is relevant to my claim - im guessing the answer would be no?

 

sorry for being completely thick if the answer is really obvious!

 

Jane

:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...