Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • utter BS, doesn't matter you signed it. pers i'd be writing as per the other threads here rejecting the car as not as described under CRA etc and be done with it. as its a debit card you could also do a full chargeback within 120 days to your bank and simply dump the car back to BMW. 100's of like threads to read here. get your ducks inline. make sure you know what you are doing and off you go. dont take any BS from BMW, no matter what you sign it does NOT remove your consumer rights. p'haps it might be on the off chance you are a good manager , a quick phonecall tomorrow saying you dont want it because (no bla bla fitted) it might be resolved in 5 mins..i will guess to date you not tried
    • No need to worry about Rwanda Just give all the illegals one way trip to Northern Ireland then they can wander off into the EU through your beloved open border.     Job Done 😂🤣  
    • despite the evidence mounting against Chrichton, Vennells wrote in a meeting note that Crichton 'was possibly more loyal to her professional conduct requirements' "Vennells said Crichton was upset that the Post Office had ruined her reputation and compromised her by undertaking a further review of the Second Sight handling. Crichton was said to be ‘very emotional’ and her ‘ego and self-esteem have been undermined’."   That it seems all about their own interests - says a lot about both Chrichton and Vennels views on 'professional conduct requirements' eh?   Former Post Office chief executive Paula Vennells complained that general counsel put her integrity 'above interests of business' | Law Gazette WWW.LAWGAZETTE.CO.UK Susan Crichton was left waiting outside board meeting to discuss damaging forensic accountant's report, inquiry hears.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Letter to Capquest


sarahpp
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6251 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Oh yes they DO send letters. This is how they hound people when they dont have their number!!!

 

Next time they say they dont send letters, say "oh thats funny, because Im looking at a pile of letters here from you. are you saying that even though they are on your headed papers, they are not from you"?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think because I had not followed up the CCA letter I'd forgotten about it .all they have done is alert me to firing off the next letter(s) along the line of , "you've no agreement so go away and don't annoy me again" I saw one in the library,but not as short

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guess what?

 

capquest have just sent me another 'give us 28 days letter' does the right arm know what the left is doing or what????????

 

I have no intention of supplying them with any information..if they want it...let them go find it. It's quite evident to me that they don't have any credit agreement of mine.....do I just lie back and wait for the next letter or should I fire off a letter? Any ideas?

 

looks like they've defaulted on the cca request, I'm going to fill in a complaint form for the OFT tomorrow.

 

Salisburyowl

Link to post
Share on other sites

but they don't write letters do they?.....;)

 

I have looked at your earlier post and it looks like they should have received your request on 31st Jan (?) so, yes, they are in default but, pesonally I would wait until the 12days + 1 calendar month is up and then complain to Trading Standards because a criminal offence will have been committed. I think that the OFT come in with the failure to send you an up to date statement of account as per their guidelines. I don't think the request for the Agreement comes under their remit, just breaches of their guidelines (which are on a sticky at the top of the general debt forum I think)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Companies House. Have access to website. And they were liquidated on 19 September 2005. No company with the name HL credit control officially exists.

 

I did a bit of digging as have problems with them too. They may be known as another company called HLLC Limited there is a website for hllc.co.uk but the phone number just goes through to voice mail. However I have a letter from "H L Legal Solicitors" with a quote at the bottom HL Legal & collections also practices as HL Credit Control and HL Legal they have no company number or anything relating to their registered status.

Do you have a website? Add the following code to add a link to The Consumer Action Group:

 

<a href="http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk"><b><font color="#FF0000" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The Consumer Action Group</font></b></a> - <font color="#FF9900" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Reclaim your rights as a consumer and reclaim your unfair bank charges! Free site with letter templates and helpful forum.</font>

 

_____________________________________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi there just wanting to subscribe to the thread, WELL DONE stick to your guns, ive spent literally over 4 hours today going through posts, im getting so much knowledge!

Me Vs AA/Blair Oliver - Defaulted on CCA, Committed Criminal Offence, started chasing payment

 

Me Vs Great Universal - Wrote off the 2k balance, couldnt supply docs

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/74209-me-littlewoods-catalogue.html

 

My Friend Vs Lowell Portfolio - Balance written off, all action stopped!

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/75075-my-friend-lowell-victory.html

 

My Friend Vs Empire Catalogue - Balance Cleared

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/75713-my-friend-empire-droyds.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Subscribing

 

This must be one of the most addictive forums on the internet. Im hooked. Its good to know that there are so many decent folk out there who have been bullied and threatened by these parasites who do not appear to have heard of GOOGLE and give scant regard to the law. Lots of them must be losing out on their monthly bonuses in their call centres when so many refuse to even speak to them. Most of my alleged debts are now reaching the six year mark and then I will have some fun with the b******s

Link to post
Share on other sites

Subscribing

 

This must be one of the most addictive forums on the internet. Im hooked. Its good to know that there are so many decent folk out there who have been bullied and threatened by these parasites who do not appear to have heard of GOOGLE and give scant regard to the law. Lots of them must be losing out on their monthly bonuses in their call centres when so many refuse to even speak to them. Most of my alleged debts are now reaching the six year mark and then I will have some fun with the b******s

 

Just subscribing, at a similar junction at the moment with Arrow Global and MBNA. Good luck!:)

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I found this which may help you:

Dear Sir/Madam

 

COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 77(1) and SECTION 78(1) CONSUMER CREDIT ACT (1974)

 

I submitted the enclosed notice under Section 77(1) and 78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 to **** on (date) in respect of an alleged debt to them (their reference XXXXX).

 

To date ******* have not responded to this notice as required by law in that they have not supplied a copy of the alleged original signed agreement .

 

As more than 42 days have now elapsed, ****** has committed a criminal offence and I wish to submit a formal complaint to you.

 

I would be obliged if you confirm what action you propose to take in respect of this matter.

 

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi iam actually dealing with this company at the moment, i was paying £50 pound a month which they have just raised to £60, £50 was bad enough. Anyway im hoping ive kept my letters from them because im sure i had lots of scary threats from them in letters which is why i agreed to start paying off my debt promptly. If i havent, do you think i can ask them for copys of all correspondance they sent to me, or do you think if they know i havent got them they will include all appropriete things they should have done to begin with?. thnx.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A Subject Access Request will compel them to provide all of the information which they hold on you. It will cost you a £10 fee (they cannot charge you any more than that). There is an SAR template in the library section. You will need to adjust it slightly to reflect the fact that you are asking for all information held. They have 40 days to supply this.

 

I can't comment as to whether Capquest would make alterations as that may be a potentially defamatory statement. The law clearly states that they should not do this.

 

Obviously, it may be better if you could find all of the documentation yourself but, I understand that filing systems do go awry (mine for example!) particularly if the subject matter is distressing.

 

Good Luck, whatever you decide to do

 

Sarah

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sarah

 

I echo your point on filing. Like many, during my bury head in sand phase, I didn't even open letters (thankfully I kept most of them though). Now my filing system is my friend, especially when battling on so many fronts.

 

And now, thanks to CAG, I've the strength to open all letters!

 

Regards

 

Lantana

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well capquest have sent me some copies of amex statements...funny thing is I requested a CCA not SAR and even then I wouldn't count 1 years statements 2005/6 as fulfilling any SAR request.

 

What are capquest playing at eh? Not long now before they have commited a criminal offence. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well capquest have sent me some copies of amex statements...funny thing is I requested a CCA not SAR and even then I wouldn't count 1 years statements 2005/6 as fulfilling any SAR request.

 

What are capquest playing at eh? Not long now before they have commited a criminal offence. :D

They know exactly what is required from them by law. They even employ pet in house lawyers. They work on the assumption that you the alleged debtor are not fully aware of your rights but thanks to sites like this and some of the undoubted experts on here their bluff, bullying and blatant mistruths (by some) are failing to intimidate any more

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...