Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Are 1st Credit being fair and correct?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6288 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi. Over the last 2 to 3 years, I have received a letter from 1st Credit once a year, requesting I contact them immediately regarding a £5500 approx. debt owing to Tesco Personal Finance.

 

Upon receipt of the first letter, I rightly contacted Tesco to trace the account. They had no records of the outstanding account, even though I provided 2 different addresses going back at least 7 years.

 

I contacted 1st Credit and told them to get a copy of the account information from the client (tesco) but no reply was ever sent. I receive these letters from 1st Credit every 6 to 12 months but nothing is ever actually done.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah I'm not the only one suffering from these people!

I'm having a nightmare with 1st Credit Ltd who claim I owe Abbey money from ten years ago!

After explaining to them in October 2006 that I've had nothing to do with them I requested evidence from Abbey to prove I owed them money.

Abbey had no record of me on their system but if they found something then I'd be sent the evidence.

Two months later I receive a badly photocopied statement from 1st Credit Ltd who claimed it was from Abbey. The account number and sort code on the statement didn't match to the details 1st Credit had for me.

I confronted them about it and they sent me a solicitors letter threatening me with court action within the next two weeks.

I wrote them a letter stating that because this was ten years ago and I hadn't heard anything until last October. The debt was statue barred and they couldn't continue with the case.

 

I was contacted by 1st Credit Ltd yesterday and the phone call was insulting and abusive.

The woman I spoke to accused me of lying six times, she cross-examined me trying to get me to confess to the debt and also accused the Office of Fair Trading of talking rubbish in advising me that the debt was statue barred.

When I also stated the evidence produced had nothing to do with my account, she told me that didn't matter.

 

I then asked her for further evidence of this debt as I wasn't accepting the statement produced. She told me I'm not entitled to anything and I was getting a court summons where this "evidence" would be produced.

 

What can we do about this company?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, contact Trading Standards and OFT. What they are doing is clearly a breach of the OFT guidelines.

 

Secondly - DON'T SPEAK TO THEM ON THE PHONE!!!!

 

They are trying to intimidate you into paying. Report this to TS & OFT too. Let them take you to court if they want to - you can defend the claim and force disclosure of said documents.

 

But I can pretty much guarantee it will not go to court - if they know the debt is statute barred, which they will, they will also know they cannot enforce it through the courts. Send them a CCA for good measure. If they continue, you can SAr them as well, but I personally wouldn't waste my £10 on these guys.

 

Once you've done all this, have a nice cup of tea, relax ... and look forward to hearing nothing more from them. I've had a couple of DCA's like this chase me for statute barred debts they have still to show me any proof of existing and it all seems to be bluster. Once challenged, I've heard nothing more.

 

However, in case I'm wrong (IMO unlikely from my experience) cover your bases with OFT and TS and a letter.

 

ps If they do call again, send them the telepjhone harrassment letter and laugh in their faces - it annoys them, it really does;)

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, contact Trading Standards and OFT. What they are doing is clearly a breach of the OFT guidelines.

 

Secondly - DON'T SPEAK TO THEM ON THE PHONE!!!!

 

They are trying to intimidate you into paying. Report this to TS & OFT too. Let them take you to court if they want to - you can defend the claim and force disclosure of said documents.

 

But I can pretty much guarantee it will not go to court - if they know the debt is statute barred, which they will, they will also know they cannot enforce it through the courts. Send them a CCA for good measure. If they continue, you can SAr them as well, but I personally wouldn't waste my £10 on these guys.

 

Once you've done all this, have a nice cup of tea, relax ... and look forward to hearing nothing more from them. I've had a couple of DCA's like this chase me for statute barred debts they have still to show me any proof of existing and it all seems to be bluster. Once challenged, I've heard nothing more.

 

However, in case I'm wrong (IMO unlikely from my experience) cover your bases with OFT and TS and a letter.

 

ps If they do call again, send them the telepjhone harrassment letter and laugh in their faces - it annoys them, it really does;)

 

Do all of the advised. you have to remember that DCA personnel work on a commision basis..The more money they collect, the more wages they get- nice people eh? They'll try anything to boost their wage packet...

Just hate every DCA out there

Link to post
Share on other sites

My thread here was really a bit of a joke at 1st Credit's expense; http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/73108-1st-credit-noting-contents.html

 

But there is a more serious point to it; They are useless. Run rings round them.

 

They are also very abusive on the phone.

 

If you do receive an abusive call from anyone; take a deep breath and don't let it get to you; remember that it is you that is in control. They want to speak to you, and if they want to they will have to show you basic respect and abide by your standards.

 

- The call is being recorded, even it is it not. Make them agree to you recording the call; explain that it will not be possible for the call to continue if they do not agree. "Once you have started the recording", get them to reconfirm for the benefit of the tape. At the end, ask them if they want you to send them a copy of the recording for their records.

 

- If they interrupt; make them listen to you and don't listen to them until they have. You let them have their say, make them let you have yours. Be firm, but polite. And more importantly, irritatingly patronising.

 

"Excuse me, you seem to have accidentally started to talk when I was, I'm sure you didn't intend to, but I listened to what you had to say so please listen to me until I have finished what I have to say."

 

- If they are disrespectful; they must apologise to you before you continue the conversation

 

- If they make a sweeping dismissive statement, make them justify it. They do not move on until they have. A matter that is raised must be dealt with; you cannot move on until it has been. It must be taken to the stage where it makes sense to you or they admit it doesn't.

 

- Control the flow of the conversation; they move on once they have dealt with matters that they raised to the satisfaction of you understanding.

 

"It is important for both of us that we make sure this issue is dealt with properly before moving on. unresolved issues or points of confusion will not help either of us in the long run. Therefor please confirm why you believe that the Statute of Limitation does not apply to your organisation. I also need to know what other statutes your organisation has been exempted from, how this exemption was granted, and by whom."

 

- Remember where you were; if they try to move on too soon, remember where you need to take them back to.

 

- But don't bother asking for managers. Even if you did get to speak to a real one, that's making life easier for the caller as they didn't have to deal with you when you are being difficult. They probably hate the manager anyway. If they want you to speak to a manager tell them that you want to deal with them, as they phoned and as it is them that said XXXX. Why are they raising issues that they then can't deal with?

 

- Never feel embarrassed by the fact that a conversation might not get anywhere if you do the above; it is their fault. Tell tham that the conversation is not achieving anything, because they are not providing you with a small number of things that are perfectly reasonable to request and that in any case they ought to be giving without being asked. Might they perhaps wish to take advantage of an opportunity to collect their thoughts and put them in writing at a later date?

Number of times I've asked 1st Credit for information that I stil haven't recieved... 55 as at 02/05/07 :!:

Link to post
Share on other sites

2nd thing here is if its over 6yrs since the last transaction [moneywise] then.... .forget it!

 

 

dx100uk:)

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I spoke to the Office of Fair Trading yesterday who are looking into it. They've told me to send a letter stating the OFT rulings they've breached and to demand a letter stating the case is now closed.

If they dismiss the letter and continue to pursue the matter I've got to contact OFT who will involve Trading Standards and to inform the Police to state a complaint of harassment. :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Today I have received a further letter from 1st Credit entitled 'Legal Proceedings'. I am now very concerned and worried because they have threatened to do the following:

 

Court action

Bailiffs

County Court Judgement

Substantial Legal Costs

A formal charge against my house (yes I am a home owner)

 

I still insist I have no trace of this debt, going back at least 6 to 7 years! When I received the first of these 'letters' from 1st Credit, I immediately tried to trace back the debt. The client, Tesco Personal Finance, had no record of my owing the money. I provided them with both current and previous addresses going back almost 10 years and nevertheless, I'm sure they would have chased this up years ago! My local Citizens Advice also asked 1st Credit for proof of the loan or debt, never received a written reply in nearly 2 years.

 

Maybe I shouldn't panic just yet; I have found a similar letter to the above from November 2005, again no subsequent 'court action' or 'bailiff' actually happened. But I am concerned if the said 'debt' is on my credit file??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote: "But I am concerned if the said 'debt' is on my credit file??"

 

It'll only take you 5 minutes to check!

 

Experian Credit Expert, check credit rating, credit reports & file alerts - with Experian CreditExpert.co.uk

 

Don't forget to cancel the free trial!

 

Funny enough I've got two copies of my credit report one from two years ago and another just recently and the debt I'm being chased for isn't on either of them. :rolleyes:

 

As for 1st Credit Limited I received this letter yesterday.

 

I refer to your telephone conversation with a member of our staff where you claimed that we were guilty of harassment over a 'statute barred' debt.

 

It is the policy of 1st Credit Ltd to advice the OFT and Local Trading Standards offices whenever false allegations are made against the company

 

You have been advised numerous times that this debt is not statute barred as a payment of £289.02 was made on the 8th May 2001. We therefore fail to understand why you continue to claim it is.

 

I would also mention that you acknowledged this debt on the 5th February 2001 and offered to make payment in full. No payment was received.

 

As statute barred will be applicable on the 8th May 2007 I have passed your file to our Solicitor to commence legal action. If judgement is obtained against this will ensure we have at least a further six years before the debt becomes statue barred.

 

I regret that we were unable to reach a mutally acceptable agreement to clear this debt.

 

[edit]

 

CC OFT

Surrey Trading Standards.

 

 

How many of you spotted the huge mistake in the above?

 

For those who didn't see it let me point it out to you :p

 

You have been advised numerous times that this debt is not statute barred as a payment of £289.02 was made on the 8th May 2001. We therefore fail to understand why you continue to claim it is.

 

I would also mention that you acknowledged this debt on the 5th February 2001 and offered to make payment in full. No payment was received.

 

Confused? Yes so are they!

 

So they're claiming I've got an outstanding debt of £289.02. But if I made that payment of £289.02 on 8th May 2001, I don't owe anything as I've paid the debt.

 

I spoke to the National Debt Helpline and they've told me that 1st Credit Ltd have currently over 40 complaints regarding the same problem everyone else is having. Why am I not surprised. :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd ring surrey trading standards and advise them of the glaringly obvious error - if you've paid, there's no debt - if you haven't paid, it's statute barred.

 

Oh deary, deary me.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If only we could charge them for standard letter at £35 a pop!

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ....I'm confused too. I dont think that they are claiming that the outstanding debt is £289.02, just that you made that payment, also that you promised to clear the debt in full in february but didnt!

 

have you asked them by what authority they are chasing you?

 

if not immediately send a CCA request in they have 12 working days to supply the agreement and any statement of account.

 

if they cant supply it, which i dont think they can then they can't chase you for the debt.

 

END of story

 

Dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ....I'm confused too. I dont think that they are claiming that the outstanding debt is £289.02, just that you made that payment, also that you promised to clear the debt in full in february but didnt!

 

have you asked them by what authority they are chasing you?

 

if not immediately send a CCA request in they have 12 working days to supply the agreement and any statement of account.

 

if they cant supply it, which i dont think they can then they can't chase you for the debt.

 

END of story

 

Dave

 

 

I don't understand the "by what authority they are chasing me" question. Do you mean who has submitted the file? If so, then they're claiming its the Abbey but funny enough I submitted the same letter to Abbey that was sent to 1st Credit Ltd regarding the debt and the details outlining its statue barred. I received a reply four weeks later stating that they are struggling to find any record of this debt and that my account is closed but if they find anything record of it then I will be notified.

 

I'd ring surrey trading standards and advise them of the glaringly obvious error - if you've paid, there's no debt - if you haven't paid, it's statute barred.

 

I contacted OFT and Surrey Trading Standards. Both claim they've not received anything from 1st Credit Ltd regarding the false allegation of harassment.

 

I have however received witness statements from Trading Standards who are now investigating the case.

Despite stating in my last letter that I will no longer communicate with them by telephone. I've received five phone calls this week. Three of which were a computerised message asking me to urgently call them back.

 

I've also got copies of my credit report from last week and last year both don't have any record of any outstanding debt owing to Abbey.

 

Just have to wait to see what Trading Standards have to say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi .......

 

"by what authority" I meant did they ACTUALLY have any legal authority to collect this debt

 

If you ask them for a copy of your original aggreement they probably wont be able to supply it...(CCA request)

 

if no copy of aggreement........it follows NO debt

 

let them squirm

 

Dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are shaming me into action. I really need to do the trading standards for harrassment thing on them too, but just haven't had the time...

 

They do seem to specialise in collecting debts that don't exist. I have proof issued by their client that mine doesn't...

 

But right now I am off to bed...

Number of times I've asked 1st Credit for information that I stil haven't recieved... 55 as at 02/05/07 :!:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello guys,

 

can you please PM the 1st Credit contact phone number or email address, if you have..thank you:)))

 

Kind regards,

 

Maria

Carphone Warehouse WON £195.00

Welcome Finance in Court. N244 accepted.

Barclaycard WON with contractual, PPI and charges for time spent and letters sent

Halifax solo, switch, Credit Classic, Halifax one Itsme Vs Halifax 2 accounts

Creation Finance Prelim received offer of £79.88.... Itsme VS Creation Finance

Vodafone overcharged Vodafon.. anything that could be done?

 

U know where the scales r:)))))

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

1st credit...pain of my life. Full of it! I'm fortunate to know the rules cos according to them they can collect any debt at any time even though they've chased me for 15 year old debt and had no contact from me within that time...have no account proof so I said better send you a stat barr letter then but nope that doesn't stop them. Complained to credit counsel that their parent company is a member of but they seem as interested as a chocolate fireguard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send the stat barr letter and keep sure they have to sign for it. After the date of receiving it you get anymore demands report them to the OFT and your local trading standards. But in ANY written contact you have with them write along the top in capital letters:

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

That way anything contained in the letter cannot be used in a court or used to prove you admit liability.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As both are public information, as as I'm sure they want people to get in touch with them to discuss debts so that matter can be resolved, from their website:

 

 

Contact Us

1st Credit's head office is located at-

The Omnibus Building

Lesbourne Road

Reigate

Surrey

RH2 7JP

Telephone 01737 228 555

Facsimile: 0870 164 2070

Email: [email protected]

  • Haha 1

Number of times I've asked 1st Credit for information that I stil haven't recieved... 55 as at 02/05/07 :!:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...