Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I thought I should send the begging letter to the prosecutor. Does the hearing means the time I need to send back by? If so, it’s June 5  I plan to send the new begging letter as following, can I ask for some suggestions? Dear Investigator/Prosecutor,  Thank you for your reply. I deeply regret my actions and the inconvenience they have caused.  I’m extremely remorseful for my crime. and regret it everyday. I often ask myself ‘’how can I do that thing just because I felt it is interesting. There are a lot of crimes in the world, but feeling it’s interesting is certainly not a reason to crime. I should not crime with any reason.’’ I think about these things every day, and I understand that I can’t blame anyone but myself.  I thanks to the staff who stopped me, as this is a valuable lesson in my life. I told myself that I should never ever repeat such a thing again, and never ever do anything which is possible to be in breach of any law. As a result, I carefully tap my oyster card every time before I enter the station now. I remind myself that I did a wrong thing before, and I should never let it happen again.  Although my monthly travel expenses do not warrant a season ticket, but I just renew my season ticket (please see the attachment). I understand that a crime cannot be truly compensated for, but purchasing a season ticket offers me a small measure of comfort, knowing that my actions caused a loss to the public interest.  I received an email which ask me to negotiate being class teacher in this summer (please see the attachment). I hope that I could teach the lovely students again, which may not be allowed with a criminal record. I would please ask that you would please provide me a single opportunity to settle all outstanding sums owed outside of court without the need for legal proceedings which would have a determinantal impact on my teaching career.  I sincerely apologise again for my crime. If you need anything further from me to help you please let me know.   Yours sincerely,
    • LoL Dx you crack me up. Thanks for the advice. I'll stay positive.
    • Utter Rubbish!! lowell dont write and beg for deals once they start court. as for your attitude, we'll thats nothing new for you.😎 you wont be quizzed, it's not like TV, simply refer to your defence/WS when answering anything the judge may ever ask. well it involves chickens. dx  
    • Thanks fk, I hope I don't have to face the court. Bless you for the reassurance. 
    • Keep an eye out on the post, you may get a discontinuation notice. Im sure however youll be okay. You seem to have enough evidence to dispute the balance. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Robinson, Way & Co


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5705 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

After a run in with Lowell Portfolio I have now received a letter from Robinson way and co.

I sent a CCA request to these in March and they kindly took my £1 fee of the balance and I havent heard a peep off these people since.

Then today I received a letter off them which says:

 

FORMAL DEMAND FOR PAYMENT

 

We are authorised by our client to recover the full amount due, quoted above. This is a formal notice of intended court action. We will take action unless YOU PAY US THE FULL AMOUNT YOU OWE WITHIN 7 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS LETTER.

If court action is taken and a court considers your failure to pay to be due to your refusal or neglect to pay, an order for repayment may be made. If you fail to pay in accordance with a court payment order, the following may occur:

* A process of enforcement by court officers

* An order for deductions from your earnings

* An unpaid Court order may make future credit difficult to obtain

* If you are a homeowner, we may seek to apply a charge to your property

THIS DEBT WILL NOT GO AWAY - IT MAKES SENSE TO PAY IN FULL - NOW.

 

Is there a letter I could send to remind them of my request, I have learned that these people say a lot of these things to get you to contact them. They have also rang my house a few times in the last few days.

 

Penny.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 100
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You need to send a letter back stating that they are in criminal default of your CCA and to NEVER call you again.

Threaten further action if they do.

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may wish to adapt this letter to your needs:

 

I refer to my letter dated {enter date} which was delivered via Recorded Delivery to your offices on {enter delivery date}.

 

You have failed to acknowledge this request in any way, whether by confirmation of receipt of the letter or by supplying the requested documents. The documents I requested should be readily available as proof of your legal right to collect this account.

 

In my letter of the {enter date} I made a formal request for a copy of the signed, executed credit agreement for the above account under Section 77(1) and Section 78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and a true signed copy of the Deed of Assignment. In addition a full statement of my account should have been sent to me detailing all debits and credits to the account from the time {debt agency name} purchased this account, along with any other documents mentioned in the credit agreement.

 

You are reminded that you are obliged to supply these documents, whether you are the original creditor or not, as defined under Section 189 of the CCA 1974.

 

The Consumer Credit Act allows 12 working days for this request to be carried out before your company enter into a default situation. If the request is not satisfied after a further 30 calendar days, your company commit an offence. These time limits expired on {enter date} and {enter date} respectively.

 

As you are no doubt aware, Section 78(6) states:

If the creditor under an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1) -

 

(a) He is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement; and

(b) If the default continues for one month he commits an offence.

 

Therefore on {enter offence date} this account became unenforceable at law and no further payment will be made by myself to the account, as you have failed to comply with a request for a true signed copy of the said agreement, and other relevant documents mentioned in it, and failed to send a full statement of the account and failed to provide a true copy of the Deed of Assignment, under the relevant sections of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. Further, i do not acknowledge any debt to {debt agency name}.

 

I require the following action from {debt agency name} :

 

1. All payments made to date to {debt agency name} for this account should be refunded in full, including interest at the rate of 8% per annum.

 

2. Removal of all defaults entered by {debt agency name}. Note this is to be a complete deletion and not merely an amendment.

3. I look forward to compensation under Section 13 of the Data Protection Act 1998 to be offered for the processing of my data in the manner it has been done over the past number of years.

 

4. After a full refund of all payments with interest and compensation are received by myself, you will be required under Section 10 and Section 12 of the Data Protection Act 1998 to cease and desist all manual and automatic processing of my data within your company and any other company within your group.

 

If you do not respond positively to my request, court action may be taken under Section 14 of the Data Protection Act 1998 to force {debt agency name} or any other company within the group to comply with the refund of all monies paid, removal of all defaults maintained and compensation for damage and distress as a result of unlawful data processing. I may also pass the matter to the relevant enforcement authorities including, but not limited to, the OFT, the Information Commissioners Office, Trading Standards, the CSA, the FOS and my local MP.

 

I look forward to your reply within 14 days to resolve the matter amicably.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this what they've sent?

 

RW-NoLP.jpg

 

Report them to Manchester Trading Standards:

City of Manchester

Trading Standards Office

1 Hammerstone Road

Gorton

Manchester

M18 8EQ

 

 

t: 0161 234 1555

f: 0161 957 8379

e: [email protected]

w: Manchester City Council Trading Standards Service

 

Good luck, regards, Dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, definately report them, they are not supposed to send out letters which look like official court documents... this definately is against the OFT regulations.

 

Robinson Way, along with Westcot(t) and Moorcroft are PITA's who will try anything. I've recently had three debts returned by Westcot and am after having all tracing info they placed on my credit reference account removed as all three debts were returned to clients without further action. In two cases the debts had already been cleared! The third one was two weeks away from being statute barred.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send the letter Rory suggests above, also contact Manchester TS's.

 

If you get an account at Photobucket, upload the scan and paste the IMG CODE on a blank line, makes it easier to see, also, black out the barcode on the letter!

 

And have a read of my fun and games with my favourite friends! If they had a braincell between them they'ld be dangerous!

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/71386-diskmandave-robinson-way-co.html

 

Regards, Dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that Dave.

I have been reading through your Robinson Way thread and your Lowell thread too as I also have sent them a CCA. I will get the letter sent out to Robinson way tomorrow and report them too. Ill also get my daughter to sort out the photobucket account so I can show any letters or agreements(if any) I get back. Its a bit much when you have to get your kids to show you how to work a computer.:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

After getting my daughter to scan the letter and show me how to attach the file hopefully here it is . . .

How did you recieve this letter. A statutory demand should be served in person. If this is not possibe a request may be made at court to have it served by recorded delivery. You probably got this by 2nd class post and its not worth the paper its written on

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes ODC you're right, it was sent second class post. They'll try anything to scare people. I wouldn't have known that if it wasn't for this site, and they know people will be scared into ringing them, I would have done a few months ago.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Fallenangel

I've got one of those letters, it's exactley the same as that one.....word for word. Unfortunately (for RW) its on a debt that is statute barred!!!.......should I report them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Report them to Trading Standards.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just typed out the letter in hope of sending it off today, went to print it out and discovered I've ran out of ink. Typical. So it will have to be tomorrow. I've been printing so many letters out lately what with bank charge claims and CCA's.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep a note of the date and time of all calls recieved from these imbeciles from the date they received you letter. They cannot deny receiving it so have no excuse to ring you. If you get a witheld call you may want to answer it. If they ask for penny peny ask who is calling. If they refuse to answer hang up. You may consider getting all witheld calls blocked by your telephone supplier. I did this a long time ago and it dramatically reduced the number of callls from the ****

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, there have been no further phone calls from RW & Co but today I received this letter:

 

We refer to your recent communication requesting a signed agreement relating to the above account

Recent??? I originally sent it in March!!!

As with most Home Shopping accounts, you will not have signed a credit agreement. You are deemed to have agreed to the terms and conditions of the credit, which were relayed in the catalogue itself, when you placed your first order.

 

By ordering goods from the catalogue, you are liable for payment of those goods. If you are denying responsibility for the debt, we would ask what steps you have taken to return the goods you did not intend paying for?

 

The debt remains outstanding and we require an offer of payment by return.

 

What now? Is this just a standard letter? And what happened to "We will take you to court if you do not pay in full within 7 days of this letter"

 

Is there any reply I can give to this letter or are they just trying to scare me into phoning them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCA still applies.

They are trying their normal smoke and mirrors approach.

I'd send back a CCA noncompliance letter AGAIN and remind them of what is required.

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are talking sh!t. There are numerous threads on here where it has been proven that they still need to produce the CCA

 

Its a standard RWC scare letter. Ignore it and NEVER EVER phone them. You could complain to TS about Clownells sending a debt which was in dispute to another scummy DCA. Contact Clownells and ask for a copy of their complaints pprocedure

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks ODC, thats what I thought. I won't ring them nor will I answer the phone to them. It's amazing the lengths they'll go to to get people to pay them money, but I suppose for every 1 person that stands up to them there will be a load that get scared into paying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks ODC, thats what I thought. I won't ring them nor will I answer the phone to them. It's amazing the lengths they'll go to to get people to pay them money, but I suppose for every 1 person that stands up to them there will be a load that get scared into paying.

Unfortunately that is true. I was one of them until I discovered this site and the CCA 1974 plus other laws. They are pure **** the whole lot of the and in my peronal opinion anyone who lowers themselves to work for them was probably bullied at school. They have no brains or common sense. No help to sort the problem out amicably. Straight into threat mode immediatly/ W anchors

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...