Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Hi everyone, Apologies for bringing up the same topic regarding these individuals. I wish I had found this forum earlier, as I've seen very similar cases. However, I need your help in figuring out what to do next because we've involved our partners/resellers. I work as an IT Manager in a company outside of the UK. We acquired a license from a certified reseller (along with a support agreement) and also obtained training sessions from them. The issue arose when we needed to register two people for the training sessions, so we used an external laptop for the second user to keep up with the sessions for only a month. During this period, the laptop was solely used for the training sessions. After two weeks, my boss forwarded an email to me from Ms Vinces, stating that we are using illicit software from SolidWorks. Since this has never happened to me or anyone we know, I went into panic mode and had a meeting with her. During the meeting, we explained that we were using an external laptop solely for the training sessions and that the laptop had not been used within the company since her email. She informed us that for such cases, there are demos and special licenses (though our reseller did not mention these types of licenses when we made our initial purchase). She then mentioned that we had utilized products worth approximately €25k and presented us with two options: either pay the agreed value or acquire SolidWorks products. We expressed that the cost was too high, and our business couldn't support such expenses. I assured her that we would discuss the matter with the company board and get back to her. After the meeting, we contacted the company reseller from whom we purchased the license, explained the situation, and mentioned the use of an external laptop. They said they would speak to Maria and help mediate the situation. We hoped to significantly reduce the cost, perhaps to that of a 1-year professional license. Unfortunately, we were mistaken. The reseller mediated a value €2k less than what Maria had suggested (essentially, we would need to acquire two professional lifetime licenses and two years of support for a total of €23k). This amount is still beyond our means, but they insisted that the price was non-negotiable and wouldn't be reduced any further. The entire situation feels odd because she never provided us with addresses or other evidence (which I should have requested), and she's pressuring us to resolve the matter by the end of the month, with payment to be made through the reseller. This makes me feel as though the reseller is taking advantage of the situation to profit from it. Currently, we're trying to buy some time. We plan to meet with the reseller next week but are uncertain about how to proceed with them or whether we should respond to the mediator.
    • Thanks London  if I’ve read correctly the questionaire wants me to post his actual name on a public forum… is that correct.  I’ve only had a quick read so far
    • Plenty of success stories, also bear in mind not everyone updates the forum.  Overdale's want you to roll over and pay, without using your enshrined legal right to defend. make you wet yourself in fear that a solicitor will Take you to court, so you will pay up without question. Most people do just that,  but you are lucky that you have found this place and can help you put together a good defence. You should get reading on some other Capital One and Overdale's cases on the forum to get an idea of how it works.  
    • In both versions the three references to "your clients" near the end need to be changed to "you" or "your" as Alliance are not using solicitors, they have sent the LoC themselves. Personally I'd change "Dear ALLIANCE PARKING Litigation Dept" to "Dear Kev".  It would show you'd done your homework, looked up the company, and seen it's a pathetic one-man band rather than having any departments.  The PPCs love to pretend they have some official power and so you should be scared of them - showing you've sussed their sordid games and you're confident about fighting them undermines all this.  In fact that's the whole point of a snotty letter - to show you'd be big trouble for them if they did do court so better to drop you like a hot potato and go and pursue mugs who just give in instead. In the very, very, very, very unlikely case of Kev doing court, it'd be better that he didn't know in advance all the legal arguments you'd be using, so I'd heavily reduce the number of cards being played.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

OVO/ Lowell - 2 CCJs ruled at old address. Consent order? Help!


Recommended Posts

Hi all

I'm looking for some help with 2 newly discovered CCJs. 

Last week, had a voicemail left from an enforcement agent who was at my old address trying to make contact for a CCJ - when I heard this I immediately signed up for a credit report and saw 2(!) CCJs had been added to my account in 2023. Looking at the dates, they were both ruled AFTER I had moved out of that address. 

Admittedly, I did have my head buried in the sand regarding some finances and I know this is not mitigating but I had A LOT going on with bereavement and other similarly life changing issues which I won't go into. One CCJ is from OVO and one is from Lowell. I did not know these were at CCJ stage and as stated before, the rulings were after I had moved address. 

As soon as I discovered these (next day), I put myself into the 60 days government breathing space to try and get this sorted. 

I would like to attempt to resolve these by requesting consent to set aside from the companies. I have a couple of questions:

1) Is there anywhere I can find how to actually ASK the creditor to consider this? I know a consent order needs to exist, but how do I go about asking for them to consider one?

2) Is there a template/ example of the legal jargon I would put in the consent order, or does the creditor write this up? A lot of the links I've found are broken (presumably old or out of date info)

3) If I ask for their consent, and they agree, can I arrange a payment plan with them to pay once (and if) it is approved in court? Or would this have to be paid in full once set aside is granted? I've seen something called a Tomlin Order?

Any advice is hugely appreciated!!!

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

well 1st of all you need to get your ducks in line. you are in the info gathering period.

there is no rush.

nothing to panic over and no need to agree to anything - as you might not even owe anything - let alone need consent orders.

1stly on monday go ring northants bulk, you'll need the CCJ's numbers from your credit file.

as for a copy of EACH default judgement for claimant AND the particulars of claim from each claimform.

there will be a small fee.

once you have that info for both comeback here.

 

now the enforcement officers voicemail.

1st

lets blow a big elephant out the water here - he cant do ANYTHING. there is no right of forced entry on any civil consumer credit county court CCJ's. so stop wetting yourself.

2nd

whomever he is trying to collect money for (ONE of the CCJ's must be for over £600 for HCEO's to be involved) he still has to send a Notice of Enforcement to your correct and current address, not a old one that lowell and ovo purposefully used to gain a default backdoor CCJ

he cant pull those type of scams.

what do you do..

sit on your hands till you have ALL the info,

then i suspect we'll ask you to create a new thread for the OVO debt . i will expect is for energy charges that you ran away from at you old home?

as for the lowell one, twill be some consumer credit or mobile or landline phone bill/contract you also ran away from.

now you know and for future readers WHY it it is SO SO SO important to NEVER EVER EVER run from debt. always write to everyone telling them where you are after moving..even if you do ignore them after that, at least they cant get a a backdoor CCJ you are denied to defend upon.

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Do not wish to sound negative, but you are saying the CCJ judgments were granted in 2023?

Getting a CCJ set aside has to be done with haste after being granted.

The court has discretion when the respondent became aware but unlikely to be in your favour.

You have an obligation to inform your creditors if you move address.

 

While the claim is active, the court grants a Tomlin order to suspend any further enforcement action while the claim is still live.

Edited by whitelist
Link to post
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, whitelist said:

While the claim is active, the court grants a Tomlin order to suspend

Unfortunately not I'm afraid...you are never going to to get a Consent Order after judgment its not in the judgment claimant's interest or benefit and is also considered as debt cleansing by a court.

Once you have gathered all the necessary information as posted by DX above and If you have a valid defence to each claim then you would submit two form N245 to stay the execution and 2 x N244 to make application to set a side the judgments and redefend each.

Fee for N245 £10

Fee for N244 £275.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ve spent 2 hours so far on hold to northants bulk, and I suspect I’ll be hung up on in 15 minutes when they close.

Is this the only way to get the info I need?

I’ve read that I can also contact my local county court but I feel they’ll just direct me to northants.

Should I send an email? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Both are default judgments so never allocated to your local court. Its either phone or email a general enquiry to MCOL.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. I’ll send them an email but also keep at it on the phone, I doubt the emails are responded to all that swiftly. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand your frustration but until you have the details its impossible to make an application...you do have a valid defence I assume before you go to the trouble and expense ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

mondays are always v busy for mcol following the w/ends when phones are not manned and MCOL goes down or whatever.

just make SURE you get the POC for each claim.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, 

I managed to get through on the phone today and have been emailed the details of each claim. Should I post them here? Presumably there’s certain things I should redact before doing so. 
 

Thanks in advance 

Link to post
Share on other sites

particulars of claim for each.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 06/04/2024 at 00:11, dx100uk said:

a copy of EACH default judgement for claimant AND the particulars of claim from each claimform.

suitably redacted read upload (only remove your name/address/ claim number)

scan both up to PDF read upload

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did ask for particulars of claim for each.

Could you confirm if the attached is in fact that?

If so, I’ll redact and upload the rest of the docs 

THE CLAIMANT'S CLAIM IS FOR £776.93 IN RESPECT OF CHARGES ARISING FROM THE ENERGY SUPPLY TO *** UP TO 30/04/2019.

THE CLAIMANT ALSO CLAIMS ITS REASONABLE RECOVERY COSTS OF £40.00 PURSUANT TO THE CLAIMANT'S TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

THE DEFENDANT HAS FAILED TO PAY WITHIN 14 DAYS AS PER THE CLAIMANT'S PAYMENT TERMS.

THE CLAIMANT FURTHER CLAIMS £269.04 INTEREST PURSUANT TO THE CLAIMANT'S TERMS AND CONDITIONS AT THE RATE OF 4% ABOVE THE BANK OF ENGLAND BASE RATE UP TO 26/05/2023 AND CONTINUING AT THE DAILY RATE OF £0.09 FROM TODAY'S DATE (01/06/2023) UNTIL JUDGMENT OR SOONER PAYMENT

AND THE
CLAIMANT CLAIMS:

(1). £1,085.97 

(2). FURTHER INTEREST AT THE DAILY RATE OF £0.09

(3) . COSTS

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep thats the one from OVO.

now the lowells one please

just copy and paste the text here as i've done above

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

THE CLAIM IS FOR THE SUM OF £350.00 DUE BY THE DEFENDANT UNDER AN AGREEMENT      REGULATED BY THE CONSUMER CREDIT ACT 1974 FOR A CAPITAL ONE ACCOUNT WITH AN ACCOUNT REFERENCE OF ***                        

THE DEFENDANT FAILED TO MAINTAIN CONTRACTUAL PAYMENTS REQUIRED BY THE AGREEMENT AND A DEFAULT NOTICE WAS SERVED UNDER S.87(1) OF THE CONSUMER CREDIT ACT 1974 WHICH HAS NOT BEEN COMPLIED WITH.                          
THE DEBT WAS LEGALLY ASSIGNED TO THE         CLAIMANT ON 16-06-22, NOTICE OF WHICH HAS BEEN GIVEN TO THE DEFENDANT.      

 

THE CLAIM INCLUDES STATUTORY INTEREST UNDER  S.69 OF THE COUNTY COURTS ACT 1984 AT A RATE OF 8% PER ANNUM FROM THE DATE OF ASSIGNMENT TO THE DATE OF ISSUE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS IN THE SUM OF £28.00                           
 

THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS THE SUM OF £378.00                                   

Edited by novice95
Format
Link to post
Share on other sites

so the lowell one can be ignored, do you remember when you took the cap1 card out and when you last paid or used it?

the Enforcement officer would have been trying to enforce the +£1k OVO judgement.(read what i said above about his powers)

OVO state this was for Energy till 30/04/2019 but not when from? did you run away from a property rent or otherwise owing them around that time?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Capital One was taken in 05/2016 - hasn’t been used for absolutely years, I was paying Lowell arrears to it in 2022/ early 2023. It wasn’t to Cap1 directly. When you say ignored, do you mean that as in they won’t enforce? 

With regard to OVO, it was set up in late 2018 around October time, I moved out of the rental property it was supplying urgently due to a domestic situation with my ex partner who claimed to have been sorting it - he clearly was not and both of our names would have been attached to it so I do understand being liable - just wish I had known it had gone this far. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

lowell are a dca they cant 'enforce' anything . they are NOT A BAILIF

they could return to court and ASK the court to send court bailiffs but ive never seen lowell ever do that and for +£300 its not going to get them anything. civil consumer debts have no right of forced entry. 

if you were paying cap1, then when sold on, paying Lowell, the debt cant be Statute barred and paperwork wriggles like no signed agreement etc, are gone now the CCJ was granted. nothing you can do. the CCJ sits there now for 6yrs paid or not paying or not till it drops off on tits 6th B'day.

as for OVO looks like theres nowt your can do either. but you need to contact OVO and p'haps start paying it off, though again no bailiff can do anything really.

sorry cant see theres anything we can help with now e know the 2 CCJ's info.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for taking the time to look, appreciate it. 
 

Do I have no leg to stand on regarding them being sent to an old address therefore not receiving notice? (I know I should have updated, but I’ve read they’re supposed to trace) 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no.

it is quite legal for a claimant to use the last known address you informed the original creditor or a later debt buyer of in writing.

under the pre action protocol there is guidance that expects reasonable steps should be used attain a debtors correct address, they are not binding, nor of course does a claimant have to abide by or follow PAP at all. It's only a slap on the wrist if they don't use or follow it.

Even if you had written proof that a claimant was legally aware and knew your correct address, (which almost always guarantees a set aside) that only meets ONE of the two criteria for a successful set aside. You also need a defence for why you don't owe said debt. in either of your cases i see neither are met to date and would be a waste of the £275 cost of an N244 set aside.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...