Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is a ridiculous situation.  The lender has made so many stupid errors of judgement.  I refuse to bow down and willingly 'pay' for their mistakes.  I really want to put this behind me and move on.  I can't yet. 
    • Peter McCormack says he has secured a 15-year lease on the club's Bedford ground.View the full article
    • ae - i have no funds to appoint lawyers.   My point about most caggers getting lost is simply due to so many layers of legal issues that is bound to confuse.  
    • Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same.   Yes.  But every interested buyer was offering within a range - based on local market sales evidence.  Shelter site says a lender is not allowed to wait for the market to improve. Why serve a dilapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease.   The dilapidations notice was a legal first step.  Freeholders have to give time to leaseholders to remedy.  Lender lawyers advised the property was going to be sold and the new buyer would undertake the work.  Their missive came shortly before contracts were given to buyer.  The buyer lawyer and freehold lawyers were then in contact.  The issue of dilapidations remedy was discussed..  But then lender reneged.  There was a few months where neither I nor freeholders were sure what was going on.  Then suddenly demolition works started.   Before one issues a s146 one has to issue a LBA.  That is eventually what happened. ...legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease   A s146 was served.  It took 3y but the parties came to a settlement.   (They couldn't revert as they had ripped out irreplaceable historical features). The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there.  That's not the case   One can ask for another extension.  In this instance the freeholders eventually agreed with a proviso for the receiver not to serve another. You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension.  Correct.  But receiver lawyer was an idiot.   He made so many errors.  No idea why the receiver instructed him?  He used to work for lender lawyers. I belatedly discovered he was sacked for dishonesty and fined a huge sum by the sra  (though kept his licence).  He eventually joined another firm and the receiver bizarrely chose him to handle the extension.  Again he messed up - which is why the matter still hasn't been properly concluded.   In reality, its quite clear the lender/ receiver were just trying to overwhelm me (as trustee and leaseholder) with work (and costs) due to so many legal  issues.  Also they tried to twist things (as lawyers sometimes do).  They tried to create a situation where the freeholders would get a wasted costs order - the intent was to bankrupt the freeholders so they could grab the fh that way.   That didn't happen.  They are still trying though.  They owe the freeholders legal costs (s60) and are refusing to pay.  They are trying to get the freeholders to refer the matter to the tribunal - simply to incur more costs (the freeholders don't want and cant's afford to incur)  Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to.... The property does not qualify under 67 Act.  Their notice was invalid and voided. B petition was struck out. So this is dealt with then.  That action was dealt with yes.   But they then issued a new claim out of a different random court - which I'm still dealing with alone.  This is where I have issues with my old lawyer. He failed to read important legal docs  (which I kept emailing and asking if he was dealing with) and  also didn't deal with something crucial I pointed out.  This lawyer had the lender in a corner and he did not act. Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been ....  Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at?   I could.  But the evidence is clear cut.  Receiver email to lender and lender lawyer: "our strategy for many months  has been for ceo to get the property".  A lender is not allowed to influence the receivership.   They clearly were.  And the law firm were complicit.  The same firm representing the lender and the ceo in his personal capacity - conflict of interest?   I  also have evidence of the lender trying to pay a buyer to walk.  I was never supposed to know about this.  But I was given copies of messages from the receiver "I need to see you face to face, these things are best not put in writing".  No need to divulge all here.  But in hindsight it's clear the lender/ receiver tried - via 2 meetings - to get rid of this buyer (pay large £s) to clear the path for the ceo.   One thing I need to clarify - if a receiver tells a lender to do - or not to do - something should the lender comply? 
    • Why ask for advice if you think it's too complex for the forum members to understand? You'd be better engaging a lawyer. Make sure he has understood all the implications. Stick with his advice. If it doesn't conform to your preconceived opinion then pause and consider whether maybe he's right.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Norwich Union Are A Nightmare Its Official Honest?


friendgeorge
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6281 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

well where do i start, we had an accident on the 14th October 2006, a lovley lady went into the back of us on a roundabout, NICE LADY, anyway, we thought we were with the Post office who i must say have been great, as soon as we rang them the night of the accident they were great, but within days we had the letter from Norwich Union to say that we were in fact insured with them and they would be dealing with the claim, anyway we had a courtesy car with drive assist, which again they have been great, they are claiming the excess and the cost of the hire car from the nice ladys insurance which is Tesco by the way, they are having trouble getting anything from norwich union as we are, jst after the accident i was told to email a sketch of the accident, which i done on the computer as they recieved it as i put a trair on the email it was opened with in 4 hours of sending, anyway, after 2 weeks i rang and was told by a muppet of a woman, thast they couuld not open the email att., ok so i sent it again, in onother format adobe, everyone has adobe??? well another 2 weeks and nope you guessed it they could not open it, so i asked to speak to the manger who was dealing with my claim, a edited (i hope you never have to deal with this lady) she told me not to listen to her staff, and that the sketch was not good enough she wanted a hand drawn sketch, and could i fax it, well i couden't as i don;t have a fax, so i told her i would sent it to be signed for by her and her only. she agreed, anyway this was the 17th December 2006, and we have not heard anything, i have been on the phone since 11.23am this morning trying to get through to claims the number is an 0845 number which i have always rang, they are saying the phone lines are down, i have spoken to 6 different people in india 3 members of the switch board, and many other in between, so i rang the Post Office, and thank god they got me through to claims just now at approx 3.36pm can you belive it, anyway NO JOY surprise surprise???? they have sent a letter to Tesco the nice ladys insurance in december and they have not got back to them, even though they only had 2 weeks to do so, i asked if they would get penalised in anyway for not replying to the claim, and he said quote "nooo, not really? i don't know" so i blew, i asked to speak to someone in charge and he told me ring back tomorrow as everyone is really really really busy His words? i have had enough, anyone else had this trouble, if so DID YOU GET ANYWHERE WITH THEM???????? any advice would be great:evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK. A few questions to start off with

 

What Cover do you have??

 

Where is the car currently?

 

Are you happy for the vehicle to be repaired at the Approved Repairers?

 

Have you contacted Tesco Direct?

 

Are you claiming for anything other than damage to your car / hire car costs?

Abbey - owed £3260 - Paid up.

 

Barclays owed £2500 - Paid up.

 

Halifax, Mint & Egg - next on the hit list

 

Dont click on the scales - I'm quite proud of my little red dot! - As the little red dot has gone - click away!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want my advice I would not waste anymore time dealing with NU's Indian Call Centres who are useless - instead contact Norwich Union's Chief Executives' Office to make a complaint - this is what I did and they're really helpful. Contact Details are as follows:-

 

 

General Insurance Customer Relations PO Box 78 Surrey Street Norwich NR1 3EB

01603 682556

Link to post
Share on other sites

Want a Simple solution?

 

Has your car been repaired yet or is it at a garage waiting to be repaired?

 

If it hasn't been repaired yet and the lady has admitted liability and tescos are not disputing it then forget Norwich Union. Take them out of the equation go direct to the ladies insurers and have them arrange the repairs. This way you won't have to pay your xs then claim it back, they should be happy to do this as they can send it to a garage they have a deal with and will get it done cheaper.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all and thanks for the comments, the car is outside my house at the moment repairs were done asap, no complaint there, we are claiming for excess only and repairs, i will be ringing tesco again today to try and get somewhere with them, as norwich union are saying that it's tescos fault that it's taking so long? i am fully comp, with legal cover and we had a hire car for the 2 weeks that the car was in the garage, this was from Drive assist, which i may add were great, they told me to ring Tesco as they said the NU were rubbish, and that they have had trouble with them in the past, i will be emailing CE of Nu now, we've just had enough thanks again for the comments

Link to post
Share on other sites

Beware, Tesco DO drag their feet in my experience - My OH had an accident, long story and I've told it before, but it took THIRTEEN MONTHS to sort out a simple collision, and even then they refused to go further than 50/50 liability (If we had defended this as I wanted to, we would have won; the evidence against other party was overwhelming IMHO :D ). We had to constantly chase Tesco's sub-contracted solicitors, compile all documents, put everything together - it was basically us doing all the work while Tesco and their lackeys fobbed us off. For months. NU sound pretty useless - but I would respectfully submit to my Right Honourable Friends that Tesco are the kings of bull.

-----

Click the scales if I've been useful! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the comments which i totally agree with, anyway we have legal cover with Minster Law, they are sub contacted by NU, well that's what it states in the documents anyway, thay have told us via letter that IF we do have any problems with NU then we can contact them, the nice lady who hit us, WILL NOT ACCEPT THAT IT WAS HER FAULT, and the hire car company told me yesterday that Tesco will dig their heels in, due to her not accepting it was her fault, so i think i will be in for the long run by the look of things, its just we concerned about our 4 years no claims, and that i am stuck with NU until September 2007 as we paid for a year insrance in one go, and if i changed now i'd loose the money, but if god forbid we have another accident, i just could not deal with NU again?

Link to post
Share on other sites

My advice is

 

1. If you have the NIce Lady's telephone number ring her up and ask her is he really denying it was her fault (she went in the back of you) ?

 

2. Can't see how she can avoid accepting fault and when she does ask her to write,phone,fax,email (whichever) Tesco to ask them to admit the claim.

 

3. Norwich Union are pretty poor at the moment but they have (and most Insurers are the same) no real interest in persuing recovery against the other Insurer and its a low priority - however continue to chase them and as suggested try and deal locally (good news on this point - NU have said in the press they are bring some of the call centres back to the UK)

 

4. Check with the Post Office - as the agent did they provide you with a Motor Legal Expenses cover/policy ? If so contact them - they persue what is known as Uninsured Loss which in this case is your policy excess you paid and any injury (???)

 

5. Get a local broker next time you insure - we'll help you !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would not ring the Nice Lady. It may be construed at a later date by a weaselly lawyer as harassment, trying to get her to admit her 'guilt' or pressuring her into a 'false confession'. I know it's tempting - we had the address of That Woman (nothing so nice as Nice Lady) sitting on the desk staring at us for the whole of those 13 months. It was so tempting to go there at night and paint her new car bright gloss orange with blue spots, or something like that...resist!

 

Seriously though, I wouldn't contact her - isn't it like a court case, where you could be seen to be intimidating the other party?

-----

Click the scales if I've been useful! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Demon - after any reasonable length of time and being stalled by Insurers no court in the land could really argue against making some form of contact - you are simply checking facts ... "have you really said it wasn't your fault " " I was thinking Tesco must have their files mixed up ..." "can you help me ? " "how would you feel if it were you" sob, sob ....

 

In the absence of an insurance contract any motor accident would fall under commom law. The fact Insurers and others are involved is of course relevant but what options do you have ? Not many and its reasonable to follow all those available.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Work for a big insurance company. My advice in the future is:

 

1. Don't buy insurance from NU no matter how cheap they are (I suppose you didn't know because it was a "whitelabel" policy with Post Office - check the small print to see who you are actually insured with before buying as it is almost always one of the big 4 insurers if they are not a 'classic' insurance company)

 

2. Phone Drive Assist and see if they have got their money for the hire back from Tesco - this will indicate whether it is NU or Tesco that is causing the delay.

 

3. Find out who your legal expenses policy is with - they are there to get your excess back not your insurer

 

I don't agree that NU won't try and get their money back from Tesco though - their indian call centres are a total nuisance and have huge departments chasing money off other insurers - they can phone several times a day.

 

hope this helps, happy to give any advice required on insurance matters. I am an expert

 

Nelly

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to hear that you have had these problems I have to say though our experience with claiming with NU as our insurer was brilliant, they were helpful and sorted the 3rd party out (whose fault it was) mind you it perhaps worked out better that the police were called and they charged the other guy with driving without due care and attention and having an illegal rear tyre - my advice to people always call the plod even better if you can get them to attend.

 

Good luck with getting it sorted, oh and NU are definitely bringing the UK call centres back as know one of the top bods and it came from his mouth dont have a timescale though it could be sometime :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may well find that in the event of an accident where there is no injury that the police may not attend, but if there is any injury or if you make allegations of offences against the other party involved it should ensure their attendence. Keeping a disposable camera in the car is not a bad idea either as it allows you to take photos at the time of the vehicles involved, the scene of the accident and also of the driver. These could provide good evidence in the future should the insurance companies start to mess you about.

Link to post
Share on other sites

friendgeorge i work for norwich union if there's anything i can do pm (can u send pm's on this board???) your claim number and i'll have a look into it.

 

 

As for the not accepting fault, tesco/direct line have the final decision with regards to liability, they would and should deal without an admission of liability with a hit in rear case such as yours.

 

A hit in rear on the approach to a roundabout is a very common accident (i deal with at least 2 daily) and i'm surprised that any company would drag their feet.

 

As for the norwich union customer service...all i can say is sorry. Believe me that we aren't all the same, but granted some of the CS we have is shockingly bad

GE Capital (Topman Storecard) Won £180

Barclaycard Won £552

Halifax...your next!

Barclays Bank Student account..then you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...