Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is a ridiculous situation.  The lender has made so many stupid errors of judgement.  I refuse to bow down and willingly 'pay' for their mistakes.  I really want to put this behind me and move on.  I can't yet. 
    • Peter McCormack says he has secured a 15-year lease on the club's Bedford ground.View the full article
    • ae - i have no funds to appoint lawyers.   My point about most caggers getting lost is simply due to so many layers of legal issues that is bound to confuse.  
    • Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same.   Yes.  But every interested buyer was offering within a range - based on local market sales evidence.  Shelter site says a lender is not allowed to wait for the market to improve. Why serve a dilapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease.   The dilapidations notice was a legal first step.  Freeholders have to give time to leaseholders to remedy.  Lender lawyers advised the property was going to be sold and the new buyer would undertake the work.  Their missive came shortly before contracts were given to buyer.  The buyer lawyer and freehold lawyers were then in contact.  The issue of dilapidations remedy was discussed..  But then lender reneged.  There was a few months where neither I nor freeholders were sure what was going on.  Then suddenly demolition works started.   Before one issues a s146 one has to issue a LBA.  That is eventually what happened. ...legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease   A s146 was served.  It took 3y but the parties came to a settlement.   (They couldn't revert as they had ripped out irreplaceable historical features). The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there.  That's not the case   One can ask for another extension.  In this instance the freeholders eventually agreed with a proviso for the receiver not to serve another. You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension.  Correct.  But receiver lawyer was an idiot.   He made so many errors.  No idea why the receiver instructed him?  He used to work for lender lawyers. I belatedly discovered he was sacked for dishonesty and fined a huge sum by the sra  (though kept his licence).  He eventually joined another firm and the receiver bizarrely chose him to handle the extension.  Again he messed up - which is why the matter still hasn't been properly concluded.   In reality, its quite clear the lender/ receiver were just trying to overwhelm me (as trustee and leaseholder) with work (and costs) due to so many legal  issues.  Also they tried to twist things (as lawyers sometimes do).  They tried to create a situation where the freeholders would get a wasted costs order - the intent was to bankrupt the freeholders so they could grab the fh that way.   That didn't happen.  They are still trying though.  They owe the freeholders legal costs (s60) and are refusing to pay.  They are trying to get the freeholders to refer the matter to the tribunal - simply to incur more costs (the freeholders don't want and cant's afford to incur)  Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to.... The property does not qualify under 67 Act.  Their notice was invalid and voided. B petition was struck out. So this is dealt with then.  That action was dealt with yes.   But they then issued a new claim out of a different random court - which I'm still dealing with alone.  This is where I have issues with my old lawyer. He failed to read important legal docs  (which I kept emailing and asking if he was dealing with) and  also didn't deal with something crucial I pointed out.  This lawyer had the lender in a corner and he did not act. Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been ....  Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at?   I could.  But the evidence is clear cut.  Receiver email to lender and lender lawyer: "our strategy for many months  has been for ceo to get the property".  A lender is not allowed to influence the receivership.   They clearly were.  And the law firm were complicit.  The same firm representing the lender and the ceo in his personal capacity - conflict of interest?   I  also have evidence of the lender trying to pay a buyer to walk.  I was never supposed to know about this.  But I was given copies of messages from the receiver "I need to see you face to face, these things are best not put in writing".  No need to divulge all here.  But in hindsight it's clear the lender/ receiver tried - via 2 meetings - to get rid of this buyer (pay large £s) to clear the path for the ceo.   One thing I need to clarify - if a receiver tells a lender to do - or not to do - something should the lender comply? 
    • Why ask for advice if you think it's too complex for the forum members to understand? You'd be better engaging a lawyer. Make sure he has understood all the implications. Stick with his advice. If it doesn't conform to your preconceived opinion then pause and consider whether maybe he's right.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/Restons Claimform - old HFC Goldfish card debt - Prob SB'd


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1022 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

After some very bad personal circumstances I ended up owing Goldfish £6025. I went through a nervous breakdown and couldn't cope, full stop. I ignored them , moved and tried to restart my life. Stupid I know but different people cope in different ways and debt doesn't always come to the top of life's priorities. I have now started to get a grip of things I am nibbling away at all debts. I have now realised that I am owed charges from all my previous cards and banks and I could clear a large amount of my debt with the help from this site and the brilliant people on it!

 

 Wescot contacted me in August 2006 and made various threats to take me to court for £6025 plus £350.00 legal expenses. 

I was badgered into paying £50 a month and have been ever since. It's a struggle to pay this. I now realise, since joining the site, that a good part of this debt is made up of unlawful penalty charges and the interest on them placed on the account by Goldfish. I take it Goldfish have sold the debt to Wescot?

 

Am I now hooked into this repayment or can I do anything to get the debt reduced. I am terrified they will send bailiffs around or lose me my house if I have a bad month and can't pay!!

 

Any ideas /suggestions?

 

Glennyboy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 93
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Send Westcot a CCA request - this will determine if they can legally chase the debt.

 

Send Goldfish a SAR request (with your £10) this will make them give you all the paperwork and statements on your account, then you can calculate what charges have been placed on your account and then claim them back! which will then reduce the balance of the debt.

 

Hope this has helped.

 

PS - DO NOT TALK TO THEM ON THE PHONE - DEAL WITH THEM ONLY IN WRITING!

  • Haha 1

Me Vs AA/Blair Oliver - Defaulted on CCA, Committed Criminal Offence, started chasing payment

 

Me Vs Great Universal - Wrote off the 2k balance, couldnt supply docs

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/74209-me-littlewoods-catalogue.html

 

My Friend Vs Lowell Portfolio - Balance written off, all action stopped!

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/75075-my-friend-lowell-victory.html

 

My Friend Vs Empire Catalogue - Balance Cleared

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/75713-my-friend-empire-droyds.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Kenny. I thought that may be the best course. Just needed confirming. And am now not talking to anyone on the phone. always asking security questions etc. Not in this day and age!!

Going to need a new printer and hard rive at this rate!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you need any help, im here, i am not the best at this, but can help you as best i can, and will help you as best i can.

 

Kenny

Me Vs AA/Blair Oliver - Defaulted on CCA, Committed Criminal Offence, started chasing payment

 

Me Vs Great Universal - Wrote off the 2k balance, couldnt supply docs

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/74209-me-littlewoods-catalogue.html

 

My Friend Vs Lowell Portfolio - Balance written off, all action stopped!

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/75075-my-friend-lowell-victory.html

 

My Friend Vs Empire Catalogue - Balance Cleared

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/75713-my-friend-empire-droyds.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Here goes, please bear with me.

In late 2002, I maxed out my Goldfish card. I had a few problems, lost my wife, house and kids and had a breakdown. This is not a sob story or an attempt to wriggle out of my debt. I moved address and rebuilt my life.

 

In September 2006, I was contacted by Wescot Credit Services, out of the blue, demanding full repayment of £6025, etc etc. I now realise this was a blanket letter sent to anyone with my name, using the voter's register or some other database. I contacted them and have agreed a repayment of £50.00 a month, even though money is very very tight. Since then I have found this site and realise that there a large amount of money owed to me ,in charges, which can ease the situation.

 

I sent S.A.R to Goldfish on 20.03.2007 and cca to Wescot on 20.03.2007. So far no reply from Wescot.

 

I have received this reply from Goldfish:

 

Goldfish

PO box 3598

Glasgow

G68 9YG

 

Dear Glennyboy

 

I write further to your recent contact with our offices.

 

I must advise you that on 17th February 2006, the ownership of the Goldfish business passed from LLoyds TSB plc to Morgan Stanley. As your account was closed prior to the acquisition date it was not included in the Morgan Stanley portfolio and as such we assume no such responsibility under the Data Protection Act or otherwise.

 

I must therefore ask you to contact LLoyds TSB directly in order to address any concerns you may have. Lloyds TSB have accepted that they are the data controllers in these circumstances and therefore, responsible for dealing with inaccuracies or queries.

 

The contact in Lloyds TSB is Mr David Bruce, Credit Risk, consumer lending, Lloyd TSB Bank plc, Third floor, Trafalgar House, Brighton, BN1 4FY.

 

I hope this will be of assistance to you

 

Andrea Monroe

 

Customer Liaison officer

 

My £10.00 S.A.R was sent back to me, in the form of a postal order made out to Goldfish!!

 

Now , I am confused. Am I dealing with Lloyds bank, or have they sold it to Wescot? What if Wescot ignore my C.C.A?

Sorry it's long winded, but I needed to get it all out.:-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send the SAR to Lloyds regarding the charges. Send them the same PO back. Once you have this information we can start to reclaim your charges. Read through the FAQS and the step by step instructions these are linked in my signature.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi glennyboy,

 

i sent my dpa to gold fish (morgan stanley) and just waiting for them to send my statments out.

i havent received a letter like your and been with them for years.

 

will let you know how i go on with my statments as the date is up on the 11 th april.

 

 

good luck

 

anabel xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well CCA sent to Wescot on 20th March and still no contact from them.Do I just sit tight?

 

Goldfish ( a.k.a Lloyds Bank)say they passed the Goldfish business to Morgan Stanley .

 

But:

"As your account was closed prior to the acquisition date it was not included in the Morgan Stanley portfolio" and then advised to contact Lloyds TSB direct, which I have done.

 

Credit Card run around or what?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely,

Checked on Royal Mail and its been delivered. I'll play the waiting game.

 

The thing that really p****s me off is Wescot only contacted me by trawling the voters register. Apparently it's a common tactic to blanket mail everyone with the same name and see how many people own up t6o the debt!!

 

Good job I am an honest bloke. Ha Ha.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Well, still nothing from Wescot after I CCA'd them on 20th March. Nothing in reply to S.A.R to LLoyds who took it from Goldfish.

 

Where do I stand with this now? Shall I send them a letter asking to write off the debt? Or will Wescot take me to Court?

 

Bearing in mind, until I have sight of my history I can't tell how much they owe me , but I reckon its at least £2,500.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would send them the non compliance letter (sorry dont know where it is)

 

or perhaps send them a Letter Before Action letter with an estimated cost of charges?

Me Vs AA/Blair Oliver - Defaulted on CCA, Committed Criminal Offence, started chasing payment

 

Me Vs Great Universal - Wrote off the 2k balance, couldnt supply docs

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/74209-me-littlewoods-catalogue.html

 

My Friend Vs Lowell Portfolio - Balance written off, all action stopped!

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/75075-my-friend-lowell-victory.html

 

My Friend Vs Empire Catalogue - Balance Cleared

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/75713-my-friend-empire-droyds.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi glennyboy-pm'd you-i'm in same boat being pushed between hfc, lloyds nd goldfish-cant get any info at all for sar

lloyds S.A.R -sent 04/04/200

statements received 11/05/2007

prelim-14/05/2007 -£4987

lba-30/05/2007

n1-20/07/2007

 

Co-Op prelim sent-20/04/2007-£136.50

settled in full

goldfish prelim-27/06/2007

 

capital one -deemed served -01/07/2007

settlement without cci offered 17/07/2007

halifax prelim-17/07/2007

 

aqua--prelim-13/07/2007

 

welcome-prelim-30/06/2007

lba-14/07/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still no CCA from Wescot after requested on 20 th March, although they are still phoning three times a day for payment.

 

Goldfish/Lloyds have completely blanked my S.A.R, so it looks like they are struggling to find my details.

 

What's the timescale before Wescot commit a Criminal offence? Is it in working days?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi glenny-i'm still running round in circles-goldfish say my account was sold to lloyds-they canyt trace anything without a card no but i no longer have this-

 

hellllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllp

westcot deny they have it-so do hfc-so do morgan stanley...............

lloyds S.A.R -sent 04/04/200

statements received 11/05/2007

prelim-14/05/2007 -£4987

lba-30/05/2007

n1-20/07/2007

 

Co-Op prelim sent-20/04/2007-£136.50

settled in full

goldfish prelim-27/06/2007

 

capital one -deemed served -01/07/2007

settlement without cci offered 17/07/2007

halifax prelim-17/07/2007

 

aqua--prelim-13/07/2007

 

welcome-prelim-30/06/2007

lba-14/07/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't know what to suggest any more. What really gets me is the fact I have tried to do the right thing after losing the plot, and all these people just blatantly ignore legitimate requests and continue to harrass people on the phone. I wouldn't mind, but I fully expect any fees returned to come off the outstanding balance, and I am willing to pay what I can in instalments.

 

Being treated like something on the bottom of their shoe is driving me nuts. I am tempted to sit tight, shut up and see if they get me into court. My credit score is wrecked anyway, so they can't blackmail me with that one.

 

No wonder people go into hiding!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:mad: :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Glennyboy.

 

Have just been reading your thread. With regards to a CCA request the following holds true

 

After 12 working days the DCA is "in default", and cannot seek to enforce the debt whilst that status remains. Therefore you are under no legal obligation to pay them.

 

After one month, the DCA has committed an offence under the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

You should report them to Trading Standards, the Financial Ombudsman and the FSA.

 

Did your CCA request letter read similar to this

 

I do not acknowledge ANY debt to your company. I require you to supply the following documentation before I will correspond further on this matter.

 

1. You must supply me with a true copy of the alleged agreement you refer to. This is my right under your obligation to supply a copy of the agreement under the legislation contained within s.78 (1) Consumer Credit Act 1974 (s.77 (1) for fixed sum credit) - your obligation also extends to providing a statement of account. I enclose a £1 postal order in payment of the statutory fee, PO Serial Number*******

 

2. You are notified that you are obliged to supply these documents, whether you are the original creditor or not under S189 of the CCA 1974.

 

3. Non-compliance with my request is a criminal offence under the above Act and will result in a report being submitted to the relevant statutory authorities.

 

4. As you are aware, a credit agreement that is not properly documented and signed by the customer is totally unenforceable under the CCA and therefore is a complete defence to any court claim that is issued.

 

 

5. Furthermore you are reminded that under s78 sub section (6) whilst the default continues you are not entitled to enforce the agreement in law

I would request that this data is provided to me within the next 14 days. If you are unable to provide this data then I require all adverse information to be removed completely, including any defaults that may have been applied.

 

Have you had a copy of your most recent credit file? Don't give up with the CCA route. Remember a criminal offence has now been committed by Westcot for their failure to comply with your request. If you have not done so already, you should also send CCA requests to Goldfish & Lloyds. Seeing as they are having trouble complying with your S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) requests, I think they're going to have problems too with your CCA requests. :D

 

Leave them to default after 14 days and then commit an offence after 1 month, then report them to the relevant authorities too.

 

If you are being harassed by phone, write the following letter to the offending company - you can change the wording to suit - ie: your place of work telephone number etc.

 

 

Re: Harassment by telephone

 

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER:

 

Dear Sirs

 

I am writing in relation to the quantity and frequency of telephone calls that I have received from your company,which I deem to be personally harassing .

 

I have verbally requested that these stop, but I am still receiving calls.

 

I now require all further correspondence from your company to be made in writing only and I wish you to remove my telephone number from your database.

 

I am of the view that your continued harassment of me by telephone puts you in breach of Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

 

If you continue to harass me by telephone, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to OFCOM, Trading Standards and The Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you will be liable to a substantial fine.

 

Be advised that any further telephone calls from your company will be recorded or noted on a diary of calls sheet for future reference.

 

 

Yours faithfully, etc etc

 

 

Good luck with everything. I will watching to see how you get on. :)

 

deedee

  • Haha 1

My threads

deedee1310 v Abbey, deedee1310 v Capital One, deedee1310 v Halifax Plc, CapQuest CCJ, deedee1310 v Littlewoods & deedee1310 v Smile

If I have been of help in even the smallest way, please click the star and "add to my reputation" :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Dee Dee

 

My CCA request was worded very similiarly, apart from the bit about not acknowledging the debt. The problem I can see is that I have agreed to pay £50 a month off the debt. Can they claim that as an acknowledgment?

 

Like I have said, I am not trying to avoid paying it, but if a large lump of it is charges owed, I could see a light at the end of the tunnel!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Previous acknowledgement of the debt is irrelevant. You can choose not to acknowledge a debt at any time. As has previously been stated, once they are in default you can legally withhold all payment until they produce the agreement.

 

Personally I would not immediately go rushing off to TS to complain. The longer they are in default the worse for them. The more they try to pursue the debt while in default the more it looks like harassment.

 

Remember you are building a case against them.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...