Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi just typed all defence clicked next and it's deleted all. Any help
    • I forgot to say, there is one last possibility and that is that they will receive your letter of rejection and simply fold, accept the rejection and refund you. Don't wait too long for this. Seven days maximum – but in that seven days you could send your letter of claim anyway and when that you don't hear from them or when they start mucking around at least you are seven days closer to beginning the legal action – and they will know it (which is the important thing).
    • Okay that is excellent that you have an email between the garage and the warranty company confirming that there is a serious problem with the gearbox. That is very powerful evidence. I think the situation is this: you have sent them a letter of rejection but the reputation of big motoring world is that they won't take a lot of notice and they will try to prevaricate and maybe even blame you. Clearly you don't want the car any more and anyway it sounds as if the cost of repairs is going to be enormous. You don't know if the warranty company is going to step up to the mark but the whole thing is going to take a long time and I understand that you have lost confidence in big motoring world because of this event and also their reputation which you are now discovering on Facebook and on this forum and no doubt elsewhere. On the basis that you don't want the car any more and you want your money back, you need to hurry things along. I think the first thing is that you need to decide if you are prepared to bring a claim in the County Court. Even without the warranty money, the claim is worth more than £10,000. For actions less than £10,000, you bring a "small claim" and this means that even if you lose the case you won't be liable for the other side's costs. If you win the case then not only will you get your money plus interest but also you will recover all of the costs of the action. For actions more than £10,000, you go to something called the "fast track" and in the event that you lose the case, then you could be liable to reimburse the winner some of the costs. This means that in addition to not recovering your own money, you would lose your own court fees and also you would have to to bear the costs of the other side probably something less than £5000 – but as a rough guess. If you bring your court claim then your chances of success are almost 100%. Frankly if you brought a court claim then I can imagine that big motoring world will put their hands up and pay you out rather than face go to court and losing and getting a judgement against them. However, it you need to consider that this is a risk factor – although my view it is a negligible risk factor. If you did bring a court case, it wouldn't be instant. If they put their hands up then it would probably happen very quickly. If they didn't put their hands up then you could take anything up to a year for the matter to be resolved and during that time you would be without your car and without your money and in the middle of litigation. I'm explaining this to you say that you understand how it works. Bring a court case would be really the last resort when everything else has failed. However, I'm quite certain that you would win and it would be stupid of big motoring world to try to resist. In order to bring a court case you would have to send a letter of claim giving them 14 days to accept rejection and organise the refund otherwise you would begin the claim. Don't imagine that you could bluff this. If you did send a letter of claim then you would have to go through with it otherwise you lose all credibility and you might as well pack up and go home. So with this in mind, here are possible courses of action you could take. You can simply wait and see what their reaction to your letter of rejection will be. However they may not reply or else they may find some other reason to delay and of course during that time you will be without your car and without your money blah blah blah, not knowing if big motoring world were going eventually to start acting sensibly and respectfully towards you. The second thing you can do – and I think this has been suggested on Facebook – is that you can go along there and simply make yourself present and talk to other customers and generally speaking make a nuisance of yourself and embarrass them to the point where you would be explaining to other potential customers to be careful, to look on Facebook, and to do some careful research before they put their business to big motoring world. This has a reasonable chance of success although you would have to be careful. You should go accompanied by a friend and there should be no anger, no arguments, nothing that could be considered as being overly aggressive so that big motoring world would have no justification in kicking you out or even worse, calling the police. If you did this, then I would suggest that you record everything on the telephone carried in a pocket. A fully charged battery will probably keep a voice recorder and a telephone going for more than 20 hours or 30 hours. The other person can video any incidents so that everything is clear and you can inform big motoring world then it will be going up on the Internet. If you did this, my favourite option would be to issue the letter of claim giving them 14 days, and then going along to big motoring world with a copy of your letter of rejection and a copy of the exchange between the mechanic and the warranty company and a copy of your letter of claim – all settled together – and probably about 20 or 30 copies in all and I would start handing them out to any customers who came in. Big motoring world will soon get the picture and they will either move your the premises in which case you stand outside and carry on doing it or they will finally give in. Of course there is a chance that they won't give in and they will simply call your bluff – but in that case I think you have no choice other than to follow through with your 14 day threat in the letter of claim and to begin the legal action. At the same time you should be putting up reviews on Google and also trust pilot explaining exactly what has happened and also explaining that the mechanic has confirmed to the warranty company that there is the serious problem, that you have asserted the right to reject and that this is been ignored by big motoring world and that you have now sent a letter of claim and that you will be starting a legal action in 14 days. Once again, don't bluff about the legal action. If you threaten it – then you must mean it – and on day 15 you click of the claim. You don't need a solicitor for any of this. It's all fairly straightforward and of course we will help you all the way that it the decision is yours to make and I think you need to make it fairly quickly. I think the cost of starting an action for about £13,000 is 5% and then also if it goes to trial which I would say is almost impossible – there would be an additional fee. You would claim interest at 8%. A judge might award a lower figure but frankly if you can show that big motoring world is attempting to ride roughshod over your very clear statutory consumer rights, I can imagine that the judge will want to show displeasure by awarding the full 8% which is a pretty good rate – even though it's not compensation for the hassle and the distress you are going through. If you decide to get solicitor, then if you win the case, because it is over £10,000 you will recover some of your costs but you won't recover all of them. If the solicitor begins by having exchanges of letters then I doubt whether you will be up to recover the cost of those and you could easily find that you're chalking up 500 quid or even a thousand simply on initial exchanges of correspondence. Also you need to bear in mind that if after having exchanges with a solicitor, big motoring world cave in – then you definitely won't get those costs back because you won't have gone to court and therefore a judge will not have made the order for payment of those costs. I suggest very strongly that you avoid paying any money for a solicitor and that you do it yourself. It's not a big deal – although you will have to you react quickly to the help we offer on this forum. Also, an additional benefit is that you will learn a lot and you will gain confidence and eventually you will feel good about suing anybody else who gets in your way. Nothing not to like! If you do decide to instruct a solicitor then you must take control of the solicitor. Most of them prefer to sit in an office writing letters on the clock. If you do decide to instruct a solicitor then you must instruct the solicitor very firmly that they should send one letter of complaint giving seven days. A second letter – a letter of claim giving 14 days and that they must then begin the action. If you don't do this. If you don't take control then it will simply cost you money, you will be without your car even longer and of course without your money. The whole thing is a nightmare. I think I've laid out the options but please do ask questions. I hope you can see that this is the kind of advice that you won't be getting on Facebook. Nothing against Facebook. It's good as a meeting place and to make people realise that they aren't on their own – but after that the advice given is weak and confusing.  
    • What makes you say that?  I have no idea how I would go about that or why they would even entertain discussions now that they've won the Court case
    • Our main Equity Partner, Cabot Square Capital invests 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

A can of worms ?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5899 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Don't forget you can claim back the tenner if they are processing your data without proper authority.

 

I was not aware that you can claim back the £10, elaborate please & how, I have a DCA that have and are still processing my Data Unlawfully, in fact they have been collecting a debt for 14 years & I had been paying them up until Feb....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Think it means as no valid agreement produced, no permission to share info with third parties ie. CRA and no permission to store,use or process your data. Therefore if you do a request under the DPA and they hold details without holding permission (ie the correct agreement) they are breaching the DPA and breaking the law.

Never thought of that one :) good reason to ask for your £10 back.

ali x

Btw I am no expert just give notes based on what I have read on here and other forums/sites, plus my own experiences and investigations.

 

All ccj's now dropped off file, 2 yrs to go to clear file.

All old debts either settled or made unenforcable.

 

RBS MPP-Full offer at 8 wks from first complaint

RBS Overdraft loanguard-full offer at 8 wks from complaint

Citicard ppi-with FOS finally paid 8 months after offer through FOS!

Capital one x2- with FOS

Monument ppi-with FOS

aqua x2 ppi-partialled settled still pushing for the rest

Black horse ppi-offers made and accepted except for one early loan they say no info held-still pushing for payment

Link to post
Share on other sites

Answered my first 'phone call from them last night.... only 'coz I was expecting someone else and they caught me on the hop.

 

"IN WRITING OOOONLY PLEEEEASE, THANK YOOOOU !!" I shouted over the top of him. Shame. He had a sexy voice.... what a waste.... lol ! :D

 

SAR.... posted off today.....:D

Complaint letter.... also posted off today.....:D

 

As it goes in Chess.... "Check"..... ;)

 

Tick tock....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wish my special friends would give me a call, the only problem is they do not appear to be working hard enough to find out my number..

 

The only thing they seem to be able to do is accuse me of having a CCJ which they have no documentary evidence........ (shame I have been paying them for 14 years)

 

I hope they make a decision soon to take me to court, I could do with a day out....

 

keep going PO

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Hey all

 

Hoping your peace has endured but that you are also getting somewhere with the pond ****. Was talking through your thread with my other half who has had some bully boy DCA on the phone today that left him bewildered that this stuff actually happens. (he's not had the pleasure before)

 

I am literally on the edge of my seat waiting to hear what they come up with, if anything. It is indeed a can of worms, so the very best of luck, can't wait to hear how you get on.

 

ps they will be sitting in their office wondering what the hell to do about you lol!:D

Dipply75

 

I am in no way a legal advisor and only speak from my own experiences and the helpful advice of those in the same boat! :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

ps they will be sitting in their office wondering what the hell to do about you lol!:D

 

You may be right there.... but they need to get a wriggle on.... the 40 days are nearly up on the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) and they still haven't provided me with details of their official complaints procedure.... :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Time is up.... think I've been dumped. ;)

 

No response whatsoever to SAR

No response whatsoever to my request for their Complaints Procedure.

Absolutely no attempt to contact me whatsoever....

 

Have to admit to being a little surprised by their total SAR non-compliance... seems a bit silly considering the ICO will now be picking this one up as well as the FOS.

 

Oh well... better get scribing then....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Decision time....

 

A SAR non-compliance letter, including a para about the Financial Crime branch of HM Treasury.... (courtesy of Rory32 in one of his threads)....;) just to add to the pressure, or

 

Straight to the ICO to let them deal with it....

 

What do you think people ? :confused:

 

To be honest, my faith in all of these supposed regulatory bodies is not great.... so my inkling is to go with Option 1 and land them in the poo that way. However, since they have defaulted on a legal request... Option 2 shouldn't be ruled out either. I just don't think it would stress them as much as the thought of having Option 1 carried out....

 

I will look into the FOS side of things a bit later on....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Decision time....

 

A S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) non-compliance letter, including a para about the Financial Crime branch of HM Treasury.... (courtesy of Rory32 in one of his threads)....;) just to add to the pressure, or

 

Straight to the Information Commissioners Office to let them deal with it....

 

What do you think people ? :confused:

 

To be honest, my faith in all of these supposed regulatory bodies is not great.... so my inkling is to go with Option 1 and land them in the poo that way. However, since they have defaulted on a legal request... Option 2 shouldn't be ruled out either. I just don't think it would stress them as much as the thought of having Option 1 carried out....

 

I will look into the FOS side of things a bit later on....

 

Personally, i would start a formal complaint with F.O.S. (they haven't sent their complaints procedure), and a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) non-compliance letter, with only a limited time to respond (no more than 14 days).

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does Any One Have A Link For A Template For A Non Compliance To A Cca Request Letter.

 

There is no need to write.... unless you prefer to. If/when the DCA contacts you, just write back (rec. delivery) something like...

 

Thank you for your letter of xx/xx/2007.

 

A legal request for my Consumer Credit Agreement (Consumer Credit Act, 1974) was received by yourselves on xx/xx/2007. Until such times as you are able to comply with this request, no (further) payments will be forthcoming.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

good luck p1

 

you sound like your ready for the fight

 

essexboy

 

Thanks Essexboy,

 

To be honest, there are times when I just want to leave it as it is. Life can be hard enough without going looking for it, so to speak... which is what it seems like I'm doing. They haven't had a payment for 8 months now.... :D

 

However, now that they've been stupid enough to totally stuff up on the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) :rolleyes: .... and not even bother to give details of a Complaints Procedure, let alone try and get me to believe they're actually dealing with a complaint :rolleyes: ... they've annoyed me.

 

Even if nothing else comes from this, I can happily land them in the poo, knowing that they will be charged £400 for the FOS to investigate their dodgy dealings. Time will tell if it goes any further than that....

 

To think that I was once afraid of these morons though..... :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...