Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Standard form being sent to large numbers of claimants. Just answer as the form asks.  No need to  go into any detail, unless the forms asks for specific details of how health impacts on daily activities. If you are worried contact Citizens Advice as they are experts with PIP, as they are trained to understand what evidence is required for assessments.
    • Resume payments with the debt collectors? You say not to pay dca though do you not? 
    • yes they mostly would be enforceable, but that wasnt the point. even if they get a CCJ the very worst they could have done is get a restriction k which is useless to them. doesnt hurt anything. the CCJ would remain on file for 6yrs yes, but then gone same as a DN. the rest k charge does not show at all. and even so, the idea was to get your debts issued a default notice ASAP, them RESUME payments.. the advise is NOT conflicting, just you don't read things properly or understand.  oh well. dx
    • This is the dilemma I had then and still have it. The bit that stopped me was the post 2015 comments about them being enforceable now in most instances which I feel hasn’t been answered unless I am missing something. the bonus I guess is not all credit agreements now will be chasing me so less people chasing me down so to speak. this is the problem as there is conflicting messaging out there it is hard to plan a strategic way forward 
    • In 2017 my wife was given PIP and I finally, officially, became her carer. In 2019 she was reviewed and we were told it would be done by phone to make it easier for her as she has mobility issues and anxiety. The review was very simple, Has anything changed? No, ok, we'll stay as you are then. In 2022 a second review, this time by phone again but with an awkward given at the end for 5 years. Today, we got a new review letter (I know wait lists are bad, but I dont think the wait will take til 2027 for a decision). We're a bit confused because it's a letter, not a phone call as before. The form is just questions that ask "has anything changed" Now, since 2017, nothing has changed except we had our home adapted via disability grant. This was noted in the phone calls. So we should really write that nothing has changed in the last 2 years. The adaptations have been mentioned in both previous phone reviews, but not in writing so I guess we should bring it up. But we feel that they want us to explain everything as if it were a new claim again... And are worried if we miss something in the original claim or the phone calls she will risk losing part of the award (a 2 point swing could be really bad) It does just say "has anything changed?" But in dealing with ESA prior to getting PIP, answering the question asked "has your condition worsened or improved" at a review process with a simple "no, I'm still the same" somehow led to ESA ending and needing appeal. So just want a bit of guidance. How much detail is needed? Is minimal ok? Or should we be blunt with the fact nothing has changed, and bullet point the things she struggles with in each section?   I know the obvious thing is to just explain it all,but over 10 years the sheer amount of times the poor woman has had ESA or PIP stopped/refused just because something was missed out in their report, or they felt it meant a new claim should be made, or that they judged her healthy because we missed a tiny thing in our forms. During COVID it finally seemed like it was all just going to be smooth, especially with the phone reviews and the 5 year reward, but here we are. We just want to make sure we have the least chance to trip ourselves up, but making sure we have what is expected if you get me? I wish I still had a copy of the forms from 2017, because I could just verbatim copy them and add in about the adaptation, but (ironically) we lost our photocopies we kept of them when the house was being adapted
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

No council tax banding


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 481 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi apologies if this is posted in the wrong section but my question is kind of related to credit files.

 

I recently moved home to a new rented property.

 

My landlord who I know quite well told me they would pay my council tax for me. It is in my contract that I am not responsible for council tax which is great. Then when checking around for example for new energy suppliers I noticed some of them could not find my address on the drop down box after putting in my post code. No problem as I just enter addresses manually when needed. But found it a bit strange as the house is less than 30 years old but all other houses on my street come up.

 

I then owed a final payment for council tax from my previous address no problem I will clear it. Then I was curious how much the council tax is for my new rental property and went to check the band and it shows as deleted. The house is not under repair - its totally liveable and in very good condition and was previously used as holiday lets before I moved in.

 

Question is

why would it show as deleted and will this have any affect on my credit rating ? Because of the house not having a council tax band. I have applied to get on electoral role here and that is currently being processed. Im sure my landlord is not up to anything dodgy as they are very well off - own a number of properties and so on. Anyone know what this means or if it would affect me in anyway thanks )

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you checked whether your property is on the Royal Mail Postcode Address File [PAF]? That is the definitive list of UK properties addresss used by just about everyone else. Easiest way to check is enter your address on the Royal Mail Postcode Finder and see what comes up.

 

Postcode Finder - Find an address | Royal Mail Group Ltd

 

If it isn't there you can report it to Royal Mail and get it added.

 

Report an incorrect or missing address | Royal Mail Group Ltd

 

It shouldn't affect you credit rating because of council tax because you aren't liable to pay it. If the council's electoral services say they can't put you on the Electoral Register that would definitely make it difficult to get credit. And if potential lenders can't find you on the PAF they might also decline to lend.

 

So if not on PAF report that to Royal Mail asap and get it put on.

 

Is where you live a whole house or is it a house that has been subdivided into flats? Sometimes a previous owner has created a separate flat in part of the premises and decided themselves to give it a new number. Eg the house is number 12 in the street and owner called the flat 12A but the owner never notified that to the local council or Royal Mail.  Although postie will still make post deliveries it then won't be in PAF.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I checked and my address is on PAF and listed.

Its a house not flats no other tenants. So far my change of address for the Electoral register is being processed got notifaction of that the other day.

 

I did double check my contract and clearly states landlord will pay council tax (and tv licence)

just strange the banding shows as being deleted. Maybe they get billed at there other address they live at in my City.

 

But if it dont affect my credit rate or future credit applications then all good. thanks for your reply.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's on PAF so as far as credit is concerned lenders can verify your address against PAF and so that shouldn't cause you any problem.

 

Council tax isn't your problem as you have a signed contract confirming the landlord is paying it.  It's possible the change of use from holiday let to domestic dwellinghouse has required banding to be reviewed. As a holiday let maybe it was paying business rates not CT?

 

Just bear in mind that in law the person primarily responsible for paying both Council Tax and TV licence is the resident/occupier of the house, not the non-resident landlord. So if the landlord fails to pay CT/TVL it is you who would be in the firing line initially.  So you might want to ask the Landlord to confirm that they have in fact paid them.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes im aware im responsible but they have assured me they are paying it. And knowing what I do of them they have no reason not to pay - they are very stable financially both working in legal related occupations.

 

The banding shows as last being updated 2011 around the time the property became a holiday let. So dont know maybe I will ask them again to clarify. Thanks for your replies

Edited by dx100uk
unnecessary previous post quote removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ethel Street said:

Sounds like it became liable for buisness rates not CT in 2011 and the owner will now have to go through the process of getting it banded for CT again. 

 

Yes I think your right I remember they did tell me they had written to the council last month informing them that they would paying Ctax and not the tenant. Think that is the answer and makes sense ) cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Just to add my air of caution here as the landlord may have mentioned they were informing the council they would pay council tax but you actually have no evidence of that bar it written in your tenancy agreement.

 

As has been previously stated it is you that is responsible for checking whether you pay council tax and tv licence not the landlord.

 

My advice is I would contact the Council and inform them of the date you moved in and whether you are liable for council tax as you tenancy agreement states landlord pay this and you want clarification. (checking is very simple and also covers your back but make sure to get that clarification from the council in writing and keep it safe)

 

I would say to anyone that has that written on any tenancy agreement that landlord pays council tax to always check yourself with the council and get their response in writing as it is your legal responsibility to check if you pay council tax not the landlord.

 

 

  • Thanks 1
  • I agree 1

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...