Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good morning all, No further communication with P2G so now submitting my small claims action. Would be grateful for any feedback on my description of claim before I submit later. The defendant in this case is Parcel2Go Limited The claimant sent a parcel using Parcel2Go Ltd as a broker and Evri as the shipper containing two handmade bespoke wedding trays to a customer with tracking number P2Gxxxxxxxx. The parcel was never delivered although the defendant stated that three attempts had been made to deliver the parcel.  The claimants customer waited in for four days to receive the delivery but no delivery was attempted. There was no communication with the claimants customer.  Despite many web chats and emails the parcel was not delivered and on the Parcel2Go website it stated that the customer had refused delivery. This was not true as no delivery had been attempted.  I was informed that the parcel was being returned to me but after waiting three weeks was informed by Evri that the parcel was lost. I was offered compensation of £20 + shipping fee which I refused and after sending Parcel2Go a Letter of claim this was increased to £75 which I also refused. It is clear that the defendant is responsible for the loss of the parcel as they did not act with reasonable care and skill when handling the claimants parcel, contrary to section 49 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015. The claimant therefore seeks £370 in respect to the value of goods plus court costs. I thought it might be better to use the CRA rather than the Supply of Goods and Services Act as we are sole traders - is this correct?
    • No new development, I'm afraid. The last update I received was a letter from the court, advising that the case had been transferred to Croydon County Court.
    • Read how your orgnisation can make opportunities and employment more accessible for disadvantaged young people.View the full article
    • Hi, I am aware there’s been few threads about this already but just wanted to confirm information on my case. I was with Village gym last year(2023) on initial 6 month usual contract they do, I lost my job and due to that I couldn’t afford to pay for gym nor I had any motivation to go to gym at that time so they sent me arc phone message in September 2023 that I owed them £140 so I paid them back on instalments in 2 months time.  Then I started receiving new years deals in December 2023 and I decided to give them a call but they never mentioned anything about 6 month contract or anything, only that it would be monthly rolling contract and I paid them for 2 months and then I realised both months they charged me £59 instead of £38 they offered me on the phone when I mentioned that I am still student, even though before I was paying £43 a month in mid 2023. I spoke to gym entrance lady and she said I should give a call to gym on the phone number so I did and whoever answered said they’ll pass my info to manager and he will give me a call back in 24 hours, of course no one called me back so I called again and they said same thing. And of course once again no one got in touch with me so I got tired of them charging me more than they should and decided to cancel my direct debit and stopped going there as I got new job with rotation shifts which is not good for me as I cannot visit gym after I finish at 10pm every second week.  And now in April I received arc message saying this :  Also they have my old flat address where I used to live. What is the  best thing to do for me please? Thank you!
    • Richard Holden refusing ro answer Jon Craig's questions in a Sky pool interview and his spad argiung about the questions. As Jon said, not his finest hour.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Will Advice Please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 388 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good Afternoon 

can anyone help me

if my mum in law has left in her will that everything is to be split 3 ways with my hubby and his 2 sisters

what would happen if he passed away before her.

 

would it come to me as his wife or go 50/50 to his sisters 

 

many Thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your husband's share would go to you

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Will Advice Please

Expressed that way you are now putting me in doubt....

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, BankFodder said:

Expressed that way you are now putting me in doubt....

 

It would be OK if the OP was talking about children or grandchildren of the intended beneficiary - they would inherit if the intended beneficiary pre-deceased the testator (s33 Wills Act).

 

But I don't know that the same appiles to the widow/widower.  I'd have thought it didn't apply...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does the Will say anything about what happens if your husband or his sisters die before their mother?

 

There are default rules about what happens in that situation but the default rules can be overridden in the Will. The Will can direct that something different to the default rules happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I might be mistaken but I presume the OP would have said if the wording of the will took account of the scenario where her husband predeceased the testator?

 

@dillon21  -  without knowing the exact circumstances and wording of the will nobody here can really help you.

 

I would suggest that if your MiL's will simply leaves a bequest to your husband and does not spell out what will happen if he pre-deceases her, then you cannot assume that you will get anything as his widow.  However, if he has any living children or other issue surviving both him and your MiL, they will probably inherit.

 

I presume your MiL is still alive?  I would suggest that she gets proper paid for legal advice from a solicitor to make sure that her will puts her actual wishes into effect after she dies.

 

(My wife is a local authority solicitor and we have three law degrees between us.  When we got married we did our own wills because our wishes were really simple and we thought we knew what we were doing.  A couple of years later we realised that we had made a complete pig's ear of them.  We paid a solicitor in private practice to do them properly)

Link to post
Share on other sites

pretty sure if anyone (other than direct children or grand children) mentioned in a will predeceases the will writer it does not go to their existing wife nor children, it goes back in the pot and is split between those already mentioned pro rata in the will.??

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Manxman in exile said:

I might be mistaken but I presume the OP would have said if the wording of the will took account of the scenario where her husband predeceased the testator?

 

 

It's best to check these things. Not everyone asking for advice has the familiarity with the legal construction of Wills that some regular posters have. And it's useful for other people reading the thread in the future to be aware of the issue.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, dx100uk said:

pretty sure if anyone (other than direct children or grand children) mentioned in a will predeceases the will writer it does not go to their existing wife nor children, it goes back in the pot and is split between those already mentioned pro rata in the will.??

 

Yes.  

 

To clarify my earlier post:  where a testator leaves a gift to a child or remoter descendant, then if that beneficiary pre-deceases the testator the gift does not fail, but goes to any surviving issue of the deceased benficiary - unless the will specifically states otherwise.

 

Wills Act 1837 (legislation.gov.uk)

 

So in the OP's case I don't think she will benefit if her husband dies before her MiL, but his children and grandchildren etc will - if he has any.

 

People really need paid for legal advice from a solicitor (not a will writing firm) unless their wishes are unbelieveably simple.  And most people's are not.

 

The problem the OP has is that this is not her (or her husband's) will...

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ethel Street said:

 

 

It's best to check these things. Not everyone asking for advice has the familiarity with the legal construction of Wills that some regular posters have. And it's useful for other people reading the thread in the future to be aware of the issue.

 

Very true.  I think from #6 the OP is going to investigate further.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, dx100uk said:

pretty sure if anyone (other than direct children or grand children) mentioned in a will predeceases the will writer it does not go to their existing wife nor children, it goes back in the pot and is split between those already mentioned pro rata in the will.??

 

Sorry!  To clarify further, if the gift does fail because the dead beneficiary had no children, then yes, it goes back into the residual estate to be distributed as per the will.  So the OP might get something out of that depending on what the will says

 

It can get complicated...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...