Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
    • Weaknesses in some banks' security measures for online and mobile banking could leave customers more exposed to scammers, new data from Which? reveals.View the full article
    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Managing own £24K debts after 1 year on a fee paying DMP


Recommended Posts

stop doing their mind games on you job for them, looking for everything to justify that you are dealing with a reputable company ...they are not 

one of the worst of the worst in trying to ....money out of people that dont ever owe anything

lets put it this way..if you did owe it, why did the OC sell the dent on for 10p=£1 and not crush you in court themselves eh?

go read a good few link threads.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

PRA have now produced a statement for the Lloyds Loan we got the UE+Terms for, and declared it enforcable.  I'll scan up at some point.

Also had a long one from PRA: Re Barclaycard - enclosing letter B/Card to them   Letter from B/C to me in response to CCA, as well as their attachments.

I'll scan it up in full some time tomorrow/the day after, however, they've provided a recon of the credit agreement, and a copy of the terms "as varied in accordance with section 82(1) of the act".

They also state the interest rate, fees, and charges set out in the agreement (with variations) may differ from what they've discussed with me due to the status of my account.

Anything I should be particularly looking out for in these?  About to go have a trawl through some B/C threads.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it'll all be irrelevant twaddle paperwork, nowhere will it show how and when you signed up to the card and 9/10 they get the address WRONG for the tine of sign up which must be in the head of all sections. they always do. no sig or online tickbox, dated with an IP address .

last time here pra tried this in court they lost, the IP address they claimed was the customers, signing up online on the claimed date for a card turned out to be an IP address used by ............LLoyds bank.:pound:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The address was right, but no dates or any kind or indication of agreement online - literally just the terms.

i presume this is compliant with the s78, but not enforceable in court?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if its only t&C's ...thats not an agreement nor compliant with prescribed terms. probably the 620000 crap

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The letter from Barclaycard to PRA says it encloses

The 2 Ts & Cs have the correct address, and the header stating it's a "Credit Card agreement regulated by..."  The "short form cancellation" is a single piece of paper with

Quote

"YOUR RIGHT TO CANCEL:
Once you have signed this agreement,
you will have a short time in which you
cancel it. We will send you exact details
of how and when you can do this"

 

Which is pretty pathetic IMHO.

In other news, I now have a FOS investigator on the case re: Lloyds CC affordability, and they've separately decided to open a case re: the loans too.

edit: Sorry I've not scanned these up yet - it's a slow scanner, and I've been dealing with my cat being hospitalised and all the crappy paperwork around that! (£3800 for an MRI!)

 

Edited by Mezzle
Fix improper bbcode
Link to post
Share on other sites

aw poor pussy. def comes first. thats expensive . 

 i can assure you every page you have is here in bc threads multiple times already.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, I bet, I think I've seen two at least in the three threads I've looked at, but one of them led to an argument in the rest of the thread and the other led to the person ignoring your advice...  

I'm sorry us people asking for help are such a pain at times! :)

And thankfully, pussy has insurance for the first £4k 😅 which renews on Saturday, giving us perfect timing for double the cost! 😅

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Update:

Things still going. I still haven't gotten around to scanning the PRA docs above, but they seem u/e for now.

Cat has passed away :(

Lloyds have sent back SAR data - which is a massive document full of random stuff.  I can find in their entries from their system where it says that an automated system sent out default notices (a month after account closure!?) - but I never received any :(

Letter from Wescot re: Cabot/Fluid this morning saying I've fallen behind on payment plan and need to start paying them again.  Based on advice here, I've previously sent a CCA Request to Cabot who've come back saying it's U/E (25th October).  No mention of U/E on Wescot's letter, like there should be - but I'm guessing that Wescot has no idea I've sent the CCA Request to Cabot and been deemed u/e

Question:  Wescot letter - should I do any/all of the following

  • Letter them telling them I'm dealing with Cabot direct
  • Letter them telling them debt is u/e and further contact is harassment
  • Letter cabot with token F&F offer (I'd be happier with a line drawn under things)
Link to post
Share on other sites

as ive said 4 times now - wetcloths dont ever own debts - so you always ignore them.

as for the lloyds default notices were sent out.

cant see why thats an issue.?

so what are the defaulted dates? as once it reaches 6yrs the whole account is removed form your credit file, doesn't necessarily men a debt is not still owed thats down to enforceable agreements or not.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, Filed and ignored.

For lloyds, I've 

  • Overdraft - Complaint made & Refund bought balance down to £38 - being bought back by Lloyds
  • CC - With FOS re: affordability/default date + incorrect reporting to CRA.  Have been provided with enough to satisfy CCA - but not be enforceable in court (based on #49)
  • Loan 1 - enforcable based on post #37
  • Loan 2 - No response to CCA Request

I was speculating at one point that none of them would be enforceable if Lloyds didn't send me DNs (as I've not received them)

All default dates are Oct 22, when Lloyds sold everything off based on letters from ex DMP company, except for OD - which was changed and has been updated to July 2019

Edited by Mezzle
Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, dx100uk said:

so what are the defaulted dates?

are they still showing on your credit file too?

the defaulted dates should almost match if they do.

as lloyds agreed the od was  inflated and refunded and the loans were to prop up their od, pers id be hitting them with IRL claims too?

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

All default dates are Oct 22 (in both SAR and Credit file), when Lloyds sold everything off based on letters from ex DMP company, except for OD - which was changed and has been updated to July 2019.  

Lloyds have had complaints re: all accounts for either IRL/Affordability - and have declined all but the overdraft.

CC has been sent to FOS who're looking into it - and this has also raised that the limits reported on my Credit report are being reported incorrectly. If it's changed to accurately report what my limits were/when they were increased - they gave me an increase whilst I was over limit at one point.

I'm still waiting on the letter re: the Loans to come before I can push the Loan complaints to FOS

 

Edited by Mezzle
Link to post
Share on other sites

:cheer2:

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks HB :)

Just had a response from Cabot/Marbles. 

Seems like a legit recon contract to start with (I will scan this in at some point) - even has the checkboxes, correct address, etc etc. However, the IP on the box is a bogon IP of 10.150.102.120 - Meaning either it's one of their inbound proxies, and they've misconfigured and are logging incorrectly for LOTS of people - or they've faked it.

File and wait for Claim form ? or tell them where to stick it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

get it all up.

await letter of claim if they are ever that bold!!

you NEVER reply as i said before, only a PAPLOC needs a reply ever!

and of course a claimform from northants bulk...:eyebrows:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Managing own £24K debts after 1 year on a fee paying DMP

well you've written off a good few £1k's of your £24k total....

marbles looks enforceable and they'll not let this go as its almost £7k.

was this also taken out when your file was shot with defaults and huge debts?

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

IP listing is not part of the CCA.

so was this when you had numerous defaults and outstanding debts?

you'd better wise up, as an IRL complaint might be the only route out you have , though running up almost £7k is going to be a hard one to counter, even if they did regularly up your credit limit over the years.

pers id start gathering evidence and get an sar off to newday ASAP.

see what case you might be able to make to newday.

cabot will not give up here

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

All the defaults for everything hit around the same time - when things got too overwhelming to pay back.

The other way out would be to pay it back, surely ? Just count it as one of the debts on the dmp.

 

 That said, 4 accounts with new day open at once?  🤔

Link to post
Share on other sites

exactly.

let this run as with any other that have returned possibly legit paperwork until/unless you ever get a letter of claim on any of them.

time to get the sar sorted back and digested.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...