Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted.
    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
    • Weaknesses in some banks' security measures for online and mobile banking could leave customers more exposed to scammers, new data from Which? reveals.View the full article
    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MBNA,Experto Credite,Varde Investments,County Court


1882ian
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4580 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all I have been a reader of this site for some time. The wife and I found this site after we had paid for one of those solicitor’s as a one off payment as we had the money at the time but not the time or know how of how to deal with the paper work. We both had cards but only I am being chased at the moment. I had an MBNA card (formally Abbey CC) let’s say with £8,000 owed on it. At first like everyone else we were getting a lot of harassment on the phone by MBNA then received the letters from experto credite then Varde investments (Ireland) then Credit Management Consultants of Reading. I have now received a County Court Claim form details below.

Claimant

Varde Investments (Ireland) LT

Suite 316

77 Sir John Rogersons Quay

Dublin 2

Ireland

Address for sending documents and payments (if different)

Hegarty LLP

Defendant

Me

Particulars of claim.

The claimant claims for the sum due under a/various credit agreements(s) entered into between MBNA Europe Bank Ltd and the defendant. The rights of MBNA Europe Bank Ltd passed to the claimant pursuant to an assignment 2010 between MBNA Europe Bank Ltd and the claimant

The agreement(s) was/were terminated upon the defendant failure to comply with the terms of the agreement(s) and or the statutory notice of default served by MBNA Europe Bank Ltd the claimant complied with section III and IV and annex B of the PD Pre-Action conduct. And the claimant claims: Credit card accout xxxxxxxxxx balance say £8,000 as of 2009intrest under s69of the county court act 1984 at a rate of 8% a year from the default date(s) 2011 of £xxxx and also at the same rate up to the date of judgment or the earlier payment at a daily rate of 1.91 and cost.

Signed

Hegarty LLP

 

I received a letter from our solicitors on 18th October 2010 stating that they had received a letter from MBNA confirming that they cannot provide a copy of the original executed agreement and consequently cannot comply with section 78 request. They state that they will not try to legally enforce this agreement against me while their position remains the same.

 

Solicitor’s words: This means the agreement is unenforceable until such time as MBNA does comply with our request.

 

Where do I go from here? I cannot afford a solicitor to deal with this. Do I dispute the full amount on the ground of MBNA not complying with the section 78 request. Claim form issued on the 3rd Aug I have only got 14 days to reply.

If anyone can help Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you receive a default notice and Notice of Assignment ?

 

Have you still got the letter that your solicitor received from MBNA ?

 

What is the issue date on the claim form ?

 

The time line is :

 

Date of issue + 5 days for service + 14 days to acknowledge + 14 days extra to submit defence if that is your intention.

 

You might want to have a read of the following if it is your intention to defend.

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]29416[/ATTACH]

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

moved to legal forum

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have they supplied a copy of your credit agreement, because in my experience, when MBNA took over Abbey CC, the agreements got mislaid.

If you haven't already done so, send off a s78 request enclosing your£1 to the claimant via recorded delivery.

 

Alan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the all your prompt replies. Just reading as much as I can (heads spinning) should have some time at the weekend to regain my thoughts.

CitizanB

Did you receive a default notice and Notice of Assignment? Not that I know of

Have you still got the letter that your solicitor received from Mbna ? Yes

 

What is the issue date on the claim form ? 3Aug

Bazaar

The claim form gives me a county court, claim number, and an issue date, four pages, numbers on the bottom right hand side 15321,15322,15323,15324, numbers on the first page left hand corner N1CPC claim form (04.06)

Again thanks for your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is your timeline with the claim form being dated 3 August

 

Date of issue 03 August + 5 days for service = 08 August + 14 days to acknowledge receipt + 14 days to submit a defence if you are going to defend.

 

If you are going to defend, you need to determine on what grounds.

 

You need to obtain information by way of CPR31.14 and obtain extra time by way of CPR15.5 if the claimant refuses to provide it.

 

You will find details of the above in the link I gave you earlier.

 

If s78 is your only defence, you may not find it adequate for a good defence.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did the solicitor send you a copy of the letter from MBNA saying they wouldn't be pursuing it? If not I'd be inclined to ask them for it.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Thanks again for your replies and the reading I have done on the site is very useful.

 

I went back to the solicitors to get a copy of the letter from MBNA stating that they cannot provide a copy of the original executed agreement as I couldn’t find my copy.

 

The solicitor drafted a defence for me that I sent off.

 

Received an acknowledgement from the court dated 17/08/2011 stating that they had received my defence.

 

A copy is being served on the claimant (or the claimant’s solicitors) the claimant may contact me direct to resolve any dispute.

 

If the dispute cannot be resolved informally the claimant will inform the court that he wishes to proceed.

 

The court will then inform you of what will happen.

 

Where the claimant wishes to proceed, the claimant must contact the court within 28days after receiving a copy of your defence; after that period has elapsed the claim will be stayed.

 

The only action the claimant can then take will be to apply to a judge for an order lifting the stay.

 

My question is am I still within the 28days, No one has contacted me and I wondered what if anything I should do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again for your replies and the reading I have done on the site is very useful.

I went back to the solicitors to get a copy of the letter from MBNA stating that they cannot provide a copy of the original executed agreement as I couldn’t find my copy. The solicitor drafted a defence for me that I sent off. Received an acknowledgement from the court dated 17/08/2011 stating that they had received my defence. A copy is being served on the claimant (or the claimant’s solicitors) the claimant may contact me direct to resolve any dispute. If the dispute cannot be resolved informally the claimant will inform the court that he wishes to proceed. The court will then inform you of what will happen.

Where the claimant wishes to proceed, the claimant must contact the court within 28days after receiving a copy of your defence; after that period has elapsed the claim will be stayed. The only action the claimant can then take will be to apply to a judge for an order lifting the stay.

My question is am I still within the 28days, No one has contacted me and I wondered what if anything I should do.

 

What do you man.. "Am I stll within the 28 days".. ?

 

Your timeline would have been...

 

Date of issue on claim form + 5 days for service + 14 days to acknowledge claim form + 14 days to enter a defence .. that is 33 days from the date of issue of the claim form to the time when you submit your defence.

 

If the court has acknowledged and advised that your defence has been copied to the other side then I would say you were in time.

 

If you want to know what is going on.. you can telephone the issuing court and ask "what is the status of the claim please".

 

The other side have 28 days in which to confirm if they want to proceed. If they dont do this, then the claim will be stayed.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

:thumb:

 

I would suggest you still continue to read round the forums and make sure that you are able and ready to defend properly should they have a bad hair day and decide to proceed :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...