Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bought a holiday lodge with false promises


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 355 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Quote

Thankyou in advance everyone. We purchased a lodge as a holiday investment in february based on the salesman showing us a screenshot of the accounts from a lodge on the same park. He then stated 2 other lodges near to us was fully booked out all the time and furthermore not to book owner stays on our lodge as it would be busy. The salesman suggested we keep head of bookings on our side to direct bookings to our lodge which lacks integrity impartiality and honesty. We bought the lodge for 125000 and they offered us 70k. If we sell it through an agent, we have to give them 15% +vat of the sale price.We have evidence other than residents from another park they own threatened to sue them for mis selling. The owners won but signed a disclaimer. We will see if our insurance legal team can assist. We thank you in advance.

 

Thankyou in advance everyone.

 

We purchased a lodge as a holiday investment in february based on the salesman showing us a screenshot of the accounts from a lodge on the same park.

 

He then stated 2 other lodges near to us was fully booked out all the time and furthermore not to book owner stays on our lodge as it would be busy.

The salesman suggested we keep head of bookings on our side to direct bookings to our lodge which lacks integrity impartiality and honesty.

 

We bought the lodge for 125000 and they offered us 70k.

If we sell it through an agent, we have to give them 15% +vat of the sale price.

 

We have evidence other than residents from another park they own threatened to sue them for mis selling.

 

The owners won but signed a disclaimer.

 

We will see if our insurance legal team can assist.

 

We thank you in advance.

Edited by BankFodder
Restructured to make it intelligible
Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, please will you post up your messages in a properly spaced and punctuated state so that they are easy to read – especially for people with small screens and for whom solid blocks of text can be especially difficult.
Secondly, even though I've restructured it for you on this occasion, I am finding it really quite difficult to understand exactly what the problem is and what you are asking us.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou for your advice and guidance.

 

The forecast on financial returns is inaccurate.

 

We were advised turn key however since speaking to other disgruntled lodge owners  they are having to via social media plug the business to keep afloat and this was never mentioned in conversation with the salesman who suggested the other lodges bringing in an annual return of 23k.

 

We'll be lucky according to the park manager if we break even which is 6k.

 

We believe we've been mis-sold.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

A forecast is inaccurate by definition. It is not to be believed especially when coming from an eager salesman. Other than that I can't make any sense of your story, sorry. 

 

"We were advised turn key" :confused:

"They are having to via SM plug the business to keep it afloat"  :confused:

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...