Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Shein has been linked to unethical business practices, including forced labour allegations.View the full article
    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

walton v rbos


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4882 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

paul does.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.netsight.co.uk/news/articles/RBS_Zope

 

INTERESTING LITTLE link above from 2006 .....

 

WHILST THE CONTENTS MAY OR MAY NOT RELATE TO the accounts "created" by RBS the link gives an insight into RBS behaviour

 

the words " secret squirrel " come to mind

quoting from it

 

"

25 Jan 2006

Royal Bank of Scotland Embraces Zope

 

From time to time we're involved in projects that we really, really can't talk about - no matter how much we'd like to.

But today one of those projects was picked up by ZDNet.co.uk, which we reproduce here:

---

The Royal Bank of Scotland has revealed that it is working on a large content management system based on the open source application server Zope.

At the end of last year, the bank sent an email to a number of Zope mailing lists, stating that it was looking for a developer to join the CMS development team in its Corporate Markets division, which provides financial services to large and medium-sized businesses and serves around 75,000 customers worldwide.

The job advert said that the bank was looking for a developer with three years experience of developing with Zope and Python and "demonstrable experience of working with and scaling high volume Zope sites".

RBS refused to provide further comment on the project, but ZDNet UK found out some more details about the project from Matt Hamilton, technical director at open source consultancy Netsight, which worked with RBS on the project.

He said that the project, which has been going on for about two years, [MEANING STARTED IN 2004 ????? ] is one of the largest deployments of Zope that he is aware of and also "one of the most sophisticated", although he was unwilling to provide technical details. RBS is using Zope to underpin the intranet for its corporate markets division. This intranet is used daily by RBS staff, including its traders, for business processes as well as retrieving information, according to Hamilton.

Graham Oakes, an independent consultant who has worked on a number of proprietary and open source CMS projects, said that it makes sense for RBS to use Zope on its intranet, as it will allow it to keep its costs down and will not directly impact customers.

"You don't need an all-singing and dancing fancy Web site if it's not for your customers," he said. "People have more control over their own intranet, for example, if people have a problem using it, you can train them. You can't do that for customers," he explained.

Oakes said that RBS's decision to use Zope is likely to encourage other companies to do the same.

"Although Linux has become pretty well established, open source applications that are further up the stack, like content management, are closer to users so companies are worried about how usable it is and how reliable it is," Oakes said. "Every little bit of publicity helps ? if you hear about a large organisation using Zope you get more assurance that it's an enterprise-ready system and that it's going to stay around."

Gary Barnett, a research director at analyst firm Ovum, agreed that this migration is likely to attract interest, particularly as banks tend to be "fairly conservative adopters".

"A lot of banks are using applications like Apache and Perl, but it's interesting to see they're using Python and Zope as it's moderately hardcore open source stuff," he said.

Although many banks run Linux servers, the use of open source in user-facing applications is more rare. The Allied Irish Bank is migrating 7,500 users to the Java Desktop System and BPU Banca is migrating 8,000 workstation clients to Linux desktops, Red Hat announced last year.

The reason why open source migrations in banks are often kept quiet is due to the commercial sensitivity of projects, according to Barnett. Other potential reasons why open source migrations are kept under wraps were covered in ZDNet UK's recent special report, published last November.

Hamilton said that until RBS sent the email to the mailing list, the Zope community was unaware of the project.

"This was the first public announcement that they were using it ? the Zope community didn't know," he said. "I think this signals a change in thinking ? large companies are realising that to get the best out of open source they have to work with the open source community."

Hamilton claimed that RBS has successfully recruited staff with experience in developing Zope systems since posting to the mailing list. Companies are likely to struggle to recruit open source developers through the normal channels, such as recruitment agencies, he added.

"With recruitment agencies ? if you say you're looking for a Zope developer, they won't have a clue what you're talking about. If you get in with the open source community you can find the right people," he said. "

:cool: sunbathing in juan les pins de temps en temps

Link to post
Share on other sites

As RBS have obtained a charge on D&Ds property the bank's processes outlined in a witness statement seem to contradict what they've told the press.

 

Qoute from the Sunday Times:

 

The bank claims the new loan accounts were created “purely” for administration and that it was never intended that the debts should be collected.

They were unable to explain exactly what the purpose of the “administrative accounts” was, why they had created them and how many customers were affected.

 

 

 

Contained in a witness statement submitted into court last year outlining the accounts purposes.

 

 

"In order to clarify the Bank's processes, when a customer's account defaults, the Bank closes the customer's branch account (in order that it can no longer be utilised), and the outstanding debt on that account is transfered to a new account set up within the Bank's Credit Management Sercices ("CMS"). CMS then use this account to track the debt and any interest thereon, with the ultimate aim of recovering the debt from the customer......

 

Regards

 

on the surface it seems the RBS definition of CMS as stated above is at a variance with the definition of CMS below :???:

 

 

"The Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) has revealed it is working on a large content management system (CMS) based on the open source application server Zope."

:cool: sunbathing in juan les pins de temps en temps

Link to post
Share on other sites

on the surface it seems the RBS definition of CMS as stated above is at a variance with the definition of CMS below :???:

 

 

"The Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) has revealed it is working on a large content management system (CMS) based on the open source application server Zope."

 

No. The devil of TLAs (three letter acronyms) is that they can refer to several different things.

 

Here RBS are doing exactly that - CMS - credit management services, an internalised TLA.

 

CMS - content management system, an externalised TLA, widely in use to mean content management system, which most internet savvy businesses have in one form or another.

 

Both are appropriate uses (if you must) of TLAs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Better and better:D

 

Got problems with NatWest, myself at the moment. Does anyone know the new Chairman's name and contact details?

 

I understand Mckpilock...ooops Mckillop stands down in the spring.

 

 

Howard Davies

Senior Manager, Public Affairs

12th Floor

280 Bishopsgate

London

EC2M 4RB

 

Sir Tom Mckillop

Chairman

Royal Bank of Scotland

36 St Andrew's Square

EDINBURGH

ED2 2YB

Edited by paulwlton
  • Haha 1

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

This'll remind RBS that this aint going away.

 

 

Howard Davies

Senior Manager, Public Affairs

12th Floor

280 Bishopsgate

London

EC2M 4RB

 

Date 31 Dec 2008

 

Dear Sir,

 

I refer to your letter forwarded to my honourable MP John Healey dated 2 April 2008 and in particular the statement you made in relation to my “recover accounts” where it is admitted and I quote you: “this was because his loan account was set up incorrectly as a different type of “recovery account”, However, you fail to state what the different type of “recovery account” is and whether you intend to rectify this error now that it’s been uncovered.

 

After receiving the bank’s confirmation that the accounts have been “set up incorrectly” I forwarded a notice pursuant to the Data Protection Act 1998 advising the bank to rectify this error and delete all incorrect data, the notice was sent by recorded delivery. However, according to the bank they never received such a notice contrary to the fact I have a dated electronic signature as prima facia proof of delivery and receipt.

 

Furthermore, at the recent court hearing a lawyer representing the bank submitted a document, which claimed the following, “the information on the accounts is both accurate and up to date” As you can imagine I am more than a little bemused and bewildered with your lawyers claim as this statement is contrary to the content of your letter dated 2nd April 2008 which I viewed as a matter of fact.

 

I have recently written to the bank’s solicitors in relation to the above matter and I am awaiting a response,

As of yet no explanation has been provided by the Bank as to why you are processing a “router account” which bears no resemblance to my indebtedness to the bank and yet this is entitled a “book debt”- monitoring for arrears. The banks failure to explain the true purpose of this “type of account” is now the subject of political concern as well as National media interest, as it has been stated by the Bank to the National Press that the Bank is not sure what the purpose of the "Router Accounts" and of what use of them are.

 

You are probably aware that a joint meeting is to take place between John Healey MP, Andrew Miller MP and Stephen Hester to try and resolve matters that have arisen from this serious unexplained erroneous accounting practice. Prior to this meeting myself and Andrew Miller’s constituent Mr William Grace are to attend a meeting in London with both our M.Ps, where we intend to put serious accusations on the table and demand that our concerns be answered one of which is if this “type of account” was never intended to be collected, then It is assumed these accounts were never presented to auditors as "performing assets", in other words RBSs “book debt” is not an asset.

 

I would like to make you aware that several media outlets are eagerly awaiting the outcome of this meeting, and are in constant touch with me with regard to the outcome and any updates I can supply them with, and of course Mr Grace, who has other serious concerns to raise.

 

I hope to receive a timely response to my criticisms .

 

Yours Faithfully

 

Paul Walton

 

Copy John Healey MP

Copy Information Commissioners Office

Copy Cobbetts LLP

Edited by paulwlton
  • Haha 1

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems all defaulting accounts passed to CMS are assigned to "routers". The "router account" is personal data as defined under the Data Protection Act 1998 and this should be forwarded on receipt of a Subject Access Request, this is not happening - RBS are treating this as some sort of internal account and have admitted to the Times that it should never have been revealed to customers (i wonder why?). In my view this is a breach of the DPA and anyone who doesn't receive their "router" after a request should make a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office.

 

Regards

 

 

AlanDickinsonRBS.jpg

Edited by paulwlton

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another load of rollocks

 

They make no reference to the fact that they have unlawfully added contractual % contrary to the original agreement. Nor does he explain why if it's only intended for internal use there is a need to include the T's & C's. Don't their own staff already know them.......... by heart.

 

Also there is no explanation as to why these 'internal' accounts & the inflated amounts have been litigated in the courts

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems all defaulting accounts passed to CMS are assigned to "routers". The "router account" is personal data as defined under the Data Protection Act 1998 and this should be forwarded on receipt of a Subject Access Request, this is not happening - RBS are treating this as some sort of internal account and have admitted to the Times that it should never have been revealed to customers (i wonder why?). In my view this is a breach of the Data Protection Act and anyone who doesn't receive their "router" after a request should make a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office.

 

Regards

 

 

RBS are now refusing point blank to produce the signed executed agreement for credit cards under a s78 request or a SAR. They claim it's not stored in a relevant filing system, so they don't have to supply it:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is absolute rubbish!!

 

Here's a thought.......

 

He says 'No new accounts are opened without the knowledge of our customers'!

 

Well... That is a blatant Lie, or has CMS Telford not been 'Honest' with him when they tell him what they are doing.

 

We have proof that they set up new accounts without our knowledge.

 

D&D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another load of rollocks

 

They make no reference to the fact that they have unlawfully added contractual % contrary to the original agreement. Nor does he explain why if it's only intended for internal use there is a need to include the T's & C's. Don't their own staff already know them.......... by heart.

 

Also there is no explanation as to why these 'internal' accounts & the inflated amounts have been litigated in the courts

 

Agreed...rollocks.

Edited by paulwlton

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is absolute rubbish!!

 

Here's a thought.......

 

He says 'No new accounts are opened without the knowledge of our customers'!

 

Well... That is a blatant Lie, or has CMS Telford not been 'Honest' with him when they tell him what they are doing.

 

We have proof that they set up new accounts without our knowledge.

 

D&D

 

RBS will probably claim that your accounts were set up "as a different type of recovery account" not as a new account has you claim. (but we know different).

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

As this man Alan Dickinson has stated the router account is an automated program ..To Force any data controller to supply ALL information they hold including all information regarding automated data and decisions you must specify this..taken from the legal guidance given by the Information Commissioners Office

 

"In order to obtain this informationthe data subject must specifically request it when making the subject access request by virtue of the Data Prorection ( Subject Access) (Fees and Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations 2000 (S.I No 191).

 

sparkie

Edited by Sparkie1723
Link to post
Share on other sites

The explanation of the new "router account" number ......to prevent duplication with customers with the same name....................I would have thought that the unique bank account Number given to your bank account, one which is recognised through out the world banking system would be sufficient to attend those particular needs............no one else has the same account number as you ...so what is the problem and why change the account number......to enable manipulation of accounts .....and for no other reason.

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

As this man lan Dickinson has stated the router account is an automated program ..To Force any data controller to supply ALL information they hold including all information regarding automated data and decisions you must specify this..

 

In our original SAR to Joyce E Tudor, there was no mention of router accounts. But in our "Diary event history" from CMS it mentions router accounts, & even the account numbers. It was from this that we specifically asked for data .....& got it.

Oh, & the banks Solicitor also had our router account numbers.Not so internal then.

Debs

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...