Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi LFI, Your knowledge in this area is greater than I could possibly hope to have and as such I appreciate your feedback. In your point 1 you mention: 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver. I understand the point you are making but I was referring to when the keeper is also the driver and admits it later and only in this circumstance, but I understand what you are saying. I take on board the issues you raise in point 2. Can a PPC (claimant) refer back to the case above as proof that the motorist should have appealed, like they refer back to other cases? Thanks once again for the feedback.
    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Your bank is taking your benefits in charges


steven4064
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3995 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have read this thread with considerable interest, and would like to seek advice regarding my financial situation. I am registered disabled and in receipt of both DLA and Incapacity Benefit, my wife is my carer; although we are being told by the Benefits Agency that we need to complete a form to make this official (we had informed the relevant people at the BA and were told they had "sorted" it out for us - they havent!).

 

We are a family of three who are on benefits, our daughter is at school and is 13. I am classified as chronically ill and am on first name terms with my GP's, who have written me a wonderful letter supporting my situation healthwise and regarding financial matters.

 

I admit to having been foolish to apply for four credit cards, a storecard and a loan. Everything has now caught up with me and I have been dealing with the relevant parties (banks and Credit Collection Agencies),including a financial statement. Add to this I have run into difficulties with a couple of my utility payments, and an old Council Tax bill has reared its ugly head. I have written to and offered monthly payments of £10 which have been accepted by all parties barring the Council Tax arrears; they want me to pay £90 a month! Threatening me with a bailiff if I don't comply. I have so far made one payment, the next is due soon.

 

I was told that I have to meet the payment of £90 which is to be paid for in five monthly payments, and inform the others that until I have cleared the Council Tax arrears they will be paid £1 a month; as Council Tax is deemed an essential need. I have received two letters informing me that I am now in default!

 

Another I am having problems with is MBNA, who I have written to and spoken to on the telephone; and have just received a letter from MBNA charging me £25 for the privilige! It made me laugh and I jokingly said to my wife that I'll respond in kind and ask them to donate my charge to a charity of my choice!

 

With what I've now read about the social security situation I would like to enquire as to were I stand! When I applied for my credit cards/store card/loan I informed each party of my financial situation, and that is that I was and still am in receipt of benefits; they were more than happy to award me the aforementioned credit facilities! Can I reduce the monthly payments on the strength of this, and maybe even have them erased!!! I know I'm asking a lot, but these forums are a brilliant source of information.

 

I thank you in advance of your responses.

 

seeker27:grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi seeker

 

You need to pay off the council tax bill before everything else as it is a priority debt (MBNA can go ....)

 

You need some proper advice on managing these debts - if you have not done so, go to CAB or contact National Debt Line (National Debtline – Free, Confidential Debt Advice – Call 0808 808 4000, phone 0808 808 4000) ASAP.

 

The income and expenditure statement you have already is a good start. You then need to budget to pay off priority debts first. THese are

 

Rent/mortgage

secured loans

Council Tax

electricity/gas (not water)

fines (if any - may not apply but others may find this useful)

maintenance arrears (as above)

hire purchase debts

 

in that order.

 

Anything left over can bve offered to non-priority creditors at £1 a month. THis includes MBNA however loudly they shout. Do not speak to them on the phone but keep detailed records of when they call. THey are particularly nasty to deal with. THe reason they harass and bully you is just because they are non-priority creditors - they hope to bully you into paying them money that would otherwise be used to feed your family or pay priority debts.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi seeker

 

You need to pay off the council tax bill before everything else as it is a priority debt (MBNA can go ....)

 

You need some proper advice on managing these debts - if you have not done so, go to CAB or contact National Debt Line (National Debtline – Free, Confidential Debt Advice – Call 0808 808 4000, phone 0808 808 4000) ASAP.

 

The income and expenditure statement you have already is a good start. You then need to budget to pay off priority debts first. THese are

 

Rent/mortgage

secured loans

Council Tax

electricity/gas (not water)

fines (if any - may not apply but others may find this useful)

maintenance arrears (as above)

hire purchase debts

 

in that order.

 

Anything left over can bve offered to non-priority creditors at £1 a month. THis includes MBNA however loudly they shout. Do not speak to them on the phone but keep detailed records of when they call. THey are particularly nasty to deal with. THe reason they harass and bully you is just because they are non-priority creditors - they hope to bully you into paying them money that would otherwise be used to feed your family or pay priority debts.

 

Steven,

 

Many thanks for your reply, it is very much appreciated. I am now quite efficient at dealing with these non priority creditors on the telephone, but will in future, ask them to contact me in writing.

 

Steven, regarding the credit collection agency writing to me and telling me I have defaulted on my payment arrangements. I did write to the credit collection agencies concerned informing them of this new debt that I had to pay, yet they responded negatively! How should I proceed?

 

Also since first writing to the CCA's my gas/electric has gone up, and due to my disability I am having to use the private hire to get me about; which has affected my income and expenditure drastically. I am contemplating writing to the CCA's concerned and informing them of my aforementioned changes, and reducing my monthly repayments.

 

 

seeker27

Edited by seeker27
I forgot to ask a further question.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

My jsa got eaten in bank charges today. But it was lloyds bouncing of a payment that would have sent me £10 in debit if they had paid it but sent me £20 in debit by bouncing it. This is the 2nd occourance this year and now ive got £4 to live on for a week ( me/wife/3 kids) where the gov say i need £90. 2 people at lloyds say they must refund the charge as its not my money but the governments, last person said phone back at 8 in the morning. Oh well kids dry bread for tea..

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Last year November 2008, I had sky direct debit set up from my Nationwide a/c... I was not working then as i was on maternity, the only income into my a/c were tax credits, and child benefit, the amount which sky should have deducted should have been £23.00, but they 've tried deducting £30.00, this amount bounced, they tried the second time, after which I notified Nationwide to cancel the direct debit, but somehow it happened the 3rd, of which natinwide told me it was too LATE to stop it then, in total , i was charged £90.00, by the bank , can i reclaim ? if so which is the best way/approach pls ???

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

i know that the banks cant take benefit any forms of benefit to pay for charges or when an account is overdrawn, they have a legal right to pay the money back to the customer, in fact if you go into the jobcentre there is a letter they can send to the bank requesting this. however the jobcentre do offer post office accounts which may be a good route for now - tey are free.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
i know that the banks cant take benefit any forms of benefit to pay for charges or when an account is overdrawn, they have a legal right to pay the money back to the customer, in fact if you go into the jobcentre there is a letter they can send to the bank requesting this. however the jobcentre do offer post office accounts which may be a good route for now - tey are free.

 

If this is the case that we cant claim back our charges under the social security act 1992, then shouldnt the template letter stick for claiming bank charges back when on benefits in the template letter section be removed?

 

Both - please see post #21

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I have managed to sort out quite a lot of my financial mess, until recently. I have a current account with NatWest and a overdraft limit of £750.

 

Until recently all my benefits used to go in to this account, but I was unable to control my finances so had all of my benefits transferred in to my savings account so I could keep track on what was coming in and what was going out.

 

Now my problem is that NatWest have charged me extortionate fees and I am currently nearly £950 overdrawn. They have charged me almost £200'ish. I have been charged £76 Unpaid Item fee, Guarantee Card Payment Fee £70, Unpaid Item Fee £15, Guarantee Card Payment Fee £15.

 

Can I be charged so much money in fees, I am a single mother and on benefits and I am also a carer for my sick mother. I am very worried as I owe so much money to NatWest and I do not think I will be able to pay so much money back.

 

I went to my local branch and spoke to the manager about the excess fees, and he told me that there was nothing that he could do he said. Please could someone help me please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

can anyone please clarify, if im being chased for debts, but am on benefits, pensioners etc, can the court make an award for payments of these debts against my income, which is below the accepted standard and therefor paying benefits to me to ensure im at at that standard,

Seems any award made against my income would in effect bring me back below that minimum, and if they did, could i then apply for more benfits as its been taken by the courts??

Edited by pawnbrokers
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

This has been posted elsewhere on the site,but its needed in here too.

 

A friend of mine was in despair following Santanderlink3.gif not only charging him for a failed direct debitlink3.gif,but then continued to add further daily charges.

He informed me that he had called them and emailed them,explaining that the charges were punitive since his only income is Jobseekers allowance.

The fees stood at £55 and were rising.

He asked me if I could help,and duly wrote him a letter.

I was finding it hard to understand,how a bank like Santander,were openly flouting their obligations.

My friend had pleaded with them and explained his situation.

Santander of course could see from the account too-that he was in reciept of benefits since they were paid into this account.

No excuses then...lets get to work.

 

 

 

 

 

Account number xxxxxxxxxxx Sort Code xx xx xx

 

 

 

 

letter before actionlink3.gif

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

I am very disappointed in your response to my complaints which were made to you today, and that you have chosen to ignore my request for hardship, I therefore have no alternative but to seek recourse through the county courtlink3.gif system. I believe that Santanderlink3.gif have treated me unfairly under the following BCOB rules of which Santander should be compliant with,since Santander is a firm regulated by the FSA.

 

Rule 5.1.1 R states “A firm must provide a service in relation to a retail banking service which is prompt, efficient and fair to a banking customer and which has regard to any communications or financial promotion made by the firm to the banking customer from time to time.”

 

Rule 5.1.4 G “Principle 6 requires a firm to pay due regard to the interests of its customers and to treat them fairly. In particular, a firm should deal fairly with a banking customer whom it has reason to believe is in financial difficulty.”

 

Santandar have been informed that I am in reciept of state benefits and that I need these to cover essential living costs including food and heat/lighting.

 

Santander have not at any point acknowledged that this is a hardship case despite me notifying you.You have levied charges of £55 in recent days,and have refused to refund these in your return call to me on 6th.June. For these grounds I feel that I have been treated unfairlylink3.gif.

 

In order for this claim to be settled without the need for court action I require that the full amount taken of £55 returned to me by way of a credit to my account.

 

 

If I have not received a satisfactory response within 14 days then court action will be commenced without further notice and further costs will be incurred.

A judgment for a breach of BCOBS is very serious and the FSA would be empowered to act.

 

 

Yours Faithfully

 

 

Mr V. Upset

 

 

 

 

Would the recipients of his email to Santander actually know what the letter was about ?

 

You bet they did!

 

 

He got a reply quite swiftly...in fact in the space of 30 minutes.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Message:

Good Afternoon Mr V. Upset Thank you for your email.

I am happy to reverse the amount of £55, which have been waived due to exceptional circumstances.

To ensure no further charges are incurred on your accounts, we would ask you to monitor your accounts throughout the month. This can be completed through Online Banking, Local Branch and Telephone Banking.

I hope this information is useful and if you have any other queries, please do not hesitate to contact me via Secure Messaging or my colleagues on 0845 9724724.

Kind Regards,

 

The nice man (who knows his BCOBs from his bankcharges)

 

Santander Customer Services

 

 

 

So the message to all those who believe they have been treated unfairly,is to give them a taste of their own famous words when they fob you off with sorry we cant refund the charges..... "This may not be the reply you wanted"

 

Edit.

The banks get letters and emails from people threatening them with Court action every day.

We know this and so do they.So its essential,that you are willing and prepared to act on any threats if the bank do ignore your letter/email.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I did this a few years ago, if you say you will accept a lower amount than what's owed they will be more likely to give you a refund. Since then though I have always lived within my means and never go overdrawn, five years and counting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Accepting anything less than whats owed is not something CAG would ever advise.

Of course they will be more likely to agree if you do.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

bcobs came in nov 2009

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Does it matter if you didn't notify them at the first instance that you were on benefits? I've been on DLA for 4.5 years now. I dread to think how many times i've been charged the £22 personal reserve usage fee from barclays, but i never notified them. Do i stand a chance of claiming them all back?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does it matter if you didn't notify them at the first instance that you were on benefits? I've been on DLA for 4.5 years now. I dread to think how many times i've been charged the £22 personal reserve usage fee from barclays' date=' but i never notified them. Do i stand a chance of claiming them all back?[/quote']

 

start your own thread in the Barclays forum

 

see video below

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3995 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...