Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • yep, throw that morality card out the window....9/10 you never owe a DCA ANYTHING!! they are NOT BAILIFFS!!
    • (See the link to DVLA’s INF188/6 document I posted above, page 4 as cited) “I have a new medical condition that I have told the DVLA about on my recent application. Can I drive? As soon as the DVLA receives your correct and complete application for a new licence and as long as you meet all the Section 88 criteria, you may drive. It is important that you are satisfied that the medical condition you have declared on your application does not stop you from driving. If you are unsure, check with your doctor or healthcare professional before you make a decision. You can also look up your condition in the ‘Assessing fitness to drive’ guide, which you can find at www.gov.uk/dvla/fitnesstodrive to see whether you meet the medical standards for driving. As this guide is intended for healthcare professionals, it can be complicated. Your doctor or healthcare professional should be able to help you if necessary." It seems that DVLA think that S.88 does apply for applications disclosing a new medical condition after all. Why might this be so, and what of “qualifying application" and "relevant disability"? S. 92(1) imposes on the driver a requirement to disclose a relevant disability. S.92(3) requires the Secretary of State to refuse such an application disclosing a relevant disability ….. EXCEPT S.92(4) requires the Secretary of State to grant such an application if the relevant disability is “adequately controlled”. Hence my belief S.88 can apply for medical conditions (if the driver meets the medical standard of fitness to drive) as the application remains a qualifying application IF the driver meets the medical standard of fitness to drive, until DVLA (on behalf of the Secretary of State) say it doesn’t, provided the driver believes they meet the (medical) standard. Additionally, at (or before) June 2013 (as noted in my previous post) the medical standard for fitness to drive for conditions involving excessive daytime sleepiness was changed from “completely controlled” to "adequately controlled".  
    • CFO Bill Guan allegedly led a team at the news outlet that was behind a global money laundering scheme.View the full article
    • Anyway, I've asked my Booking.com flat-rent-out-bloke what needs to be done on the Booking.com portal to cancel a reservation. I got a late message "I'll let you know tomorrow".
    • I see that at the start of your thread you said they hadn't sent a Letter of Claim.  And in fact in all the uploaded material there is no LoC.  This is great news.  Even were you to lose - you won't - the judge would chop off a chunk of the money for their non-respect of PAPLOC. However, I'm a bit confused as you've named the file name as a SAR.  Are you sure about this?  Did you send any other letters apart from the one dx advised which was a CPR request (not a SAR) to DCBL (not Group Nexus).  I'm not being pernickety, this will be important for your Witness Statement further down the line.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

close premium finance help needed


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5864 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hiya, Checked the mcol today. Close premium finance are defending the claim. I presume i will get a copy of there defence through post.

 

Also am i right in thinking it will now get transferred to my local court?

 

I never recieved the breakdown of the charges that they promised me suprise suprise.

 

keep you posted

 

 

karen

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Karen, yes you are right, it will get transferred to your local court. I wonder if they have put the breakdown in their defence.......LOL:p

And if you do end up in court with them it won't be intimidating, it's quite an informal set up, tables and chairs etc with just the people there that are needed. I went back last year to sit in on a directions hearing for bank charges. It was very insightful:)

When you said they could account for the £30 charge, was that in writing?...where in the country are you? (if you don't want to disclose this on here please PM me)

Thanks for keeping us informed:D

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya, Received today my notice of tranfer proceedings, defence and allocation questionaire.

 

This is there defence

 

Close premium finance enables clients to spread the cost of their insurance premium by borrowing through a loan acount and then making repayments over an agreed instalment period, which is usually 6,10 or 12 months. The client enters into a running account agreement with close premium finance, which allows them to renew the loan agreement year after year.

Miss karen xxxxxxx entered such an agreement on 23rd june 2006 when her appointed insurance broker, maynard milton insurance services, arranged for finance to pay for a private car insurance policy to the value of £333.75, The loan was set up to be paid over ten monthly instalments of £42.02 with the first payment due on 24th July 2006.

 

The claimant frequently defaulted on repayments during the course of the loan agreement, On each occasion that a payments was returned unpaid a default charge was levied. Evidence for this can be provided if required.

 

The law allows us to impose default charges which are a "resonalbe pre-estimate" of our costs for dealing with an account once it falls into arrears. This includes the adminstrative, staffing and systems cost of communicating about the state of the account, answering and additonal queries there may be and/or renegotiating the loan.

 

The law also allows us to charge interest on any amount owing to us.

 

The terms and conditions of our agreement set out our legal position in relation to default. Under those terms and conditions, clients have agreed to reimburse us for all resonable costs and expenses directly or indirectly incurred by us in connection with any failrue by them to pay any amount due in respect of the account.

 

In addition, under those terms and conditions we are entitled to charge defulat interest on any amount which remains unpaid on an account after a default.

 

Our defualt fee has been calculated in view of our legal position and the costs we are legally entitled to recover under the law of contract and under the terms of the agreement between us and our client.

 

we also point out that we have not charged default interest in this case, despite our entitlement to do so. We are therefore unable to refund these charges, as they have been properly and resonably levied.

 

 

Not sure what to make of all that. Read it 3 times now.. Should i be worried.

 

Regarding the allocations questionaire ive nearly completed it but on the "other information" secion should i include anything on there or do i send any documents with this form back to the court?

 

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

 

Stadium it was actually over the phone that i was promised a breakdown i still have the guys name and then i wroted when it didnt arrive. It still didnt arrive.

Im in essex.

 

(sorry its long dont blame me blame close pf)

 

karen

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not necessary to keep bumping this post up just because it went from the top post down to post no 3.

Cahoot - Rejection of offer sent 14/06/07

 

Barclaycard - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 22/03/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry if my original post was a little short. Unfortunately for some of us those that provide assistance do so voluntarily and cannot be here 24/7.

I understand that going to court etc can be a stressful/worrying experience but there are many on here who are in the same position and its not fair to them/their case to needlessly 'Bump' over them.

 

What I am trying to say is that it would have been far better if you had actually posted that you really needed some urgent help/advice or reassurance rather than just a meaningless 'Bump'.

 

That being said I hope that the experience today isnt too stressful for you and you are successful in your claim. Good Luck. :)

Cahoot - Rejection of offer sent 14/06/07

 

Barclaycard - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 22/03/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Karen, I'm sorry I can't help much with this.... they keep referring to them as default charges, not admin charges, which is a help, I would think....reasonable pre-estimate eh? Thats a laugh! What did you put in your POC, did you ask then to disclose their costs? It's a shame you have no proof of what was said on the phone:(

I did have a good look to see if I could find a similar case in the threads, but couldn't. It may well be that they are just doing what the banks do...try and put up a fight but give in at the final hurdle. I'm not sure about the other information bit, nothing is required for bank claims, so I would say leave it blank (unless someone else knows different?)

 

Try not to stress too much, this all just seems pretty straight forward. Thank you for the click, much appreciated:)

I asked where you were cos I was thinking about a court buddy, but you are a bit far away from me..it hopefully won't come to that eh...if it does I'm sure there will be someone here that can go along with you for support. keep up the great work!:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that stadium.

 

People probably read this and think silly woman its only a court case. But ive never actually been into a court and when the court papers come yesterday i was very stressed..

 

I spent ages yesterday looking through posts about allocation questonairre and couldnt find much about the other info so am going to leave it blank i think.

 

I will keep you updated. I presume the next think i will recieve is a court date. omg

 

karen

Link to post
Share on other sites

After another search on the site I did find a couple of threads relating to Close and their extortionate charges....where members want to reclaim..either no one has gone as far as claiming them back or they've just not posted the outcome. I don't know what happened here but someone managed to get money back from Close (but they don't say what for) http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/vehicle-retailers-manufacturers/37213-missy-close-motor-finance.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that stadium.

 

People probably read this and think silly woman its only a court case. But ive never actually been into a court and when the court papers come yesterday i was very stressed..

 

I spent ages yesterday looking through posts about allocation questonairre and couldnt find much about the other info so am going to leave it blank i think.

 

I will keep you updated. I presume the next think i will recieve is a court date. omg

 

karen

The court isn't as daunting as you might think, but I totally understand why you feel the way you do, anyone would who's never stepped foot in one would be the same. You are not being silly, what you are doing isn't to be taken lightly, court is court, whether you are the claimant or not you should be prepared and know what you are doing. You are doing a fab job so far, be proud of yourself!:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that stadium will go and have a read now..

There wasn't much to read really LOL....if you do a search for close premium, or close motor insurance (or any variation) you will come up with a few threads that will show you aren't the only one doing this....but so far I've not been able to find a thread that has gone as far as you have:???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

People probably read this and think silly woman its only a court case. But ive never actually been into a court and when the court papers come yesterday i was very stressed.

 

 

I certainly dont think so - usually just a fear of the unknown and not knowing exactly what to expect. You will probably walk out of there, if it actually goes to court(remember many settle beforehand) wondering what all the fuss was about.

Cahoot - Rejection of offer sent 14/06/07

 

Barclaycard - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 22/03/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya, No i dont do i need them?

 

Also i still cant find much to do with allocation questionaire if anyone can confirm i dont sent anything with it in the post just the form and that i leave the other information part blank.

 

thanks in advance

 

karen

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Karen, sorry for not getting back to you sooner..... regarding 'other information'part, you should refer to any documents you think might help the judge manage the claim, and make reference to any documents you will be using (tho you don't need to include them with the form) I think also a request for the judge to order a form of basic disclosure. You have already asked them for a breakdown of their charges and they have not supplied. (did you ever request this in writing? if not maybe you should, and refer to the telephone conversation regarding it, in your letter)

 

They state in their defence:

Our defualt fee has been calculated in view of our legal position and the costs we are legally entitled to recover under the law of contract and under the terms of the agreement between us and our client.

and so refer to the T&C's.....of which you do not have a copy? I think you should request a copy asap and state in the 'other info' section that you are awaiting a copy of the T&C's.

T&C's have become very important in bank claims now, and I think the same applies here, as it's basically the same sort of claim.

 

How long have you got before the AQ needs to be returned?

 

This is purely just my advice, I'm no expert in this:) I have taken some info from the bank library AQ information section and tried to fit it in with your claim. I hope it is of some help.

I am willing to help and support you all the way with this, however and whenever I can. These charges are extortionate and whatever happens with your case will definately go towards helping others (myself included, as I intend to do this early next year:D )

Link to post
Share on other sites

Heres T&C page for download if needed, sorry writing is so small but only copy available.

 

Send big files the easy way with sendspace. Files too large for email attachments? No problem!

 

Thank you, thank you shudder!!:D that is extremely handy!!!

 

There you go Karen, you won't need to ask them for T&C's.....wonder if they even have a copy? LOL.

 

I am going to go away and have a good read of them later:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

There isn't anything refering to specific figures only their right to make a charge.

 

From the brokers side I do tend to find Close Brothers one of the better premium finance providers although I do think their charges are excessive. We have even gone to the point of disclosing their charges in bold writing and in a bigger typeface on all our premium advices so the charge is more transparrent to the customers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks so much again for all your help. Can i just write in the other info box that i have requested a copy of the t & c and that i have requested a breakdown of the charges twice and never receieved them?

 

Also you said about the basic disclosure. Do i just write that i want the judge to order this or is there any particular way of doing this.

 

I just havent got a clue have i lol

 

thanks

 

karen

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think something along the lines of:

I respectfully ask the Judge to order a form of basic disclosure, as despite repeated requests, I have been refused a breakdown of the defendants costs regarding their penalty charges.

I have also requested a copy of the terms and conditions of the account, of which I have yet to recieve.

 

Still request a copy of T&C's from them, even though we have a copy from shudder they aren't very easy to read and you would need a clear copy on paper to take into court with you (if it gets that far)

 

I had a read of them last night, and I don't like them very much. I haven't got time right now to highlight the points that concern me, but will get back later today. If you get chance Karen, have a good read of those T&C's. There is no mention of any specific charges or costs, so I don't see how they can use it in their defence!:confused: ....a good thing I think:)

 

Thanks for the info shudder.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...