Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Euro car park ticket


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5310 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there

 

My wife recently registered the birth of our child in sale (nr manchester).

She parked and in the rush did not buy a ticket..no change either.

 

As she planned to go shopping after in the store she thought it would be fine.

She was delayed as our son needed feeding and by all accounts would not stop for at least half an hour.

 

On her return she noticed the attendant putting a ticket on her car.

The ticket states £50 but £30 if paid within 14 days.

With the birth etc we have only got round to looking into this today as the ticket was issued 20/02.

They have spelled sainsburys as SAINSBURY..so without the S at the end. Does this make it invalid?

 

Also should we appeal as she has a very good reason for being delayed.

In her anger she decided to not go shopping which someone told me would have invalidated the ticket as you can send your till receipt in

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where did she park?

Please note: I give advice, in good faith, based on my reading and experience. Please satisfy yourself, that any advice given is accurate in content before acting upon it.

A to Z index

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/site-questions-suggestions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

 

...........................................................................

Link to post
Share on other sites

It might be worth a try, but these private parking companies are not noted for their compassion and will probably reject any appeal. Far better to wait for them to write to whoever is the registered keeper demanding that the "fine" be paid by the RK and then write back and point out that any contract is with the driver, not the registered keeper. Don't forget to mention that the regsitered keeper is under no obligation to supply details of who was driving the vehicle at the time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

she parked ina standard bay. what about the fact that they have incorrectly written sainsbury and not sainsburys...surely sainsbury does not exist

 

Hi bluecityboy

 

When you park on private land ie; supermarket the driver enters into a contract, if the driver breaks the contract a penalty will be applied. This can be enforced in a County Court providing the other party to the contract can prove that the person to whom they are asking for the "fine" is the driver

 

How are they going to prove the registered keeper was driving the car at the time of the breach?

 

Write to them, tell them your wife was not the driver, and invite them to prove she was, in a Court of Law.

Please note: I give advice, in good faith, based on my reading and experience. Please satisfy yourself, that any advice given is accurate in content before acting upon it.

A to Z index

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/site-questions-suggestions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

 

...........................................................................

Link to post
Share on other sites

The parking company or landowner are unable to enforce a "penalty" against you. The only way they could get money from you is if they can prove that you are the driver and take you to the County Court.

 

They can only win damages from you. The landowner or lessee have a contract with the parking company. I would guess that they do not charge a fee just let the car parking company run the car park and the "income" comes from drivers who pay.

 

As such the landlowner has suffered no financial loss and therefore there can be no claim for damages.

 

I would not pay a penny!! Just write back and say that you have recieved an invoice in the sum of £x and say on what basis do you feel that I have entered into any contract with either your company or the landlowner.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You've got to understand, blue, that Council/Police tickets are different to tickets issued by private parking companies for parking on private land. The private companies have no right to demand that the Registered Keeper divulge the driver of the car on the day the ticket was issued. Nor are they allowed to state that the Registered Keeper is liable for any 'fine' they issue. It is the driver of the car who (implicitly) enters into a contract and (implicitly) agrees to be bound by the terms of this contract - and if they can't prove who the driver was, then they really have no recourse, even for their actual losses, never mind any 'penalties'. Ignore it, and wait until (if) they write to you. Then as Howard says above, write back and ask them on what basis etc.

-----

Click the scales if I've been useful! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

On her return she noticed the attendant putting a ticket on her car. The ticket states £50 but £30 if paid within 14 days.

 

What does the sign say int he car park? Does it say you don't need a ticket if you are a customer?

 

The legal basis for issuing private parking tickets is very flimsy, especially since contractual penalties are unenforcable. The only way it could be enforcable is if they showed you had agreed to pay £50 as a straightforward fee in return for parking. Even in that highly unlikely circumstance the charge would be owed by the driver, not the owner/keeper.

Post by me are intended as a discussion of the issues involved, as these are of general interest to me and others on the forum. Although it is hoped such discussion will be of use to readers, before exposing yourself to risk of loss you should not rely on any principles discussed without confirming the situation with a qualified person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

I followed the outline provided regarding the ticket and sent a letter threatening to bill them for my letters the next time they made contact. & months later and the silence from them is beautifully stunning :-) It works

cheers to everyone for their help

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

My car was parked in St George Retails park in Leicester at 10:35 AM and got a Euro Car parking ticket at 10:37 AM stating on the ticket that I left the Car Park. I wrote to the Euro Car Park appealing that I was in the Retail park and never left the car park.

Euro Car Park replied saying that "The instruction, from our client, is to issue a Parking Charge Notice to any vehicle if the occupants are seen leaving the car park and not going directly in the stores within the retail park."

Can you please advise me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My car was parked in St George Retails park in Leicester at 10:35 AM and got a Euro Car parking ticket at 10:37 AM stating on the ticket that I left the Car Park. I wrote to the Euro Car Park appealing that I was in the Retail park and never left the car park.

Euro Car Park replied saying that "The instruction, from our client, is to issue a Parking Charge Notice to any vehicle if the occupants are seen leaving the car park and not going directly in the stores within the retail park."

Can you please advise me.

 

Feel free to ignore Euro Parks. What you have is an unenforceable invoice.

As you have found thier 'appeals' system is worthless. It is done 'in house' so you will always get rejected no matter how valid your reason is.

By taking the ignoring route the following will now happen-you will get another letter from Euro Parks then 2/3 off thier DCA which will be either Brinx/Control Account (or even both as recent posts have shown).

After this they will give up. Be prepared for some quite threatening letters though.

 

Have a look at this link to see how things operate

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/parking-traffic-offences/166615-euro-car-parks.html?highlight=euro+parks

Edited by DDWales
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

You should not have replied at all. As you can see, even using a perfectly reasonable "defence", they simply ignored you.

 

Leave it at that now and have no further communication with them at all. Ignore everything they send you no matter how threatening it is, because remember, that's all they have, threats.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

I wouldn't pay out anything to these muppets. ECP operate in a number of Sainsbury's car parks. They don't do court and they will write to the RK. A few letters and they go away.

 

In your case I've seen the signage in Fosse Park and I know they'd a have a right b*gger of job convincing a court that a valid contract had been formed.

 

The same goes for their signs at other Sainsburys.

 

Ignoring the letters works well for most people, I suggest you do likewise.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:-| Has anyone been taken to court by not paying a parking charge notice issued by ECP I got 1 from loughborough sainsburys for being there 45 mins over the 2 hour free parking didnt see any signs at the time but they were there with very small print not exactly noticable for any1 !!!! so got caught out, i very rarley go there was free last time. shall i just ignore it??? never happend to me before

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Everyone

 

I need some help with this as well.

 

I got a parking charge notice from Euro car parks recently. The only difference is that the place I parked is basically an area with loads of shops and town is 10mins walk from there. I parked there shopped in them shops for like 30mins and then I walked towards town to get something from town. The parking time limit was 3 hours therefore I came back in 2 hours (in total). What I didnt know was that someone would be watching me. I came back and I had this notice on my car.

 

It says: Left the car park on foot. Customer only car park.

 

I haven't seen a parking notice like this in my entire life in such a big car park where 2/3 of it was empty. It has given me a date to pay the fine if I do it by that date I have to pay £50 else it will be £70 normal charge.

 

What does everyone suggest I do? I've heared from some people saying that they can't do anything and I should just simply ignore this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still heard nothing and considering we were registering the birth of my son who is 3 in february I suggest that everyone else does the same. Just write back and advise that after the first letter you will start charging for your letters, keep copies and send registered. I said £75 per letter including the 1st so it makes their requests pale and they just go away...no other agencies involved at all

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Again

 

I've just heared from a friend recently that same thing happened to him. He had to pay this fine but he ignored all the letters and everything and then they took him to the court and he had to pay nearly £200.00 in total.

 

My cut-off date is 8th oct for paying £50.00. I'll rather pay 50 then paying 200 and going to courts and stuff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...