Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Bit unfair to come back here the day it's due to be filed.... Looks like london1971 one?  I'm not sure if they did Inc point 5, let @AndyOrch confirm it should be there before filing please A day late won't hurt Dx
    • Last month was confirmed to be the hottest-ever May on record, in terms of global average temperatures, completing an entire calendar year of month-by-month records.  The average temperature last month was 1.52C above the pre-industrial average, according to the Copernicus Climate Change Service, known as C3S. The average global temperature for the 12-month period to the end of May was 1.63C (2.9F) above the pre-industrial average
    • This time you do need to reply to them with a snotty letter to show you'd be big trouble for them if they did try court. We will help this evening.  
    • Hi, I just wanted to update the post and ask some further advice  I sent the CCA and CPR request on the 14th May, to date I have had no reply to the CCA but I received a load of paperwork from the CPR request a few days ago. I need to file the defence today and from the information I have read the following seems to be what is required.  I would be grateful if some one could confirm suitability. Many thanks   Claim The claim is for the sum of £255.69 due by the Defendant under an agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 for a PayPal account with an account reference of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)  The Defendant failed to maintain contractual payments required by the agreement and a Default Notice was served under s.87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 which has not been complied with. The debt was legally assigned to the claimant on 15-09-21, notice of which has been given to the defendant. The claim includes statutory interest under S.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue of these proceedings in the sum of £0.00. The Claimant claims the sum of £255.69   Defence  The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is noted. I have had financial dealings with PayPal  in the past but cannot recollect the account number referred to by the Claimant. 2. Paragraph 2 is denied. I am not aware of service of a Default Notice by the original creditor the Claimant refers to within its particulars of claim.  3. Paragraph 3 is noted. On the 17/5/2024 I requested information related to this claim by way of a Section 77 request, which was received and signed for by the claimant on 20/5/2024. As of today, the Claimant has failed to respond to this request, and therefore remains in default of the section 77 request and therefore unable to enforce any alleged agreement until its compliance. 4. Therefore it is denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, and the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) Show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement and: (b) Show the nature of the breach and evidence by way of a Default Notice Pursuant to s.87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. 5. Paypal (Europe) S.A.R.L is out of the juristriction of English Courts. 6. As per Civil Procedure 16.5 it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 7. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed, or any relief.
    • Thanks @dx100ukI followed the advice given on here... then it went very quiet!  The company was creditfix I think then transferred to Knightsbridge (or the other way around) The scammer independent advisor was Roger Wallis-having checked his LinkedIn profile just this morning, it does look like he's still scamming vulnerable people... I know I was stupid for taking his advice, but i do wonder how many others he has done this to over a longer period of time (it came as a  massive shock to him when our IVA suddenly failed). Lowell have our current address (and phone numbers if the rejected calls over the past couple of days is anything to go by!) No point trying the SB because of the correspondence in 2019? Thanks
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Please Help CCA request turn down


spore33
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6073 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm suprised that the police haven't been in touch with you regarding the 'stolen' cheque! If not, you really should report it yourself, if only to cover yourself in case of any future unpaid tickets. Have you been in touch with your insurance company with regards to the car being stolen (assuming it was insured)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

well if they cheque was stolen then from what i understand you defo are not responsible for the charges or the money being paid back. I thing you need to go to the police and speak to a solicitor.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

something still feels wrong about this to me.

 

The cheque was stolen and the police not involved. I dont claim to know everything but that to me sounds wrong.

 

I assumed that if the bank thought there was some type of fraudlant activity they would have got the police involved straight away.

 

My advice to u is change banks as they dont sound like a good bank.

 

What bank is it so i know to stay well clear of them.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im not even so much worry about the money being pay back or not bc is over a year now I just want to move on,what is making me going mad is when I request for the CCA, the bank told me they are not obliged to send me a copy bc there were history of fraud.

 

As pt2537 said (theres no section in the consumer credit act which says " a creditor may with reasonable cause refuse a request under section 77 or 78") that is what im standing on at the moment.Im waiting for pt2537 or any one else in the forum to draft me a letter to send to those thieves

Link to post
Share on other sites

can i be a real pain, and ask if possible, could you post a copy of the letter they sent you in response to your cca request.

 

if not could you type it up, that way we can compose a reply tailored to the letter they sent you

 

obviously removing all personal details first

 

Regards

paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Paul for your advice I have been trying to attached the copy of the letter but I don't know how to,that is why im just writing what is on the letter.

 

I confirm that as your account is now registered as fraud, we are not obliged to provide you with a copy of the agreement requested under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 section 77-78.

 

Please find enclosed Postal Order for £1.00

 

Yours sincerely

 

sarah smith

senior payment Advisor

HFC Bank limited

Link to post
Share on other sites

Banks and other financial institutions often don't involve the police when they are defrauded, because they do not wish their (rather over-inflated) reputations to suffer. In any case, they aren't the victim - their customer is.

 

I worked for a company that lost tens of thousands because of a fairly complicated [problem] involving insurance sales and company fraud. We went to the police, and in the course of the investigation evidence was found to suggest that one of the credit card merchant services had lost almost £3m; the company were aware of it, but did not wish to co-operate with the investigation because they were desperate to keep the facts about how easily and how often the [problematic] had taken their money out of the media.

 

In Spore's case, I'd be inclined to remind the bank that there is no lawful excuse for failing to comply with his request, and then call their bluff with the fraud thing by asking them to confirm the name and station of the police officer dealing with the matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Mrs/Ms Smith

 

Re ACC NO xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Thank you for your letter dated xx/xx/2007 the contents of which are duly noted.

 

I draw your attention to the fact that the Consumer Credit Act 1974 provides that a consumer may request under section 77 or 78 a copy of the executed credit agreement for their account providing payment of the statutory fee of one pound is made

 

On the xx/xx/2007 i wrote to your company requesting that you provide a true copy of the credit agreement for the account numbered above pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act 1974. I find no provision within the Act for a creditor to refuse to comply with a statutory request from a debtor, therefore i draw your attention to the fact that my request was recieved by you on xx/xx/2007 and you have/had til xx/xx/2007 to comply. Im sure you will be aware that should a creditor fail to comply with a statutory request under the provisions of 78(1) Consumer Credit Act 1974 within 12 working days as laid down in Consumer Credit (Prescribed Periods for Giving Information) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1569) the debt enters default and s78(6) Consumer Credit Act 1974 states

6) If the creditor under an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1)—

 

(a) he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement;

 

and

 

 

(b) if the default continues for one month he commits an offence

 

 

therefore i respectfully request that you supply me the documentation that i requested. i enclose the one pound fee you returned.

 

should you refuse to comply i will make a formal complaint to Trading Standards requesting the take enforcement action against you

 

Should this account enter into default / also while this account is in default (edit to suit) i will not be making any further payments until you comply

 

please supply the requested information in 7 or 14 days

 

 

I look forward to your reply

 

 

edit to suit, it should make them take notice. i have been extremely busy today so i have not had a chance to proof read this so i would read it through and amend the bits you find that need it

 

i hope this helps,

 

regards

paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they are saying that your account is now registered "as fraud" and they are not obliged to provide you with a copy of the CCA (which IMO is bowlarks), then equally, you should not be obliged to make any payments on an account that the allege to be fraudulent. They can't have it both ways.... :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...