Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
    • Hi LFI, Your knowledge in this area is greater than I could possibly hope to have and as such I appreciate your feedback. I'm not sure that I agree the reason why a barrister would say that, only to get new customers, I'm sure he must have had professional experience in this area that qualifies him to make that point. 🙂 In your point 1 you mention: 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver. I understand the point you are making but I was referring to when the keeper is also the driver and admits it later and only in this circumstance, but I understand what you are saying. I take on board the issues you raise in point 2. Is it possible that a PPC (claimant) could refer back to the case above as proof that the motorist should have appealed, like they refer back to other cases? Thanks once again for the feedback.
    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

me and my Various benefits story


EYEBALLS01
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5081 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

People need to remember that ATOS does not only conduct medicals for the DWP, they are the equivalant of the wild-west hired guns, they can be hired by any government department OR private company if they can afford the amount they charge.

 

ATOS do the medicals/health side of things for many, many different places, such as the prison service, Royal Mail, Ministry of Defence etc...

 

In this country they are second only to the NHS in terms of the number of doctors they 'engage'.

 

It's important that the truth about their practises is as widely known as possible, as more and more private companies (I believe the latest is the Co-op) are using their services.

 

One day, where ever you work could end up using them, and you want to make sure that any health issues you have are looked into professionally, by honest, ethical staff.

 

Think of the nightmare you could have, if you were forced out of work because a work doc (paid for by your company) said you were unfit, yet when you went to claim benefits, another doc (employed by the same company, but that companies wages paid by the DWP) said you were perfectly fine for work.....

 

Its happened before..

Note - all posts are my opinion only, and no action should be taken on any advice given without consulting independant advice from a suitably qaulified advisor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

This thread really shocked me. I cannot believe the restrictions on recording!

 

My suggestion would be to go in with a pad and pen, and each time they say something, reply "Please wait a moment while I write that down". Then write it down. If they complained, I'd say, "I'm very sorry about this, but I am not allowed to record this on audio, so I have no choice but to write it down instead."

 

Any flaws in that strategy?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, if the examiner ended up sending of a inaccurate report to the DWP, it would be your word against his.

 

You could complain to ATOS, and atos would investigate, in my case (complained via my mp) that consisted of ATOS simply asking the doctor if he acted in the way I stated.

 

The doctor said no, he did not.

 

End of investigation, doctor believed to be telling the truth, claimaint must be a liar.

 

A doctor or nurse willing to lie on a medical report is not going to think twice about saying your notes were not a accurate representation of the medical, or that you made the whole lot up. A covert tape recording on the other hand is much, much harder for them to dispute, even if it ends up not being used as evidence, its going to make them think twice about lying, as it could be used, and used to get them in serious trouble if they are proven to be a liar.

 

However,if you took notes, as you describe, and then refer to the notes, if and when a doctor turned round and stated the notes were a lie, you could turn round and say, really - I have the recording of the medical to prove they are accurate. They would be stuck, if they argue you cant use the tape as evidence, that would show they have something to hide, if you do use it - you prove the doctor lied at the report stage, and during the investigation stage, and hopefully that may get the b*****d struck off completely.

Note - all posts are my opinion only, and no action should be taken on any advice given without consulting independant advice from a suitably qaulified advisor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DO NOT TELL THEM YOU ARE

RECORDING THE EXAMINATION UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES

Unless you are actually complying with their over the top rules about pro-calibration, twin deck machines etc.

 

If you try to use your own tape recorder, and do not comply with their rules then if you tell them your going to record the medical they will stop the medical, and your benefits can be stopped.

 

If you are going to record secretly, do it just that way - SECRETLY - you are within your rights to do so, just DONT TELL THEM...

 

 

 

I agree with you there just get taping and keep schtum

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Despite good medical evidence I have been turned down by this Company who are paid by my employers to make the decision for ill health retirement.

I`ve worked for 35 blemish free years and have become disabled. I get DLA and ESA and even `Pathways to Work` people agree I`m not fit for any work and given my age will not work again.

Has anyone else had dealings with them?

Cheers

IF I HAVE BEEN ANY HELP AT ALL OR JUST MADE YOU LAUGH AT MY STUPIDITY PLEASE MARK MY PERFORMANCE!

 

ALSO REMEMBER TO DONATE. EVERY LITTLE HELPS AND THE FORUMS ARE FOR YOU!;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I am having trouble dealing with Government paid private health companies. (Please also see my thread on Capita Health Solutions in Emloyment section).

 

I have applied for ESA and am on the first 13 week allowance.

 

I have tried 3 times to get to a medical some 15 miles away but cannot travel more than a mile or 2 in a car and have also started suffering from Agoraphobia and panic attacks.

 

ATOS advised me to get a letter from my GP faxed to them asking for an exemption or home visit which my wife organised for me.

 

They rang her today and they said the medical expert had authorised a taxi! I have plenty of family and friends who will take me. That was never the issue.

 

They are phoning back tomorrow to let me know what my options are but on the phone today they told my wife I had no choice but would speak to a Manager.

 

Can anyone please advise

Cheers

IF I HAVE BEEN ANY HELP AT ALL OR JUST MADE YOU LAUGH AT MY STUPIDITY PLEASE MARK MY PERFORMANCE!

 

ALSO REMEMBER TO DONATE. EVERY LITTLE HELPS AND THE FORUMS ARE FOR YOU!;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi. This seems rather awful actually as Capita run the pensions for companies as well and as ill health retirement brings with it an early pension at an increased rate it seems there is something not too above board going on here. Unless you are not over 50?

Link to post
Share on other sites

This does not surprise me about Capita - a friend of mine that works for a well known large supermarket wanted his retirement money from them. He has been working for his company for 4 or 5 years. He was given the option of taking all of his pension money that he paid into since been employed with his supermarket, not much money, but it was his money.

 

He requested that he would like to take all of his pension money at the end of July, which he was told that he would happen, he also completed all the necessary documents confirming this. He gave Capita his bank details stating that his pension money should go into his bank at the end of July. Capita told him that they would get back to him. As he did not hear back from Capita he assumed that his money would go into his bank account by the end of July, which he was relying on for personal reasons.

 

When he checked his bank at the end of July no money was in his account from Capita.

He phoned Capita and at first he was told by the person on the phone that he did not know what had gone wrong. After been on the phone to Capita for while and stressing his disappointment that his money was not in his bank account as he was lead to believe would be from Capita, he was then told to hang on the phone while the person on the phone took instructions, when the person got back to him on the phone he was then told that it was the end of July was the date that they would be only stating to process my friend pension payments. Capital never mentioned this to my friend in the communication he had with them. Also my friend was told that he would get his payment in two parts the first would be a quarter of his money within ten working days and the rest at the end of the month, which makes his payments a month later then when he initial requested.

 

Now why did Capita not tell him that his money would be a month late and why could they not have process his payment when he requested at the end of July, as they had plenty of time to do so.....

 

My friend had made plans for his money, which he had to postpone and this caused him lots of problems and was stressful for him. It seems that Capita is doing what is best for them, are they trying to keep people pension money to make profit themselves, I wonder????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies. I`m getting my appeal paperwork together and have yet another letter from my GP stating that I will not work again. Capitas medical bod never even came to see me as I could not travel to London or Croyden. I live 50 miles+ away from each.

Even ATOS who are another such company have finally granted me a home visit.

My original application had the full backing of my immediate Management and also a 28 page report from a Harley Street Consultant who came to a hospital within 8 miles of me and examined me twice 90 minutes each time!

He agrees that I am a genuine case and certainly could not go back to my present job which was quite active and would find it very difficult to do any other job.

I`m 53 this year and would have done my 40 years when 57 but would have worked until 60. It`s a complete nightmare as my wife is severely disabled and although I worked full time I was her main carer particularly at night. She had carers and an alarm in the day. Since my health got worse we have relied heavily on our 19 year old daughter who goes off to University in 2 weeks and our 13 year old daughter who has a heart of gold. My older daughter decided not to go away to uni but woth 3 A`s and 2 B`s whilst looking after us and coping with her mum being in ICU twice we were very insistent that she goes and really want her to enjoy it.

Sorry gone a bit off point. I cannot believe that a so called Labour Government have left many private and public empoyees at the mercy of these people who are presumably on a quota driven service level agreement. My actual report from them reads as if I will never work again but the final page states that I do not qualify. They offer no solutions and presumably just hope that you top yourself or die of natural causes before they have to pay out.

One of my closest friends is an employment Solicitor and had to apologise for laughing when he saw it and offered to represent me but I will complete the appeal/tribunal first if I can last the pace!

Sorry for the rant but I`m just nonplussed

IF I HAVE BEEN ANY HELP AT ALL OR JUST MADE YOU LAUGH AT MY STUPIDITY PLEASE MARK MY PERFORMANCE!

 

ALSO REMEMBER TO DONATE. EVERY LITTLE HELPS AND THE FORUMS ARE FOR YOU!;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I seem to be stuck having to deal with these private companys being paid taxpayers money for what we pay the Government to do. Capita represent my employees and ATOS DWP.

 

Although both have a lot of evidence from my GP and Consultant (28 page report!) stating that I will not work again, Capita have refused me ill health retirement after 35 years unblemished employment and ATOS who had to do a home visit after much squabbling and letter from my GP have put me in the work related group!

 

Capita refused to come and see me stating that I needed to be dying to get a home visit! :?(honestly said that).

 

I have to now appeal both and with my physical and mental problems makes it very hard to go on. Only our 4 children and wek old first grandchild keep my wife (disabled for 12 years) and I bothering going on!:evil:

IF I HAVE BEEN ANY HELP AT ALL OR JUST MADE YOU LAUGH AT MY STUPIDITY PLEASE MARK MY PERFORMANCE!

 

ALSO REMEMBER TO DONATE. EVERY LITTLE HELPS AND THE FORUMS ARE FOR YOU!;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rubi T

Did speak to our care manager and a lady from social services but because Capita and ATOS are private companys` they are looking into it but didn`t hold out much hope!

IF I HAVE BEEN ANY HELP AT ALL OR JUST MADE YOU LAUGH AT MY STUPIDITY PLEASE MARK MY PERFORMANCE!

 

ALSO REMEMBER TO DONATE. EVERY LITTLE HELPS AND THE FORUMS ARE FOR YOU!;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Wonder if anyone can advise. I`ve been off work for over a year after working and paying contributions for 34 years.

 

During the past year I have been on half and in May no pay and now get contribution based ESA, a higher child tax rate credit than before and high rate DLA (mobility and care) I appreciate that the latter is not means tested.

 

I heard on Friday after an appeal to Capita that I have been granted early medical retirement at the upper tier, which means I get my full pension. I don`t know any figures yet but it obviously won`t be as much as my precious salary.

 

My question is probably evident but do I lose all my ESA as it`s contribution based. Also presumably my tax credits will drop.

 

Many thanks in advance

IF I HAVE BEEN ANY HELP AT ALL OR JUST MADE YOU LAUGH AT MY STUPIDITY PLEASE MARK MY PERFORMANCE!

 

ALSO REMEMBER TO DONATE. EVERY LITTLE HELPS AND THE FORUMS ARE FOR YOU!;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

For contributory ESA, the first £85 per week of a pension is disregarded. 50% of the remainder is deducted from ESA.

 

For tax credits, the first £300 per year of pension is disregarded, and the rest counts as income, in addition to any contributory ESA received.

Post by me are intended as a discussion of the issues involved, as these are of general interest to me and others on the forum. Although it is hoped such discussion will be of use to readers, before exposing yourself to risk of loss you should not rely on any principles discussed without confirming the situation with a qualified person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Zamzara

Thanks very much. Nice clear concise answer

Cheers

IF I HAVE BEEN ANY HELP AT ALL OR JUST MADE YOU LAUGH AT MY STUPIDITY PLEASE MARK MY PERFORMANCE!

 

ALSO REMEMBER TO DONATE. EVERY LITTLE HELPS AND THE FORUMS ARE FOR YOU!;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Sorry to hijack but Erika do the same rules apply for ESA?

IF I HAVE BEEN ANY HELP AT ALL OR JUST MADE YOU LAUGH AT MY STUPIDITY PLEASE MARK MY PERFORMANCE!

 

ALSO REMEMBER TO DONATE. EVERY LITTLE HELPS AND THE FORUMS ARE FOR YOU!;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to hijack but Erika do the same rules apply for ESA?

 

Kind of. ESA© doesn't expire (exhaust) the way JSA© does. If you're entitled to the contributory benefit when you claim, you'll continue to be entitled to it as long as you meet the generic conditions for ESA - there is no six month limit.

 

If you need to claim means-tested ESA, then the rules about income and capital are broadly the same as JSA.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, Eyeballs I don't believe so. The contributions based ESA is ongoing.

 

EDIT: Posted at the same time as Antone. Antone is far better placed than I, for ESA queries lol. I haven't studied it in depth yet, so only know the basics of ESA at the moment.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, Eyeballs I don't believe so. The contributions based ESA is ongoing.

 

EDIT: Posted at the same time as Antone. Antone is far better placed than I, for ESA queries lol. I haven't studied it in depth yet, so only know the basics of ESA at the moment.

 

Heh. Well, your answer was correct there :)

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to you both. I`m on contribution based ESA. worked 34 years now have been granted ill health retirement but don`t know figures yet. I take it I will lose my support level ESA?

IF I HAVE BEEN ANY HELP AT ALL OR JUST MADE YOU LAUGH AT MY STUPIDITY PLEASE MARK MY PERFORMANCE!

 

ALSO REMEMBER TO DONATE. EVERY LITTLE HELPS AND THE FORUMS ARE FOR YOU!;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to you both. I`m on contribution based ESA. worked 34 years now have been granted ill health retirement but don`t know figures yet. I take it I will lose my support level ESA?

 

If you are on contribution based ESA, you are able to receive some occupational pension. The first £85 per week will be fully disregarded, and as such will not affect your payments. After that, 1/2 of any amount over £85 is disregarded, the rest will be deducted from your benefit.

 

If, for any reason, you needed to claim ESA(IR) then any pension income would be counted as income and deducted from your benefit.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

After a really long struggle,well documented in other threads I have finally been given a full pension from my employees through Capita so thanks to all who helped

 

I am on ESA and when I phoned them to tell them that I was getting a lump sum and pension they said that I would still be on ESA at it was contribution based.

 

I then wrote them a letter on the 29th of December asking them the same in writing but have not heard anything and today my two weekly amount was paid into my account

 

Obviously it would be a bonus if I still got ESA but it could someone please comment for me.

 

Cheers:confused:

IF I HAVE BEEN ANY HELP AT ALL OR JUST MADE YOU LAUGH AT MY STUPIDITY PLEASE MARK MY PERFORMANCE!

 

ALSO REMEMBER TO DONATE. EVERY LITTLE HELPS AND THE FORUMS ARE FOR YOU!;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your occupational pension affects contribution-based ESA like this:

 

the first £85 per week is fully disregarded

half of any amount over £85 per week is disregarded, and the rest is taken, pound for pound, from your benefit.

 

An example:

 

You receive £64.30 in ESA© per week, and an occupational pension of £100 per week. The first £85 of your pension is ignored, leaving £15. Of that £15, half is ignored, leaving £7.50. That remaining £7.50 is deducted from your benefit, so you would receive ESA© of £56.80 per week.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I`m getting confused now. I`ve spoken to three different DWP employees and put my question in writing to which they have not replied regarding Contribution bases ESA.

 

They say that I am entitled to my £179 per fortnight even though I get a decent pension and lump sum and because I`ve paid 35 years worth of contributions I will continue to get it at least until retirement age.

 

It`s a very strange situation and I feel like I`m getting money under false pretencies but they tell me I`m not. Hopefully they`re correct but I would like something in writing as common sense would tell me that I would lose it as per the parameters supplied by ZamZara. Any ideas?

IF I HAVE BEEN ANY HELP AT ALL OR JUST MADE YOU LAUGH AT MY STUPIDITY PLEASE MARK MY PERFORMANCE!

 

ALSO REMEMBER TO DONATE. EVERY LITTLE HELPS AND THE FORUMS ARE FOR YOU!;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...