Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
    • Sars request sent on 16th March and also sent a complaint separately to Studio. Have received no response. Both letters were received and signed for.  I was also told by the financial ombudsman that studio were investigating but I've also had no response to that either.  The only thing Studio have sent me is a default notice.  Any ideas of what I can do from here please 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Time off for dental/doctors appointment. What is the law?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5520 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can anyone tell me what the Law says about having time off for Dental or Doctors appointments? Does the employer have to allow you time for this?

 

Also what about taking a son or daughter for a dentists appointment? Does the employer legally have to allow this without asking for the time to be made up?

 

Thanks in advance.:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is my understanding that there is no statutory right to have time off to visit the Dr. or Dentist

 

With regards to dependants again there is no statutory right for time off with the exception in a failure of normal care arrangements, you are allowed, to take unpaid leave, in order to deal with emergency situations regarding dependants.

 

I would say that a routine visit to the Dr or Dentist would not fall under this heading but this is open to interpretation may be dependant upon the reason of the visit.

 

I would be interested in sidewinder or Che's thoughts on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Freaky

 

The doc is basically right in order to implement an EU directive the UK Parliament inserted a new s.57A into the ERA 1996 which is often referred to as Time off for Dependents.

 

The right however, as the doc rightly states, is limited to 'emergency situations' such as accidents, unexpected disruptions in care etc. It would not extend to pre-booked GP / Dentist appointments as by their definition you had advance notice of these.

 

The right could be used by you saying that I had arranged for a childminder to take my child to the GP and 1 hour before or on the day they phoned me and told me that they could not come - this unexpected disruption would probably bring you within the Act, but I don't think this is really what you were asking.

 

Parental leave can exist in certain circumstances but this must be taken in minimum blocks of one week - so doesn't really cover your question.

 

Finally check any handbook / policies / contract - large companies sometimes have an actual policy re gp appointments etc

 

Hope this helps

 

Che

  • Haha 1

...................................................................... [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Please post on a thread before sending a PM. My opinion's are not expressed as agent or representative of The Consumer Action Group. Always seek professional advice from a qualified legal adviser before acting. If I have helped you please feel free to click on the black star.[/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS] I am sorry that work means I don't get into the Employment Forum as often as I would like these days, but nonetheless I'll try to pop in when I can.[/FONT] [FONT=Arial Black][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=Red]'Venceremos' :wink:[/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks chaps. All as much as I thought really.

It's not me but Mrs Freaky who is having a hard time from one of the HR bods in her place.

I was hoping she could throw something legally binding at her.

 

It's a bit of a poor show if she has to feign an emergency for the sake of a 10 minute check up.

 

Thanks for all the information.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Not sure about the accuracy of everything in that link DMD, helpful of course though it is.

 

For example it states the right is to paid time off.

 

Check out some of these links:

 

http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg...0898061&r.s=tl

 

ACAS : Acas - Working parents

 

AMICUS: Your right to dependant's leave

 

They all suggest that the right is unpaid. Perhaps there is another right that they were referring to in the law and parents link?

 

I'm happy to stand corrected, but I am not aware of any statutory right to dependent leave that would be paid.

 

Kind regards

 

Che

...................................................................... [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Please post on a thread before sending a PM. My opinion's are not expressed as agent or representative of The Consumer Action Group. Always seek professional advice from a qualified legal adviser before acting. If I have helped you please feel free to click on the black star.[/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS] I am sorry that work means I don't get into the Employment Forum as often as I would like these days, but nonetheless I'll try to pop in when I can.[/FONT] [FONT=Arial Black][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=Red]'Venceremos' :wink:[/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think it's discretionary at the moment.

 

I worked in the public sector for a while and we were encouraged to make our appointments at the beginning or end of the working day. We did have our time made up to equate to the full day though....although this didn't equate to much in practice as I was working far in excess of the standard day anyway.

 

The ironic part was one day when I woke up with an eye infection. I got an emergency Optician's appointment to check it out thoroughly as I wear contact lenses. I then went to my GP's and picked up a prescription for antibiotic drops before going to work. Think it took less than 45 mins in total.

 

However, my request for my time to be made up for the Opticians appointment was refused as it was against the Employer's Policy!

 

So, I should have stayed at home for a further 30 minutes waiting for my GP's surgery to open...then made an emergency appointment for after morning surgery...and then I would have been lucky to have got into work by lunch time. BUT I would have had the morning credited!! And they wonder why the country's in such a mess!!!

 

Back to post...has Mrs Freaky offered to make the time up??

If you feel I've helped then by all means click my star to the left...a simple "thank you" costs nothing! ;)

 

Restons MBNA -v- WelshMam

 

MBNA Cards

 

CitiCard

M&S and More

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just found this at CAB...

 

 

Time off to visit the doctor or dentist

Your employer may allow you time off work to visit the doctor or dentist but they are not legally required to do so unless your contract of employment says they are. Your employer can, for example, insist that you make these visits outside work hours, that you take holiday leave or that you make the time up later on. You should check your contract of employment to see what rights you have to take time off for doctors or dental appointments.

Pregnant women, however, are allowed reasonable paid time off work for ante-natal care. This time does not need to be made up later on.

If you are disabled and your employer will not let you take time off for a medical appointment connected with your disability, they could be breaking the law.

 

http://www.adviceguide.org.uk/index/e_time_off_work.pdf

Edited by WelshMam2009
Link not working correctly

If you feel I've helped then by all means click my star to the left...a simple "thank you" costs nothing! ;)

 

Restons MBNA -v- WelshMam

 

MBNA Cards

 

CitiCard

M&S and More

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to admit I do become a little frustrated with people who seem to expect to be paid by their employer whether or not they actually do any work.

 

There is already a huge cost to employers in meeting the statutory requirements, and when myself and the other "bosses" at my company get paid late, short and sometimes even not at all in order that we can meet our contractual obligations to our employees, it really does get frustrating when said employees then expect to be able to take time off work for various reasons (in of itself not too much of a problem) but then expect to be paid for not working.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to admit I do become a little frustrated with people who seem to expect to be paid by their employer whether or not they actually do any work.

 

There is already a huge cost to employers in meeting the statutory requirements, and when myself and the other "bosses" at my company get paid late, short and sometimes even not at all in order that we can meet our contractual obligations to our employees, it really does get frustrating when said employees then expect to be able to take time off work for various reasons (in of itself not too much of a problem) but then expect to be paid for not working.

 

Don't disagree as there are always some who will abuse the system....and still do.

 

However, a little flexibility goes a long way with the work force, especially if parents of young children. In my case, my GP's surgery doesn't start until 9.30am and is closed on Saturdays. For a pm appointment you have to have your phone contantly on re-dial at 9am (which isn't always practical) and the appointments are all gone by 10 past!!

 

It all depends on your companies policies and procedures but I don't think it's unreasonable for staff to make the time up.

If you feel I've helped then by all means click my star to the left...a simple "thank you" costs nothing! ;)

 

Restons MBNA -v- WelshMam

 

MBNA Cards

 

CitiCard

M&S and More

Link to post
Share on other sites

Give and take is the key - flexibility is fine as long as its a two way street. Sadly there are some employees who see give and take as employer gives and employees take. (having been an employee I have worked for companies that are the exact opposite)

 

Certainly we do take pains to accommodate reasonable requests from our guys - and in the main they do return the compliment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...