Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok I got the Parking company wrong. Sorry. The WS Witness Statement  is what you will need to complete if NPE decide to go to Court. So are you saying that when they finally got round to sending you the correct documents, they dated the new NTH the same date as the original NTH? I hope you have kept the original one and the correspondence with NPE, yourself and the ICO. So yes, please post everything up.
    • Why are you paying them anything? you are just running out the statute barred clock to infinity. Personally I'd stop paying them immediately, and ignore any further communication from them unless it's a letter of Claim.  Also have you moved since taking out the Credit card, if so you need to write to them with your current address.
    • No they must've redacted the contract, that was like that when I received it. Yes correct I was there for 90 seconds!  Yes I uploaded the whole contents of their response to my CPR31.14, which included the original PCN 
    • Hello, I have an old Capital One credit card debt under £1500 for which I've been paying £1 a month for 5+ years. I did a CCA request to Lowell and received the original signed CA plus statements from date of inception to the end of 2019. I can see from the statements that no payments were credited to the account for all of 2019. I know payments were made as they were part of my DMP with Payplan. At the time the account was with Fredrickson.  They have not provided any statements from 2020 to present and I am writing to them to request these. So I'm sure the balance they are pursuing is incorrect - can I dispute the debt amount based on this and render it unenforceable? I've trawled the forums and Google searched but can't find an answer, so apologies if it's been asked before. Any input most appreciated, thank you :-)  
    • Thank you for your comments everyone. I have spoken to Ico about recording my phone calls for my personal use and also mentioned it to a law firm they said i was ok as long as it was not shared and for my personal use. I would never share it. I can easy prove i need to record on disability grounds.. I normally make videos how i am to document my conditions and how i am affected. I have in the past obtained a phone call to doctors to reception by GDPR. Normally I have my partner with me now. The only way i found is to have a advocate with me. even with my partner with me a trainee gp seen a short video and said in front of my partner “are they voluntary or involuntary”   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ruthbridge Ltd


devlin76
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4063 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi kayle,

Google Experian and/or Equifax the

two main agencies and take the free 30

day trials,the will ask for a debit/card

for id purposes no charge is made to

the card.

Just cancel before the 30 days is up.

 

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 288
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Do not enter into any form of contract with them whether verbally or in writing, do not speak with them over the phone, just confirming your name and address is entering into a slient contract, never admit you owe them or agree to pay them. The burden of proof is with them not you. They will make veiled threats and may harass you, don't get scared, always ask them questions and always in writing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi There,first timer here. i received a letter a couple of weeks ago from Ruthbridge limited asking whether my husband resides under the address of our home (well yes he does since we own the property) he was advised to make contact with the above, which i had urged him to do since i don't like things hanging over me. He was unsuccessful trying to call them so i decided to take action in my own hands- i googled Ruthbridge to see first what they are about and this Forum came up with a lot of people getting a lot of grief from them. Now, neither of us know why the letter arrived in the first place. we are unaware of any debts and really i'm looking for advice of how to tackle this. I don't want to ignore the letter but at the same time i don't really want to open a (very nasty by the look of it) can of worms. Could someone please advise what the best steps are. The letter stated that my husband needs to make contact with them otherwise they will arrange for their agent to contact us. that has not yet happened but i want to be prepared especially having read what this company is putting people through.any help or comments are appreciated.thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, If Ruthbridge have not

stated what the are chasing

they can be ignored until the

do.

They are well known for chasing

debts that are statute barred or

unenforceable in some way.

Jason & Julia Evans the deadly

duo who seem to be in charge

of all the departments.

Check your husbands credit reference

files with Experian and Equifax for

any indication what the debt might be.

If it does no show then it will be over 6

years old.

Get the info and post back here for advice.

ANDNEVER EVER PHONE A DEBT COLLECTOR

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, thanks very much for your reply. well we have ignored the first letter but received another one-today- specifically addressed to my husband- stating that he owes just over £1700. the letter was very polite offering a 'special deal' that if he phones them within 5 days they will only request a payment of £345 in one and only installment. my husband and i have been married for 9 years and the debt is approx 15 years old- he took on a credit card for his step farther so to be fair it's not ever really his debt although it is in his name. Now a part of me wants it paid and over with but i have read so much about Ruthbridge that i am very concerned that i will be opening a Pandora's box. i am planning to ask his step-father to deal witht he financial side of things but i understand that even that needs to be handled very carefully as it is always strongly advised not to call them and i simply don't want my husband step father to call and put his foot in it...i'm really looking for the best and safest solution...:-)

Edited by robinfly
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, thanks very much for your reply. well we have ignored the first letter but received another one-today- specifically addressed to my husband- stating that he owes just over £1700. the letter was very polite offering a 'special deal' that if he phones them within 5 days they will only request a payment of £345 in one and only installment. my husband and i have been married for 9 years and the debt is approx 15 years old- he took on a credit card for his step farther so to be fair it's not ever really his debt although it is in his name. Now a part of me wants it paid and over with but i have read so much about Ruthbridge that i am very concerned that i will be opening a Pandora's box. i am planning to ask his step-father to deal witht he financial side of things but i understand that even that needs to be handled very carefully as it is always strongly advised not to call them and i simply don't want my husband step father to call and put his foot in it...i'm really looking for the best and safest solution...:-)

This debt is almost certainly statute barred, no payment

or acknowledgment in the past six clear years

confirm this and tell Ruthbridge the debt is SB

and he wont be paying END OF STORY.

Ruthbridge are notorious for chasing SB

debts and offering''discounts'' to wrest

payments out of unsuspecting people.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I had some problems last year (same tiime of year also) same problem with mcKenzie Hall from a debt spanning as far back as 2000 - this was a debt I had already cleared up with the original company. Luckily I didn't ring them straight away, I planned to ring in my lunch hour from work - one of my colleagues (a former bank manager) advised me DO NOT RING - GET IN TOUCH WITH A FREE LEAGAL ADVICE LINE - I did this and they were well aware of this company - I sent them all the details and they told me not to get in touch as this debt was STATUTE BARRED. The tone of the initial letter was scary (BOLD RED FONT), the second stated that if I failed to communicate within 10 days a bailiff would appear on the doorstep to take goods up to the value of the debt. I rang the legal aid line (which was free by the way) and they told me they could not do this - if anyone did turn up ring the police, however, they doubted that anything would happen....THEY WERE RIGHT!!! One year on I now receive the same piffle from another company - I will relegate this letter to were it belongs - in the bin as it is rubbish.

 

Thanks to this site I was able to get info relating to bully boy tactics of both McKenzie Hall and now Ruthbridge Ltd. I really just wanted to state for the record that sites like these are BRILLIANT!! It gives peace of mind and lets you know that you are not alone. Companies like those named previously, often operate close to the wind and if you have all the information to hand and seek advice, they can't con you. All the advice on this site has really helped....THANK YOU!! ☺

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ruthbridge are notorious at this time of year in particular on old SB debts,

their threats are empty and in most cases if the people they contact are

savvy so will their pockets:madgrin:

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please do NOT throw these letters away, you should keep them as proof of the intimidatory tactics should you ever need it. Always, report this type of intimidation to the OFT. They will not deal with individual cases, but they do keep a record of all complaints and when sufficient are received they will act. :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

I recieved a letter from Ruthbridge Ltd last week. It claimed I was a customer of theirs and they needed to trace me and could I call them. I naturally calledthem...Number Withheld and the Lass on the end started asking me personal questions. I stopped her mid flow and said quite politely "You should already know this if i'm a customer of yours" she stuttered to a halt. I proceeded to inform her that I have never heard of them and would not pass any of my personal details to anyone over the phone no matter how official the letter looked stating the current climate etc. Could she send me details in a letter.

 

Upshot is the conversation ended with her sympathising with me and apologising....have not heard from them since.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Beware of ever speaking to Ruthbridge they

can be very abusive and arrogant, dealing

mostly debis that no other company will touch,

often statute barred or no documents or both.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...
Ignore them, bunch of chancers on a fishing trip to see who they can hook in. Do not enter into any dialogue with them, do not agree that you owe them, the burden of proof is on them, not you.

 

That what friend said I was but perturbed because it was in my name ? Thank you for your help, as I think I was told it was s.b if it was true.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Welcome to CAG,

 

If a debt has reached the depths of Ruthbridge it is either statute barred or unenforceable, so you need to check your cedit reference files to see what is showing.

 

Until Ruthbridge actually state what they are chasing ignore them, and do NOT be tempted to phone them., they are known to try intimidation.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to be SURE of your facts Statute Barred = 6 years with no payment or written acknowlegment of the debt (5years in Scotland).

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to be SURE of your facts Statute Barred = 6 years with no payment or written acknowlegment of the debt (5years in Scotland).

 

I've have just checked on my credit file and only thing can see is a company I had trouble with back in oct 2007? But have never had any letters or calls since!! The payment I sent was aug/sep 2007. What dose this mean. Is it s.b or do I have too pay them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to be SURE of your facts Statute Barred = 6 years with no payment or written acknowlegment of the debt (5years in Scotland).

 

I've have just checked on my credit file and only thing can see is a company I had trouble with back in oct 2007? But have never had any letters or calls since!! The payment I sent was aug/sep 2007. What dose this mean. Is it s.b or do I have too pay them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aug/Sept 2013 if your dates are right. No need to do anything until the debt is identified.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi I have just received a 2nd letter stating the dept and that they have been appointed as agent By company too recover dept. they talking about going too court if I ignore the letter. And that all costs will be added too said dept. what do I do ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...