Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • See what you think of the attached. I have to do some proofreading of an English grammar book for an Italian publisher this weekend - for money! - so I'm afraid corrections and suggestions will come in dribs & drabs.  I've totally knackered the layout, the numbering and the order of your Exhibits but there will be several versions done so don't worry about that ATM. Your arguments are superb. What is less superb is the way you jump from one to the other and back again, so I haven't changed your words, but I have moved the paragraphs around and given each section a heading. New bits are shown in red. Crossed out crossed out in black is something you've quoted from the government Code of Practice, but that has since been withdrawn so unfortunately that argument has to go. Your paras 7 & 8 don't harm your case but to me are waffle and can go.  Keeping the arguments clear & concise will always impress a judge. IMPORTANT - did you ever send Simple Simon a CPR request? Defendant's WS - version 2.pdf
    • Hi Schipoo and thanks for the update. This is a brilliant result as rergards your fight with HMRC. If you can manage a Donation to the site, it would be greatly appreciated. Let us know how it goes as regards the fees being sought by Independant Tax.
    • A never ending torrent of **it Outrage as ‘tidal wave’ of sewage floods historic market town’s unique chalk river WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Exclusive: Water firm pumps sewage into river Misbourne, Amersham on 21 ‘dry days’ during nearly five month period  
    • Worth noting that all of these firms - either the alleged EIS investment, the rebate company themselves or the payee were all registered to the same address. Clavering House is 3 miles away from HMRC Benton Park view offices.   Wardrop - unfortunately unsuccessful due to late appeal - assessments opened by HMRC in March 2019. Scammed by Richard Hall (Capital allowances consultants ltd - Clavering House) investments into Cryoblast Limited 15/16 (Paul Huggins - Clavering House) and Eco Cooling solutions 16/17 (Anthony Fitches - Clavering House).    Mccuminsky - scammed by Capital Allowances after providing his details to Stefan Brown Alpha Tax Consultants (Clavering House) payment made to Eco Cooling Solutions.    Robson - scammed by Capital Allowances - 15/16 paid to Cryoblast 16/17 paid to Eco Cooling.    Myself - scammed by Allan Maxwell - MaxTax (other business Maxwell electronics) registered to Clavering House.   Cryoblast Solutions and Fast Tax - Alan O’Hara    Please note there are two Cryoblasts involved - Cryoblast limited (Paul Huggins and Clavering House) and Cryoblast Solutions Limited (Alan O’Hara also director of Fast Tax).    My return simply said “Cryoblast” another thing that should have been clarified as part of HMRC guidelines before paying out the claim.    Cryoblast limited was already suspected to be involved in fraudulent claims before my investment as Huntly had open assessments issued in November 2018.    Cryoblast Solutions, the same company director as Fast Tax where my money was sent was dissolved before my claims were submitted. 
    • On the d-day issue, * we know sunaks shameful self-interest preferring a hope at using lies for self-promotion over honoring our heroes, * we know Starmer demonstrated his statesmanship with other statesmen and women,  ** BUT where was Farage? Was he in a pub looking for self-promotion? .. Surely as a wannabe statesman - he should have spent a bit of his (someone elses?) cash attending the ceremonies? or wasn't he offered a seat near enough the front to interest him?   mind you .. "I said I wanted my county back. Well now I want my life back ... I am not a career politician... I won't be changing my mind again, I promise you" - Nigel Farage, stepping down from public life. 5 July 2016  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HELP working two jobs


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6079 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I have a full time job with one council and because of financial reasons I need to work a part time job which is with another employer. My full time job and my part time job managers are both aware I work for the other.

Is there any problem with my doing this?

I work 37 hour a week for one job and another 19 hours for the other.

I understand there is a working hours directive, but surely this would not be an issue if it is my choice to work because of necessity???

Link to post
Share on other sites

you are refering to the Working Time Directive which was incorperated into English law in th Working Time Regulations 1998.

 

there is no problem with you working for 2 seperate employers IMHO and you are allowed to opt out of tthe 48 hr weeks anyway so it will not cause you any problems

 

regards

paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

The basic rights and protections that the Regulations provide are:

 

A limit of an average of 48 hours a week which a worker can be required to work (though workers can choose to work more if they want to).

 

A limit of an average of 8 hours work in 24 which nightworkers can be required to work.

 

A right for night workers to receive free health assessments.

 

A right to 11 hours rest a day.

 

A right to a day off each week.

 

A right to an in-work rest break if the working day is longer than 6 hours.

A right to 24 days paid leave per year.

 

As the opt out is going through a negotiating process in Europe, the UK law remains unchanged on this point and workers are still able to opt-out of the weekly working time limits but this opt-out will be coming to an end in due course.

 

Member States discussed a revised proposal from the European Commission at the Employment Council on 2 June. However there was no agreement on the proposals at this point.

If my comments have been helpful please click my scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

the only exception to this is if you are a tcho driver maximum 48 hour week, over 5 days. 40 hour week plus eight hiurs overtime max

 

 

This comes under Mobile workers in road transport. The 48 hr week is an Average of 48 hrs over 26 weeks or less by agreement with the workers, Breaks IE 45 mins per 4.5 hrs driving is NOT included towards the 48 hrs, so for example........you work Monday to Friday, you drive 10 hrs on Monday and Tuesday ( total 1.5 hrs break each day ) and weds to Friday you drive 9hrs a day ( total 45 mins break each day )

 

Total break time is 5.25 hrs, so you can work under the working time directive for a total of 53.25 hrs legally.

 

Even this is further complicated by the fact of periods of availability, So you are waiting to unload and you have been told it will take 3 hrs before they start to unload you. Now this 3 hrs does NOT count towards the 48 hrs week. So now add the 3hrs to the 53.25 and you find yourself working 56.25 hrs.

 

So in practice mobile workers can and still do work many more hours than the 48 hr week, in fact i will go as far as say that the majority work excessive hours, yet staying within the working time directive and the maximum hours allowed under the European drivers' hours rules.

 

There is no law governing LGV drivers to a 5 day week, however new rules came into affect in April that require drivers to take a full 45 hr rest every 2 weeks.

If my comments have been helpful please click my scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does the WTD affect the NHS, we were told it doesn't by the employer...shifts finish at 2030 start again at 0700, only a 10 minute 'concessionary' break in a 7.5 hour shift etc

Poppynurse :)

 

If my comments have been helpful please click my scales!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The NHS has a special 'opt-out' or did when I worked there, a 10 minute concessionary break is definately not on. You need to speak to your union rep as they will be able to bring the matter up with the relevant HR person and your manager. You should have a minimum of 20 minutes - especially if part of your shift involves computer work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The NHS opt-out ends in 2009, NHS trusts have agreed to have a 58 hr week for all staff, however many are failing to meet this target.

 

Only giving a 10 minute concessionary break in an 7.5 hr shift is not on at all Speak to your union rep asap.

If my comments have been helpful please click my scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think it is min 40 min break

check with union rep

its 40 min 4 me

 

Then you are ahead of the game.

 

It is a 20 minute break for every 6 hours. Your employer is entitled to tell you when to take it, but this must not be at the start or end of your work period.

 

Question for everybody. Is the eleven hours between shid=fts absolute? Or is it averaged over a number of days/weeks?

Link to post
Share on other sites

my understanding is, providing you are not in a exempted industry, the legislation provides an absolute 11 hours between shifts

 

Correct But again you can opt-out but your employer can not force you to have less than 11 hrs

If my comments have been helpful please click my scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

i finish work at 11pm and am expected to be back in work at 5.45am, apparently its "all part of being on the management team" except im the only one of the management team that has to do this!

wouldnt mind but i work in a late night shop where no night is quiet (shoplifters, fights etc) so when i get home i cant unwind and sumtimes im still awake at 2am, then i get moaned at when im half asleep at work the next day and make silly mistakes :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

fiyah

Irrespective of your position, you should have an employment contract (must be given within two months of start of employment by law), which must state, hours worked, pay entitlement, holiday entitlement and amount of notice required.

The hours worked in your case seem to be the most important as by what you say you are working 17 hour day. If that is five or six days per week then your employer is taking illegal action as you cannot be forced to work more than 48 hours per week and you are working almost double that.

 

They may have just given you the title of manager to take advantage of you.

 

If you want further help on this you should start a thread of your own.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...