Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

G24/BW ANPR PCN Claimform - Everyman, Southgate street, Winchester, SO23 9EG ***Claim Discontinued***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 160 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Which Court have you received the claim from ?

  1. MCOL Northampton N1 ?

If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form. (not the response page or AOS)

Name of the Claimant :           G24 Ltd

Claimants Solicitors:  BW Legal

 

Date of issue – 06 July 2023

 

Date for AOS - 25th July 2023

Date to submit Defence -8th August 2023

What is the claim for

1.The claim is for the sum of £174.52 being due from the defendant in respect of a parking charge notice for a contractual breach which occurred on 08/07/2022 in the private car park/land at EVeryman Southgate street Winchester, SO23 9EG in relation a (vehicle and reg details)

2.The PCN was issued as the driver failed to comply with the terms and conditions as displayed.

3.Despite demands the charge remains unpaid.

4.The claim also includes the statutory interest pursuant to section 69 of the County courts act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum (a daily rate of £0.04 from 08/07/2022 to 05/07/2023 being an amount of £14.52.

5.The claim also includes the £60.00 recovery costs as set out in the terms and conditions and in the ATA AoS code of practice

 

What is the value of the claim? 174.52

Amount Claimed 

court fees £35.00

legal rep fees £50.00

Total Amount  £259.52

Have you moved since the issuance of the PCN? (y/N - if Y state Date too) N

Did you receive a letter of Claim With A reply Pack wanting I&E etc about 1mth before the claimform? Y/N + date and did you reply? N

 

court paper.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 Date of the infringement 08/07/2022

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 13/07/2022

[scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s

3 Date received not sure only a couple of days though

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] not sure

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? yes

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] n

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up n/a

7 Who is the parking company? G24 Ltd

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Everyman, Southgate street, Winchester, SO23 9EG

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under.

can't remember

There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure,

please check HERE

final notice reverse.pdf

Sorry, seem to have lost the original notice, but have the final one

 

quick note... yes it does mention pof act

 

appeals with the IAS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to G24/BW ANPR PCN Claimform - Everyman, Southgate street, Winchester, SO23 9EG

I take it that the car park was for something like Permit Holders only or Staff members only. as there appears that you were not supposed to park there. The Final Notice you posted is no use as it is the original notice that must comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 which governs private parking.

if you haven't kept the original PCN please send off an SAR so that we can see what they have and why they think they have a case. Quite often they don't. Already they have overcharged you by about £70 which is par for the course for them . Totally unlawful.

Well done for not appealing. You have more chance of being made a Dame of the British Empire than  getting the IAS to cancel your ticket.

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform

.

register as an individual on the Gov't Gateway Site
Go to HMRC's login page.


Click the GREEN sign in button.
Click “Create sign in details”
Enter your email address where asked.
You will now be emailed a confirmation code. ...


You will now be issued with a User ID for your government gateway account.
 note down your details inc the long gateway number given, you might need it later.
 

then log in to the MCOL Website

.

select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.

.

then using the details required from the claimform

.

defend all

leave jurisdiction unticked.

click thru to the end

confirm and exit MCOL.

.

get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim


type your name ONLY


no need to sign anything

.

you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.

you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.

………….
 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The car park is a cinema car park, but the cinema only opens in the evening..... There was 1 other car in there during the drivers visit.

 

I have now found the original PCN. It was lost in the mountain of crap that they sent me over the year

 

Thank you for your advice so far......

 

2022-07-13 CPCN incident on 2022-07-08.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

We've seen this before.

Presumably the fleecers will say there is a period of the day, when the cinema is closed, when no parking at all is allowed.

The most important thing now is to follow dx100uk's advice three posts up and start the process of defending the claim.

Come back when that is done and we can move on to other bits & pieces.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, presuming you've done AOS and CPR ...

... is this place local to you?  Can you easily go back and take photos of the signage?

Often the signage is pants, and a good way to trip up the fleecers, especially in these cases where it's a car park but then suddenly it isn't a car park any more for certain chunks of the day.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

They keep referring to there being a contractual parking charge. This is strange because the time you were there you were not allowed to park. As it is therefore a prohibitory sign no contract can be formed with you.  So you did not breach their contract that they have with some other drivers. Admittedly you may be described as a trespasser but only the land owner can sue for that, not the lesser human beings  at G24.

On top of that under the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 they have not issued it in accordance of the Act. Under Schedule 4 S9[2][a](2) "The notice must—(a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates;"

There is no Period of Parking mentioned on the PCN. There are the times of entering and leaving the car park but they are on photographs not the PCN itself. In any event there is no way that a car being driven from the entrance to a parking spot then later driving from the parking spot to the exit could be described as being  part of a parking period.

Further, in Schedule 4 S9[f] states at the last part "the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid;"

G24 totally missed out the words in brackets which is contrary to S9[2].

As a result you as the keeper are not liable for the debt. Only the driver is now liable and as just about everybody who has a valid motor policy is allowed to drive your car good luck with them convincing a Judge who was driving if you don't tell them. Courts do not accept the rogues premise that the keeper and the driver are the same person. Their needs to be more definite proof.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What utter rubbish signage (which is good news for you).

The entrance sign says the T&Cs are inside the car park.

Once there it's CUSTOMER PARKING ONLY - how do they know you weren't a customer?  Customer of who?

Nothing about a period of the day in which no parking is allowed.

I see in electronic-microscope viewable small print there's some rubbish about inputting your reg inside the cinema.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a cinema car park Dave and as the cinema wasn't open there could be no customers.

The charge is definitely a penalty since there was no legitimate interest involved since there was no need to keep the car park clear for patrons of the cinema. I am not saying that there may not be a charge for entering the car park at the wrong time but no way can £100 can be justified .  You could also accept that you were trespassing and only the land owner can do that .

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

defence was due over 6weeks ago

i hope you did file a defence?

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 09/07/2023 at 17:07, Hector0393 said:

Date to submit Defence -8th August 2023

On 10/07/2023 at 03:48, dx100uk said:

you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.

you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.

And?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...