Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

UKPC parking invoice - tesco Faraday retail park,Coatbank Street, Coatbridge. ML5 3SQ scotland


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4805 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Bit worried having seen the last posting re bailiff/debt collector. I have just received my third letter - this if fom Debt Recovery Plus asking for £128.75 - no explanation as to how this is made up, the last one being for £70. This one asks if I was not the driver for me to let them know who was and says that it is essential I settle this account without delay or contact their offices. If I fail to make a full payment or to make contact with them, it will be passed to their litigation team and legal recovery action may commence. A typical case will be referred to the County Courts for an application for a County Court Judgement. If we are successful with our application, enforcement options will include:

An attachment of earnings order.

County Court Bailiffs being instructed.

Your items being sold at public auction to pay the judgement.

 

It also says you can view a selection of CCJs we have successfully obtained against people who have ignored our correspondence on our website: www.drpl.co.uk.

 

Is the advice still to ignore?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It also says you can view a selection of CCJs we have successfully obtained against people who have ignored our correspondence on our website: www.drpl.co.uk.

 

The CCJ's listed could be for all manner of debts, council tax/ rent arrears or commercial debts. Pound to a penny, not one is for a PPC ticket.
Link to post
Share on other sites

You mean where they say;

 

"CCJ's Issued

Contrary to what you may have read on various web forums Debt Recovery Plus Ltd DOES apply for CCJ’s against individuals and companies who resist payment. Please don’t believe everything you read on the forums. See the below list for some of the CCJ’s we have successfully applied for in recent months."

 

 

Absolute tosh! And all part of the scare! They HAVE to take someone to court, they then HAVE to win the case. Only, and I repeat this for the avoidance of doubt, ONLY after the defender refuses to pay the amount sued for (usually after 28 days), only then can they file for a 'Judgement' (a CCJ). So, whilst it say they get CCJ's for those who resist payment, it would be more accurate to say that they apply for CCJ's for those cases that (a) come to court, and (b) they happen to win.

 

For those cases listed - there is no indication as to whether the actions were ever defended (id not, they win anyway) or if they ever got paid - two very important points!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there all.

 

Just a quick line to say thanks for such a sterling forum thread. I'm afraid that I've only been able to read the first 7 pages or so (there's so much!) but what I have read has helped me no end.

 

As you'd expect, like everyone else here UKPC have hit me with an unreasonable 'parking charge notice'. This one's for parking for too long in the car park at a McDonald's on the outskirts of Hull, East Yorkshire.

 

Apparently, the two of us took too long eating our lunch that day (shouldn't have stayed for those chocolate muffins) which meant that UKPC want £100 for the privilidge! We both arrived in different cars and arrived and left at exactly the same time. I have received my demand, my friend is yet to receive his.

 

Anyway, to my point: With everyone's great input here I've got a polite, stern and factually correct letter written up to send back to UKPC regarding the extortionate parking demand. Let's hope they don't turn nasty like they have to some of you lot. Kudos to Notpayinapenny, natmax and bankbustermum for the majority of my input!

 

If people want a copy of the letter, PM me and I'll send a copy to you. I don't want to put it up here in the public forum in case those thugs at UKPC end up reading it here.

 

Thanks again for everyone's help, good luck to all those who are still in battle!

 

FrenchieDuNord

Link to post
Share on other sites

never, never bother to reply to them, dont waste a stamp

 

and it costs them every time they write their phoney letters , from the office cleaner, the tea boy and the filling clerk claiming titles such as pre-action dept , their solicitors, the person who is coming to kill your dog and steal your kids , they live in a fantasy land called "Planet Perky"

 

and if you want a laugh just search for Perky on the forum

 

asa for the thugs, please dont assume they can actually read, most failed their job application for McDee's on the first question 1) your name

..

Link to post
Share on other sites

If people want a copy of the letter, PM me and I'll send a copy to you. I don't want to put it up here in the public forum in case those thugs at UKPC end up reading it here.

Agree with Kip, don't bother with any letter, it will be ignored. So return the favour and ignore them.

regards

Please remember our troops, fighting and dying in our name. God protect them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's the latest progress on mine...

 

Debt Recovery Plus have now mailed trying to collect and the price has gone up from £90 to over £140. Still ignoring them. Am curious to see how long it goes on for. It sounds, from the other posts, it'll take another month or so for the next two letters to come and then they'll give up.

 

Kinda tempted to start a sweepstake on when the final letter will come!

 

Thanks to all of you for the advice and for the forums in general...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I heard on the 'Today' programme this morning that the Disability Alliance group are taking UKPC etc to task for limiting parking times for disabled motorists then charging them when if they exceed the times. They also put the blame firmly on the supermarkets and other companies for using these [problematic] in the first place. :)

 

Here's the info from the BBC news site:

 

UK's big supermarkets are breaking disability laws by having strict time limits in about two-thirds of their car parks, charities have told the BBC.

Private firms run some of the parking areas for Tesco, Asda, Sainsbury's and Morrisons and customers face penalty charges for overstaying.

But under the Disability Discrimination Act, businesses need to make extra allowances for disabled people. The supermarkets say they will review their policies on disabled parking. Supermarkets are increasingly using private parking firms and automatic number plate recognition systems to limit customer parking, often to two hours. The restrictions are to discourage drivers from abusing the free parking spaces. A survey for BBC Breakfast - which contacted 200 different large supermarkets from the four main chains, and spoke to 124 - suggests about two-thirds of the car parks that impose time limits do not give disabled people any extra time to shop, which is a breach of the law.

 

Neil Coyle, from the charity Disability Alliance, said: "Supermarkets need to acknowledge there is a problem, and secondly, very quickly they need to ensure their car parking procedures conform with the law. "You or I can stamp our feet and say how outrageous it is but at the end of the day there is a law that protects disabled people from this happening." He said the supermarkets needed to end the "unfair charges" or "they can wait until someone takes a legal case and potentially face a considerable compensation case".

 

Motorist campaigner Neil Herron said supermarkets should get rid of the "draconian" and "legally questionable" private enforcement process and handle car parking in house. "If someone is abusing the system, clamp them, charge them a £2.50 clamp release fee, handled by their own staff. Britain's motorists are being stealth taxed by another dubious practice," he said.

Edited by Stargazing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ultimately the supermarket is to blame. I can't see the parking companies decided on the 2 hour rule.

 

The way around it would be a mass shop with maybe 2 trollies full of stuff, lots of it frozen, and when you get to the checkout, say sorry, haven't got time to unload and pay for this, I have to remove my car from the carpark and leave them with it.

 

50/60 trollies a day for a few weeks would have them changing their minds about the silly parking control or at least give a generous time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there.

 

I received a ticket from UKCPS this afternoon. We were parked on double yellow lines for about 20 minutes with our blue badge on display. My disabled mother is the driver, and is fairly confident that she's allowed to park there as long as the badge is on display. I don't drive, I know nothing of the laws in place. We both find ourselves in unfamiliar territory.

 

I thought the best bet would be to do a bit of digging online and I found myself here. My original plan was to write a letter to the company, arguing our case but now I'm not so sure. I've read a couple of letters that people in similar situations have sent.

 

I'm upto page 10 of this thread, and plan on reading a lot more to see how certain cases ended up.

 

Any advice on this would be much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your 'ticket' was from UKCPS. then we have to assume you were on private property, and any 'waiver' for a blue badge is invalid. But so also is any legal requirement for you to pay it , unless you expressly agreed to the terms and conditions imposed on you when you entered the car park.*

 

In a few weeks time you;ll receive the first of several misleading letters urging you to pay before you are given a CCJ for non payment. Ignore these too, as they are similarly misleading, and designed to bully you into paying.

 

Ignore everything, except a Court-issued notice requiring your attendance. You can THEN show your badge and explain the circumstances if required. Until then, just get on with your daily life, and don't give these cretin's a moments notice.

 

*Assuming you read, understood, and agreed to abide by them. It is not enough for them to assume implied consent because you drove in.

Edited by buzby
Link to post
Share on other sites

is UKCPS another private [EDIT] then?

 

Of course they are. This is their website

 

When I first Googled the name I came up with the "UK Coloured Pencil Society". Perhaps the people who run the parking company are only allowed to use coloured pencils. They might stab themselves with a sharp pen.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Appeal

 

UKCPS Ltd have an established appeal system which we believe protects our clients and your interests.

The process is as follow:- Appeals should be in writing and sent to:

 

 

UKCPS Ltd

PO BOX 1355

Huddersfield

HD1 9ZN

Please enclose your name and address so the appeals department can reply to your letter. Enclosing payment and your parking charge notice will ensure that excess charges will not be added during the appeals procedure. If your appeal is successful a full refund will be given.

 

 

Pay us and refund!!!!!!!!!! I bet they dont!!!! what ****

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please enclose your name and address so the appeals department can reply to your letter. Enclosing payment and your parking charge notice will ensure that excess charges will not be added during the appeals procedure. If your appeal is successful a full refund will be given.

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Please remember our troops, fighting and dying in our name. God protect them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4805 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...