Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
    • Sars request sent on 16th March and also sent a complaint separately to Studio. Have received no response. Both letters were received and signed for.  I was also told by the financial ombudsman that studio were investigating but I've also had no response to that either.  The only thing Studio have sent me is a default notice.  Any ideas of what I can do from here please 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Cabot/FIRE Help Please - TSB CC debt 2006


pat5y
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3757 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I had a credit card with TSB in 1983.

 

In 2006 because of an accident I could only pay £5 per month to the outstanding balance of app £10,000.

I still pay this £5 today by standing order to TSB.

 

I received a few letters from Cabot telling me they bought the debt from TSB,

but I ignored them and continued to pay my £5, that I had agreed with TSB to the TSB.

 

Today I get a letter from FIRE saying to make them a reasonable offer.

 

I checked noodle credit report as advised in the CAG forum and TSB are not listed on my credit file.

 

The debt says it is cabot that own it, but I have never dealt with Cabot.

 

I was wondering what to do next and any advice please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 82
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Lol they agreed £5 so keep it at that!!! :)

 

Okay, have you ever been sent a statement of how much is owing?

 

They are legally obliged to provide you with this. on a minimum of a yearly basis. OOI... Did you continue to pay £5 to Lloyds or change it to Cabot?

If Lloyds have sold this debt, there could be something very very wrong!!!

Edited by fkofilee

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I still pay £5 per month to TSB by standing order and have never acknowledged Cabot.

There is no mention of TSB on my credit file, only Cabot.

 

What do you mean if Lloyds have sold this debt then there could be something very wrong?

 

In other threads I have read to send a letter to find out if they have the original agreement, but who do I sent it to ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

In 1983 I was given a cheque guarantee card which also acted as a credit card by the TSB.

 

In 2006 after having an accident and a change to my life circumstances

I could only pay £5 per month to this card and have been doing this ever since by standing order.

The debt is approx £10000.

 

This past year I have been receiving letters from Cabot and just ignored them and continued to pay my £5 per month to the TSB.

 

Now I have received a letter from FIRE.

 

I have been looking about these forums and saw that you could look at noodle for details of your credit file.

 

I checked with noodle and there is no mention of TSB,

just the company Cabot with defaults on the approx debt of £10000.

 

I would appreciate some help what to do with TSB, Cabot and FIRE,

and advise on whether I should cancel my standing order to TSB.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi pat5y, and welcome to CAG! :-)

 

I am literally running out the door, but will be back later. In the meantime, others may come in and help too.

 

What does the letter from FIRE say?

 

I assume you have not so far asked for a copy of the original credit agreement?

 

Have TSB continued to add interest to this debt?

 

DD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, This debt has been sold on to Cabot Financial a debt purchaser, Fire are its collections arm.

TSB now have no interest in this account.

 

What is the content of the letters from Cabot/Fire please.

Do not cancel payments yet.

 

Your next move is to make A CCA Request under Sections 77/78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 to get a copy of the agreement for this card.

 

There is a £1 statutory fee for this and Cabot have 12 + 2 Working Days to comply, there is a template in the CAG library for you to use.

 

The fee is best paid by using a £1 postal order marked clearly 'for statutory fee only'.

 

Get this done asap and come back when you get the result.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I am aware obtaining any form of copy of the original agreement may be a problem in this case

as the agreement dates from 1983.

 

I believe Cabot are allowed to supply a copy of the current t&cs.,

if the agreement was executed before May 1985

and they are unable to supply a copy of the original.

 

Was there any PPI on your ac?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope you've been getting regular statements

and the debt has been going down

and interest was frozen too....

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the debt was £10000 and has been sold then there is somethign very VERY wrong with it. No creditor would wipe that amount off. They would take you to court over it themselves.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the debt was £10000 and has been sold then there is somethign very VERY wrong with it. No creditor would wipe that amount off. They would take you to court over it themselves.

 

A recon is not acceptable in this case.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the debt is no longer being reported on your credit file it is because the default was placed more than 6 years ago.

 

Did you not receive a Notice of Assignment from either LTSB or Cabot advising the account had been assigned (sold) to them ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all for taking the time to reply to my post.

 

Interest is no longer being added to this debt and I don't think their is any PPI.

 

The letter from fire says make us a reasonable offer by a certain date either one off payment or payment plan as a final attempt to resolve the matter and stop further action.

 

I have had no letter from TSB saying they have sold the debt on.

 

Does CCA mean credit card agreement?

 

Thanks for your help !

Link to post
Share on other sites

consumer credit agreement

 

which crapbot must have to demand money from you.

 

are you saying they have offered a discount?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'd send an sar to TSB and get all the statements

 

and fire an CCA request off to crapbot.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

All they say is make us a reasonable offer.

Thanks

 

So theyre offering a discount but have carefully worded it.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Cabot replied to me stating they do not hold the information I requested under the CCA1974. They will anticipate they will be able to provide the information within 40 days as they have requested the info from the original lender.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell them NO 12 +2 working days no more after which the account will be formally in dispute and no further correspondence will be entered into.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Brigadier2jcs

 

Letter was sent to them on the 11/11/13 and I received the above reply yesterday. Do I still tell them no 12+2 woring days no more after which the account will be formally in dispute and no further correspondence will be entered into? If answer is yes, why would I not enter into anymore correspondence with them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Brigadier2jcs

 

Letter was sent to them on the 11/11/13 and I received the above reply yesterday. Do I still tell them no 12+2 woring days no more after which the account will be formally in dispute and no further correspondence will be entered into? If answer is yes, why would I not enter into anymore correspondence with them?

 

Yes you do tell them that. Also you won't enter your into any more correspondence with them as they have failed to provide the correct documents pursuant to this *supposed debt*

 

It's up to them to prove you owe it, not you to prove you don't.

 

Just to clarify... 40 days is only applicable to a SAR and if you haven't requested it then they can't use that as an excuse to delay getting the CCA

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct 40 days for a SAR. It is unreasonable to state a 40+ delay for a CCA request provision is made for a short extension of the 12 +2 working days if they have to obtain the copy agreement from the original creditor but certainly not 40 days.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cabot state in there letter

 

"Thank you for your request under the consumer credit act 1974. Cabot currently does not have this information on file. However we have requested the relevant information under section 77 and/or 78 of the consumer credit act 1974 from the original lender. We anticipate that we will be able to provide this information with in 40 days. In the event we are unlikely to obtain this information within those time limits we will write to you again."

 

They did not send back my postal order.

 

Also I am still paying the TSB £5 per month, as was agreed with the TSB years ago. This is done every month by standing order.

 

Will I know write to Cabot saying 40 days is unreasonable and will now not enter correspondence with them and will I still pay my £5 per month to TSB?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...