Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In answer to your questions yes even though it wasn't called that, it was the NTK. Had it been a windscreen ticket you would not have received the NTK until 28 days had elapsed. In earlier times if the warden was present then a windscreen ticket would have been issued. It nows seems that the DVLA and the Courts don't see a problem  with not issuing a ticket when a warden is on site. A period of parking must mean that ther e has to be a start time and a finish time in order for it to be considered a period. A single time does not constitute a period. I am not sure what you mean by saying it could be taken either way.  All they have mentioned is  the incident time which is insufficient. There are times on the photos about one minute apart which do not qualify as the parking period because they are not on the PCN itself. The reason I asked if the were any more photos is that you should be allowed 5 minutes Consideration period for you to read the signs and decide whether you want to accept them and you do that by staying longer than 5 minutes. if  more  do not have photos of your staying there for more than 5 minutes they are stuffed. You cannot say that you left within the 5 minute period if you didn't , but you can ask them, should it get to Court , to provide strict proof that you stayed longer than the statutory time. If they can't do that, case over.
    • I recently bought some trainers from Sports Direct and was unhappy with them and their extortionate delivery and return postage charges. I tweeted about being unhappy, and received a reply from someone claiming to be from Sports Direct asking me to send my order number and email address by pm, so a claim could be raised. Which I (stupidly) did. The account used Sports Direct's name and branding, and a blue tick.  The following day I received a call from "Sports Direct Customer Service", and with a Kenyan number. They asked for details of the issue, and then sent me an email with a request to install an app called Remitly. They provided me with a password to access the app then I saw that it had been setup for me to transfer £100, and I was asked to enter my credit card number so they could "refund" me. I told them I was uncomfortable with this (to say the least), and was just told to ring them back when I did feel comfortable doing it. Ain't never gonna happen.  I just checked my X account, and the account that sent the message asking for my details is gone. I feel like a complete idiot falling for what was a clear scam. But at least I realised before any real damage was done. if you make a complaint about a company on social media, and you get a reply from someone claiming to be from that company and asking for personal details, tread very carefully.   
    • The good news is that their PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012  Schedule 4.. First under Section 9 (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; The PCN does not specify the parking period. AS you rightly say the ANPR times do not include driving to the parking space and then from there back to the exit. And once you include getting children in and out of cars especially if seat belts are involved the time spent parked can be a fair bit less than the ANPR times but still probably nowhere near the time you spent. But that doesn't matter -it's the fact that they failed to comply. Also they failed to ask the keeper to pay the charge.  Their failure means that they cannot now transfer the charge from the diver to the keeper . Only the driver is now liable. As long as UKPA do not know who was driving it will be difficult for them to win in Court as the Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Particularly as anyone can drive any car if they have the correct insurance. It might be able to get more reasons to contest the PCN if you could get some photos of the signs. both at the entrance and inside the car park. the photos need to be legible and if there are signs that say different things from others that would also be a help.
    • Farage rails and whines about not being allowed on the BBC ... ... but pulls out at the last minute of a BBC Panorama interview special. It was denied it was anything to do with his candidates being outed as misogynists and Putin apologists, or that farage was afraid Nick Robinson might throw some difficult questions at him ... despite farages recent practice at quickly cowering in fear.   It was claimed 'it wasn't in Nigels diary'     Nigel Farage pulls out of BBC interview at last minute amid Hitler row WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK ‘Panorama’ special postponed as Reform UK party faces row over candidate who claimed UK would have been ‘better off’ if it had...   Waaahhhh
    • i'd say put lowells to strict proof of where the payment came from. cant hurt to send SB letter, even if proved not. at least they get your correct address. they'd have to link the old IVA times scale to a payment  these IVA F&F pots (if thats where it came from) most mugs dont even know they are not only taking most of your payments on fees but also creaming money off to supposedly offer F&F's.  funny when the IVA fails or is complete these sums of money in F&F pots never get given back or even mentions... these IVA firm directors esp with regard to knightsbridge and creditfix were fined and struck off more times than Paul Burdell of Link Fame and still managed to continue to scam people.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

NATWEST and DATA PROTECTION ACT COMPLIANCE - READ THIS


BankFodder
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4249 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I sent a SAR to Natwest at the beginning of December, by the first week in January, I not only had copy statements, I received wads of the Foolscap stuff with data going back to when the account opened - admittedly that was only 1998, but the info is there none the less.

 

Seems it may just be issues with certain account management centres?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 116
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I dont know where its coming from but under the DPA there is no restriction to a six year period for the bank/cc company to supply anyone with data.

 

If they hold the data and it is covered within the DPA, then THEY HAVE TO PROVIDE IT when you send a written SAR and the approriate fee however odl it is.

 

When I say 'Covered in the DPA', I mean its data and on a relevant filing system both as defined within the Act.

 

Hope that helps and PLEASE spread the word, i see so many people saying 'I have asked for six years worth of data, if you use the site tempate you dont, you ask for the lot and are damn well entitled to it.

 

Assert your rights, claim back what youre entitled to.

 

HTH

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, i have recieved six years worth of statements back from nationwide and from HSBC, i do believe i incurred alot of charges before this period though. What would you reccomend to do to get the statements back from this period? Any advice would be helpfull.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So the fact that HSBC claim not to have any statements past the last 6 years for me is a lie? I've spoken to both their Customer Relations Dept. and their call centre, and they claim not to have any more data than that.

 

Is there another way for me to get access to this data, as I know the statements I am missing (sheets 13 - 20) which are prior to 2000 are where most of the charges lie.

Link to post
Share on other sites

natwest cashed my cheque for £10 in sepember (origanally asked for statements in july) and still nothing has arrived.spoke to numerous people who said they would ring back,got a case ongoing with information commisioner(nothin heard) suppose court is likely.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So the fact that HSBC claim not to have any statements past the last 6 years for me is a lie? I've spoken to both their Customer Relations Dept. and their call centre, and they claim not to have any more data than that.

 

Is there another way for me to get access to this data, as I know the statements I am missing (sheets 13 - 20) which are prior to 2000 are where most of the charges lie.

 

I would be cautious in saying theyre lieing, i suspect that the peoprlyou speak to are told somehting very carefully worded to allow them to tell you what they are without having to tell a lie.

 

From the ltters i have seen being produced the statems are generic and dont refer to a specific account.

 

They may say something like we dont have too.. and if we did it would have been sent.

 

Or we dont have too.... and statements are destroeyd after .....

 

What they dont do is say to you "Dear bloggs, our company policy is that data in all forms held by nastbank are destroyed on its 6th anniversay."

 

As far as I can make out most banks use a form of fiche for archive storage, where this is the case the destruction of the data wholesale is not a problem but from what i know of fiche records to select individual records for destruction out of the mass would be difficult and costly to carry out. The first bit of that statement means it wouldnt matter because they would get some cheap labout to do it for them, its the second bit that matters.

 

Now of course it may be that they do destroy all records after six years, but there are customers who have accounts which are tweny or thirty years old or more. In my view it is extremely unlikley they would destroy account details of active accounts.

 

They may change the form that data is held in but i dont believe they will destroy it.

 

If you have a mortgage for example the liitation period is 12 years i believe, ask yourself this. the ability to claim for mistakes/bad debts works two ways, are the bank really going to destory all data they would need to defend themselves or claim and debts as a result of amortgage in 4, 5, or 6 years?

 

It dont stack up imho.

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

i sent of for statments on the 3rd of january and ater a number of calls to them i have only just recived the them, only to find that they have only sent me 2 statments from the past 6 yrs which i think is natwest just [edited] now i have to wait another 10 days for the rest of them. as any 1 else had this problem?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Subject Access Request Goggarburn Address

 

can you please help me. I have all my bank statements going back about 15 years. I wrote to Natwest asking for a comprehensive list of charges, and enclosed the £10 cheque, but they just sent me 6 years of statements. I am not sure what the DPA is all about, or who Joyce is, or what the Goggarburn address is all about. I would really appreciate some advice on how to respond to Natwest simply sending me statements with no accompanying letter. On my statements i appear to have 'service fees' coming out every month for years and years, but i read that Natwest won a court case to say i cant claim these back now?

any advice would really be appreciated

thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mark

 

go through the statements and make a list of the charges, what theyre descirbed as and the values, start a thread of your own in the natwest forum and ask in there for assistance and im sure somoene will help unravel the mysteries of natwest charges.

 

Burnsy

 

If you look in the templtes forum there is a thread for nonc-omplaince with the Data protection act and some follow up leeters for just this situation.

 

Start your own thread and post quesitons in there and im sure somoen will help you.

 

HTH

 

glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a word of warning to everybody, the banks try and pretend they have not had your letter asking for charges. My advice, always send it recorded delivery, every time. Its worth it, that way you have a name of somebody who signed for it at the other end when you check on the royal mail website and it can be traced bac to who signed for it and when. ALWAYS SEND BY RECORDED DELIVERY. Mine took 10 days for statements to arrive. All 680 of them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Sent my letter recorded delivery, I even have a print out of the signature I got form the Royal mail Website and that was on the 22nd of December.

 

Still no show on the statements though, who is this nice Joyce lady i can speak to about this, I need that money owed to me to pay for glasto tickets!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, if you have somebodys name you entitled now to log onto the Banking ombudsmans website and tell them you have had no response from the bank and they can chase for you, providing tracking number etc. to them to chase. However, I suggest (a) has your cheque for £10 been cashed or not ? The £10 you send with your letter requesting copies of your statements. If you didnt enclose the cheque that could be why they havent responded. I suggest you start again. Redo the letter asking for your last six years worth of statements, enclose £10 payable to the bank, whichever bank you are chasing, and if its the Natwest as mine was, and still is, then you need to send the request to the Alex Lyons, Data Protection Manager address, you get a quicker response than by sending it to your own branch. The full address for Alex Lyons, Data Protection Manager can be found on this website by checking out the links or if you like if you are struggling to find it, I can dig it out of my files for you today if you just respond saying you cant find it. I will help if I can, but you must start the process again and send by either recorded or special delivery to the Alex Lyons address. I got a reply within 14 days by doing this. Best of luck.... If your cheque has been cashed though, you can get onto the banking ombudsmans website and report it, and they can get involved in chasing for you too. Dont give up. Its worth every minute spent on this. Make it your project for the next three months. It will pay off, and will be worth every dreaded minute you spend on it.

 

All the best.

Link to post
Share on other sites

checked my statement. The cheque hasn't been cashed. Odd though that they have received the letter (I sent it to Alex Lyons at the mentioned address) yet the cheque has apparently gone missing. I am very sure I placed the cheque was placed in the letter so I'm a little puzzled as to the delay.

 

Whats the best way to chase this up without wasting time being passed from department to department?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I requested information on fees and charges applied to my account going back 4 years and quoted the data protection act. I didn't enclose a cheque (whats the point, they'd only bounce it and hit me with another charge). I received a big bundle of statements about 2 months later. A few months later I complained that I hadn't received the information I had requested and they sent another bundle of statements that were exactly the same as the first lot. So I will complain again that I have not received the information I requested, lets see if they send me another bundle of statements.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again, basically, you should send a postal order for £10 made payable to them and then they will have to send you exactly what you have asked for. Unless you pay the statutory £10, they will just keep messing you about.

 

I am happy to help in any way that I can but you have to keep to the rules of the claim help. You need to send 10 in the way of cheque, postal order or other. Otherwise they will mess you about.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all,

 

I'm new to this rather excellent website and need a bit of advice. I've read through the FAQs advising me to send off a Data Protection Act request to NatWest plus a £10 cheque, but I'm unsure who to make the cheque out to and which address I should be sending my request to. Any help will be gratefully received.

 

samivel

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, you need to make your cheque payable to your bank or building society, whomever you are asking for the statements off, i.e. Natwest Bank, Barclays Bank, or whoever. You need to send the first letter asking for your statements to their addresses to be found in forum links. If you need help just reply to this post and I can find the address for you. Hope this helps, but hurry up and start your claim. Hope this helps.

 

Fend x

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nattie,

Your comments at #2 are most illuminating.

Could you advise whether the same systems apply to NatWest credit cards?(My daughter had one until 2004 but due to home moves etc lost ALL of her CC statements AND account number! - don't you just love kids).Despite sending Natwest CC my daughter's name, billing address and when she terminated the account, they are pleading ignorance. If the SAR is meant to cover ANY information the company has on the individual then one would think that they have more than one search key!

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi everyone, i have been having one hell of a problem going back to last November with the [edited] Natwest, going under the guise of NatWest collection centre, and i would really be grateful for any help, they really are are driving me to the depths of despair, its a long winded affair, do i post a thread here, or could i email it to someone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest NATTIE

bankaid you post on the natwest forum and kennyh will respond shortly once i have read post 2

 

Edit yes the post stands

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hiya Nattie,

I know that I must sound thick but, I cant find the link to NatWest Contacts section.

I just need the correct and full Goggarburn address to start the ball rolling.

Cheers

Marcus

Link to post
Share on other sites

I submitted a letter under the DPA to Natwest by handing it in to my local branch.

 

I requested that they provide me with 6 years of details so that I can submit my claim for charges (totalling £1700), but I forgot to put the £10 cheque inside.

 

Within 14 days a package arrived full of my 6 years of statements and last weekend I submitted my initial request for repayment of the £1700.00.

 

I'm looking forward to their response (and payment)!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand that the NatWest are routinely refusing to suppy more than 6 years of personal data in response to Data Protection Act disclosure requests.

 

I understand that they are tell at least some people that they do not hold personal data going beck further than 6 years.

 

There is some evidence to suggest that this is not correct and complaints are about to be made to the Information Commissioner.

 

If you have been refused disclosure going back more than 6 years you should consider witing to the Information Commissioner about it.

 

Watch this space as we expect to have more news about this in January.

01012003

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4249 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...