Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I googled "prescribed disability" to see where it is defined for the purposes of S.92. I found HMRC's definition, which included deafness. I don't  think anyone is saying deaf people cant drive, though! digging deeper,  Is it that “prescribed disability” (for the purposes of S.88 and S.92) is defined at: The Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1999 WWW.LEGISLATION.GOV.UK These Regulations consolidate with amendments the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1996...   ….. and sleep apnoea / increased daytime sleepiness is NOT included there directly as a condition but only becomes prescribed under “liability to sudden attacks of disabling giddiness or fainting” (but falling asleep isn't fainting!), so it isn’t defined there as a “prescribed disability”  Yet, under S.92(2)(b) RTA 1988 “ any other disability likely to cause the driving of a vehicle by him in pursuance of a licence to be a source of danger to the public" So (IMHO) sleep apnea / daytime sleepiness MIGHT be a prescribed disability, but only if it causes likelihood of "driving being a source of danger to the public" : which is where meeting / not meeting the medical standard of fitness to drive comes into play?  
    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
    • The King is the second monarch to appear on Bank of England notes which will be fed gradually into the system.View the full article
    • The King is the second monarch to appear on Bank of England notes which will be fed gradually into the system.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

FSA To Review Waiver


crfx250
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5989 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I want you here too Money :cool:

  • 04/04/07 - £104 exit fee refund - Portman BS
  • Halifax Current a/c 20yr (closed) - in progress - all 20 years statements recovered!
  • Halifax Platinum Card 15 yr - Court Action Commenced - all 15 years statements recovered!
  • A&L Current a/c - You're next..

Write to your MP and

COMPLAIN about the ANTI-CONSUMER way in which the OFT Test Case is being handled!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 479
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

COMPLAIN TO YOUR MP ABOUT THE UNFAIR AND BIASED WAY THE FSA HAS HANDLED THE THE OFT CASE WHEN IT WAS SUPPOSEDLY ESTABLISHED TO SUPPORT CONSUMERS, NOT ISOLATE THEM

Just 5 Easy Steps!

  1. Use the template letter here
  2. Copy the text (amend if necessary but it will be fine as is for most people).
  3. click the link to the site shown at the bottom of the letter or click here
  4. Follow the instructions on the site to send to your MP (it will tell you who your MP is if you do not know.
  5. Go here to tell us which MP you've written to.

The letter can also be re-purposed to send to other representatives (Euro MPs, MSPs, Councillors etc.) - just modify it yourself as required

 

Thank you!

 

  • Haha 1
  • 04/04/07 - £104 exit fee refund - Portman BS
  • Halifax Current a/c 20yr (closed) - in progress - all 20 years statements recovered!
  • Halifax Platinum Card 15 yr - Court Action Commenced - all 15 years statements recovered!
  • A&L Current a/c - You're next..

Write to your MP and

COMPLAIN about the ANTI-CONSUMER way in which the OFT Test Case is being handled!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I like it MacBoy - 5 easy steps, thats what people like, easy, and only five steps - wonderful.:-D

  • Haha 1

The Waiver is an FSA Conspiracy with the banks against the consumer - Complain to your MP and the FSA about their shameful act!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers kog :D

  • 04/04/07 - £104 exit fee refund - Portman BS
  • Halifax Current a/c 20yr (closed) - in progress - all 20 years statements recovered!
  • Halifax Platinum Card 15 yr - Court Action Commenced - all 15 years statements recovered!
  • A&L Current a/c - You're next..

Write to your MP and

COMPLAIN about the ANTI-CONSUMER way in which the OFT Test Case is being handled!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now, now, DoS.... ;)

  • 04/04/07 - £104 exit fee refund - Portman BS
  • Halifax Current a/c 20yr (closed) - in progress - all 20 years statements recovered!
  • Halifax Platinum Card 15 yr - Court Action Commenced - all 15 years statements recovered!
  • A&L Current a/c - You're next..

Write to your MP and

COMPLAIN about the ANTI-CONSUMER way in which the OFT Test Case is being handled!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I'm calling it a day! Not one Mod decided to reply to me and yet I have had 17 threads deleted as unapproved ( this one will be next)

Sick of having to pick dummys up that have been thrown out of the pram.

 

Good luck to you all and I hope all works out. Thank you very much everyone who has put some hard work into this and I hope the letter gets results. I will still post questions for help on my forum, but I think the helping has had its day for me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DoS - check your PMs - and chill.. ;)

  • 04/04/07 - £104 exit fee refund - Portman BS
  • Halifax Current a/c 20yr (closed) - in progress - all 20 years statements recovered!
  • Halifax Platinum Card 15 yr - Court Action Commenced - all 15 years statements recovered!
  • A&L Current a/c - You're next..

Write to your MP and

COMPLAIN about the ANTI-CONSUMER way in which the OFT Test Case is being handled!

Link to post
Share on other sites

DoS we've only just started - we don't need the Mods, we have the tools here, we have like minded people visiting this thread and I'm sure there are people who are complaining.

 

You are just frustrated because you want an instant result. Its not going to happen, it takes time.

 

The waiver is being revued in a month or two so we have at least that much work to do to drum up more complaints for them to influence the outcome.

 

KBO

The Waiver is an FSA Conspiracy with the banks against the consumer - Complain to your MP and the FSA about their shameful act!

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the news this morning- Trutex who make school uniforms had a petition for people to sign to take to No 10 to stop adding VAT on school uniforms...........3,000 people signed it.........3,000!!

And what do we get for trying to help people? How many have we got?

Mind you we can look forward to the Charter- that'll have them worried :rolleyes:

 

OOPs! is that a robot I hear coming???

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

You won't get CAG-Botted for that :lol: I've also had a few barbed words to say about that whole charter nonsense too and I haven't been snipped y........

 

 

 

 

;)

  • 04/04/07 - £104 exit fee refund - Portman BS
  • Halifax Current a/c 20yr (closed) - in progress - all 20 years statements recovered!
  • Halifax Platinum Card 15 yr - Court Action Commenced - all 15 years statements recovered!
  • A&L Current a/c - You're next..

Write to your MP and

COMPLAIN about the ANTI-CONSUMER way in which the OFT Test Case is being handled!

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the news this morning- Trutex who make school uniforms had a petition for people to sign to take to No 10 to stop adding VAT on school uniforms...........3,000 people signed it.........3,000!!

And what do we get for trying to help people? How many have we got?

Mind you we can look forward to the Charter- that'll have them worried :rolleyes:

 

OOPs! is that a robot I hear coming???

 

:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

From the FSA website

The main practical effect of this waiver is to allow the firms to stop resolving complaints about unauthorised overdraft charges. We have reserved the right to revoke the waiver after two months if the county court and the FOS stays sought by the firms do not happen, or if we believe continuing with the waiver is inappropriate. We will renew it after 12 months if we are satisfied the criteria for granting the waiver are still being met and we think continuing it is not inappropriate (see Section 7 of the modification direction).

The Waiver is an FSA Conspiracy with the banks against the consumer - Complain to your MP and the FSA about their shameful act!

Link to post
Share on other sites

From the FSA website

The main practical effect of this waiver is to allow the firms to stop resolving complaints about unauthorised overdraft charges. We have reserved the right to revoke the waiver after two months if the county court and the FOS stays sought by the firms do not happen, or if we believe continuing with the waiver is inappropriate. We will renew it after 12 months if we are satisfied the criteria for granting the waiver are still being met and we think continuing it is not inappropriate (see Section 7 of the modification direction).

I won't hold my breath!

 

LOL Mac :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The above clause is a getout clause, its been put in because the FSA are quite prepared to remove this waiver if the conditions apply.

 

It is up to all of us on here to create them conditions through our complaints to the FSA and our MPs.

The Waiver is an FSA Conspiracy with the banks against the consumer - Complain to your MP and the FSA about their shameful act!

Link to post
Share on other sites

kog you're absolutely right - I'm thinking perhaps we should get a protest together at Canary Wharf soon too, if the MP thing starts to gain some traction...

  • 04/04/07 - £104 exit fee refund - Portman BS
  • Halifax Current a/c 20yr (closed) - in progress - all 20 years statements recovered!
  • Halifax Platinum Card 15 yr - Court Action Commenced - all 15 years statements recovered!
  • A&L Current a/c - You're next..

Write to your MP and

COMPLAIN about the ANTI-CONSUMER way in which the OFT Test Case is being handled!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, just found this thread. You are all doing a great job!

 

As some of you already know I have already started a dialogue with my MP Evan Harris and am in the process of writing to Hector Sants, John Fingleton and Walter Merricks using versions of the template.

 

I had one successful claim through the FOS (£9,320 from Lloyds TSB) but have had a second put on hold (£4,380 also Lloyds - it was a very tough few years!). My wife received a letter from Lloyds announcing that the complaint was on hold within three days, boy they can be quick when they want to be! No communication at all from the FOS about it.

 

The day the FOS suspension of complaints was announced I called the FOS to complain and was escalated two levels of management. Both had their answers off pat (apparently from the same crib sheet so they had been briefed) spouting the FSA line. Both also tried to discourage me from writing to my MP - cheeky b*****ds. This encourages me to push this campaign as hard as possible as this might be something they are concerned about.

 

Power to us all!

 

Muggy.

LTSB £9,356 settled in full through the FOS

**

SIGN the petition to make banks deal with charges

**

**

COMPLAIN to your MP about the FSA waiver and the ANTI-CONSUMER way in which the OFT

Test Case is being handled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has anyone had any reply from the FSA - I have't heard a peep from the rabble. They've battend down the hatches, has anyone complained to the FSA, I did but not a peep.

 

kog

 

this is what I received yesterday from the FSA when i emailed them.

 

]many thanks for your email which has been passed to the Chairman of the Consumer Panel, John Howard[

 

Jackie Allen[/

Consumer Panel Secretariat

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has anyone had any reply from the FSA - I have't heard a peep from the rabble. They've battend down the hatches, has anyone complained to the FSA, I did but not a peep.

 

I received a reply to my complaint within a day. Two of the points of the complaint were totally ignored. The other 2 were dismissed.

 

Basically the tone of the email was that they are entitled to introduce any rules they like and that they do not have to investigate complaints based on "dissatisfaction" with their decisions:evil:

 

They can do more wriggling than a rattlesnake grabbed by the tail!

Link to post
Share on other sites

duncan_disorderly - do you think you could reply to them, keep at them, pester them ask question, prod them. We need to keep building up the pressure. Tell them you are not satified by their reply, they have not answered two of your concerns and the two that they have are unsatisfactory.

 

From their site

Anyone directly affected by the way in which the FSA has exercised, or failed to exercise, its functions (other than its legislative functions) under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA) may complain about the FSA's alleged misconduct using the FSA Complaints Scheme.

The Waiver is an FSA Conspiracy with the banks against the consumer - Complain to your MP and the FSA about their shameful act!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great stuff:D

 

They've caused our heads to bleed its time for us to cause their heads to bleed.

The Waiver is an FSA Conspiracy with the banks against the consumer - Complain to your MP and the FSA about their shameful act!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone directly affected by the way in which the FSA has exercised, or failed to exercise, its functions (other than its legislative functions) under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA) may complain about the FSA's alleged misconduct using the FSA Complaints Scheme.

 

I have bolded the section in brackets above. The reply from the FSA quoted the following:

 

You have complained that the FSA's decision to grant a waiver to firms from the complaint-handling rules that apply has caused you detriment. Having assessed your complaint in accordance with the rules in COAF, we have concluded that the matter complained of is excluded from investigation under the rules of our Complaints Scheme.

Our decision is based on the following:-

 

Complaints about FSA's rules and guidance are excluded from investigation under the scheme by virtue of COAF 1.4.2.(3) which states:

 

1.4.2.(G) Each of the following is excluded from the complaints scheme:

 

...(3) complaints in relation to the performance of the FSA's legislative functions under the Act (including making rules and issuing codes and general guidance);

In addition we have concluded that your complaint is based on your dissatisfaction with the FSA's exercise of its regulatory discretion, and, therefore, we would not investigate it under our scheme by virtue of COAF 1.4.2.A which states:-

  • 1.4.2.A Circumstances under which the FSA will not investigate:

  • The FSA will not investigate a complaint under the complaints scheme which it reasonably considers amounts to no more than dissatisfaction with the FSA's general policies or with the exercise of, or failure to exercise, a discretion where no unreasonable, unprofessional or other misconduct is alleged.

I have asked them to send me a transcript of my complaint as completed on the online complaint form. I did not keep a copy, and will refer them to the points not addressed once I receive it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...