Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell/Overdales - PAPLOC Now claimform - old Landlords Utility debt ***Claim Discontinued***


Recommended Posts

So this debt accrues before your father actually took ownership of the property ? I thought it related to a normal in-between tenants occupancy and your father was landlord all through.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes youre right, he has owned it years.

What im saying is - Npower billed him for £1000s to start with as the prev tenant left owing tons, they eventually reduced it

THEN, in August 19 told him he had 30 days to tell them who was living at the property from Sept 18 to May 19 or they would then put him on a deemed contract from 6th Sept 19 which is months after the bill in question date

it was probably empty for so long as hes old and doesnt get round to sorting stuff out quickly

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay I understand , but was there a reason he didn't tell them who occupied the property during that period when the debt was accrued ? 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

They knew it was empty, the previous tenant told them when they left and we told them too - we always send meter readings off so theres no dispute as to how much energy the prev tenant used. They had no reason to believe anyone was in there.

When they wrote asking who was responsible in Aug 19 i believe Dad had spoken to them on the phone around that time so they knew from the horses mouth it was empty until May 30th 19.

They had sent someone round to check the meters just after the new tenant came in in may 19 so they had their own copy of what the readings were

They know exactly when it was tenanted and when it was empty

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the best way forward is to simply admit the standing charge amount during the period it was empty...which is what your father is legally liable for...so £130?

If your in agreement I can draft a suitable defence in the morning.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its going to court anyway once you submit a defence..its whats in that defence and how its plead .....I wouldn't want to pay anything either but standing charges are legally owed on empty properties either by the landlord or owner of said property.

Let me know , either way you can run with your defence and get into legal arguments or you can submit a part admittance for standing charge only and defeat the inflated estimated charges.

 

 

.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to confirm after speaking to him, he's def not admitting even the standing charges he says I'll just put the defence in as above

Just one thing @Andyorch right or wrong,

if he's trying to use a defence that they didn't follow protocol when placing him on this deemed contract

- does anything need adding to the defence specifically about that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

are you sure there is any deemed protocol?
he's a landlord, he is responsible for paying for energy supply/use when he has no tenant in the said property.

i know i said it pages ago and others did too, but there is really no get out for him in law, i dont think it will matter to any judge what 'get out' you may think absolves him from this bill being his responsibility, if there was a period without tenants, it won't work, he is at least liable for the standing charges and ought to admit that much, else he'll get saddled with the whole sum.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the info BF posted said what energy companies need to do, and they didn't. I don't know what a judge will think but I look at it, as its just as much a gamble for lowell to chase that amount when only half of it can reasonably be considered due to him. 

He ll get his day in court like he wants, if he loses so be it

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, gwebstech said:

Just one thing @Andyorch right or wrong, if he's trying to use a defence that they didn't follow protocol when placing him on this deemed contract- does anything need adding to the defence specifically about that?

There is  nothing legislation wise you can add all the world and his dog and judges know that owners of vacant rental properties are liable for standing charges.

Because your intended defence does not accept this or mention being a landlord the court will just assume Dad is the defendant and if you raise it on the day or in a WS it will be regarded that you have miss led the court and will most probably award the full amount plus costs plus interest 

  • Like 2

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No problem we can only advise what we deem the correct process for the best outcome but its your defence and you must do what you feel is best for you.

Best of luck

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

The other side have had a questionnaire sent to them around 2 weeks ago but my Dad hasnt a questionnaire to fill in yet - how long should he wait as id have thought he would have had it by now?

should i contact the court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does it state on MCOL status that a DQ was sent to the defendant ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

well go look!

claim history

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i wish you'd copy and paste the claim history here....

are dq's mentioned at all?

 

On 15/12/2023 at 12:06, gwebstech said:

The other side have had a questionnaire sent to them around 2 weeks ago

it will state this on mcol if true

#dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Claim History

Your acknowledgment of service was received on 06/11/2023 at 01:06:51

Your defence was submitted on 22/11/2023 at 11:12:28

Your defence was received on 22/11/2023 at 12:05:16

as for lowells...thats all it says, i saw the letter from them and although i didnt spend long reading it, they had def filled in questions about mediation and stuff

I just re read that lowell letter  they've not sent it to court yet.

Apologies. I thought everything was done through the court so the system would show it immediately 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you've had that for almost a month...:whistle:

if as we've said 1000's of times on this and your other threads.....if you spend your time reading up on lowell claimform threads, you'd already know thats a std tactic from them to intimidate and harass defendants.

the COURT sends out the DQ N180's NOT LOWELLS!

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They've sent a proper dq, I just hadn't posted that as I can't see there's anything worth posting here

I only posted the covering letter as I thought this was all standard practice 

My dad had this a few days before he even remembered to give it me and he's only had it around 2 and a bit weeks

Let me know if you need all the pages uploaded 

20231216_230528.PDF

Edited by gwebstech
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...