Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The defendant in this case is Parcel2Go.com Limited The claimant sent a parcel using Parcel2Go Ltd as a broker and Evri as the shipper via the Defendant's service containing which contained two handmade bespoke wedding trays to a customer with  under  tracking number P2Gxxxxxxxx. The parcel was never delivered although the defendant stated that three attempts had been made to deliver the parcel.  The claimants customer waited in for four days to receive the delivery but no delivery was attempted. There was no communication with the claimants customer.  Despite many web chats and emails the parcel was not delivered and on the Parcel2Go website it stated that the customer had refused delivery. This was not true as no delivery had been attempted.  I was The Defendant informed me that the parcel was being returned to me but after waiting three weeks I was informed by the courier that the parcel was lost. I was offered compensation of £20 + shipping fee which I refused and after sending Parcel2Go a Letter of claim this was increased to £75 which I also refused. The Claimant did not purchase the Defendant's insurance policy as requiring people to pay extra for rights already guaranteed under the consumer rights act 2015 is contrary to section 57 and 72 and therefore unenforceable. The Claimant rejected the Defendant's standard compensation offer. It is clear that the defendant is responsible for the loss of the parcel as they did not act with reasonable care and skill when handling the claimants parcel, contrary to section 49 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   By failing to ensure the safe delivery of the Claimant's parcel the Defendant breached section 49 of the CRA 2015.   AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS £370.00 being the value of the lost goods £xx.xx being the price of shipping and interest pursuant to s69 cca 1984.   See what BF thinks but I think something like this is better. Remember you are suing P2G not evri.
    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Car Accident - Local Authority Claim???


spinningfish
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6299 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello there

 

Last night I had a car accident, whereby I was driving though our local lanes to get home and as I came through the corner, the back end of the car swung out. This caused the car to crash into the bushes and flip over on to its roof, on the grass verge. If I had been going fast it would have been very serious indeed.

 

I believe the car to be a write off, as the roof crushed, and a lot of the panels are dented. Luckily, I have escaped with just a sore neck and back, although I have not seen a doctor.

 

The policeman who arrived on the scene said the cause was that the road was VERY greasy. And it was. When you walked along it, it was like something had spilled on it. Very slippy indeed.

 

The farmer, whose hedge I have 'pruned', said that a few cars have come off the road there, and in fact, one came off the road in the same place the day before, as he was working in his field. Luckily, that driver didn't hit anything.

 

The point is, do I have any grounds on which to make a claim against the Local Authority?

 

Thanks in advance

 

Fishy....

Link to post
Share on other sites

You would have to prove that the council were actually negligent in some way. Questions such as why was the road slippery ?, what was on it ?, were the council made aware etc would all have to be asked.

Pam.

 

If anything I've said helps you then please feel free to tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Since you will need facts and witnesses and the copper turned up.

 

Did he give a view about the state of the road specifically?

 

e.g. did he suggest what was making the road 'greasy'?

 

Was it wet/icy?

 

In truth without any proof as to what makes the road greasy i dont see you have a claim.

 

JMHO

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I took out a policy with Swiftcover in November with an excess of £150 on the fully comp policy.

 

I had an own fault accident at the beginning of the month and have now been advised that my excess is £550!?!

 

The problem with Swiftcover is that they don't send you out your insurance documents in the post - they are stored in your own online area, and you print them off as required.

 

I've added my partner to the policy, since November, and as such they have replaced the policy documents online, which means I don't have access to the original documents proving my £150 excess.

 

At no point prior to the accident was I advised that the excess has increased to £550. I'm kicking myself for not reviewing the documents online, but didn't feel I had to as the people I have spoken to have always spelled things out and explained everything.

 

I'm getting the impression that they have increased the excess to favour themselves, as I have had to make an own fault claim, but I'm at a loss as to what I can do.

 

Can anyone help me, please??

 

Thanks in advance

 

Mr Fish...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've requested that information, and I'm waiting on the response.

 

If it was from adding my girlfriend, why would it increase MY excess??

 

I don't get it. :mad:

 

Is she a high risk driver - under 25 just passed test that sort of think - convictions, previous accidents?

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

She's on a provisional, so yes...

 

Would that affect my excess though?

 

Probably - as she is a higher risk - did your premiums go up much?

Have a look attheir website and put your details in with her and without her and see what the differences are.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You might have an argument there... If the Mid Term Adjustment was done over the phone, and he did not tell you of the change of xs then you should have a complaint. The only problem is if the call is not recorded (which I would find strange nowadays) - If it wasn't recorded, and the script they have advises the advisor to tell you of the change of xs, all the Ins. Co have to do is to prove that the adviser was fit and proper.

 

 

 

---added---

 

Thinking about it more, the excess shouldn't change as a result of this. I am certain the insurance company should keep your excess the same, but add on a inexperienced drivers warranty of £400 (in this case)...

 

What will probably happen though is that you will have to pay the excess and recover it back through your complaint

Abbey - owed £3260 - Paid up.

 

Barclays owed £2500 - Paid up.

 

Halifax, Mint & Egg - next on the hit list

 

Dont click on the scales - I'm quite proud of my little red dot! - As the little red dot has gone - click away!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Adding another driver to your policy wouldn't increase your XS as its not changing your risk on the policy (her XS would almost certainly be higher as she has a prov license) Also, the insurer cant increase your XS mid term just because of a claim. (basically any changes that happen during your contractual year e.g convictions claims etc cant be taken into account until your next renewal date) So that only leaves 2 logical options, either your XS has always been £550 and you've simply mis-read the docs, or swiftcover have made a balls up and either quoted you for your girlfriends XS or tried to increase yours mid-term which they're not allowed to do. (breech of FSA regulations).

Sounds like you've done the sensible thing and asked them to explain what's going on so post back when they get back to you and if you need any more help just give us a shout.

 

 

DA.

If you find the advice I give is useful, then please feel free to click the scales :)

 

"It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt" :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK. I'm really, really confused now.

 

I had to buy a run-around car in the meantime, while my claim is going through. I've just looked at the schedule and it shows my compulsary excess as £0 and my voluntary as £150!! So what the **** is going on??

 

Is the person who advised me, over the phone, that my excess was £550 talking utter nonsense, or can they just adjust my excess as they see fit whenever they like???

 

I'm sooooo mad about this now!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am wondering if there is a vehicle type excess that applies to your first car as well? What type of cars are involved.

Cahoot - Rejection of offer sent 14/06/07

 

Barclaycard - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 22/03/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks like you've a £150 xs.

 

As mentioned before - I have the feeling the extra xs you've been quoted is for the inexperienced driver.

 

Best to ring them, get through (the hardest part!) and confirm that this is the case. They might have it down as the inexperienced driver has had the accident

Abbey - owed £3260 - Paid up.

 

Barclays owed £2500 - Paid up.

 

Halifax, Mint & Egg - next on the hit list

 

Dont click on the scales - I'm quite proud of my little red dot! - As the little red dot has gone - click away!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, I've got the response and if I was fuming mad before, I am volcanic now!!

 

Here it is:

 

"Thank you for your e-mail,

 

We apologise for the delay in our response, we are unfortunately receiving a higher volume of e-mails than usual and are currently attempting to clear this backlog.

 

I can confirm that when you set up your policy, you did not have an excess of £150. Your excess was actually £550 in total. This is a combination of a £50 compulsory excess plus the £500 voluntary excess, which you selected yourself from the drop down box when you were completing your quote online. It is your duty before setting up the policy online to check your policy details and excesses, and you ticked a box to confirm you had done this.

 

When you changed your car to the Nissan on 10th February, you then reduced your voluntary excess down to £150 (there is no compulsory excess for this car).

 

However, as the claim made on 1st January was on your Renault Laguna, then the excess for that car applies. At no point have we changed your excess. You have selected your own voluntary excesses and you could have checked your excesses at any time in your Swift Space. "

 

It was never, never, never £550 when I took out the policy!! I would have never taken out a policy with such a ridiculous excess at my age. It's ridiculous!! And also my claim was made on the 1st February, you flaming idiots!!

 

Now the problem is to prove that they're lying through their teeth! I can't prove a thing, because all their documents are kept online, and the originals are no longer there. If I request proof they can doctor it any way they like to suit themselves.

 

Any suggestions??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Might sound like a silly question but are you sure you did not print a copy of the documents when you first started the policy?

Cahoot - Rejection of offer sent 14/06/07

 

Barclaycard - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 22/03/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wish I did, but I had no need.

 

They are there online for when you need them, and I had no need before now - and they are not there anymore. :mad:

 

What is my next move guys and girls? Do I go straight for the Ombudsman route, or ask them to provde documentation to substansiate their claims, under the DPA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel the next step is asking for a subject access report - as you need the documentation in front of you to see where they are coming from.

 

It could be that the quote engine, when giving you a quote defaulted to £500. Might be worth your while, and saving a tenner, if you go to the search engine and reinput your details (but say change the house number) to confirm that this hasn't happenned. If it has, and you've accepted the £500 vol xs there is nothing you can do I'm afraid

Abbey - owed £3260 - Paid up.

 

Barclays owed £2500 - Paid up.

 

Halifax, Mint & Egg - next on the hit list

 

Dont click on the scales - I'm quite proud of my little red dot! - As the little red dot has gone - click away!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...