Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Any update here? MET started a court case recently against a Cagger concerning this very site and EV charging - and then bottled it and discontinued the case before the hearing. It would be useful for others to know what happened in your case.
    • The important thing to know is that MET - although they will send you threat after threat about how they will divert a drone from Ukraine and make it fall on your home - hardly ever do court. Even in the very small number of cases where they send court papers, if the Cagger defends, they drop the matter before the hearing.  They have no real intention of putting their rubbish claim before a judge.  The aim is to find motorists who are terrified of the idea of going to court and who will give in when the court papers arrive. Thanks for doing the sticky and well done on finding F18's thread.  Do what they did.  On the first page - I think post 19 - there is the address of the CEO of BP.  Write to them, lay it on thick about being genuine customers in the various premises, mention the small kids, the very short stay time, attach any proof of purchase - and request that they get the invoice cancelled.
    • Thank you for that, I have obviously already been convicted so I think the appeal lodged is for the previous offence? Sorry if that doesn’t make sense. I suppose my only concern is that weds I go there and they don’t let a stat dec happen. If they do then as you say and solicitor says it’s highly likely I’ll be happy with the outcome. But I’m being told there’s no guarantee for the stat dec to be hard Weds as that’s not what the hearing is proposed for. Solicitor has stated that you can put a stat dec before a magistrates at any time so it shouldn’t be a problem.   
    • I re-read the extract from your  solicitor's letter this morning and think I might understand what they have in mind. I believe (and it’s only a guess) their strategy is this: 1.    You will make your SD 2.    You will enter fresh pleas to the four charges (not guilty) but will offer to plead guilty to speeding on the understanding that the FtP charges are dropped. 3.    If this is accepted they will attempt to argue that the two offences were committed “on the same occasion” 4.    You will be sentenced for those two offences (the sentence depending on whether the “same occasion” argument succeeds). They also have a plan in the event that your offer at (2) is unsuccessful and you are convicted again of the 2xFtP charges (and so face disqualification under “totting up”): 5.    They will make an “exceptional hardship” argument to avoid a ban. 6.    If that is unsuccessful they have already lodged an appeal in the Crown Court against that decision. (This is the only “appeal” I can think of). 7.    They plan to ask the court to suspend your ban pending that appeal. If I’m correct, I’m surprised the Crown Court has agreed to accept a speculative appeal (against something that hasn’t happened). The solicitor says this is to lodge it within the normal timescales. But you will have 21 days from the date of your conviction (which will be next Wednesday) to lodge an appeal with the Crown Court, so there is no need for a speculative appeal. I have to say that an application to have your ban suspended pending an appeal is unlikely to succeed. The Magistrates Court is unlikely to agree to it for one very good reason: if they make such an order (suspending your ban until your appeal is heard), all you need to do is not to pursue the appeal and the Magistrates order suspending your ban will remain in place. Hey Presto! No ban and no need for you to trouble with an appeal. Perhaps he will ask for your ban to be suspended for (say) three months or until your appeal is heard (whichever occurs first). This potentially creates a problem because if your appeal is not heard in that time either your ban will kick in or you will have o go back to court to get the suspension extended. But the solicitor obviously knows more about these things than I do. I would want to be very clear about this solicitor’s fees and what he proposes to charge you for. As I said, there is absolutely no need to lodge an appeal with the Crown Court. That can be done if and when it becomes required. But I am still firmly of the opinion that it is overwhelmingly likely that you will not need to progress beyond point 2 above. Point 3 is optional and I don’t know whether he solicitor has made It clear to you that the only thing you will avoid in the event of success is three penalty points. You will still be fined for the second offence and your driving record will still be endorsed with the details, but no penalty points will be imposed. Do let us know how it goes.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Guidelines - Requests For An Original Agreement Under The Consumer Credit Act 1974


gizmo111
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3514 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I agree Car.

 

From my own experience my local branch had the executed agreement all along- and they still didnt get it to me in time- I am lucky that the agreement has been improperly completed.

 

However if my local branch is holding an agreement from February 2004 does this mean other branches are holding such agreements from the same period?

If so, there is no need to send cobbled agreements. unless the original is lost or improper executed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

It would be a logistical nightmare trying to find which branch executed - and therefore should hold - the original agreement, though. Which is why I think they'll get away with a copy under a CCA request, but won't when it comes to Court.

 

On the other side of the argument, though, is the fact that creditors must have been aware of the 1974 legislation when executing agreements in the 1980's - never mind the more recent ones! If they weren't, they are just being irresponsible lenders and deserve everything they get, IMO.

 

It all depends what the opinion of the Judge you get is though - which makes this a lottery, despite being clearly enacted at Parliaments intention!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am embroiled in a battle with HSBC who have confirmed in writing that they have no signed agreement, and admitted that they know it to be unenforceable, yet have registered a default and say that they will be 'continuing our normal collections process'.

 

I'm not bothered about the collections bit - in fact I rather look forward to telling MCS to gain height, turn to the right and feck off.

 

However, HSBC's response to a s.10 notice about the default was to maintain that they have fulfilled their obligations under the CCA in re the agreement, and so their 'Legal Department' tells them that the default is OK. I think they have CCA and DPA issues arse about face. However, when I raised the issue of consent to process data they simply responded with 'we consider that this correspondence is now too protracted and this is our final response' - so no answer at all, then.

 

I suppose I will have to go to Court to enforce the s.10, using the lack of a signed agreement as evidence of no consent. What I want to know is this: can they claim that using the account is sufficient evidence of agreement? I know this doesn't work for the CCA, but what about the DPA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's the ICO's opinion that this is evidence of consent, but regardless of whether you consented to using the account, they need express written permission to share your data with a CRA under s.35 DPA or they commit a criminal office.

 

The ICO view is only an opinion and isn't binding on a Court, so bring a claim and argue your case, I say.

 

This is what I'm doing with Barclays;

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/data-protection-default-issues/110184-car2403-barclays-bank-default.html

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good evening,

Whilst I agree with all that is said here....WARNING the Consumer will find that TS are VERY loath to start a prosecution. I discovered this from personal experience, I wrote to TS with a compaint about non-compliance by Northern Rock plc and all of the evidence needed to commence a prosecution was in the envelope - BUT NO REPLY HAS EVER BEEN RECEIVED from TS...so after 3 months I telephoned TS, only to be told....we don't get involved in these matters....you need to speak to the OFT or the Ombudsman, so I called the Ombudsman and they said that basically they were not interested unless there was 'actual monetary loss', and 'breaches of the

CCA Act were not considered 'worth pursuing', as they did not want to 'fire a warning shot across the bows' of anyone who might have broken the Law, because the 1974 CCA had 'been replaced' by the 2005 Consmer Credit Act .....??? Methinks this is a 'wheels within wheels' situation - draw your own conclsions...!!

It is much better to take the evidence of non-compliance with the CCAct1974 to the OFT direct.

Keep claiming..remember it's your money you're after!!!!

Best wishes to everyone

Dougal

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you wish to complain about the CRIMINAL aspect of non-compliance I would think there is no harm in writing to TRADING STANDARDS, the OFT..........even your local MP.............and asking for a WRITTEN REPLY within 14 days......................Is there anyone else to put on the list ??..................Its only going to cost a quid in postage each time and it may hurry things along.................................This is NOT LEGAL ADVICE from me.............just seems common sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again ... sorry to harp on ...

I have sent off 3 CCas. What should i do next? What if I receive CCA which is correct or incorrect? Maybe I am trying to run before I can walk but my mind is working overtime. I will post the CCAs once they appear (On my General Debt thread)

Thanks,

Ann.

Link to post
Share on other sites

fernack, you don't need to do anything until they reply - getting wound up thinking about what might be, when it probably won't turn out that way, is counterproductive.

 

If you are really, really concerned about this, you can follow them up on your request - the general advice given here is that you shouldn't do this, as it may cause them to respond where otherwise they would be in default of the request, but each case is different and it's ultimately your decision as to how to progress in your own case.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quickie ...

 

I posted off 3 CCAs yesterday. Since then have been reading various threads and have noted that some advise that the term I ACKNOWLEDGE NO DEBT WITH YOUR COMPANY, or similar, head each letter. I didn't do this. Will it matter?

Thanks in anticipation, Fernack.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent mine before people were advising to say that - and they still had the same effect so don't worry.:p

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quickie ...

 

I posted off 3 CCAs yesterday. Since then have been reading various threads and have noted that some advise that the term I ACKNOWLEDGE NO DEBT WITH YOUR COMPANY, or similar, head each letter. I didn't do this. Will it matter?

Thanks in anticipation, Fernack.

 

don't worry about it to much, it only really applies if there is a chance the debt is statue barred

 

regards,

shane

 

_______________________________________________

All advice is offered freely & without prejudice

 

 

If my post has been useful to you please click the scales

____________________________________________

All advice is offered freely & without prejudice

 

 

If my post has been useful to you please click the scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, Heres my take for what its worth,

I have been refused CCA by Bcard because I didnt sign the letter template I sent out, Can they go to court issue CCJ against me while this is dragging on?/

My trouble is I am currently not at my usual address due to work, so it could be a couple of months before I receive any mail. I am in the process of moving back home from USA ( I Know, what for? you may ask) should I get a box number for mail when I return? so that family friends etc are not receiving calls from Mercers. This thread has me confused a little, so any help would be appreciated. I have started my own thread to keep everything in order. thanks again guys, great site, ps. 5% is a small price for the help on here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, Heres my take for what its worth,

I have been refused CCA by Bcard because I didnt sign the letter template I sent out, Can they go to court issue CCJ against me while this is dragging on?/

My trouble is I am currently not at my usual address due to work, so it could be a couple of months before I receive any mail. I am in the process of moving back home from USA ( I Know, what for? you may ask) should I get a box number for mail when I return? so that family friends etc are not receiving calls from Mercers. This thread has me confused a little, so any help would be appreciated. I have started my own thread to keep everything in order. thanks again guys, great site, ps. 5% is a small price for the help on here.

 

Hi bazaar.

 

Be VERY careful here, as I'm interested as to the reason they NEED to have your signature? I'm not casting doubt on their integrity in the slightest, but some companies have been known to use Photoshop to copy signatures from letters sent to copy agreements that weren't originally signed! In fact, the advice many CAG-ers are giving now is to only TYPE your name and not sign anything that you send to any collection department.

 

The Consumer Credit Act also doesn't require you to sign the request in the first place, although they may argue they need this to ensure they only release information to the correct person. I'd counter that argument by clearly showing that you've provided enough info for them to ID you, (such as full name, address on the account and account numbers, etc) if they do bring it up.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Just wondering what people think i should do about HFC. I have been paying them for some years,,occasionally get a letter from Weightmans. I got a letter about a review and sent them a CCA. At first they sent a letter saying they didn't have a copy of the agreement but then the following day sent a copy of an 'application form'.

I got a letter template from here sending it back to them saying thanks for the application form, if this is your true copy of the 'agreement' then it is not an enforceable debt.

They then sent me a letter saying that they would look in to me complaint,,I did not complain..

They have just replied saying that they have fully complied as " the copy of the signed agreement you have been provided with states Application, you will note in the signature box, that it states 'this is a credit agrrement regulated by the CCA 1974 and by signing this you want to be legally bound by its terms". They also say that at some point I must have been issued with new terms and conditions if these have changed.

 

They did send me an application form but it had none of the prescribed terms on it such as APR etc,,

 

Is it worth going to the ombudsman or is there another letter that I can send,,or what should I do?

 

Any advice please,,

 

Thanks

 

Cups

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi cups,

 

The best advice initially to to create your own thread and post up the letters you've sent and responses you've received (personal data removed, of course) which will mean you can get specific advice on your individual case.

 

There's some instructions here if you're unsure;

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/consumer-forums-website-questions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

 

I have 2 claims with HFC at the minute and they don't play nicely, so I won't respond to your post here as it may mislead you - once you've got your thread up and running, come back here and post a link and I/others will be able to help you better then.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my case the CCJ was granted two years ago. At the time I was not in a fit state to fight it. I have now reviewed the case and the amount my creditor is recieved judgment for is clearly not correct.

I was made redundant just three weeks after I took out the loan with insurance. The insurance was not valid as 30 days had not passed when I was made redundant. yet in the judgment they included all 60 months of insurance payments at £70.62. = £4237. They also included interest on the loan for the full 60 months £4892 and only 30 months had passed by the time they recived judgment.

There was also my over draft of £5000. They did not produce anything other than my bank account application and my debit card application. (i cant find a CCA for the overdraft) I was told my OD was protected for un-employment but when I tried to claim they said it was not.

perhas less imortant thy also included over £1200 of bank charges

They recieved a judgment for a full £27,500.

I have no excuse to have not disputed or appealed as soon as jugment was given other than I had been out of work for over a year had just got a job and was at one of the lowest points in my life. They had really ground me down to a point I thought I just could not fight it. Iwas just confused by all the technical jargon they and the courts were using and I was not given very good advise from the CAB.

 

Please is there a case for me after so much time to appeal for the judgment to be be set aside and a review of the actual amount owed?

 

please help

 

many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my case the CCJ was granted two years ago. At the time I was not in a fit state to fight it. I have now reviewed the case and the amount my creditor is recieved judgment for is clearly not correct.

I was made redundant just three weeks after I took out the loan with insurance. The insurance was not valid as 30 days had not passed when I was made redundant. yet in the judgment they included all 60 months of insurance payments at £70.62. = £4237. They also included interest on the loan for the full 60 months £4892 and only 30 months had passed by the time they recived judgment.

 

There was also my over draft of £5000. They did not produce anything other than my bank account application and my debit card application. (i cant find a CCA for the overdraft) I was told my OD was protected for un-employment but when I tried to claim they said it was not.

perhas less imortant thy also included over £1200 of bank charges

They recieved a judgment for a full £27,500.

I have no excuse to have not disputed or appealed as soon as jugment was given other than I had been out of work for over a year had just got a job and was at one of the lowest points in my life. They had really ground me down to a point I thought I just could not fight it. Iwas just confused by all the technical jargon they and the courts were using and I was not given very good advise from the CAB.

 

Please is there a case for me after so much time to appeal for the judgment to be be set aside and a review of the actual amount owed?

 

please help

 

many thanks

 

Yes, judgments can be challenged many years after they were registered but you need valid arguments. In my case i challenged a judgment because the account contained unlawful charges prior to judgment, the judge allowed me to enter a defence this was after seven years. I would start a thread and hopefully you'll get advice.

 

Paul

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, judgments can be challenged many years after they were registered but you need valid arguments. In my case i challenged a judgment because the account contained unlawful charges prior to judgment, the judge allowed me to enter a defence this was after seven years. I would start a thread and hopefully you'll get advice.

 

Paul

 

Paul Thanks,

So in my case this could apply, as the the judgment contained unlawfull charges in excess of £1200 and this has only recently come to light. I have started a thread PLEASE PLEASE can some of you experts have a look? many thanks in advance !!

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/122828-urgent-help-req-plz.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

How do CCA's relate to overdrafts? I did not sign a CCA in relation to my OD but did aplly for my account and a debit card?

 

Hi sierra,

 

The answer to your question is that overdrafts are regulated under the CCA - take a look here;

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/31515-ccas-overdrafts.html?highlight=overdrafts

 

In essence, the bank has to send you a letter before or shortly after you sign stating what the interest rate will be along with how/why they can terminate the overdraft. If they haven't done this, they must comply with the form/content requirements of a normal credit agreement, which usually isn't the case.

 

This is where I am with a Barclays overdraft, if you want to see how this argument works in practise; (I'm also challenging a Personal Loan agreement in the same thread/claim)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/data-protection-default-issues/110184-car2403-barclays-bank-default.html

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so i can send copies of the 2 letters i sent Barclays (1st was the CCA template & 2nd was the reply template) , along with Barclays reply to them all with a covering letter.

 

the letter from Scotcall has got the figure up from the original Barclays send to RMA letter amount of £10020 to £10210.03. not all of that is from them tho, RMA added some

 

 

Just received a new letter from Scotcall saying that after not responding to there last letter and not making any payment to them, i now have 10 day to reply making an offer to repay the debt and avoid the possibilty of further action.

 

as ive heard nothing from either RMA or NCO or ScotCall for a while i left things alone (the calls were atleast once a day).

 

so now ive got my previous CCA for Barclays and their reply ready to send to ScotCall but what letter do i need to send them? do i need to send a CCA template 1 letter to them encosing the original Barclays request and reply or something else?

thanks in advance :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Boon, send the original CCA and the chase letters, along with any replies you've had to it. It's important that you include this text in your cover letter: "I acknowledge no debt to your company or any company you claim to represent in this matter". Just outline that you believe the account is still in dispute, as outlined in the attached letters, etc, etc.

 

BTW - you're better off starting your own thread, especially if they take action against you. Take a look here if you're unsure how to do it;

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/consumer-forums-website-questions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3514 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...