Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • have you proved at what house was it left outside of & stolen from ...yours or the neighbours? the fact it was for a warranty return means nothing. neither does it that the repairer/retailer have special instructions with DPD for them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer ..you might have overruled them with your instructions on the DPD website, you stated, neighbour/safe space?? if it was left outside your door, which you appear to indicate RE: i can't see you winning this...you created your own problem with what you put on the DPD website?    
    • oh well i wonder what new fake documents they have made up then...for them to try this.... just to check nothing funky like Link have filed an n244 to lift the stay and strike out her defence....she hasnt moved since last court comms has she?   is this an n24? bit unusual for a 13mts stay to just be lifted... has she not received anything from link/kearns in the last fw weeks like a docs bundle? bit like this thread... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/466576-lc-assetlinkkearns-claim-form-2-mbna-cc/?do=findComment&comment=5256397  
    • if the agreement was taken out jan 23, then she has not reached the 1/3rd mark so the car has not become protected goods under the consumer credit act.  this puts her in a very very vulnerable position regarding ever keeping the car....whereby once they have issued a default notice they can legally send a guy with a flatbed (though they are NOT BAILIFFS and have ZERO legal powers) to collect the car.  if the car is kept on the public highway then they can simply take it away and she will legally owe the whole stated amount on the agreement AND lose the car. if it's on private property i'e like a driveway, ok they shouldn't take it without her agreeing, but if they do, it's not really on but its better than a court case and an inevitable loss with the granting a return of goods order. are these 'health reasons' likely to resolve themselves in the very short term (like a couple of months?) and can she immediately begin working again ? i'e has she got a job or would have to find one?  answer the above and we'll try and help. but she looks to be between rock and a hard place . whatever happens she will still have to pay the loan off...car or no car....unless you can appeal to the finance company's better nature using health reasons to back off for xxx months.
    • no need to use it. it doubles the size of the thread and makes it very diff to find replies on small screens too. just like @username it - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread already inc you ...gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ET v HSBC offer made - should I bite?


ETphoneshome
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6160 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 3 weeks later...

i wrote this thread for peeps in your shoes..........

When you have filed your AQ................ (multipage.gif1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page)

 

try post number 1 - and the rest if you are bored!

but the nudging letter especially - in number 1 looks to be about right for you.

 

also, a few other tips in there - take a look and see if it helps -

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Latest update...all very VERY slow.

My AQ deadline was March 18, which I met and SURPRISE! the bank didn't. I called the court to see what was going on. They asked me to write a letter asking for an update. I did. Heard nothing so I called the court again. They've said the file has just gone to the judge and it is likely he will call a hearing for sometime in June.

 

*sigh*

 

This has been going on since December.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ET - are you following other threads -

my advice stays the same now for all situations where you are waiting - after the defense - one phone call to see if they have received your breakdown - then a nudging letter every 10 days -

worming an offer out of them is the key.

 

When you have filed your AQ................ (multipage.gif1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page)

 

New---after 28 Days - Maybe No Aq!!!!!!! (multipage.gif1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page)

 

both of these have some letters i've written for peeps - use them(tweaked to your own situation) - send one tomorrow -

send the you haven't filed your aq, let's get this moving along kind of letter - and include a breakdown - yes, again. with every letter!

 

good luck - time to make your own luck - don't just sit there waiting for them to offer - he who shouts loudest, gets heard - start your letter shouting tonight!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok, the court has written to me. The hearing is on June 7. Five minutes has been allocated. Do I have to do the court bundle now?

 

I tells you, the money better come swiftly after the hearing. I've got a massive tax bill at end of July and need the £900 to help!

 

Any advice of links to people in similar situations would be massively appreciated.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right I've had an OFFER! Wooo! The amount in full with the usual letter saying they are in the right and without prejudice. But they have asked I don't claim again as a condition. I need the money and happy to accept but what have other people done about the condition of non-repeat claiming?

Link to post
Share on other sites

they will give you the money either way - so - send your own acceptance letter - like this one:

 

Date

Dear Whoever

Ref: Your Offer of Settlement

 

Account: xxxxxxxx

Sort Code xx-xx-xx

Claim No: XXXXX in XXXX County Court

 

I acknowledge receipt of your letter date xx/xx/xx and your settlement offer of £XXX

 

I accept your offer as full and final settlement only for this claim of bank charges made on my account between xx/xx/xx and xx/xx/xx(dates of first and last charge)

 

I accept this offer without prejudice and I reserve the right to make any further claims should you apply future charges that may be considered unlawful under common law or in violation of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 or Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977.

 

I will be willing to withdraw my claim upon receipt of unconditional full settlement of my claim.

 

I am also not prepared to agree to any confidentially clauses you try to impose, unless of course your client wishes to make an offer of due consideration in addition to the amount of £xxxxx, in order to be afforded this privilege by myself.

 

I trust that you will find this arrangement acceptable.

 

Yours Sincerely

 

 

 

 

get that or one nearly like it - right back to them and you'll have your money shortly

 

well done, i can smell the money from here!

 

 

 

do they actually say not to claim again - that would be new wording.

what exactly does it say - out of interest -

 

anyway = just send the letter - they will accept, no problem.

 

 

p.s. this is rayne's offer letter yesterday

the wording:

That payment is made in ful and final settlement of your claims arising from the charges applied to your account in the period referred to above and by accepting this payment you agree not to make any other claims relating to charges for the period stipulated above. HSBC also, reasonably, requires your confirmation that you will treat this payment as confidential."

so doesn't say don't file again - only for charges relating to that period.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ET well done on the offer :D Nice to see another success this week

\o/ \o/ \o/ \o/ \o/

 

if u have a look at http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/hsbc-bank/62691-rayne-hsbc-scummers-8.html#post774756 the acceptance letter i sent is towards the bottom - feel free to use it if u like :)

 

if not try one that lattie sent posted for me http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/hsbc-bank/62691-rayne-hsbc-scummers-7.html#post772497 alas i was very quick off the mark but either one should be good

 

congratulations again :D :D :D :D

 

just for info I missed some charges the first time round so will be attempting to claim those back within the second claim. Let you know how it goes

DCA's - they have the same power as an infinite number of untrained chimps working on a script for Hamlet, but the chimps would probably at least get it right :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got a letter saying the payment would be made in 14 days. That day £911 appeared in my bank called REFUND OF CHARGES. Yay! It has taken since December to get it but well worth the wait. I can now afford to pay July's tax bill. Thanks everyone on this site. Amazing help. Good luck to all of you. Pay close attention to the successful threads as they will do anything to strike out your claim. Don't give in for less than you are owed as they WILL pay up.

 

ETphoneshome now £911 better off. Watch out Natwest, you are next....

Link to post
Share on other sites

:D CONGRATULATIONS!! :D

HOPE WE ARE NEXT!!

  • Haha 1

If I have been of any help to you please be kind enough to click on my scales! Thank you

 

:D Halifax Bank...December 2006 ..... WON! 1 week after N1 filed.

:eek: Lloyds TSB....... April 2007 Lloyds TSB.....WON, 1 day before prelim. court date, still went before judge.

:p Nationwide.........April 2007 Nationwide.......WON, 3 weeks after N1 filed.

:rolleyes: Nat West....June 2007 (on behalf of friend) Settled after LBA and before filing.

:smile:HSBC - full settlement ...on behalf of my son...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Just on the same question, we are due in court for three claims next Monday, my account, my husbands account and our joint account. We've just recieved three seperate letters offering us a settlement for each case, (these are the second offers we've had for the accounts.) The two indidviual accounts are not worth accepting but the joint account is not far off the amount claimed. Would we be ok to accept the offer for this account or will it affect the claims on the other accounts?

 

Thanks

 

Laura

Link to post
Share on other sites

plinkycat - press this to start a thread of your own in the hsbc forum

newthread.gif

 

yes, it's fine to accept the one and not the other two -

i'm thinking you mean that you are due to file the claims on all three accounts next monday - surely you don't mean you have actual court dates for three accounts on the same day.... think that would be some kind of a record.

so, if you mean the 14 days are up from sending your lba and you've received offers from hsbc - then fine - accept the one and use one of the letters here - or combine a couple of letters to get it right and reject the other two. once you file your claim with mcol - you will be dealing with dg solicitors and no longer with hsbc - they normally only make offers before the court filing.Rejecting Offers

 

start that thread of your own so you can ask questions and we can find you again

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...