Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • quite honestly id email shiply CEO with that crime ref number and state you will be taking this to court, for the full sum of your losses, if it is not resolved ASAP. should that be necessary then i WILL be naming Shiply as the defendant. this can be avoided should the information upon whom the courier was and their current new company contact details, as the present is simply LONDON VIRTUAL OFFICES  is a company registered there and there's a bunch of other invisible companies so clearly just a mail address   
    • If it doesn’t sell easily : what they can get at an auction becomes fair market price, which may not realise what you are hoping.
    • Thank you. The receiver issue is a rabbit hole I don't think I'm going to enjoy going down. These people seem so protected. And I don't understand how or why?  Fair market value seems to be ever shifting and contentious.
    • Hungary is attempting to be a world power in manufacturing electric vehicle batteries, despite locals' reservations.View the full article
    • You can't, but you can (and really should) bring up the point that the lender isn't meeting their legal obligations in selling the property for fair market value. You'll have to do this in court, though. A receiver is bought in by the lender, not you. If they're a registered insolvency practitioner, you may be able to raise a complaint to the insolvency service but there are no guarantees here. Many receivers are also registered with the RICS and self-regulate so if you know the name of the receiver you can check there, again no guarantees. https://www.rics.org/surveyor-careers/career-development/accreditations/registered-property-receivership-scheme
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Car Insurance- Is this TECHNICALLY legal?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5062 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ok first of all, if you are a squeeky clean rich person you may leave now as this may upset you. :)

 

I'm just wondering if this is "technically" possible. I am a young father and times are tough at the moment, I have to drive 30 minutes to work every morning and evening and need a good well structured car as my current 2000 Astra is giving me nothing but problems. We all know car insurance for under 24's is a rip-off for those like myself who drive responsibly.

 

Is it possible to keep my insurance for my current Astra (comprehensive) and get a bigger car (like a jeep or a good 4x4), put it in my partner/father/mothers name and drive under third party even though the car has no insurance?

 

I have called my insurance company and asked them is it possible for me to drive another car third party, they said it was...

 

I went online and got quotes of £3000+ for it, which is impossible for me to afford. I'm not wanting to do this to be able to speed around in a ferrari, I just think it's completely ridiculous the prices. I have 2 years no claims bonus.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Technically yes, if the other car is not registered in your name and you have an insurance policy that allows you to drive cars not owned or registered by you (Driving Other Vehicles extension). That will give you third party cover on the other car.

 

Reality, the first time you have a claim your insurers will employ a raft of behind the scenes resources, you have a very very high chance of being detected and caught out and then your policy will be declared null and void, you will have to refund any money they paid out to a third party, and you will then have to disclose this to any potential future insurer (who will either decline you or load the premium).

 

I'm not about to divulge on a public forum exactly how insurers sense/detect/investigate fronting, but trust me it isn't worth doing it these days.

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Technically yes, if the other car is not registered in your name and you have an insurance policy that allows you to drive cars not owned or registered by you (Driving Other Vehicles extension). That will give you third party cover on the other car.

 

Reality, the first time you have a claim your insurers will employ a raft of behind the scenes resources, you have a very very high chance of being detected and caught out and then your policy will be declared null and void, you will have to refund any money they paid out to a third party, and you will then have to disclose this to any potential future insurer (who will either decline you or load the premium).

 

I'm not about to divulge on a public forum exactly how insurers sense/detect/investigate fronting, but trust me it isn't worth doing it these days.

 

Mossy

 

Thanks for the tip and help. My friend done this with his Lotus, he insured under a clio and drove his Lotus Elise, i'm not wanting to do that but he got away with it for years legally. He was always getting stopped by the police however...

 

I just need a bigger and more dependable car.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst it is legal for you to drive other cars (ie those not owned or registered to you) what you need to bear in mind is that detection techniques have become a lot more sophisticated and integrated.

 

From your original post I can see at least 3 things that you have done that would trigger 'fronting' alarm bells if I was the claims handler.

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jay. I think I'm right in saying [and Mossy and others will correct me if I'm wrong, that this could amount to 'fronting' or similar. A read around this forum will show you what other caggers have gone through.

 

If I'm right about fronting when the others comment, scroll up to the top of your thread and type in 'fronting' in the Search this Forum box, to bring up previous threads.

 

Mossy is right, insurance companies have huge resources, which they sometimes pool, so it could be stacked against you.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Find an old car like a diesel Volvo 850 in good condition which no one will want to steal. It may be a big old car but at least the insurance premium will drop until youa re 25! Can be any other similar car not associated with boy racers and thieves.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Be careful - please check your policy documents.

 

Most of the time the `driving other vehicles on a third party only basis` will be subject to the vehicle being BOTH OWNED AND INSURED by someone else at the time of use.

Often it will also exclude the use of hired/ rented/ loaned vehicles, etc. If there are clauses such as these you may need to re-think your plan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absoloutely. You are never covered to drive an uninsured vehicle.

 

That's complete rubbish

 

Most policies state 'Insured to drive a vehicle not owned or registered by the policyholder', whether or not that vehicle has any other insurance is irrelevent.

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Also of course it is 3rd party cover whilst driving. If you leave it parked at the shops or on the street there is no cover in place.

 

Therefore you would be leaving the vehicle uninsured on a public highway.

 

Actually it's whilst in charge of and not physically driving. If you are driving under the DOV cover and you park up and go shopping you were the last driver so you are still covered, if it was whilst physically driving then it would be totally impractical.

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...