Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is a ridiculous situation.  The lender has made so many stupid errors of judgement.  I refuse to bow down and willingly 'pay' for their mistakes.  I really want to put this behind me and move on.  I can't yet. 
    • Peter McCormack says he has secured a 15-year lease on the club's Bedford ground.View the full article
    • ae - i have no funds to appoint lawyers.   My point about most caggers getting lost is simply due to so many layers of legal issues that is bound to confuse.  
    • Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same.   Yes.  But every interested buyer was offering within a range - based on local market sales evidence.  Shelter site says a lender is not allowed to wait for the market to improve. Why serve a dilapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease.   The dilapidations notice was a legal first step.  Freeholders have to give time to leaseholders to remedy.  Lender lawyers advised the property was going to be sold and the new buyer would undertake the work.  Their missive came shortly before contracts were given to buyer.  The buyer lawyer and freehold lawyers were then in contact.  The issue of dilapidations remedy was discussed..  But then lender reneged.  There was a few months where neither I nor freeholders were sure what was going on.  Then suddenly demolition works started.   Before one issues a s146 one has to issue a LBA.  That is eventually what happened. ...legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease   A s146 was served.  It took 3y but the parties came to a settlement.   (They couldn't revert as they had ripped out irreplaceable historical features). The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there.  That's not the case   One can ask for another extension.  In this instance the freeholders eventually agreed with a proviso for the receiver not to serve another. You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension.  Correct.  But receiver lawyer was an idiot.   He made so many errors.  No idea why the receiver instructed him?  He used to work for lender lawyers. I belatedly discovered he was sacked for dishonesty and fined a huge sum by the sra  (though kept his licence).  He eventually joined another firm and the receiver bizarrely chose him to handle the extension.  Again he messed up - which is why the matter still hasn't been properly concluded.   In reality, its quite clear the lender/ receiver were just trying to overwhelm me (as trustee and leaseholder) with work (and costs) due to so many legal  issues.  Also they tried to twist things (as lawyers sometimes do).  They tried to create a situation where the freeholders would get a wasted costs order - the intent was to bankrupt the freeholders so they could grab the fh that way.   That didn't happen.  They are still trying though.  They owe the freeholders legal costs (s60) and are refusing to pay.  They are trying to get the freeholders to refer the matter to the tribunal - simply to incur more costs (the freeholders don't want and cant's afford to incur)  Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to.... The property does not qualify under 67 Act.  Their notice was invalid and voided. B petition was struck out. So this is dealt with then.  That action was dealt with yes.   But they then issued a new claim out of a different random court - which I'm still dealing with alone.  This is where I have issues with my old lawyer. He failed to read important legal docs  (which I kept emailing and asking if he was dealing with) and  also didn't deal with something crucial I pointed out.  This lawyer had the lender in a corner and he did not act. Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been ....  Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at?   I could.  But the evidence is clear cut.  Receiver email to lender and lender lawyer: "our strategy for many months  has been for ceo to get the property".  A lender is not allowed to influence the receivership.   They clearly were.  And the law firm were complicit.  The same firm representing the lender and the ceo in his personal capacity - conflict of interest?   I  also have evidence of the lender trying to pay a buyer to walk.  I was never supposed to know about this.  But I was given copies of messages from the receiver "I need to see you face to face, these things are best not put in writing".  No need to divulge all here.  But in hindsight it's clear the lender/ receiver tried - via 2 meetings - to get rid of this buyer (pay large £s) to clear the path for the ceo.   One thing I need to clarify - if a receiver tells a lender to do - or not to do - something should the lender comply? 
    • Why ask for advice if you think it's too complex for the forum members to understand? You'd be better engaging a lawyer. Make sure he has understood all the implications. Stick with his advice. If it doesn't conform to your preconceived opinion then pause and consider whether maybe he's right.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Wickes haven't delievered order.***Resolved***


Ladyin_blue
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2146 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi.

 

Made an order with Wickes 15days ago to arrive 14 days ago. All i keep hearing from them is my local store will contact me, which they haven't.

 

This isn't the first time this has happened. The last time it happened i got half a delievery and the store refused to deliver the rest because on their system it said it was all delievered. Customer relations informed me of this as the store would not get in touch with me even though they were told to to do that. I was eventually compensated for it, after 3 or 4 weeks of rining, so it was all sorted.

 

Now this delivery, i honesty don't want to keep emailing them and chasing them up, because i shouldn't have to.

 

Legally what can i do about it? I picked the day i wanted it delievered, had someone be there during the 10hour time slot and paid £30. In their terms and conditions, there is definitely a contract between us and they are obliged to either deliever the items or send me written information that they have cancelled it. But it says they don't have to do anything for 30 days after they recieve payment. Im wondering, if i keep quiet too, will they even do anything or notice after 30days is up?

 

Appreciate any help or advice : )

 

Regards

 

Jana

 

 

Here are parts their terms and conditions:

 

 

 

How the Contract Is Formed Between Us

 

Our order process allows you to check and amend any errors before submitting your order to us. Please take the time to read and check your order at each stage of the order process.

 

After you place an order, we will send you an e-mail to confirm that we have received it (Order Acknowledgement). However, this does not mean that your order has been accepted by us.

 

Unless you cancel your order in accordance with our Cancellations, Returns and Refunds policy (see below) or we have contacted you to confirm that we are unable to accept your order, our acceptance of your order will occur automatically on the earlier of the date we deliver the Products to you or 7 days following the date we send our Order Acknowledgement e-mail. The Contract between us will only be formed at this time.

 

We reserve the right to reject any order for any reason and no order will be accepted until payment is received in full for all Products and any related delivery charges.

 

All orders are subject to stock availability. If we are unable to supply any of the Products that you have ordered we will inform you as soon as possible. In the event that an out-of-stock product is part of an order and we cannot contact you, we will send what products we have in stock, refunding the purchase price of any unavailable product where payment has already been made.

 

Delivery

 

 

For full details of our delivery service, delivery locations and charges please refer to our Delivery Information and Charges page.

 

All quoted delivery dates and times are estimates and although we will try our best to meet them we will not be responsible if we are unable to do so. We will let you know if we cannot deliver your products within 30 days of when we receive your payment and will give you the option to either wait for the Products or cancel your order and receive a full refund.

 

We strongly recommend that you do not book fitters or trades persons until your order has been delivered and checked by you. We cannot be held responsible for any third-party costs or charges which you incur due to non-delivery of an order, or orders that have not been checked on delivery.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't need a written contract to say that they are contractually bound to make the delivery as agreed. Furthermore, if you have incurred any losses as a result of their broken delivery agreement then you would be entitled to recover those. You will also be entitled to cancel the order and to purchase the item somewhere else.

 

I'm afraid that the problem with these people is – that it's up to you to decide what you want to do about it. Of course the one thing that makes them sit up and take notice is that you bring a legal action against them. That won't resolve your problem immediately but it will give you some satisfaction and eventually will give you some compensation. It's a bit of a hassle – but it's not too difficult and on the basis of what you say, your chances of success are better than 95%. If you found something like that interesting and you will gain some transferable skills – then we will be pleased to help you. I know it sounds extreme and dramatic – but frankly you don't have any other weapons in your armoury for this kind of thing. You either have to grin and bear it or you have to take serious action. There is no middle ground.

 

If you wanted to sue them then I would be thinking of doing it for about £100. Considering that you've already spent out £30 on getting somebody to waiting for you plus the aggravation et cetera, hundred pounds a bit more than you would be entitled to but I think that it gets so close that unless they wanted to be really stupid, they would pay out rather than go to the hassle of going to court. These people are not used to being challenged in court – and they need it in order to give them a bit of encouragement to improve their services for everyone. Especially as you say that it is the second time that it is happen to you. I don't think you should be paranoid enough to believe that it's only you. It must be happening to lots of their customers – who unfortunately also decide to grin and bear it. The result is that Wicks get away with being a crappy company with crappy policies and crappy customer services – and all their customers sit around like monkeys grinning and bearing it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to General Retail Forum...please continue to post here to your thread.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't need a written contract to say that they are contractually bound to make the delivery as agreed. Furthermore, if you have incurred any losses as a result of their broken delivery agreement then you would be entitled to recover those. You will also be entitled to cancel the order and to purchase the item somewhere else.

 

I'm afraid that the problem with these people is – that it's up to you to decide what you want to do about it. Of course the one thing that makes them sit up and take notice is that you bring a legal action against them. That won't resolve your problem immediately but it will give you some satisfaction and eventually will give you some compensation. It's a bit of a hassle – but it's not too difficult and on the basis of what you say, your chances of success are better than 95%. If you found something like that interesting and you will gain some transferable skills – then we will be pleased to help you. I know it sounds extreme and dramatic – but frankly you don't have any other weapons in your armoury for this kind of thing. You either have to grin and bear it or you have to take serious action. There is no middle ground.

 

If you wanted to sue them then I would be thinking of doing it for about £100. Considering that you've already spent out £30 on getting somebody to waiting for you plus the aggravation et cetera, hundred pounds a bit more than you would be entitled to but I think that it gets so close that unless they wanted to be really stupid, they would pay out rather than go to the hassle of going to court. These people are not used to being challenged in court – and they need it in order to give them a bit of encouragement to improve their services for everyone. Especially as you say that it is the second time that it is happen to you. I don't think you should be paranoid enough to believe that it's only you. It must be happening to lots of their customers – who unfortunately also decide to grin and bear it. The result is that Wicks get away with being a crappy company with crappy policies and crappy customer services – and all their customers sit around like monkeys grinning and bearing it.

 

 

I absolutely agree with you.

 

I was actually thinking they pay £30 for each day since the day it was supposed to be delievered ;)

 

Where do i start? How do i start?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wickes Building Supplies Limited

Mr Simon King

Chief Executive

Wickes Building Supplies Limited

Lodge Way House

Lodge Way

Harlestone Road

Northampton

NN5 7UG

 

Email: [email protected]

 

Tel: 0330 123 4123

 

Company Number: 01840419

 

ceoemail: https://ceoemail.com/

 

Companies House: https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/01840419

 

Endole: https://suite.endole.co.uk/insight/company/01840419-wickes-building-supplies-limited

 

BizDb: http://www.bizdb.co.uk/company/wickes-building-supplies-limited-01840419/

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi

 

Sorry for the late update. Health hasn't been good.

 

So, Wickes customer relations department and i had gone back and forth. In the end my order did arrive and i had the driver return a few.

 

I told them of the returns, they did not acknowledge it nor refund it (23£) and gave me £30 (delievery fee) as "a gesture of good will"

 

I got so angry with this that i told them i no longer wish to communicate unless in court and that i would be suing for £200.

 

Long story short, I've got a check in the post for £200 without going to court. Should have said 300 lol

 

Thank you for all your help.

 

Thank you Stu007 for the info

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...