Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Residents are being consulted on plans to run overhead power cables 60km across the county.View the full article
    • The number of people out of work compared to jobs on offer mean more are competing for the same roles.View the full article
    • Small boat crossing numbers in last 7 days much more than the planned number to be sent to Rwanda. Small boat arrivals – last 7 days - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK These migrants obviously believe that being sent to Rwanda is not a consideration when they are aware of other migrants having died making the English channel crossing. If Rwanda was going to receive thousands of migrants, then it probably would be a deterrent to some. But the threat of sending 300 migrants to Rwanda is just not going to make any difference.
    • Last June, 3.4m members received a £100 payment from the building society. Now they will be wondering whether the offer will be replicated this year.View the full article
    • Write to the IPC complaining that UKPC have not observed the requirements of PoFA . IPC  Waterside House, Macclesfield SK10 9NR Dear IPC, I am writing to complain about a serious breach of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 by UKPCM. I feel that as it is more a breach of the Act rather than not just  complying with your Code of Practice which is why I am bypassing your operator. Should you decide to insist that I first complain to your operator, I will instead pass over my complaint to the ICO and the DVLA . My story starts with being issued a windscreen PCN on 8/3/24 which was almost immediately removed and a second  PCN was then  sent by post on 13/3/24  [deemed delivered 15/3/24] which I did not receive and had to send an sar to have that particular mess revealed later  but that is not the reason for my complaint. UKPC then sent a Keeper Liability Notice dated 12/4/24 warning me that as 28 days have now elapsed, I as keeper am now liable for the charge.  This is in direct contravention of PoFA since the keeper does not become liable to pay until the day after the original PCN is deemed to have been given which would have been 13/4/24 -a Saturday ]. Not only does it not comply with PoFA but it fails to adhere to your Code of Practice and is in breach of their agreement with the DVLA. You will be aware that this is not the first time that UKPC have fallen foul of the DVLA and presumably yourselves. I have included copies of both Notices for information. You will realise the seriousness of this situation if this is standard practice from the UKPC to all motorists or just those where windscreen tickets are involved since the Law regarding PoFA is being abused and is unfair to misguide motorists. I await your  response which I understand will usually be within a week. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I would think that should be sufficient for the IPC to cancel your PCN though  you should await comments from the Site team before sending your complaint. Don't forget to include both PCNs.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1977 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone.

 

Apologies If Posted in wrong place

 

Builder by trade.

 

Long story short.

My van was broken into Tuesday night and they totally wiped us out took everything.

We phoned the police etc did everything right.

Knocked on neighbours doors for cctv.

I had a bike in the back which I’d literally purchased that day left in there until I could hide it for Christmas.

 

I knew I had insurance for personal possessions upto 200

rang my insurance company provided proof of receipt crime number etc.

They then told me I was insured for tools in transit well I was made up as I didn’t realise and my stess levels decreased a little.

 

Went through everything no problem.

Then I recieve a phone call from the fraud department informing us that our van is a Cat C didn’t know.

And there’s a MS90 on driving licence and they voided our insurance and claim.

Which is understandable I guess.

 

we rang DVLA and these points went on in January for failure to provide information

but it was provided even got a letter to say there is a back log and heard nothing since until a pink letter arrived from court which does not mention anything about points or a fine it’s a further step notice.

 

I rang the court immediately and made appointment to do statutory declaration

unfortunately I suffered ill health and advised the court I was told where to send email and head it urgent saying I couldn’t attend as I suffer from anxiety and high blood pressure.

heard nothing since I just presumed I would receive a new court date.

 

Not the case apparently the case was heard and I received a hefty 812.00 fine and 6 points as to which I was totally unaware of until yesterday I’ve explained all this to insurance.

I was totally unaware they just voided my insurance unless I can prove this.

I’ve spoke to DVLA they told me they don’t send letters and I spoke to the court now awaiting another appointment.

 

first question.

If points were put on my licence how was it done.

I was never asked for it

 

how was the insurance unaware if points went on in January and I didn’t insure until

march.

DVLA said this should of flagged up

 

how do I prove I was totally unaware as I was

 

I’m currently unable to work due to no tools and unable to insure my vehicle not only due a voided policy but the fact I can’t work.

I’ve paid my insurance.

Contents and tools insurance and they’ve just voided only explanation I didn’t disclose information.

 

How can I disclose information I didn’t have.

Any help appreciated currently seriously stressed out

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure we can help you but I'm afraid that we need you to space and punctuate your story properly so that it is easier to read.

 

Fairly solid and poorly punctuated blocks of text are very difficult for people to follow and will discourage people who would otherwise be very enthusiastic about helping you challenge your insurer.

 

Please would you mind posting it again on a new thread but this time put it in a way that you would like to read yourself if you are thinking of helping somebody else.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

ive sorted the spacing for you

as it was probably CAG that did it

 

please continue to post here

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Insurers have a duty to treat you fairly they are subject to important regulations which are legally binding and which are called ICOBS.

 

One of the provisions in ICOBS is that an insurer is not entitled to decline a claim or to cancel insurance simply because of some administrative matter – which does materially affect the risk.

 

It seems to me that firstly you have good reason for not having informed anybody about the condition of your vehicle. Secondly, the fact that the vehicle was broken into had nothing to do with the fact that it was CAT C. Therefore in my view they are acting unlawfully in cancelling your insurance and rejecting your claim.

 

That's the easy part.

 

The difficult part will be forcing your insurer to change their mind and frankly I think that the only way that you will manage to do this will be by taking legal action. You could consider going to the financial ombudsman service that they are limp wristed and for some reason other they think that their duty is to be fair to both sides even if it is clear that one side is the wrongdoer and the other side is simply an innocent victim.

 

So the question is – what are you prepared to do about it? Bear in mind, that this is not something that will be settled very quickly. It could take at least six months and not only that I can imagine that the insurer will be so concerned about having a judgement against it in the circumstances that they will throw everything they can at you. We will be very pleased to help you all the way – and as you would only be suing for a very modest amount it won't cost you very much and because it would come under the small claims rules, there is no reason why you should suffer any great loss in the event that you don't win the case.

 

Whatever, I would certainly start off by sending an SAR to the insurer to find out exactly what they did know

Link to post
Share on other sites

The whole situation has me totally stressed. Not even bothered insurance say they won’t pay i get that

But to make our i did this to be fraudulent Is playing on my mind

I’ve never broke the law

I need my van to work I know the consequences of not declaring.

They just won’t even entertain me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tried the financial

Ombudsman and he said I had to go through the company first.

I’m

Getting nowhere fast

They basically said I was aware of conviction. Which to be fair I was aware of maximum penalty

But I was appealing

Basically my son was out with friends quite a distance from us

He has various diagnosed difficulties

He telephoned us in anxious upset state.

We drove to pick him up he wasn’t there. All staff was involved in locating him. Even local

Police

He was found thank goodness

I was anxious has I’m

A sufferer my wife had SVT induced my stress. I was caught speeding my 8mph

All that put aside the ombudsman said we should of declared the conviction. but I haven’t been convicted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Insurers have a duty to treat you fairly they are subject to important regulations which are legally binding and which are called ICOBS.

 

One of the provisions in ICOBS is that an insurer is not entitled to decline a claim or to cancel insurance simply because of some administrative matter – which does materially affect the risk.

 

It seems to me that firstly you have good reason for not having informed anybody about the condition of your vehicle. Secondly, the fact that the vehicle was broken into had nothing to do with the fact that it was CAT C. Therefore in my view they are acting unlawfully in cancelling your insurance and rejecting your claim.

 

That's the easy part.

 

The difficult part will be forcing your insurer to change their mind and frankly I think that the only way that you will manage to do this will be by taking legal action. You could consider going to the financial ombudsman service that they are limp wristed and for some reason other they think that their duty is to be fair to both sides even if it is clear that one side is the wrongdoer and the other side is simply an innocent victim.

 

So the question is – what are you prepared to do about it? Bear in mind, that this is not something that will be settled very quickly. It could take at least six months and not only that I can imagine that the insurer will be so concerned about having a judgement against it in the circumstances that they will throw everything they can at you. We will be very pleased to help you all the way – and as you would only be suing for a very modest amount it won't cost you very much and because it would come under the small claims rules, there is no reason why you should suffer any great loss in the event that you don't win the case.

 

Whatever, I would certainly start off by sending an SAR to the insurer to find out exactly what they did know

They have cancelled due to undisclosed points. Which I was unaware till

They informed me

Link to post
Share on other sites

Insurers can cancel, if they would not have offered you Insurance had they known the correct information before issuing the Insurance.

 

So you really need the Insurers to confirm in writing the reason for cancelling the policy and take it from there, by complaining in writing in the first instance.

 

Here is a link to the FCA rules and legislation that applies.

 

https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/ICOBS/8/?view=chapter

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hate to add to your woes but now having alerted the Courts to your new address etc and as you have an outstanding fine that is unpaid then you could end up with Bailiffs at the door. The worst [art being that any Warrant carries the power of forced entry. It is in your own interests to get this back to Court ASAP.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...