Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Frustratingly I've got a voice WhatsApp message from my friend but he's misunderstood the situation and thinks it's you who wants to cancel.  Anyway, I've answered asking if I can call him and hopefully the two of us will be free at the same time today to actually speak on the phone. In the meantime I found this on a page I think meant for people/businesses who have listings on Booking.com How can I communicate with guests to inform them about unforeseen issues at my property and initiate a cancellation? If you’re experiencing unforeseen issues and can’t accommodate your guests, you must report this to our customer service. They will support you with the cancellation request and relocation of the guests, if applicable. https://partner.booking.com/en-gb/help/reservations/changes-cancellations/handling-cancellations-and-guests-cancellation-requests#question-153182 So that's what the host should be doing.  
    • Hi ALl,    Would appreciate some advice and support. I went to insure my car with my partner last night and they refused insurance. I checked my dvla license online and it stated I have been disqualified for 6 months. This is due to 2 driving offences that I failed to identify the driver. I moved house a year ago and completely forgot about changing the registered address. This went to court on 14th May 24 and was given a fine for both and 6 points each totalling 12 points and a 6 month ban. I have read a few things online and spoken to a couple of solicitors for a quick consultation and views and opinions are so varied. Some solicitors are charging extortionate money for something that I know takes 5 mins such as the statuary declaration.    I am going to complete a statutory declaration today and get a solicitor to sign and submit this. But is this just delaying the inevitable? what's the likely hood of being able to overturn this and just pleading guilty to the original 2 offences and take the 3 points for each and a fine with no ban? Any help would be much appreciated, I have been sent the papers by the courts today so have this to hand. Looks like I'm only being charged for the failure to identify and not that and the speeding offence if that makes any difference.    R
    • Again, in the second letter in post 39 upload, they say they "hold a copy of the letter of claim". BUT, they didn't include it... Hmmmm!
    • I've now had a text message from them. Is it safe just to ignore and block the number? I have sent a letter off to CBQ informing them of my address.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PIP award for son with autism - already ended at time award letter received ? **RESOLVED**


The Phantom
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 476 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I hope someone can help here with a claim for PIP.

 

My son (18) with ASD is receiving UC & LCWRA and has made a claim for PIP in October last year.

 

We filled out the forms and provided medical evidence.

He had an assessment on the 2nd of February and received a text message that he was awarded PIP a week later.

 

He received a lumpsum payment of £790 today and a letter in the post saying he scored 8 points in the daily living needs section but 0 points mobility.

 

The award letter says he was awarded the standard rate of £61.85 per week from 7th of October 2022 to the 6th of February 2023 which was last week.

 

Does this mean they have already ended his claim / award last week and just paid him for four months ?

 

I am a bit confused.

Is this common to only award PIP for four months and have the claim already end by the time you get your award letter ?

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no surely that is back payment , and he will get £61+ weekly now going forward .....read the letter properly!

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have attached a copy of the letter.

It reads as if the claim has ended on the 6th of February, i.e. a day before they sent him the letter.

 

It would make more sense if it said 6th of feb 2024, that would be 1 year, but four months seems an odd time frame for a PIP claim, especially ending it before they even send him the award letter.

 

I guess I have to brave it and call the help line ....

 

Document_2023-02-13_202909.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree that the letter simply states that the claim has been paid from 7th October to 6th February (day before the letter is dated)

 

The claim is being continued, but the letter cannot confirm payments for dates which are beyond the date of the letter, as those dates have not yet actually happened yet.

 

Letters from DWP are never great at explaining every aspect in a clear way.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

no thats the date range of the BACKDATED SUM they are sending him.

he has his PIP Claim going forward

 

read the letter PROPERLY.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a note at the end saying

 

'I awarded you PIP for a set time as your needs may change'

 

but there is nowhere on the letter saying what that set time is.

 

That's why I thought it was 07.10.22 -06.02.23 (last week) which would be around 4 months.

 

There is also no statement on what future payments would be and when they would be paid. As if there are no future payments . 

 

I initially thought there are two options:

 

a) he was only awarded 4 months worth of PIP for some reason (although there is no reason as to why that would be)

 

b) whoever entered the details put a wrong end date in (6th of Feb 2023 instead of 6th of Feb 2024 or 2025...)

 

- and because that end date was in the past when they printed the letter, the system didn't include payments going forward and that's why that section is missing from the paperwork and this went unnoticed when they posted the letter.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

actually to be correct...

their template system looks like has screwed up printing it properly

or as i more suspect or bod did not tick the 'on going payment' on their system

 

there is a whole sentence missing on the award letter you have from the usual ones that go out, that comes first  and should end with the words 'for an on going period.'

 

that letter is solely about he back payment.

ring and check. 

but as his 'condition' has not and will not change - it's just an admin error i suspect

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kudos to everyone who responded, you were all pretty much right.

 

I managed to penetrate the telephone helpline's defences today and managed to speak to someone.

 

In the process I was only cut off once and my total waiting time didn't exceed an hour. 

 

The nice person on the phone agreed the letter wasn't worded very well and they omitted to put the actual award period in there.

 

I was told the award period is two years until February 2025 when it will become due for a review.

 

The time period in the letter (7th of October 22 to 6th of Feb 23) is the time period for which they have now paid him and for which he received the payment into his bank account yesterday.

 

Again, he agreed that is not too clear and could be worded better.

 

He will continue to receive monthly payments from March onwards.

 

He should get further letters to this effect and they will also send a new letter explaining the proper award period to put his mind at rest.

 

So thank you to all who responded, you were spot on.

Thank you !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

:rockon:

 

Dx

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to PIP award for son with autism - already ended at time award letter received ? **RESOLVED**
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...