Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Re: Cca Request To Connaught Collections


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6052 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I Sent A Letter To Connaught Collections As Per Your Website Requesting The Cca Agreement They Received My Letter On 13th April 2007 And Wrote To Me Today Stating That As I Had Been Making Regular Payments Towards This Debt I Had Admitted Liability For It And So Cca Made No Difference They Said They Will Request It From Original Company Citicards And That When They Get It I Will Have To Repay The Amount In Full Of £1400 If I Suspend Payments Now , Help What Do I Do Are They Right Have I Admitted Liability By Making Regular Payments And Do I Have To Pay The Full Amount Not Installments When They Produce It And What Happens If They Don;t Produce It , Cheers Lisam

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

If you are currently making payments, wait untill Connaught default at the 12+2 stage.

After this the debt becomes unenforceable and you can cancel payments.

BUT when/if they produce the CCA then your payments should resume.

 

If no CCA appears after the extra 30 days then they have commited an ofence and this can be a very powerful bargaining tool for you.

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I had one of these replies yesterday(see thread coonaught collections stat demand),I am just going to wait and see if they can produce aggreement,if they do,fair enough,if not i will stop paying,and respectfully request that as they didnt produce any proof that this debt is enforcable,they take all payments made to date(£920),as full and final settlement,and remove any adverse info they've put on my credit file,if you discount the £430 they've added in charges,i only owe about £200 now,so they should be happy that i didnt find this site £920 ago,lol!!!:-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The timelines are: The clock starts ticking the day after delivery, then it's 12 working days followed by a period of a calendar month. If the last day of the calendar month falls on a Sunday or otherwise a public holiday it's 31 days (not working days) instead of 30.

 

If you sent by rec/del and have the delivery date start the clock ticking the day after for the 1st day. If you didn't send by rec/del then it's advisable to add 2 days onto the 12 working days to allow for unproved delivery date.

 

Have a check of your timeline again with a calendar, I think your out a little. :)

 

Good luck, Dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

....and respectfully request that as they didnt produce any proof that this debt is enforcable,they take all payments made to date(£920),as full and final settlement....

 

should you do this? is this not admitting the debt?

Link to post
Share on other sites

new calculations on 12 working days mean that 2nd May 12 days up so tomorrow puts plus 2 and that means 30 days can start counting , heres hoping due a payment on 15th this month already paid last months so lets see if i hear anything what do i do if they contact me for payment ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

new calculations on 12 working days mean that 2nd May 12 days up so tomorrow puts plus 2 and that means 30 days can start counting , heres hoping due a payment on 15th this month already paid last months so lets see if i hear anything what do i do if they contact me for payment ?

 

They have no legal right to enforce the agreement whilst it in default.

(12days)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi all had two letters on Monday one from connaught saying :

Dear Madam , re: 1st credit limited (Associates) outstanding debt £------

our records indicate that yout repayment plan is £20.00 in arrears . please ensure that your plan is brought into line within the next five days , yours faithfully connaught collections uk ltd .

so I e-mailed them and told them that this a/c was in dispute and that they were in dafault by not producing CCA and that in this situation until they did I had no legal obligation to pay , not heard anything from tham yet .

 

next letter dated same day 18th May

Dear Sir/Madam ,

thank you for your recent communication . the contents of this communication have been noted . Please telephone this office as a matter of urgency in order that this matter can be discussed . Thank You for your co-operation .

yours faithfully . collection depatment 1st credit .

 

again i e-mailed them the same as above but also included that I would not communicate on the telephone and that all communication must be via e-mail or written snail mail . anyone getting dejavu with gingerheid's thread !!!! any advice from here appreciated!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

great stuff now got another letter from 1st Credit as follows :

I refer to your communication asking 1st Credit to provide you with the relevant agreement .

We will shortly be advising our client of your request . This document will be sent to you as soon as possible . This process may take at least one month .

Once you have received a copy of this agreement we would expect you to contact this office immediately to arrange settlement of this debt.

Please call this office should you wish to discuss this matter .Yours faithfully , Admin Dept.

 

seems to me i've seen this letter somewhere before too !!! so do you think i should write back and inform them that its fine if it takes a month but that as of 2nd June 2007 which is 1 week and two days away they will officially be breaking the law or should i just let them wend their merry way ?? suggestions on a postcard to We love 1st credit oh yes we do !

Link to post
Share on other sites

right well i'll wait and see what pearls of wisdom are imparted on me by anyone wishing to assist and see if 1st credit can send me out any alternative letters to the one's already listed everywhere on this sight , get some new automated responses at least make it more interesting !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right Got A Letter From Connaught Today Saying That Your Payments Are Still In Arrears We Are Going To Take Court Action If Not Brought Up To Date As You Have Now Admitted Liability , I Have Not Admitted Liability So Have Faxed Them Telling Them This And Also Telling Them That They Are In Default And As Such Cannot Pursue This Alleged Debt Succesfully Can Anyone Tell Me Have I Done The Right Thing And Is There Anything Else I Can Do Now Getting Pursued By Connaught And 1st Credit !!!! Thay Only Have Until 1st June Then The 30 Days Are Up What Now Help !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did this debt ever go to court before? Have you admitted the debt in any previous court action?

 

If not then the previous advice is correct.

 

You need to gather evidence for when this gets to court if the creditor decides to carry out their threat of court action. I would recommend that you send letters by recorded delivery as this provides evidence that they have received your letter.

 

Let me know about the past court action and I will sort out what you need to do next.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right then, the only reason they are saying you have acknowledged the debt is because you are paying it. This is a basic error on their part as the Consumer Credit Act is quite clear that it over rides normal contract law (which is what their comment is based on really) and more importantly as an organisation that operates wholly within the Act it is a fact they should be very well aware of. Very naughty.

 

I know you have written already and what you do next depends on what has already happened. You need to send a letter saying something along these lines

 

Firstly, you do not acknowledge the debt. Put that is capital/bold or both. They should not miss it!

 

Secondly detail out what has happened - you know - I wrote to you requesting a copy agreement under S77-79 CCA. You had until xxx date to comply but have failed to supply a copy. There is no exception to this and it applies to creditors or parties to whom the creditor has assigned their alleged debt (Section 189)

(Have a look at the Act and cut and paste bits into your letter. It's here

Consumer Credit Act 1974 )

After that deadline they have 1 further month to comply after which the Act says they have committed an offence (S77(4) or S78(6) depending on the type of agreement)

You can either stop payments or continue paying it is up to you. If they are in default they cannot enforce the agreement and your decision is based on whether you feel obliged to pay or not. (I'm not offering a moral point here, it really is just up to you. Many people stop paying and you are perfectly entitled to do so. This will certainly make the other side respond quicker.)

Whatever you decide to do, tell them.

You might want to wait for the further 1 month to pass so they breach the offence part of the Act just because they are in a weaker position at that point.

Always remember that if they comply then the default position stops immediately. Unless of course by complying they provide a flawed document but we will worry about that when you get to that stage.

The copy they send does not have to be complete, it can omit your signature, address and so on but it must be a true copy. Tell them it must be a true copy and you do not accept the T&C's are such a true copy. Try to find a reason why such as the print date on the copy sent or the level of charges was not that at the date the alleged agreement started. T&C's are not good enough and the OFT or DTI have confirmed this so we can look for it if they persist on that line.

Also tell them that whilst they are in default they cannot process your information so all records should be removed from any third party.

Reiterate that they cannot enforce the alleged debt until they comply with the legislation and so no interest or other costs can be added to the amount owed.

If they are harrassing you by phone, repeat parts of the earlier letter suggested to you.

Finally I would also remind them that S77-79 also requires a full statement of the account to be sent (and they remain in default until it is). This gives you an opportunity to check the amount as you mentioned it was high in an earlier post I think.

 

If you are unsure what to do, post your draft letter and I will take a look at it.

 

Good luck and keep us informed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI DRAFT LETTER BELOW ANY HELP APPRECIATED GOT BOTH BITS OF ACT IN AS NOT SURE WHICH ONE APPLYS IT WAS A CREDIT CARD ORIGINALY ANY HELP APPRECIATED , CHEERS LISA

 

Dear Sir/Madam ,

IN NO WAY DO I ACCEPT LIABILITY FOR THE BELOW DEBT.

A/C NO ****************.

I wrote to you requesting a copy agreement under S77-79 CCA. You had until 30TH April 2007 to comply but have failed to supply a copy. There is no exception to this and it applies to creditors or parties to whom the creditor has assigned their alleged debt (Section 189)

After that deadline you had 1 further month to comply after which the Act says you have committed an offence (S77(4) or S78(6)

77 Duty to give information to debtor under fixed-sum credit agreement

(1) The creditor under a regulated agreement for fixed-sum credit, within the prescribed period after receiving a request in writing to that effect from the debtor and payment of a fee of £1, shall give the debtor a copy of the executed agreement (if any) and of any other document referred to in it, together with a statement signed by or on behalf of the creditor showing, according to the information to which it is practicable for him to refer,—

(a) the total sum paid under the agreement by the debtor;

(b) the total sum which has become payable under the agreement by the debtor but remains unpaid, and the various amounts comprised in that total sum, with the date when each became due; and

© the total sum which is to become payable under the agreement by the debtor, and the various amounts comprised in that total sum, with the date, or mode of determining the date, when each becomes due.

(2) If the creditor possesses insufficient information to enable him to ascertain the amounts and dates mentioned in subsection (1)©, he shall be taken to comply with that paragraph if his statement under subsection (1) gives the basis on which, under the regulated agreement, they would fall to be ascertained.

(3) Subsection (1) does not apply to—

(a) an agreement under which no sum is, or will or may become, payable by the debtor, or

(b) a request made less than one month after a previous request under that subsection relating to the same agreement was complied with.

(4) If the creditor under an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1)—

(a) he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement; and

(b) if the default continues for one month he commits an offence.

(5) This section does not apply to a non-commercial agreement.

78 Duty to give information to debtor under running-account credit agreement

(1) The creditor under a regulated agreement for running-account credit, within the prescribed period after receiving a request in writing to that effect from the debtor and payment of a fee of £1, shall give the debtor a copy of the executed agreement (if any) and of any other document referred to in it, together with a statement signed by or on behalf of the creditor showing, according to the information to which it is practicable for him to refer,—

(a) the state of the account, and

(b) the amount, if any, currently payable under the agreement by the debtor to the creditor, and

© the amounts and due dates of any payments which, if the debtor does not draw further on the account, will later become payable under the agreement by the debtor to the creditor.

(2) If the creditor possesses insufficient information to enable him to ascertain the amounts and dates mentioned in subsection (1)©, he shall be taken to comply with that paragraph if his statement under subsection (1) gives the basis on which, under the regulated agreement, they would fall to be ascertained.

(3) Subsection (1) does not apply to—

(a) an agreement under which no sum is, or will or may become, payable by the debtor, or

(b) a request made less than one month after a previous request under that subsection relating to the same agreement was complied with.

(4) Where running-account credit is provided under a regulated agreement, the creditor shall give the debtor statements in the prescribed form, and with the prescribed contents—

(a) showing according to the information to which it is practicable for him to refer, the state of the account at regular intervals of not more than twelve months, and

(b) where the agreement provides, in relation to specified periods, for the making of payments by the debtor, or the charging against him of interest or any other sum, showing according to the information to which it is practicable for him to refer the state of the account at the end of each of those periods during which there is any movement in the account.

(5) A statement under subsection (4) shall be given within the prescribed period after the end of the period to which the statement relates.

(6) If the creditor under an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1)—

(a) he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement; and

(b) if the default continues for one month he commits an offence.

(7) This section does not apply to a non-commercial agreement, and subsections (4) and (5) do not apply to a small agreement.

 

I will not be making any further payments on this account as you are now commiting an offence by not providing the relevant paperwork.

If you do send the relevant paperwork it must be a true copy and I do not accept the T&C's are such a true copy.

Whilst you are in default you cannot process my information so all records should be removed from any third party.

Also you cannot enforce the alleged debt until you comply with the legislation and so no interest or other costs can be added to the amount owed.

I would also remind you that S77-79 also requires a full statement of the account to be sent .

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest that you cut down the extracts you have quoted from the Act to the relevant one only. Fixed sum is for a loan, running credit is a credit card account.

I would also select only the relvant parts of that Section such as Section 77 (1)(a) (b) and © plus (4)(a) and (b) or Section 78 (1)(a) (b) and ©and (6)(a) and (b).

I would also change the wording about the debt to

I do not acknowledge ANY debt with either you or [insert name of original creditor]

Give us a shout if you are not sure which part of the Act you should be quoting

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...