Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agreed, let them default. Keep everything in writing, if they ring to discuss the accounts over the phone, simply say 'everything in writing please', and hang up. They'll soon get the message. Get all of your paperwork in order too, if you haven't got any, or are missing relevant documents, then you can SAR the original creditor, which is free and they have 30 days to supply the info. Keep a diary of events too. sit back and relax, YOU'RE in control, not them.
    • thought you said you had an sjpn? dx  
    • dont go near them bunch of scammers! ive removed ref. dx  
    • I used to post regularly in order to provide factual information (rather than advice) but got fed up with banging my head against a brick wall in so many cases when posters insisted black was white and I was writing rubbish. I have never posted anything which was untrue or indeed biased in any way.  I have never given 'advice' but have sought to correct erroneous statements which were unhelpful. The only username I have ever used is blf1uk. I have never gone under any other username and have no connection to 'bailiff advice'.  I am not a High Court Enforcement Officer but obtained my first 'bailiff' certificate in 1982. I'm not sure what records you have accessed but I was certainly not born in 1977 - at that time I was serving in the Armed Forces in Hereford, Germany (4th Division HQ) and my wife gave birth to our eldest.   Going back to the original point, the fact is that employees of an Approved Enforcement Agency contracted by the Ministry of Justice can and do execute warrants of arrest (with and without bail), warrants of detention and warrants of commitment. In many cases, the employee is also an enforcement agent [but not acting as one]. Here is a fact.  I recently submitted an FOI request to HMCTS and they advised me (for example) that in 2022/23 Jacobs (the AEA for Wales) was issued with 4,750 financial arrest warrants (without bail) and 473 'breach' warrants.  A breach warrant is a community penalty breach warrant (CPBW) whereby the defendant has breached the terms of either their release from prison or the terms of an order [such as community service].  While the defendant may pay the sum [fine] due to avoid arrest on a financial arrest warrant, a breach warrant always results in their transportation to either a police station [for holding] or directly to the magistrates' court to go before the bench as is the case on financial arrest warrants without bail when they don't pay.  Wales has the lowest number of arrest warrants issued of the seven regions with South East exceeding 50,000.  Overall, the figure for arrest warrants issued to the three AEAs exceeds 200,000.  Many of these were previously dealt with directly by HMCTS using their employed Civilian Enforcement Officers but they were subject to TUPE in 2019 and either left the service or transferred to the three AEAs. In England, a local authority may take committal proceedings against an individual who has not paid their council tax and the court will issue a committal summons.  If the person does not attend the committal hearing, the court will issue a warrant of arrest usually with bail but occasionally without bail (certainly without bail if when bailed on their own recognizance the defendant still fails to appear).   A warrant of arrest to bring the debtor before the court is issued under regulation 48(5) of The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 and can be executed by "any person to whom it is directed or by any constable....." (Reg 48(6).  These, although much [much] lower in number compared to HMCTS, are also dealt with by the enforcement agencies contracted by the local authorities. Feel free to do your own research using FOI enquiries!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ICY -V- Capital One


ICY
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4548 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 175
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

The default notice, shouldnt it have certain parts of it underlined to be valid ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am pretty certain that I have seen somewhere on the forums that there is a specific way of producing default notices to make them valid. I will see if I can find a link. BRB.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Still had no response so will be sending the following off to them this aft

 

Dear Mrs

I am extremely disappointed to note that you have chosen to ignore my previous correspondence dated 25th April 2008, and I am quite frankly shocked that you have failed to respond to a letter sent over 2 months ago, especially after the fact you wrote to me requesting I informed you if the claim should still go ahead.

I enclose a further copy of this correspondence, and would request you read this and inform me of your position on this matter as a matter of urgency.

I have recently been refused a bank account because of “a default entry on your credit file” this default is one issued by Capital One and is incorrectly entered, and also has false and misleading information on it, two years ago I was also refused a mortgage at a favourable rate which I may not have been refused had the default not been placed on my file, obviously this has resulted in me having to pay more than I should have over the past two years, I believe that this demonstrates that your false and misleading information has caused me significant harm, and as such failure to remove all negative information about me will result in a compensation claim being submitted to the courts for damages.

As has already been stated your right to share information about me with third parties ended once you terminated the agreement between myself and Capital One (this occurring when you closed my account) as such your recording of such information is in my opinion unlawful, clarification of this will be determined once this matter comes before the court.

Removal of the false and misleading information from my credit file will cease all further legal action against Capital One, and in this event I shall contact the courts and terminate the case, if you refuse to remove the information I will be applying to the court to remove the stay imposed on the case, and ensure the case is listed to appear before a judge as soon as possible.

I trust this clarifies my position.

 

Yours ...

:madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello ICY,

 

Just read your whole thread. It seems that you are having as much fun with the Cr*p ones as I am.

 

Have you had the stay lifted?I did on mine by just sending a letter. I can send it to you by PM. I didn't use a Notice of Application as this would have cost £65 (£75 now). The cr*p ones removed my default but put late payment markers on my file instead.

 

I have stuck to my guns and asked that ALL prejudicial information is removed including the uncontested CCJ that was granted against me for £265, plus the unlawful charges of course ;)

 

I'll be keeping an eye on your thread too and will let you know how mine is progressing. It's been at a standstill for now. I wrote the court telling them that Cap One hadn't settled with me as they have claimed and I have asked the claim to continue. I'll let you know how I get on.

 

Hang on in there!

 

deedee

My threads

deedee1310 v Abbey, deedee1310 v Capital One, deedee1310 v Halifax Plc, CapQuest CCJ, deedee1310 v Littlewoods & deedee1310 v Smile

If I have been of help in even the smallest way, please click the star and "add to my reputation" :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there an update on this mate?

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi guys sorry, not been online very much lately, I sent the letter on 30th June telling them the financial side is setlled but not ending the claim until default removal, they have ignored this letter sending another one today as follows-

 

I am again writing in an attempt to get this matter resolved without any further delay, I initially wrote to you on the 25th April and again on the 30th June and to date you appear to be ignoring all of my correspondence, you initially wrote to me stating “
If you are not in agreement that your claim has been settled, we would ask that you please notify us in writing which elements of your claim you believe to be still outstanding. We will then be able to discuss the matter further with you
.” I have written to you as you requested, and consider it discourteous of you to fail to respond, I have proof of delivery as letters are sent recorded delivery.

As I have already said I consider the financial part of the claim to be settled, however as stated on the court papers, default removal is also part of the claim, and as such the claim is still not completely settled, and won’t be until Capital One remove the information on my credit file.

I enclose a further copy of each letter and would request you read this and inform me of your position on this as a matter of urgency.

Further to the previous letters I am currently attempting to get a mortgage to buy a new property, and have been told that due to the default Capital One have issued on my credit file, I will be struggling to get the mortgage I want, this demonstrates clearly that your recording of false negative information has caused damage to my ability to obtain affordable finance and as such failure to removed the information immediately will result in me submitting a claim for damages.

I trust this clarifies my position.

 

 

If this doesnt kickstart them, then I have no idea what will.

 

:madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could tell them that, in a recent case in Scotland, a claimant ws awarded £116k in just these dcircumstances - couldn't get a mortgage and therefore lost potential value of the house because of false negative credit marker. See RICHARD DURKIN v. DGS RETAIL LIMITED+HFC BANK PLC, 26 March 2008, Sheriff J K Tierney

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Well this I really dont believe

 

Had a letter today from the Crap1,

Dear me

 

Thank you for your letter dated 30th June, I apologise for the delay in replying to you.

 

We refunded the default fees claimed on a without admission basis as a goodwill payment as such we believe the default that was recorded on your credit file in January 2006 was accuratly recorded. However in order to settle this matter, without admission of liability I have arranged for the default to be removed.

 

The credit file amendment department has been informed of this decision and your credit file should show the amendments within a month.

 

It is our view that we have agreed to settle your claim in full. We will write to X County Court to advise of our settelment and would ask that you do the same in order for the claim to be closed by them

 

Yours .......

 

So all is well is it.

 

Well actually NO

 

Looked on my credit file to see that I now no longer have a default. However the capital one account despite being closed a few years ago is now showing with 6 missed payments on the account, I am baffled now.

 

the following is the current record.-

ENTRY NUMBER: C3

Name:
MR X

Address:
X

Date of birth:
X

C
ompany name:
CAPITAL ONE

Account type:
Credit card / Store card

Started:
28/07/2004

Current Balance:
£0

Credit Limit:
£200

File Updated for the Period to:
31/07/2008

Status history:

[] brackets indicate most recent months status
[
hist_6.jpg
]
hist_6.jpghist_5.jpghist_4.jpghist_3.jpghist_2.jpghist_1.jpghist_0.jpghist_0.jpghist_0.jpg
Summary of payment history:
In the last 18 months of account activity, the number of status 1-2 is 5 and the number of status 3+ is 5

:madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Can anybody please tell me how long Account Information stays on my experian report?

 

this is really hitting my total credit score, which shows the only thing having a negative impact on my score is the late payments to Capital one.

 

 

Also are they allowed to record information about me as myself and capital one we no longer have a contract and didnt when they last updated my credit file on 31st July 2008.

 

I really should notify the court that the claim I submitted is now settled, in that the have refunded the money part of the claim, and have technically removed the default (even if they have replaced it with late payment markers).

 

Is there anything I can do to get the late payment markers removed?

credi.jpg

Edited by ICY
:madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks usa, although the amount they defaulted me for was less than the amount they have refunded me from charges, so is it right that although they removed the default, they can still leave these late payment markers despite them paying me back more than they alledged that I owed, therefore in theory I couldnt have owed the money in the first place, so cant have made late payments am I correct.

 

Should I write to the court and end the case, or should I take it to the court, and if I do do I need to amend the claim or explain when I arrive, really need to get a move on with this now :0)

:madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...