Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is a ridiculous situation.  The lender has made so many stupid errors of judgement.  I refuse to bow down and willingly 'pay' for their mistakes.  I really want to put this behind me and move on.  I can't yet. 
    • Peter McCormack says he has secured a 15-year lease on the club's Bedford ground.View the full article
    • ae - i have no funds to appoint lawyers.   My point about most caggers getting lost is simply due to so many layers of legal issues that is bound to confuse.  
    • Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same.   Yes.  But every interested buyer was offering within a range - based on local market sales evidence.  Shelter site says a lender is not allowed to wait for the market to improve. Why serve a dilapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease.   The dilapidations notice was a legal first step.  Freeholders have to give time to leaseholders to remedy.  Lender lawyers advised the property was going to be sold and the new buyer would undertake the work.  Their missive came shortly before contracts were given to buyer.  The buyer lawyer and freehold lawyers were then in contact.  The issue of dilapidations remedy was discussed..  But then lender reneged.  There was a few months where neither I nor freeholders were sure what was going on.  Then suddenly demolition works started.   Before one issues a s146 one has to issue a LBA.  That is eventually what happened. ...legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease   A s146 was served.  It took 3y but the parties came to a settlement.   (They couldn't revert as they had ripped out irreplaceable historical features). The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there.  That's not the case   One can ask for another extension.  In this instance the freeholders eventually agreed with a proviso for the receiver not to serve another. You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension.  Correct.  But receiver lawyer was an idiot.   He made so many errors.  No idea why the receiver instructed him?  He used to work for lender lawyers. I belatedly discovered he was sacked for dishonesty and fined a huge sum by the sra  (though kept his licence).  He eventually joined another firm and the receiver bizarrely chose him to handle the extension.  Again he messed up - which is why the matter still hasn't been properly concluded.   In reality, its quite clear the lender/ receiver were just trying to overwhelm me (as trustee and leaseholder) with work (and costs) due to so many legal  issues.  Also they tried to twist things (as lawyers sometimes do).  They tried to create a situation where the freeholders would get a wasted costs order - the intent was to bankrupt the freeholders so they could grab the fh that way.   That didn't happen.  They are still trying though.  They owe the freeholders legal costs (s60) and are refusing to pay.  They are trying to get the freeholders to refer the matter to the tribunal - simply to incur more costs (the freeholders don't want and cant's afford to incur)  Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to.... The property does not qualify under 67 Act.  Their notice was invalid and voided. B petition was struck out. So this is dealt with then.  That action was dealt with yes.   But they then issued a new claim out of a different random court - which I'm still dealing with alone.  This is where I have issues with my old lawyer. He failed to read important legal docs  (which I kept emailing and asking if he was dealing with) and  also didn't deal with something crucial I pointed out.  This lawyer had the lender in a corner and he did not act. Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been ....  Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at?   I could.  But the evidence is clear cut.  Receiver email to lender and lender lawyer: "our strategy for many months  has been for ceo to get the property".  A lender is not allowed to influence the receivership.   They clearly were.  And the law firm were complicit.  The same firm representing the lender and the ceo in his personal capacity - conflict of interest?   I  also have evidence of the lender trying to pay a buyer to walk.  I was never supposed to know about this.  But I was given copies of messages from the receiver "I need to see you face to face, these things are best not put in writing".  No need to divulge all here.  But in hindsight it's clear the lender/ receiver tried - via 2 meetings - to get rid of this buyer (pay large £s) to clear the path for the ceo.   One thing I need to clarify - if a receiver tells a lender to do - or not to do - something should the lender comply? 
    • Why ask for advice if you think it's too complex for the forum members to understand? You'd be better engaging a lawyer. Make sure he has understood all the implications. Stick with his advice. If it doesn't conform to your preconceived opinion then pause and consider whether maybe he's right.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Companies House warning of legal action, how bad is that? please help I am scared


the_pit
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3475 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have a problem and

 

 

went out of the country for a while,

 

 

on my return I have my company with a proposal of strike off flag,

 

 

so as i wanted to keep operating with the company

I called Companies house and asked what do I need to do.

 

They reply this and I am scared, what are my options please?

 

I still have time to fix this?

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------

I can confirm that the following documents are outstanding:

 

Accounts for year ended 31/07/2013.

 

Annual Return (Form AR01) for period ending 15/07/2014.

 

As the company is required to remain on the register, the proposed strike off action has been discontinued. Failure to file accounts and annual returns within the statutory times allowed is a criminal offence and due to the seriousness of the defaults, we are commencing prosecution action against the directors immediately. Conviction for these offences will result in a criminal record and a fine of up to £5,000 for each document not delivered on time.

 

As these accounts are already late, a civil late filing penalty will automatically be incurred when they are received and accepted at Companies House. The amount of the penalty increases with the length of delay in delivery and is separate to any criminal proceeding being considered against the directors. Failure to comply with the filing requirements of the 2006 Companies Act in consecutive years will result in the penalty being doubled for the current year’s accounts.

 

You may be able to deliver your annual return and certain types of accounts online via our Web Filing service, which has in-built checks to ensure that you get it right first time. Our web-site www.companieshouse.gov.uk gives information on this along with a full range of guidance booklets and forms.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Thanks a lot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have to file the accounts and pay the fines asap if you want to avoid prosecution.

In my experience they are a bit merciless and issue a fine even if you're late a couple of days with the accounts.

There maybe a loophole that others are aware of.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have to file the accounts and pay the fines asap if you want to avoid prosecution.

In my experience they are a bit merciless and issue a fine even if you're late a couple of days with the accounts.

There maybe a loophole that others are aware of.

 

I am just back in the uK, I going to start work soon but don't have any money now... I am very depressed... thanks for your answer

Link to post
Share on other sites

What happens if I am prosecuted? can I still have a normal life, work? because it doesn't say anything about prision.. just a criminal record and penalties.

 

What if I move to Ireland? I have a job opportunity there.. would it be more convenient to not be here ? (not planning to leave that unattended, just doing it from there)

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to the appropriate forum.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

You won't go to prison for such a conviction but you must take their threat seriously.

 

Your accounts for the year ended 31/7/13 were due at Companies House on 30/4/14. If you filed them between now and 31 October the penalty would be £750. They may allow you to pay this penalty by instalments.

 

Being overseas is not considered a valid or exceptional reason for not filing the accounts on time so there seems very little chance of getting the penalty waived.

 

The letter you have received sounds like a general letter issued by CH prior to them passing it to the prosecuting solicitor who would write to you again.

 

You may be able to avoid prosecution by getting those accounts filed immediately, perhaps even with a letter of apology and a request to pay the penalty over a period of time.

 

From memory you should be able to get 5 months to pay quit easily and exceptionally 10 months.

 

Doing a runner will not help you as they can prosecute in your absence and you will then have a criminal record and a fine to go with it.

 

My advice would be to bite the bullet and get those documents filed today.

 

If you leave the filing until after the end of October the penalty will increase from £750 to £1,500.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You won't go to prison for such a conviction but you must take their threat seriously.

 

Your accounts for the year ended 31/7/13 were due at Companies House on 30/4/14. If you filed them between now and 31 October the penalty would be £750. They may allow you to pay this penalty by instalments.

 

Being overseas is not considered a valid or exceptional reason for not filing the accounts on time so there seems very little chance of getting the penalty waived.

 

The letter you have received sounds like a general letter issued by CH prior to them passing it to the prosecuting solicitor who would write to you again.

 

You may be able to avoid prosecution by getting those accounts filed immediately, perhaps even with a letter of apology and a request to pay the penalty over a period of time.

 

From memory you should be able to get 5 months to pay quit easily and exceptionally 10 months.

 

Doing a runner will not help you as they can prosecute in your absence and you will then have a criminal record and a fine to go with it.

 

My advice would be to bite the bullet and get those documents filed today.

 

If you leave the filing until after the end of October the penalty will increase from £750 to £1,500.

 

Thanks for your advise, so how do I fill them? I don't know anything about that and don't have and can't pay an accountant now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you have a limited liability company but don't know how to file accounts?

 

Is this the first set of accounts for the company then?

 

If not, what have you done in the past?

 

I use to have an accountancy firm taking care of that, but I had some financial issues and couldn't pay them any more

I stopped using the accountants one year ago

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I don't know how big your company is but if you meet the criteria you can prepare and submit the accounts yourself but they must be in a format which is in accordance with the Companies Act.

 

Have a look here for a start

 

https://www.gov.uk/prepare-file-annual-accounts-for-limited-company/prepare-annual-accounts

 

Alternatively get some qualified accounting advice.

 

If you do nothing not only will you fall foul of Companies House but also more than likely HMRC as well.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Basic accounts are not complicated - you can find out how to do this online. The annual return is just a matter of filling in a form. If you want to have a company you need to meet the filing requirements.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...