Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • There's no facility for a settlement "out of court" as such. But matters that are started under the "Single Justice" (SJ) Procedure can often be concluded without the defendant appearing. The SJ procedure, as the name suggests, involves a single magistrate, sitting in an office with a legal advisor, dealing with matters "on papers" only. Nobody else can attend. The SJ deals with straightforward guilty pleas. Anything where the SJ believes the defendant should appear, or which should be dealt with by the "ordinary" court are adjourned o a hearing in the normal magistrates'  court .As well as this, all defendants have the right to a hearing in the normal court if they wish. Nobody is forced to have their case heard under he SJP.  In particular, as far as traffic matters go, a SJ will not disqualify a driver and if a ban is to be considered, the case will be passed over to the normal court. Because, following your SD, you will be pleading Not Guilty (and offering the "deal"), your case would usually be heard in the normal court, meaning a personal appearance. To be honest, performing your SD at the court is a more straightforward way of doing things. It avoids any possible hitches involved in serving he SD on the court. But of course, as I said, most courts have backlogs which mean an SD may not be quickly accommodated. If you do end up doing your SD before a solicitor, check with them the protocol for serving it on the court. Do let us know what the solicitor says about Wednesday.    
    • Welcome to posting on CAG cabot, people will be along soon to help you try to sort this out. Please complete this:  
    • Quotes of the day penny mordaunt came out swinging with her broadsword, and promptly decapitated sunak while Nigel Farage, representing Reform UK, made contentious claims about immigration policies, which were swiftly fact-checked during the debate.   Good question though raised at labour about the 2 child benefit cap, which I broadly agree with, but the tory 'trap' assumes tory thinking - rather than child centric thinking. There should be no incentives to have kids as a financial way of life paid for by everyone else ... ... BUT the kids should not be made to suffer for the decisions of their parents Free school meals would feed the kids, improve their ability to learn, and incentivise them to go to school. As an added benefit ... it would invest in our nations future.   How far this should go is a matter for costing, social intent and future path of the nation, but not feeding our nations kids is an abomination. There should be at least one free school meal per day for every child who attends school. Full Stop. Its the cheapest and most effective investment in our future we could make.
    • Hey people, I've been browsing this amazing forum for the past year and recieved a letter today which has made me require some help. Received a claim form from Cabot in the Civil National Business Centre in regards to an Aqua Credit Card taken out in 2018. I failed to make payments due to financial hardship and have not taken out any credit or uses any forms of credit since. Received a lot of letters from Cabot and their solicitors Mortimer Clarke which I've ignored    By an agreement between New Day Ltd RE Aqua& the Defendant on or around 26/03/2018 ('ths Agreement) New Day Ltd RE Aqua agreed to issue Defendant with a credit card. The Defendant failed to make the minimum payments due. The Agreement was terminated following the service of a default notice. The Agreement was assigned to the named Claimant. Cabot Credit Management Group Limited, acting as servicing agent of the named Claimant through its Appointed Representative (Cabot Financial (Europe) Limited), has arranged for these proceedings to be issued in the name of the Claimant. The named Claimant may be entitled to claim interest under the Agreement but does not seek such interest and instead claims interest under Section 69(1) of the County Courts Act 1984 at 8% p.a.from03/03/2023 until date of issue only, or alternatively such interest as the Court thinks fit THE NAMED CLAIMANT THEREFORE CLAIMS 1. 3800.82 2. INTEREST OF 379.84 3. Costs How would I go about this and what could happen? I don't remember much details about the card either.
    • cause like you said in post one, 99% of people think these are FINES (it now reads charge). and wet themselves and cough up. they are not, they are speculative invoices because the driver supposedly broke some imaginary contract by driving onto privately owned land which said owner may or may not have signed some 99% fake contract with a private parking co years ago, thats already expired or has not been renewed or annually paid to employ them dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can we turn the tables?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6249 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've dealt with the banks with the help of this site, I've responded to the private car park ticket

 

With regards to your letter dated xxx. I do not have an account with you. You refer to a Civil Penalty Charge Notice being issued. This would infer that I entered a civil agreement with yourselves. I did not.

I assume you asked the DVLA for the details of the owner of the vehicle in question. Although I am the owner of the vehicle, I am not always the driver.

In addition, please make a note of my Terms and Conditions with regard to the administration of your letters.

If you write to me again, regarding this matter, it will trigger the acceptance of the fact that you will have to pay me an administration fee of £20 per letter. This is for my time and expenses.

Didn't hear any more from them.

 

I'm more annoyed about companies trying to bully us & chargeing for not paying by direct debit or not paying on time & snowballing our bills. & I'm fighting back more.

 

I noticed on this site other people using things like "If you write to me again, regarding this matter, it will trigger the acceptance of the fact that you will have to pay me an administration fee of £20 per letter. This is for my time and expenses."

 

& thought I should do the same. If companies can change their terms and conditions & level of service (like dropping TV channels) why can't the consumer?

 

I thought I'd write a general terms & conditions notice that I could include when things go wrong & I end up having to deal with companies who think they're god & have every right to my money if they decide.

 

Perhaps someone can advice me on the legality of including such text in a letter & advice any additions/changes - must be more legal than taking hundreds of pounds out of my account when I'm paid a day late.

 

Anyway here's what I came up with.

 

My Standard Terms and conditions and Charges for dealing with companies or idividuals.

 

 

When extra administration or communication is needed to deal with a company or individual

that is not a straight forward purchace of goods or services, dealing with a financial dispute,

or any other dispute that requires me to write a letter or e-mail, make a phone call, or where

I perform reasearch to resolve a matter, or clarify my legal position, an administration

charge or fee of £50 for each half day, or part thereof of my time spent dealing with an issue

will be chargeable.

 

Charge(s) or fee(s) may be waived at my discression, if the issue is settled promptly.

 

Charge(s) or fee(s) will be payable immidiately on demand and legal action may be taken to recover

these Charge(s) or fee(s) and any costs I occur in recovery action.

 

Charge(s) or fee(s) are to cover my administration costs and loss of earnings in dealing with

companies or idividuals.

 

By responding or communicating with me in any way after you receive this you are accepting these

terms and conditions.

 

In these terms and conditions:-

 

'My' 'me' 'I' reffers to xxx, xx my address xx.

'companies' "company' 'idividuals' 'you' refers to the company or individual with which I am communicating.

 

 

Capital One Success after Letter asking for charges back;)

Alliance & Leicester Success after threatening court action :p

Abbey Sent Court Bundle, waiting for court date....

T-mobile Called, sent letter & called again - Charges Dropped:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest ArthurP

I was having an issue with GUS home shopping, I think it was Great Universal.

 

I had bought a music system with an extended warranty. They sent the wrong system so I had to re-order all over again with a new warranty too.

 

They hounded me for months to pay for the first warranty, which was obviously invalid due to the mix up.

 

In any case, they eventually threatened bailifs to my home and I sent a letter back threatening my own action and billed them £100 for my trouble thus far in dealing with it.

 

They apologised and knocked £100 off my account. I then settled the rest and closed the account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Love it. But it doesn't extend to at least 70 clauses, 3 pages and the print isn't too small to read. Although if I do Ctrl-Minus in my browser 3 times - yep thats the right size!:)

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

IANAL - Opinions offered are just my personal views and are not guaranteed to be correct. I have been known to be wrong (once or twice).

Claims in progress against:

Eldest - First Direct - Part Offer received - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/first-direct/79619-eldest-fd.html

Eldest - Halifax - Cheque Received Full amount - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/halifax-bank-bank-scotland/66254-here-we-go-eldest.html

Youngest - Halifax x 3 - Request for refund sent - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/halifax-bank-bank-scotland/79617-youngest-halifax.html

Eldest - unnamed Mortgage Provider for Charges and incorrect maths.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The scary part is that, besides the £50 per half-day, that seems reasonable. Even the method of execution is probably sound - after all, if the banks can say that you gave consent by your actions, then turnabout is fair play.

 

At the £50 per half-day, it will be seen as excessive, since administrative labour is counted in units of quarter- or half-hours (not days), and the court will only award £9.25/hour anyway. £5 per half-hour you might get away with, but at £50 per half-day it's almost certainly a penalty, equally unenforceable as those the banks impose. Good thinking, though :)

HSBCLloyds TSBcontractual interestNew Tax Creditscoming for you?NTL/Virgin Media

 

Never give in ... Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy. Churchill, 1941

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

At the £50 per half-day, it will be seen as excessive, since administrative labour is counted in units of quarter- or half-hours (not days), and the court will only award £9.25/hour anyway. £5 per half-hour you might get away with, but at £50 per half-day it's almost certainly a penalty, equally unenforceable as those the banks impose. Good thinking, though :)

 

Why should it be classed as a penelty, my solicitor charges £140 an hour, and all it is is time for fact finding reseach, letter writing, etc. :)

Good luck to each and all.

All comments are personal opinion only.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why should it be classed as a penelty, my solicitor charges £140 an hour, and all it is is time for fact finding reseach, letter writing, etc. :)

 

Because that is a service they are performing at your request, and (hopefully) to your benefit.

HSBCLloyds TSBcontractual interestNew Tax Creditscoming for you?NTL/Virgin Media

 

Never give in ... Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy. Churchill, 1941

Link to post
Share on other sites

While I see where meagain is comming from, I disagree in that it is you doing the work that you are charging for, not billing someone for something they have done.. Think of it as being self-employed.

Then again, the tax-man will just take the lot. lol

Good luck to each and all.

All comments are personal opinion only.

Link to post
Share on other sites

While I see where meagain is comming from, I disagree in that it is you doing the work that you are charging for, not billing someone for something they have done..

 

You would not have needed to do the work if it were not for the "something they have done", hence it is a cost, not a service. Saying you will charge someone for costs you have incurred is a contractual penalty, which is not allowed. You can only pass on a reasonable value of the cost itself.

HSBCLloyds TSBcontractual interestNew Tax Creditscoming for you?NTL/Virgin Media

 

Never give in ... Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy. Churchill, 1941

Link to post
Share on other sites

... I think my time has greater value than that.

 

You and the rest of the world ;-)

HSBCLloyds TSBcontractual interestNew Tax Creditscoming for you?NTL/Virgin Media

 

Never give in ... Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy. Churchill, 1941

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

At the £50 per half-day, it will be seen as excessive, since administrative labour is counted in units of quarter- or half-hours (not days), and the court will only award £9.25/hour anyway. £5 per half-hour you might get away with, but at £50 per half-day it's almost certainly a penalty, equally unenforceable as those the banks impose. Good thinking, though :)

 

Nahh, your wrong.

 

£50.00 per half day = 12 hours @ £4.17.

 

Should be £55.50 per half day calculated @£9.25 per hour. :p

PUTTING IT IN WRITING & KEEPING COPIES IS A MUST FOR SUCCESS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nahh, your wrong.

 

£50.00 per half day = 12 hours @ £4.17.

 

£50 per half day = 4 hours @ £12.50. Or to be really picky, 3h42m @ £13.51.

HSBCLloyds TSBcontractual interestNew Tax Creditscoming for you?NTL/Virgin Media

 

Never give in ... Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy. Churchill, 1941

Link to post
Share on other sites

My Standard Terms and Conditions and Charges for dealing with companies or individuals.

 

 

When extra administration or communication is needed to deal with a company or individual

that is not a straightforward purchase of goods or services, dealing with a financial dispute,

or any other dispute that requires me to write a letter or e-mail, make a phone call, or where

I perform research to resolve a matter, or clarify my legal position, an administration

charge or fee of £50 for each half day, or part thereof of my time spent dealing with an issue

will be chargeable.

 

Charge(s) or fee(s) may be waived at my discretion, if the issue is settled promptly.

 

Charge(s) or fee(s) will be payable immediately on demand and legal action may be taken to recover

these Charge(s) or fee(s) and any costs I occur in recovery action.

 

Charge(s) or fee(s) are to cover my administration costs and loss of earnings in dealing with

companies or individuals.

 

By responding or communicating with me in any way after you receive this you are accepting these

terms and conditions.

 

In these terms and conditions:-

 

'My' 'me' 'I' refers to xxx, xx my address xx.

'companies' "company' 'individuals' 'you' refers to the company or individual with which I am communicating.

 

Mr Picky here

A few spellings/typos you might want to address ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wondered when someone would pick up on the typos!

 

So I'd get away with this if I chnge the amount hey?

£50 per half day excessive. I bet judges get paid more than £9.25 per hour! Fact is if I have to take half a day (or part thereof) off work to deal with comapnies, I loose at least £50. That's the real world.

 

Guess I'll change that bit to £5 per half hour. Mind you my half day is 7am to 12 midday. 7am - 11am Reasearch 11am - 11:30 Letter writing. 11:30-12:00 confirming reasearch & sending letter.

 

Thats 10 x half hours @ £5 / half hour = £ 50 ?

 

Would I get away with this?

Capital One Success after Letter asking for charges back;)

Alliance & Leicester Success after threatening court action :p

Abbey Sent Court Bundle, waiting for court date....

T-mobile Called, sent letter & called again - Charges Dropped:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I'd get away with this if I chnge the amount hey?

 

Maybe. ISTR at least one other person here doing something similar (along the lines of "if you charge me, I will invoice you for the charge and my costs"), not sure how they got on.

 

 

£50 per half day excessive. I bet judges get paid more than £9.25 per hour!

 

I'll bet they do, but you're not a judge. No court in the land will award a lay person £100 per day in costs for small claims.

 

Fact is if I have to take half a day (or part thereof) off work to deal with comapnies, I (aargh!) lose with one o at least £50. That's the real world.

 

Fact is, you would then have to prove that loss to the court. It's not enough to say "I get paid £12/hour, and have to take 4 hours off to do this". If someone has breached a contract with you, you can't bill them at your usual service rate. To get beyond the £9.25, you have to prove that you actually lost money - as in it was a statistical certainty that you would have been paid but were not.

 

Mind you my half day is 7am to 12 midday. 7am - 11am Reasearch 11am - 11:30 Letter writing. 11:30-12:00 confirming reasearch & sending letter.

 

That's excessive again. Out of all of that time, you can only pass on the half-hour for drafting the letter (you've hit that spot-on, though - generally accepted billing practice is half an hour for a letter). The idea is that once you have done the research once, you do not need to do it again. Billing for further time for things such as "walking to the PO" is taking the mickey, though. On the other hand, if you serve the letters by recorded or special delivery, again that is a cost to you that you would not otherwise have incurred, which you could reasonably pass on (but if you ask someone to pay you £5 for SD, make sure you actually do use SD).

HSBCLloyds TSBcontractual interestNew Tax Creditscoming for you?NTL/Virgin Media

 

Never give in ... Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy. Churchill, 1941

Link to post
Share on other sites

Someone is missing something here.

 

You can claim £9.25 per hour for your preparation of the case. ie research and clerical in your own "spare" time.

 

Attendance at court would have an effect on your earnings which would be claimed as "Loss of Earnings". If your losses are equal to £100.00 per day it would be reasonable to claim £50.00 for half a days loss. You must be able to prove the loss with documentation.

PUTTING IT IN WRITING & KEEPING COPIES IS A MUST FOR SUCCESS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...