Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Seahorse v Cabot


Seahorse
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5872 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

OK, what I have is Cabot saying they are right and I am wrong. A copy yet again of my application form, a copy of the terms and conditions from 2000 (I signed the application form in 1998 ), bundle of letters supposedly copies of letters sent and that have the wrong logo for the time period, and a list of statements from 2004 onwards.

 

And several defaults. Now I was under the impression that you could only be defaulted once on an account. Can anyone enlighten me?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Time to stop pussyfooting around. They've had way too long to sort this out, so this letter is their last chance before I follow Debt Mountain and TBern's example and start legal action.

 

Dear Ms Rodemark

Cabot Reference: xxxxxx

Thank you for your letter dated 1 August 207, but received yesterday, 7 August 2007.

I see little point in trying to convince you of the reasons why I disagree with your points of view, as clearly all that seems to be happening is an automatic gainsaying of our relative positions.

I do however have a couple of points to raise in relation to some new information that you have provided, and as I have not yet had contact with you, I would like to run over some old ground, despite the pointlessness of it all..

I wonder why ”Cabot” have yet again provided me with terms and conditions pertaining to a time period with no relevance; the copy you have supplied me is dated 2000.

The “copies” of letters provided (supposedly) from Barclaycard are headed with a logo from a different time period to that of the dates on those letters. They can not therefore be considered to be actual copies of letters sent. I am confused in any case, as to why “Cabot” might think them relevant.

You have yet again provided me with a copy of my application form. And again, sight of this document proves that any consent to my data being shared was obviously withheld, as evidenced by the fact that I did not tick the box allowing data sharing to take place. Therefore it is my contention that Barclaycard have unlawfully sold to Kings Hill (No 1) Limited, now known as Cabot Financial (UK) Limited, my personal information. You will be well aware that this is in breach of the Data Protection Act 1998.

No interest rates of any sort are contained within the application form that you have supplied. I am therefore confused as to why the documents you have supplied by way of statements from 2004 clearly show that interest was being charged on this account. I have not been supplied with statements prior to 2004, but I notice that Barclaycard in one of the letters you have supplied, makes mention of a £20 charge. I assume that there would have been many more such charges applied to this account, but I am unable to recollect having ever agreed to the levying of such penalties.

I also note that you have supplied copies of default notices issued in November 2000, and November 2005. As the “industry standard” for the continuation of reporting of defaults with the various credit reference agencies is 6 years, perhaps you might explain to me why Cabot Financial (UK) Limited, despite allegedly not holding any of my personal data, are still recording this default over 6 years later.

I should also like to know why Cabot Financial (Europe) Limited have not kept to their own timescales as laid out in their own complaints resolution procedure.

For the avoidance of doubt, you will note that despite your best intentions, I am still unable to acknowledge any debt whatsoever to your company. And as “Cabot” have been unable to resolve this dispute to my satisfaction, and are unlikely to do so in the foreseeable future, I must regrettably inform you that I shall not be paying “Cabot” any money with respect to this account.

Furthermore, it is my intention to seek redress through the courts for the continued campaign of harassment by Cabot Financial (Europe) Limited in pursuit of this alleged debt, which has caused both myself and my family unnecessary upset and distress by the nature of that harassment, and for damages caused by Cabot Financial (UK) Limited’s unlawful processing and reporting of my personal information.

You may reply to this communication if you wish. But unless such communication is by way of an apology and a statement informing me that “Cabot” will no longer be pursuing this debt, and will be removing all data from their systems, including the reporting of defaults from the credit reference agencies, you might as well not bother. Any such communication should in any case, be received by me by end of business Friday 10 August 2007, after which time I reserve the right to commence legal proceedings without further notice.

You might wish to consider email as being the most suitable method of communication in view of the short timescale. You have had long enough to resolve this dispute, and I do not consider it unreasonable to expect your final say on the matter by the above date.

Yours Sincerely,

Link to post
Share on other sites

First thing I notice is, they have sent me a letter supposedly sent to me by Barclaycard on 27th May 1999. Unfortunately, it has Barclaycard's new logo on it, so couldn't possibly originate from that date.

 

Oh, dear.

 

That is golden.

Link to post
Share on other sites

C'est en Francais, Sarah. Es Espanol que es la lengua de Espana.

 

(How do you put the little accent thingies on the letters?)

 

Sorry Seahorse, I'm not getting into this, I'm practicing my gaelic cos I'm going after them in the Emerald Isle where they think they got easy pickings. Cabot? ..... pogue mahon comes to mind ! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

The British company leader of the collection of weak people enters the Spanish market.

I have leido this morning in an economic newspaper of these color salmon (I do not decide to me as it was confused.gif ) this that comes here:

 

 

The British leader of collection of weak people enters Spain with the purchase of 20% of Gescobro

 

The greater British group of management of collection of weak people, Cabot Financial, has reached an agreement strategic with the Spanish company Gescobro to step on the accelerator in the purchase of portfolios of weak people in the Iberian Peninsula. By virtue of this alliance, Cabot has acquired 20% of the capital of the group controlled by the Catalan family Garci'a Godall, who will follow the front of the management, according to explained sources near the process.

 

buitre-leonado.jpg

 

Querrá to say something?

__________________

SO MANY never gained SO MUCH in SO just a short time.

 

 

JUST TRANSLATED THE PAGE !!!! WILL CHECK THE SALMON NEWSPAPER FINANCIAL TIMES

:cool: sunbathing in juan les pins de temps en temps

Link to post
Share on other sites

SEC Info - Barclays PLC - SC 13G - Cabot Corp - On*2/8/06

 

 

oh dear !!! ( the link above does play up sometimes)

 

have fun click on everthing !!!

 

 

 

AND ME PRESUMES THIS ONE IS "OLD NEWS"

 

Barclays Private Equity - Press Office

 

I don't think this Cabot Corp is anything to do with the West Malling Cabot. Lets try not to confuse in our excitement to demolish...

Link to post
Share on other sites

(How do you put the little accent thingies on the letters?)

hold down ctrl and alt key..

 

ééééééééééééééééééééééé

ááááááááááááááááááááááá

úúúúúúúúúúúúúúúúúúúúúúú

ííííííííííííííííííííííííííííííííííííííííííííííííííííííííííííí

óóóóóóóóóóóóóóóóóóóóóóó

 

cór, áint thát nicé!

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK lets tell you about nikko --- to make up for the booboo

 

nikko securities has had very close links with the stock market side of barclays for over twenty years dating to before the stock market crash in the 80's.

Dodgy is "not the word " for the way the financial companies behave in the japanese stock market

as these posts see these two links will show ....

am posting the bit including "Yamaichi Securities Co., " in order to date the links

these links must be from about 1999 ??

 

So you get an idea of japanese business practice.

 

presumably this nikko controlling cabot is the same one with the "very close relationship " to barclays in the days of BZW etc

 

http://www.samsloan.com/pay-back.htm

 

when you read the first link above you will be totally shocked !!!

 

http://www.samsloan.com/nomura.htm

 

 

Yamaichi Securities

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to:

Yamaichi Securities Co., Ltd. (山一證券株式会社, Yamaich Shōken Kabushiki-gaisha?) was a Japanese securities trading firm. The company announced it would cease operations on November 24, 1997 and was declared bankrupt by the Tokyo District Court on June 2, 1999.

 

 

Japanese companies do not invest in their own companies in japan -- but invest abroard --- consequently they have artificial exchange rates

see THE "carry trade"

 

just a few facts about the "real" people behind "you know who"

:cool: sunbathing in juan les pins de temps en temps

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...