Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok i think we may have the issue, so its been just over 6 months since i was banned and when i defended the case and it should have been rescinded. I have just spoken to the courts, and they informed the DVLA that the ban should have been overturned. Now you need to reapply for your license when you have been banned, and they give a window of 45 days i believe after it has expired. The dates add up, what i think has happened is that my details have been removed from the system because i was banned for 6 months (when i shouldn't have been) and the additional days on top. If this is the case then i surely i can sue these idiots until the cows come home, i have been driving whilst banned (again when i shouldn't have been)  and this can affect my job, imagine i had been pulled over with my son in the car, they would have just arrested me and not listened to a word of my story.  
    • First thing to do is what the the DVLA website extract says - write to the Central Casework Group with full details of your licence, adding that you spoke to DVLA call centre xx/xx/xxxx and they told you they couldn't see the details either.  Get proof of posting. Are you in physical possession of your Driving Licence Photocard? And the card shows it is still current? If so include a photocopy of it when you write to DVLA. There's no reason for you to assume that the licence has been cancelled or that you have been banned. Just some IT problem at DVLA. I wouldn't go into all the stuff about your court case last year. There's no evidence that the current glitch in the DVLA system is anything to do with it and it will just muddy the waters.  Most comparision sites ask for your licence number. You can get quotes without the licence being checked but when you take up an insurer's quote they then check your licence number against the DVLA website to make sure it is valid and to check if any Points for motoring offences are recorded. If you are unable to access your licence details on DVLA then insurers won't be able to either so they will refuse to proceed and cancel their quote. 
    • How about posting the full email, rather than just the bits you want us to see??
    • Hi Folks,   Thank you for your help so far. Please find below the correspondence so far from various parties. If I've missed anything, please let me know. Again, apologies for not posting the correct stuff. I thought I'd lost it all, turns out it was on a rarely used pc Letter advising of change of address will be posted shortly, with proof of posting not tracked. Buncrana 1 Edited Notice To Keeper ECP.pdf 2 ECP Back of PCN.pdf 3 DRP Edited 25012021.docx 4 DRP Back of letter.docx 5 POPLA Appeal redacted.pdf 6 DCBL 30:04:24 Redacted.pdf ESSO Cobham Signage.pdf
    • Thanks just looked at SARequest It wouldn’t make ebay have to say why they suspended me. all their email said was that it was related to buying activity. But under that bike buying activity there are about five different reasons why it could’ve been. But they haven’t specified which of these five reasons it was.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

What do DCAs pay for a debt?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5993 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

TVM,

"DCA employees probably wonder how debt avoiders sleep at night."

 

A lot of people who suffer financial difficulties through no fault of their own visit this site for help and support from caring, generous people.

 

[edit]

 

Mod Note: Please refrain from making personal attacks

The only man who sticks closer to you in adversity than a friend is a creditor.

 

Debt Collection Charges

 

There is no legal basis for a creditor or a debt collection agency acting on its behalf to claim collection costs from a debtor unless there is an express provision in the original agreement.

 

Without such provision, collection charges cannot be demanded as a debt due under the agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

TVM

 

Just like you have been on other threads!

  • Haha 1

The only man who sticks closer to you in adversity than a friend is a creditor.

 

Debt Collection Charges

 

There is no legal basis for a creditor or a debt collection agency acting on its behalf to claim collection costs from a debtor unless there is an express provision in the original agreement.

 

Without such provision, collection charges cannot be demanded as a debt due under the agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please remember that it is against forum rules to make a verbal/post/attack upon any other user.

 

Moreso though, the Site Helpers & Moderating team are all unpaid volunteers.

 

Please remember this when venting any anger against any moderation that may occur. :)

 

Let's all be nice to each other.. :D

 

Regards, Dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the few months I've been a CAGger I've formed the view that the majority of posters just wish to reclaim fines levied by their bank, with the next biggest group genuinely seeking help to pay off their debts at a rate they can reasonably afford.

 

There are a few - very few in my opinion - looking to avoid their responsibilities plus the odd nutter here and there.

 

As far as I am concerned I try to offer guidance to someone most days.

 

I don't look for gratitude (but the occasional reputation click is gratifying!) but I don't need moralists preaching from on high either.

 

Even as I write I wonder how x and y are managing, and whether I managed to help them in some small way.

 

And, as Mrs. Van would tell you, I am not a pompous do-gooder either.

 

To quote Alexander Dumas, "One for all, and all for one"

 

And that was written long before Britain became the rip-off, sleazy country it has now become.

 

Vandermerwe

Link to post
Share on other sites

"There are a few - very few in my opinion - looking to avoid their responsibilities plus the odd nutter here and there".

 

If only that were true! Most (not all) debt is caused by persons seeking to have a lifestyle they want but cannot afford. How many debtors debts are caused by overspending on food, heating etc? How much by clamouring the designer clothes, nice cars, nice drugs, nice houses etc etc.

 

Ask a bailiff how many poor unfortunate debtors have plasma screens and a nice sky package. Most is the correct answer.

 

OK the banks and the credit card companies tempt you, but you dont have to say yes. Taking the money and not paying it back is no different to taking ANYTHING and not paying or giving it back. Its theft simple as that!

 

Yes those in debt due to illness, unemployment etc should be given sympathy. As for the rest? Why sympathise at all?

Link to post
Share on other sites

BBC NEWS | Business | Zambia loses 'vulture fund' case

 

buy for 2 million sue for 42 million !

=====================

 

may i suggest that a copy of the link below be forwarded as part of any defence to give the court an insight into "what dca's pay for a debt"

 

"even a country isn't safe"

 

Oxfam GB :: Vulture fund must not take cash from Zambia, say campaigners

Tam Wing Chuen -v- Bank of Credit and Commerce Hong Kong Ltd [1996] 2 BCLC 69

 

1996

PC

Lord Mustill Commonwealth,

 

Lord Mustill discussed the need to construe a contract contra preferentem: "the basis of the contra proferentem principle is that the person who puts forward the wording of a proposed agreement may be assumed to have looked after his own interests, so that if words leave room for doubt about whether he is intended to have a particular benefit there is reason to suppose that he is not."

Link to post
Share on other sites

The term "vulture" fund is used to describe investment companies that circle round very poor countries at a time when they are renegotiating unpayable debts, often run up by a previous, corrupt regime.

The funds buy up the debt on international markets at way below its face value and then try to enforce collection of the debt at full face value plus interest. The debt is usually cheap because in most cases there is little expectation it will ever be repaid.

In this case, Zambia's original debt of $30m was offered for redemption by Romania for $3m but bought by Donegal for nearly $4m. Donegal then persuaded Zambia to agree to pay $15m, a figure since inflated by legal costs and interest to what Donegal says is more than $50m.

Tam Wing Chuen -v- Bank of Credit and Commerce Hong Kong Ltd [1996] 2 BCLC 69

 

1996

PC

Lord Mustill Commonwealth,

 

Lord Mustill discussed the need to construe a contract contra preferentem: "the basis of the contra proferentem principle is that the person who puts forward the wording of a proposed agreement may be assumed to have looked after his own interests, so that if words leave room for doubt about whether he is intended to have a particular benefit there is reason to suppose that he is not."

Link to post
Share on other sites

"In 2002, Gordon Brown told the United Nations that the vulture funds were perverse and immoral. "

 

"We particularly condemn the perversity where vulture funds purchase debt at a reduced price and make a profit from suing the debtor country to recover the full amount owed - a morally outrageous outcome."

 

I reckon our Gordon should be looking a little closer to home in his quest to be seen as a guardian of the poor

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...