Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Rbs Partner Compnany - Car Finance


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5384 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have a HP agreement with Capital bank that are part of the royal bank of scotland.

 

Due to one reason or another, ours when we have had no money, and theres when an inputting error, changed the DD date to one that we wasnt paid in time to meet,then my hubby being off ill and not getting paid etc etc, we have been charged loads prob over £1000. We have a baby due soon and am sure this would be very handy.

 

The agreement was originally for 3 years and we have 18 months left. I dont know if to try and claim these charges back as will they terminate the agreement, or do i wait 18 months, and hope that nothing happens to make you ot be able to ask for them back.

 

We dont have a good credit rating and no deposit or money for another car, so need to keep this one.

 

Any Advice from anyone would be appreciated.

 

Ta very much

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have an account with Capital Bank PLC that are a sister compnay of RBS. They are car HP compnay, and we have been charged loads in the 18 months we have had the agreement, and it has not always been our fault.

 

But i have 18 months reamining on the HP. Can they close it, as i need the car desperatly and i do not have a good credit reating to go else where, Can anyone advise me please.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, this is totally diffrent to a bank account.

Please Click The Scales if I have been of help to you.

 

 

Kensington Mortgages withdrawn. no costs

NatWest Settled in full

Abbey Court Settled in Full

Capital 1 settled in full

Halifax settled in full :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think your response is a bit misleading Ed....yes it is different to a bank account and they can't CLOSE it per se, but does that mean they don't have the ability to draw in his finance deal and request immediate payment? I don't think so. I'm not entirely sure myself and wouldn't like to offer an opinion.

 

Are you sure of this Ed? Any mods have an opinion on this?

If my post has been useful, tip my scales and let me know

 

Always start with the User guide!

Stuck with RBS charges? Click here!!

 

RBS CA1 £2794 SETTLED!!! RBS CA2 £503 SETTLED!!! HBOS CC £498 SETTLED!!! Barclaycard £705 (with CCI) ONGOING!!! NATWEST CA ONGOING!!! LLOYDS CA x 2, CC, LOAN ONGOING!!! HFC LOAN ONGOING!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi T4FF,

 

Yes I am sure. This type of account is regulated and therefore, so long as JJ is maintaining the contractual obligations then there is little they can do about it. This information is based on personal experience.

  • Haha 1

Please Click The Scales if I have been of help to you.

 

 

Kensington Mortgages withdrawn. no costs

NatWest Settled in full

Abbey Court Settled in Full

Capital 1 settled in full

Halifax settled in full :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

I have fallen behind on my hp with the dreaded capital bank i get paid in a week and will clear all of my arrears off then. But can they still take the car i have paid over half of the agreement. I think i have been charges in excess of £800 in charges from them. Do you think if i clear the arrears then hit them with the letter of DPA they will continue action to take the car. I am desperate for any advise, as i simply cant pay before and cant loose the car.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you claimed your charges would they cover the outstanding amount owing on your loan? you could send a SAR but also include the wording in your letter that the account is in dispute just alter the template to show this wording. they should hold off on any action that they may be threatening. then just take it from there following the guidance on here to reclaim your money. sorry I can't be more usefull but I'm new to all this myself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have fallen in arrears with my car hp, due to health reasons, i have sent the money by BACS to capital Bank, but today got a letter from Buchan Clarke Wells that have magicly made a £710 arrears in to £890.

 

Do you know if i have to pay the charges to BCW, Please help i thought i had got through all this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i fell in to arrears with my HP and i have now got up to date the thing is i have been charged extaushantly about £350 in over 3 months..... yes thats correct in 3 months, they charged £35 a letter and no matter what kept sending them out.

 

I want to claim all of this back i am just concerned that they will say we are closing the account down.

 

I paid additional interest which i am ok with as payments were late, and although payments were late they can see i have mae things up.

 

Please advise as i cant get credit anywhere else and also i cant loose my car.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi JJ

 

I have bumped this up for you x

 

I am not sure on HP agreements so don't want to speculate, but will watch with interest to see what advice other members have on this one.

 

I am dealing with BCW myself which drew me to your thread. They are unscrupulous - one thing I would say, refuse to discuss anything on the phone with them as they are nasty, deal with them in writing only.

 

Love Spiritgirl :)

Please note I am not legally qualified, I am offering advice based on my own personal experience in the hope that it may be of help to others in a similar situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you know if i have to pay the charges to BCW,

If they are anything other than interest charges (which doesn't seem likely) then no you don't have to pay them as they are unlawful.

 

I would write to them asking for a statement of account (this is free so don't let them charges you for it).

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi JJ&B

 

Some banks have tried it but got their knuckles rapped by the OFT. I'm not sure what the contractual position is but I wouldl doubt that they can close your account. Have you paid back over 1/3 of the value? (I seem to remeber that has a bearing on things with HP)

 

Steven

 

If this post is helpful, please click the scales

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability.

Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi there , yes i have paid well over half i have said i wil pay them but want statements first to see if the amounts tally up. I cant see how they have put another £300 over night now they want £870...... yes over night.

 

I know if i send of the SAR they will never come hopefully this way they will arrive before i clear the debt off which i have said i need a week to do.

 

Actually have i done the right thing i have written to them and said i need a week to pay and i cant pay it before and i want them to advise them of the court procedings case number and court which authorises them to come and take the car on tuesday as they have just told me they will do unless i pay £600 tommrrow. But my money tree isnt in bloom yet what do they think people are rolling in it,

 

I am a mum of 2 young kids if i had £600 laying about i would be very happy

Link to post
Share on other sites

We are going through this sort of thing. My hubby got made redundant and we tried to keep on top of the payments. We are about a month behind and are paying £100 a month extra to catch up. We have about 8 payments left so we definately owe over a third!

 

They are threatening us with courts as well and I have told them to go for it. You can move the court to your local one and attend. You can argue it to the judge that you are paying/have paid your arrears off and have been paying on time since, you need to keep the car as you have children and you could lose your job without a car.

 

It is not guaranteed they will get the car back (which is what they are aiming for) and a judge is just a likely to say you can keep the car as you are paying more to catch up with the arrears.

 

So far our "charges" have come to over £800 and when I finish with the HP I want a full break down off the list of charges. And I will challenge them in court if I have to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

jj and bump. If the H P firm are regulated by the FSA. (Financial Services Authority) They would be putting themselves in a very ackward position closing your acount and repossessing your car. You would have immediate redress through the Financial Ombusman. Who would not look very lightly at such underhand methods. Who is the HP firm ?

A person is only as big as the dream they dare to live.

 

 

Good things come to he who waits

 

 

Its your money taken unlawfully from your account and you have a legal right to claim it back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
  • 8 months later...

I am hoping someone can help me,

 

I am in arrears with car HP, we have had person after peron make arrangements to pay and then they we get approched by others.

 

I wrote to the bank of scotland saying that we want to sort this out, as agreed with thier agent (doorstep) we would pay the normal amount every month £160.00 and also an additional £100.00. So £260.00 a month.

 

In june we had some money troubles they credited some chages, this covered the normal £160.00. So on the 08th August i sent a letter saying we are disapointed that they had been so inconsistant and we didmt know bank draft for £360.00 saying that this was for the monies as detailed, £160.00 payment, July and augusts £100.00 payments and the august payment of 160.00.

 

So we are upto date.

 

I wrote in the letter the cashing of this cheque confirms your acceptance of us carrying on for 5 months like this until we are clear of arrears.

 

They have cashed the cheque but we are now told by them this is tough and they want all the arrears cleared they have insurtuced a company to recover the car.

 

We have paid 3/4 of the money under the agreement and know they cant just come and take the car needs to go to court. But would the letter i sent. (which i have a copy of - and it was sent recorded delivery and cashed) mean nothing.

 

It does say that "we will take your cashing of this cheque as confirmation that you agree to the above".

 

Help and advise would be appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am hoping someone can help me,

 

I am in arrears with car HP, we have had person after peron make arrangements to pay and then they we get approched by others.

 

I wrote to the bank of scotland saying that we want to sort this out, as agreed with thier agent (doorstep) we would pay the normal amount every month £160.00 and also an additional £100.00. So £260.00 a month.

 

In june we had some money troubles they credited some chages, this covered the normal £160.00. So on the 08th August i sent a letter saying we are disapointed that they had been so inconsistant and we didmt know bank draft for £360.00 saying that this was for the monies as detailed, £160.00 payment, July and augusts £100.00 payments and the august payment of 160.00.

 

So we are upto date.

 

I wrote in the letter the cashing of this cheque confirms your acceptance of us carrying on for 5 months like this until we are clear of arrears.

 

They have cashed the cheque but we are now told by them this is tough and they want all the arrears cleared they have insurtuced a company to recover the car.

 

We have paid 3/4 of the money under the agreement and know they cant just come and take the car needs to go to court. But would the letter i sent. (which i have a copy of - and it was sent recorded delivery and cashed) mean nothing.

 

It does say that "we will take your cashing of this cheque as confirmation that you agree to the above".

 

Help and advise would be appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they take your car back now, they will have to return every penny you have paid them unless as Ray says, they get a court order.

 

If you have paid a third of the total price of the goods under a HP agreement then the creditor cannot take the goods back without first getting a court order. Even if they apply for a court order you can ask the court to suspend the "Return Order" and accept your offer to pay the outstanding amounts by instalments.

If you agree that they can have the goods back they will not need a court order. If you do not agree and the creditor has not got a court order, but takes the goods back anyway you can sue the creditor and claim back all the money you have paid under the agreement. The creditor cannot enter your premises to repossess the goods without your permission or without a court order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Im sure I have read else where, ill try and look it up, that just because you wrote this and they cashed it, it isnt legally binding because they havnt agreed and most of the time cheques are just bulk processed, ill try and look up where I read it

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...