Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Wrongly convicted Horizon victims in Scotland to be exonerated NEWS.STV.TV Victims who faced wrongful convictions are to be exonerated the day after Royal Assent is granted.  
    • If anybody has any advice here, it would be greatly appreciated, I already suffer with pre-existing disabilities & have struggled with this so far. 
    • so return of goods order etc etc read upload  scan pages to jpg, redact in mspaint. the convert to and merge to one mass PDF  read upload and use the online listed sites for all 3 stages. do you want to keep the car? i will guess this was a manual paper claimform direct from the co.court or was it org sent from salford bulk processing and has just got reaq ssigned?      
    • Speaking of the reformatory boys, here they are with all of their supporters, some of whom traveled with them from miles away, all carefully crammed together and photographed to look like there were more than about 80 .. rather like Farages last rally with even fewer people crammed around what looked like an ice cream van or mobile tea bar ... Although a number in the crowd apparently thought they were at a vintage car rally as they appeared to be chanting 'crank-her'. A vintage Bentley must be out of view.   Is this all there is? Its less than the Tory candidate. - shut up and smile while they get a camera angle that looks better
    • in order for us to help you we require the following information:- Which Court have you received the claim from ? Canterbury Name of the Claimant ? Moneybarn No 1   How many defendant's  joint or self ? One Date of issue –  29/05/24 Acknowledged by 14/06/24  Defence by 29/06/24  Particulars of Claim PARTICULARS OF CLAIM 1.  By a Conditional Sale Agreement in writing made on 25th August 2022. Between the Claimant and Defendant, the Claimant let to the Defendant on Conditional Sale. A Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi (200 P S) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200cc (Sep.2015) Registration No, ******* Chassis number ***************** (“The Vehicle”).  A copy of the agreement is attached  2.  The price of the goods was £15,995.00. The Initial Rental was £8500.00.  The total charge for credit was £3575.;17 And the balance of £11,070.17 was payable by 59 equal consecutive monthly instalments of £187 63. payable on the 25th of each month. 3.  The following were expressed conditions of the set agreement, Clause 8: Our Right to End this Agreement  8.1   Subject to sending you the notice as required by law, any of the following events will entitle us to end this Agreement: 8.1.2  You fail to pay the advance payment (if any) or any of the payments as specified on the front page of this agreement or any other sum payable under this Agreement. 8.1.3 If any of the information you have given us before entering into this Agreement or during the term of this Agreement was false 8.1.4 We consider, acting reasonably, that the goods may be in jeopardy or that our rights in the goods may otherwise be prejudiced. 8.1.5 If you die 8.1.6 If a bankruptcy petition is presented against you; if you petition for your own bankruptcy, or make a live arrangement with your creditors or call a meeting of them. 8. 1.7 If in Scotland, you become insolvent or sequestration or a receiver, judicial factor or trustee to be appointed over any of your estate, or effects or suffer an arrestment, charge attachment or other diligence to be issued or levied on any of your estate or effects or suffer any exercise, or threatened exercise of landlords hype hypothec 8.1.8 If you are a partnership, you are dissolved 8.1.9 If the goods are destroyed, lost, stolen and/or treated by the insurer as a total loss in response to an insurance claim. 8.1.10 If we reasonably believe any payment made to us in respect of this Agreement is a proceed of crime. 8.1.11 If steps are taken by us to terminate any other agreement which you have entered into with us. Clause 9.  Effect of Us Terminating Agreement 9.1 If this Agreement terminates under clause 8 the following will apply 9.1.1 Subject to the rights given to you by law, you will no longer be entitled to possession of the goods and must return them to us to an address as we may reasonably specify, (removing or commencing the removal of any cherished plates) together with a V5 registration certificate, both sets of keys and a service record book. If you are unable or unwilling to return the goods to us then we shall collect the goods and we'll charge you in accordance with clause 10.3 9.1.2 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you for all payments and all other sums do under this agreement at the date of termination 9.1.3 We will sell the goods or public sale at the earliest opportunity once the goods are in a reasonable condition which includes a return of the items listed in clause 7.1.4 9.1.4 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you of the rest of the Total Amount Payable under this agreement less: ( a) A rebate for early settlement ias required by law which will be calculated and notified to you at the time of payment (b) The proceeds of sale of the goods (if any) after deduction of all costs associated with finding you and/or the goods, recovery, refurbishment and repair. Insurance, storage, sale, agents fees, cherished plate removal, replacement keys, costs associated with obtaining service history for the goods and in relation to obtaining a duplicate V5 registration certificate 4, The following are particulars required by Civil Procedure Rules. Rule 7.9 as set out in 7.1 and 7.2 of the associated Practice Direction entitled Hire Purchase Claims:- a)     The agreement is dated 25 August 2022. And is between Moneybarn No1 Limited  and xxxxxxxxx under agreement  number xxxxxx. b)    The claimant was one of the original parties to the agreement. c)    The agreement is regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. d)    The goods claimed Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi ( 200 PS) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200 cc (Sep2015} Registration No ^^^^^^^ Chassis number ***************** e)     The total price of the goods £19570 f)     The paid up sum £1206 5 g)    The unpaid balance of the total price £7505 (to include charges) h)    A default notice was sent to the defendant on 20th February 2024 by First class post i)      The date when the right to demand delivery of the goods accrued 14 March 2024 j)      The amount if any claimed as an alternative to delivery of the goods 7505 22 include charges 5.  At the date of service of the notice the instalments were £562.89 in arrears. 6. By reason of the Termination of the Agreement by the notice, defendant became liable to pay the sum of £7502 7. The date of maturity the agreement is 24th August 2027. 8. Further or alternative by reasons of  the Defendant breaches of the agreement by failing to pay the said instalments, the Defendant evinced an intention no longer to be bound by the Agreement and repudiated it by the said Notice the claimant accepted that repudiation 9. By reason of such repudiation the claimant has suffered loss and damage. Total amount payable £19570 Less sum paid or in arrears by the date of repudiation £12064 97 Balance £7505 (to include charges.) ( The claimant will give credit if necessary for the value of the vehicle if recovered.)  The claimant therefore claims 1.    An order for delivery up of the vehicle 2.    The MoneyClaim to be adjourned generally with liberty to restore,  Upon restoration of the MoneyClaim following return or loss of the vehicle. the Claimant will ensure the pre action protocol for debt claims is followed. 3.    Pursuant to s 90 (1)  of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. An order that the Claimant and/or its agents may enter any premises in which the vehicle is situated in order to recover the vehicle should it not be returned by the Defendant 4.    further or alternatively damages 5.    costs Statement of truth The Claimant believes that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true. The Claimant understands that the proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes or causes to be made a false statement in the document for verified by statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. I am duly Authorised by the Claimant to sign these Particulars of Claim signed Dated 17th of April 2024  What is the total value of the claim? 7502   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Never heard of this   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? No   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After  Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? In a garage  Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes  Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Original Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? n/a   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? They said sent but nor received   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? None seen   Why did you cease payments? Still Paying,   What was the date of your last payment? Yesterday  31st May 2024   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes on 12 Feb 2024   What you need to do now.   Can't scan, will do via another means as you cant have jpg  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

125sms.com -Free txt message - nope, - £100 CON


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6045 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi, they are doing the same to me, someone signed up my name nad address on there and they are chargin me for something i never knew about :( they are threatening to take me to court and everything, i dont know what to do at all,

 

i told them that i never signed up to it and someone else must of done it under my name, but they have my ip? so obviousaly someone else in this household did it and i havent got a clue who did,

 

what should i do, i really need help

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 130
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest ian cognito
why would they say all that stuff

 

So you'll panic and pay up!!!

 

As has already been advised, pop their e-mail adress into your junk senders and put it behind you, there is more chance of you getting your free texts than there is of them getting you into court!!!

 

Please take notice of what has already been posted on this thread, it's a [problem], the web is full of them, people who see an easy buck and think nobody will catch up with them - how wrong they are.

 

Please folks, beware of everyone on the web, even those names you trust, let alone those you've never heard of.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh no... I was going hell until I finish reading the forum. I don't know somehow I signed up for this free sms without reading it fully. And I was getting emails after emails from them and I was so scared. Eventhough I am in Canada I was feared because I signed up with my office ip, the IP is static. I didn't know what to do. I went to the 125sms site again while I was at my work place it seems that they are recording the IP because I they had my IP, domain and everything there.

 

I am thinking of reporting to BBC or something. I see that so many people are getting this emails and for sure some of them must have paid the amount that they requested. For those poor people we should do something to end their drama.

 

Thank you for all your support. I am taking a big breath now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why is everyone making a big thing about IP addresses, if like most you are assigned an IP address dynamically then ANYONE using your ISP could have had that IP address at that given time unless you have a static address it means sweet FA, the only way they could tie you to an IP is with a UK court order ordering your ISP to release the logs of who had what IP at a given time and do you really think these chancers are going to get that court order or your ISP is going to give it to them? I think not

Link to post
Share on other sites

The type of IP you have is irrelevant, dynamic or static. Basically these guys are [problematic] and are hoping you'll give in and just pay up. i don't think you'd ever need to worry about seeing the inside of a court room over this.

[COLOR=blue][B]Defaultless since 2012 :)[/B][/COLOR][COLOR=green][/COLOR]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not irrelevant I was making a point that them having your IP address makes no difference because without ISP logs they cannot prove it was you and was attempting to help allay the fears of people worrying about IPs

 

So in reply to your post the my answer regarding IPs IS relevant and who are you to decide whats relevant or not to a discussion anyway I dont see a moderators badge on your profile!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know about IP addresses. I also know that ISPs will not under any circumstances release their log information to anyone. Even the Police have to demand it, and can only get it in case of a criminal investigation. The Police have repeatedly said to me that

"it's nearly impossible to get enough evidence to place someone at a keyboard doing a particular thing at a particular time with only electronic evidence. You need a witness."

 

So - ignore all their crap about IP addresses - they've got NOTHING. NADA. ZIP. DIDDLY. Even if they were not [problematic], I would ignore this particular piece of claptrap.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell that to the people who have had the RIAA knock on their doors or to the guy who has just lost his battle to appeal his extradition to the US for hacking into military computers. If a company has a lawful reason to bring your IP address to law enforcement they can and will track you down however in the case of this SMS service, they don't have a lawful reason but are just trying to use it to scaremonger.

 

What I was saying is that it doesn't matter in the slightest whether you have a static or dynamic IP because they are both traceable to your machine so why static and dynamic IPs were even brought into the discussion I don't know. So yes, static and dynamic IPs are IRRELEVANT.

[COLOR=blue][B]Defaultless since 2012 :)[/B][/COLOR][COLOR=green][/COLOR]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell that to the people who have had the RIAA knock on their doors or to the guy who has just lost his battle to appeal his extradition to the US for hacking into military computers. If a company has a lawful reason to bring your IP address to law enforcement they can and will track you down however in the case of this SMS service, they don't have a lawful reason but are just trying to use it to scaremonger.

 

What I was saying is that it doesn't matter in the slightest whether you have a static or dynamic IP because they are both traceable to your machine so why static and dynamic IPs were even brought into the discussion I don't know. So yes, static and dynamic IPs are IRRELEVANT.

 

Again, you're talking about Law enforcement. The Police. Criminal offences.

 

Here, on this site, we're talking about Civil Law. There is absolutely no way in a million years that anyone's ISP are going to give a company ANY information about the user of an IP address simply because they owe them money.

 

As I stated in my original post, the Police only get that information when they demand it in the course of a criminal investigation, and even then they must back it up with other evidence. Nothing you have said is a contradiction of anything I've said.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well the poster above says the company is saying if you do not verify your details they will assume they are fraudulent and pass them onto law enforcement. Last time I checked, fraud was a criminal offense. Also, there is nothing stopping a judge ordering an ISP to provide the logs in a civil case if the judge finds it fit to do so. Anyways, this is completely off topic now.

[COLOR=blue][B]Defaultless since 2012 :)[/B][/COLOR][COLOR=green][/COLOR]

Link to post
Share on other sites

All those who have suffered at the hands of these should get together and do a mass complaint to Watchdog and the OFT

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest ian cognito

There's a few where they log scams for you to check if something is on the level, you can also forward any you come across, try this one

 

Urban Legends Reference Pages

 

The problem is that these sites are run by people who are nationals of one country, often registered in another country and have the sites hosted in yet another, usually places which don't recognise international laws, the reason there are a lot of Nigerian scams around. Unless something is a major fraud or a risk to security, or the victim has pots of money, is unlikely anything will be done about it.

 

Remember - if something looks to good to be true - it usually is!!! (CAG being the exception to the rule of course)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not irrelevant I was making a point that them having your IP address makes no difference because without ISP logs they cannot prove it was you and was attempting to help allay the fears of people worrying about IPs

 

So in reply to your post the my answer regarding IPs IS relevant and who are you to decide whats relevant or not to a discussion anyway I dont see a moderators badge on your profile!

 

Chill

 

You dont need to be a moderator to pass an opinion

Whatever I post is my opinion and should be taken as such, an opinion. While it is what I believe and is offered in good faith, it should not be taken as a statement of truth

Link to post
Share on other sites

They advertise a service as free, but hidden deep within the contract is a charge.

 

More than the user being bought to court for breach of contract, I feel that the provider would have something to answer for in as much as breach of trades descriptions.

 

In any case, if the texts aren't getting through that you've sent - then the service is not being provided that you signed up for.

 

[problematic]!

Advice offered by ENRON is without prejudice and is for your judgement as to whether to take it. You should seek the assistance or hire of a solicitor or other paid professional if in doubt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...