Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
    • To which official body does one make a formal complaint about a LPA fixed charge receiver? Does one make a complaint first to the company employing the appointed individuals?    Or can one complain immediately to an official body, such as nara?    I've tried researching but there doesn't seem a very clear route on how to legally hold them to account for wrongful behaviour.  It seems frustratingly complicated because they are considered to be officers of the court and held in high esteem - and the borrower is deemed liable for their actions.  Yet what does the borrower do when disclosure shows clear evidence of wrong-doing? Does anyone have any pointers please?
    • Steam is still needed in many industries, but much of it is still made with fossil fuels.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot - Summons / Form 04 citation - old welcome finance debt - SB'd?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2702 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am awaiting the outcome of a ppi refund from welcome but stupidly I went back for more.

 

I have had a couple of loan increases and/or rewrites and now find myself with an outstanding balance of around 30k.i

 

I am currently paying £375 pcm which quite frankly I cannot afford.

 

I have just missed a payment due on 31/12/09 and I just know that the phone calls from the branch manager

are going to start tomorrow threatening home visits etc. I do not have anything to pay them with this month.

 

How do I , step-by-step sort this company out? short term and long term.

 

I have already sent letters to the branch saying that I will only deal in writing

but as soon as I miss any payment that seems to negate that agreement.

 

I used to pay by debit card on the last day of the month but come the 6th or 7th they would phone me 4 or 5 times

to find out when to take the next payment.

 

I have now managed eventually to get their bank details and pay by internet banking.

 

The branch manager told at one point that I had not been given these details by head office(basically calling me a liar) HELP!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 121
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I would firstly send them the telephone letter (will add here) and then the cca and sar requests also to see what sort of issues arise with the agreement letters are shown on this thread :)

 

Need Advice on Welcome Finance! - The Consumer Forums

 

i also had a million calls a month when paying by card they hate not being in control of a dd :rolleyes:

I am a consumer just like you, please get a second opinion or investigate yourself on anything I advise as I am in no way legally trained. Everything I know has come from the Mighty CAG and fellow CAGGERS. :cool:

 

If I have helped in any way please click my reputation star and make a donation to CAG to enable us all to continue to help each other :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okies first thing is not to worry, we have all been there and will help.

 

 

Second thing is to make your own thread in here which you have allready done so congratulations you are half way there.

 

 

You say you requested communication in writing and they did not listen.

 

 

now send them this ..

 

Welcome financial services

Compliance Department

Ruddington fields business park

Ruddington

Nottingham

NG11 6NZ

 

ACCOUNT

Dear Sir or Madam

I am writing in relation to the quantity and frequency of telephone calls that I have received from your company, which I deem to be personally harassing.

I have verbally requested that these stop, but I am still receiving calls.

I now require all further correspondence from your company to be made in writing only.

I am of the view that your continued harassment of me by telephone puts you in breach of Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

If you continue to harass me by telephone, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to OFCOM, Trading Standards and The Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you will be liable to a substantial fine.

Be advised that any further telephone calls from your company will be recorded.

The time spent on the phone on the 27/11/2009 to your company (manager Beth at the Leigh office) was in access of 2 hours and still no resolution on my account, I concider this to be unacceptable hence the request for written dialogue.

Yours faithfully,

.........................

Do you have a copy of your agreement ?

 

[NAME HERE]

 

Sorry beyond, we double posted. haha. . better too much help than none.

 

Janis, read the thread that Beyond posted as all the advise given there applies to you, any questions post here.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hehe great minds ozzy ;)

I am a consumer just like you, please get a second opinion or investigate yourself on anything I advise as I am in no way legally trained. Everything I know has come from the Mighty CAG and fellow CAGGERS. :cool:

 

If I have helped in any way please click my reputation star and make a donation to CAG to enable us all to continue to help each other :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

make sure u dont sign and send recorded :) if they call dont answer bit late once they had the letter ;)

I am a consumer just like you, please get a second opinion or investigate yourself on anything I advise as I am in no way legally trained. Everything I know has come from the Mighty CAG and fellow CAGGERS. :cool:

 

If I have helped in any way please click my reputation star and make a donation to CAG to enable us all to continue to help each other :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

make sure u dont sign and send recorded :) if they call dont answer bit late once they had the letter ;)

 

Whenever I never answered a call to welcome, they would come to my door, totally unacceptable I think.

 

Im in the same boat as you i didnt pay the 31st Dece Payment, so on 1st I sent them a letter enclosing two cheques both post dated one for the 5th and one for the 8th as that is when Im due funds, if they call Im just going to tell them they will have to accept it as how else do they expect me to pay today by card when Ive no funds?

 

I expect a call from them anytime soon:evil:!!!!

 

I hope you get things sorted out, totally understand how your feeling.

 

Michelle

Link to post
Share on other sites

agreed ozzy :)

I am a consumer just like you, please get a second opinion or investigate yourself on anything I advise as I am in no way legally trained. Everything I know has come from the Mighty CAG and fellow CAGGERS. :cool:

 

If I have helped in any way please click my reputation star and make a donation to CAG to enable us all to continue to help each other :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have other threads current but this is an urgent request.

 

I have sent off letters regarding no phone contact and a cca request.

 

They have continued with the calls (only a week since I sent letter)

 

I replied to local office re december missed payment saying that a hhome visit

they threatened would serve no purpose but if it was necessary it would be tomorrow between 1 - 2pm.

 

message left on mobile today confirming that this would happen.

 

I dont want to talk in person.

 

What should I do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Janis,

regarding the letter you sent about no telephone contact.

Im assuming you you sent it to 'Compliance'.

As it was only a week ago you'd have to allow them time for it to filter down to the local office.

I doubt they will take notice of you anyway.

If they do phone again,remind them you only want contact in writing and put the phone down.

Don't get in to a conversation with them

.If someone does call at your house, either ignore the door or tell them again 'all contact in writing',

and then close the door, but do not get into a conversation.

Some people will agree to anything to get rid of them, and they will try to use it against you.

If it gets too bad for you,

and they are still calling at your house,

phone the police.

You have no obligation to speak with them on the phone or at your home.

Hope this helps a little.

Let us know how you go.

Regards

Signaller

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have now received in the post a notice of arrears.

 

Then earlier today a hand delivered letter from an area manager requesting that I contact him by thursday to discuss the situation.

 

he also states that he has received no letter requesting contact only by letter.

 

I put in the same recorded envelope as my subject access request and have had an acknowledgement of this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats alright then, if they say they havent received it. Tell him you never received the hand delivered letter so they can cry about their £25 fee!!

 

just record the calls if they continue, if you answer then don't answer any of the security questions or say you have forgotten them.

 

just be ready to fight the all the call charges and then when you finally dispute them all, show them the proof of postage and the acknowledgement letter of the SAR, this proves they must of had it and that someone deliberately destroyed or lost it.

 

on the other hand, just send another one on its own and charge send em an invoice along with it for £25 pounds for postage and your time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

now they are really getting to me.

 

I have opted to contact this local manager as requested in the letter.

 

he asked for contact by letter, fax or to his mobile.

 

I texted saying that I would be in touch when i got the subject access request back. So far so good!!!

 

Then he left me a voicemail saying he was confused and want to resolve things positively,

however he is not aware of any request being received either locally or centrally and he really needs verbal contact.

 

In the meantime I got a recorded letter with credit agreements and statements for an account settled 3 years ago

and nothing for my present loan account. HELP

Link to post
Share on other sites

You arent obliged to deal with them verbally at all so dont feel pressured into it.

 

I would also be very careful with using mobile numbers as there is no paper chain for you should it become necessary.

 

My local branch has also denied knowledge of dispute its just a ploy to get a payment in my opinion

after all they do have commission to worry about :rolleyes:

 

if what you have received is stated to be your SAR I would put the account into dispute on the grounds it is incomplete.

 

just my opinion im sure someone will be along with more help :)

I am a consumer just like you, please get a second opinion or investigate yourself on anything I advise as I am in no way legally trained. Everything I know has come from the Mighty CAG and fellow CAGGERS. :cool:

 

If I have helped in any way please click my reputation star and make a donation to CAG to enable us all to continue to help each other :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

I have been a long term customer with welcome ,

had a couple of secured and one unsecured loans with them.

 

Now though I can no longer afford to repay my current secured loan .

 

I have a few other threads on here and have taken good advice from them but I am stuck again.

 

I did a CCA and got back from welcome a credit agreement from a previously held loan. (already paid off)

 

I have now done the SAR and await with interest that delivery.

 

I have sent off the letter re no phone contact but now the area manager has left me several voice messages

requesting that i return his call and stating that their is no request anywhere on their system for any information.

 

I have successfully reclaimed ppi from them but now I am not sure on which loans .

 

I am sure that there is something wrong somewhere as the agreement I have received includes MIF despite the loan being for £20k

 

 

Can I claim this back?

Help where do I go from here??

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont think the OP is asking how to claim back PPI as stated allready had one sucessfull claim. .

 

If you have sent CCA request and they have not complied then you need to put the account in dispute with the following letter, as they are claiming never received also send copy of orriginal CCA that you sent with note on "received on xxxx with track and trace" . . .

 

can you post up the old agreement so we can check it ?

 

Also await your SAR this will show which loan you claimed back the PPI on and what the state of play is on your acounts .

 

Never ever speak to them on the phone.

 

I have edited dispute letter to suit you.

 

......................................

 

 

Account In Dispute

 

Ref:

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

DO NOT IGNORE THIS LETTER - LITIGATION ADVICE

 

Thank you for your letter of xx/xx/xx , the contents of which have been noted.

 

You have failed to respond to my legal request to supply me a true copy of the original Consumer Credit Agreement for the above account.

 

On the xxxxx I wrote to you requesting a copy of the credit agreement and other information under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Sections 77-79).

 

On xxxxx a member of your staff signed for delivery of my written request and I have an electronic proof of delivery showing their signature and the date.

 

To date you have failed to comply with these requests in any way, whether by confirmation of receipt of the request or by supplying the requested documents.

 

These documents I requested should be readily available as proof of your legal right to collect this account under the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

In my letter of the xxxxx I made a formal request for a copy of the signed, executed credit agreement for the above account under section 77(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. In addition a full statement of this account should have been sent to me detailing all debits and credits to the account.

 

Furthermore, you are aware that the Consumer Credit Act allows 12 working days for a request for a true copy of a credit agreement to be carried out before your client enters into a default situation.

 

This period has expired.

 

As you are no doubt aware section 77(6) states:

 

If the creditor fails to comply with Subsection (1)

 

(a) He is not entitled , while the default continues, to enforce the agreement.

 

 

Therefore this account has become unenforceable at law.

 

You have failed to comply with a lawful request for a true, signed copy of the said agreement and other relevant documents mentioned in it, failed to send a full statement of the account and failed to provide any of the documentation requested.

 

Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS.

 

Furthermore I shall counterclaim that any such action constitutes unlawful harassment.

 

Please note you may also consider this letter as a statutory notice under section 10 of the Data Protection Act to cease processing any data in relation to this account with immediate effect.

 

This means you must remove all information regarding this account from your own internal records and from my records with any credit reference agencieslink3.gif.

 

Should you refuse to comply, you must within 21 days provide me with a detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data.

 

It is not sufficient to simply state that you have a ‘legal right’; You must outline your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this reasoning depends.

 

Should you not respond within 14 days I expect that this means you agree to remove all such data.

 

Furthermore you should be aware that a creditor is not permitted to take ANY Action against an account whilst it remains in dispute.

 

The lack of a credit agreement is a very clear dispute and as such the following applies.

You may not demand any payment on the account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

You may not add further interest or any charges to the account.

You may not pass the account to a third party.

You may not register any information in respect of the account with any credit reference agency.

You may not issue a default notice related to the account.

 

 

I reserve the right to report your actions to any such regulatory authorities as I see fit. You have 14 days from receiving this letter to contact me with your intentions to resolve this matter which is now a formal complaint.

 

Despite my letter regarding ANY communication from your company, which stated that I require ALL communications in writing, your telephone callslink3.gif continue.

 

This behaviour constitutes harassment; the letters stated quite clearly to you that I require ALL communications in writing for future use. Do not telephone me again - remove any telephone numbers you hold for me from your systems.

 

Your telephone callslink3.gif are in breach of the Office of Fair Trading guidelines. If you continue with them after the receipt of this letter an official complaint, together with a log recording the times and frequency of the calls will be passed both to that office and to the Trading Standards office. For your information note that ALL telephone callslink3.gif are taped.

 

This type of debt collection method is contrary to the ‘Administration of Justice Act 1970’ in that it is intended to cause alarm and distress to the recipient. Your methods will not be tolerated. A formal complaint, containing copies of all correspondence including yours, has now been submitted to the relevant authorities. This will be relevant to questions of your fitness to hold a licence under the Consumer Credit Act, whether or not it results in a prosecution.

 

Take further note that continued telephone callslink3.gif after the receipt of a request not to call may constitute a criminal offence under Section 127 of the Communications Act 2003.

 

Communicate in writing and ONLY in writing, your telephone callslink3.gif will NOT be answered.

 

HOWEVER, CALLS WILL TRIGGER COMPLAINTS TO THE REGULATORY BODIES.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

I look forward to hearing from you in writing.

 

Yours faithfully

 

Print name do not sign,c send recorded and good luck.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...