Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Campervan deposit Court Claim - got default Judgement under wrong name! **CLAIM DISCONTINUED**


moneydragon
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 557 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

WWW.MONEYCLAIMSUK.CO.UK

get the answer to the question: how do I stop a court claim?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In any case, don't discontinue straight away.

 

You might as well hang on a few days to see if he files a defence.  On the very, very, very, very small chance he doesn't (again) you would win by default (again).  I think the deadline is 1 December (your copy of the court order arrived 17 November so add 14 days).  Let us know if/when his defence arrives.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

@moneydragon  -  apologies if this has already been covered, but I don't think you've explained what you are claiming and why the defendant (whether the correct one or not) is contesting it?

 

I assume from the set aside application that you eventually posted that you were claiming the return of your deposit, but the (wrong) defendant seems to be suggesting that you were in breach of the T&Cs of hire, and that you aren't entitled to a refund.

 

Bearing in mind you may already have chucked £35 away by suing the wrong defendant, are you certain that you have a valid claim in the first place?

 

Yes - not all deposits that are described as "non-refundable" are always non--refundable, but sometimes they are.  What is the precise reason why the hire firm won't refund you?  It might save you chucking away another £35.

  • Like 1
  • I agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Campervan booking deposit fee refund - i got a default Judgement, using a named director + a T/A name - the named person got a set aside stating they are an employee only. should i continue?

we've only a small part of their T&C's here

 

to the OP:

 

please post up their full T&C's, and the date you paid that deposit and the date you cancelled and by what method you cancelled.

 

dx

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx100uk

Attached are the only tc's that I have received I note that they changed them on their website in Sept.

I paid the deposit 25.4.22 and we notified him on 30.4.22 by email . I am also aware that he managed to rebook the hire so he did not loose out.

Hi FTMDave

I have received the following email today:

Firstly, please note I have today 22/11/2022 received the General Form of Judgment or Order dated 14/11/2022. 

It has been noted the judgment has been set aside after my explanation for the default, demonstrated a real prospect of successfully defending the claim and acted promptly.

My defence is remaining the same as per the application to set aside the judgement,  please see below:

This claim is incorrect and shouldn't be against me, I work for the company which the claimant is a customer of.

The claimant is trying to make a claim because he wasn't refunded his booking deposit which he forfeited when he cancelled his campervan hire booking as per the terms and conditions he agreed to.

I have been in contact with David Wall HMCTS | County Court Business Centre | Administrative Officer since 9th September via email because I was unable to login to the moneyclaim.gov.uk website due to MFA having my old mobile number assigned to the account.

This has still not been resolved and David has stopped replying so I have had to create a new Government Gateway ID to access this claim after spending 49 minutes on hold to the CCBS helpline.

I want to make a formal complaint about David and I want the cost of this set aside request refunded on the grounds that David and the CCBC delayed the response so I couldn't respond within 28 days.

I am requesting a full refund of £275 due to the delays in which the CCBC caused me to respond to the initial claim.

Do I now submit the N279 and re-issue and if so can you please advise how to complete it.

TIA

I am requesting a full refund of £275 due to the delays in which the CCBC caused me to respond to the initial claim.

How can he ask me to refund the £275 when as he states was down to CCBC

 

tc's.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

So all as expected.

 

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/961394/n279-eng.pdf

 

The form seems pretty straightforward.  E-mail it to the court and copy to the individual you sued.  Make sure in the "subject" field you put the claim number as well as the names of the two parties.  Obviously click on the "Return Receipt" tab.

 

So that's the claim dead & buried.

 

Are you sure chargeback is a no no?  It might save you the hassle of a court case.

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Something in your favour - your opponent is an idiot.

 

He did pay £275 which he'll never see again, when he could have paid you £260 and be done with it!

 

He's not claiming the £275 from you.  He's saying he wants it refunded by the court because an overworked member of staff didn't hold his hand sufficiently when MCOL wouldn't work.  Good luck to him with that.  He could have used e-mail or snail mail or fax instead.

 

It's the judge who made the order who decides on costs, and the judge didn't order you to pay anything.

 

So if chargeback is a no no, and you're confident you have a good claim -  read Manxman in Exile's post 31 carefully - after you've sent the N279 then issue a new claim.  If you want to go through the reasons for your claim before, we'd be happy to help. 

  • Haha 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have completed the top box with claim number etc and ticked  "discontinues all of this claim"

 

then entered the defendants name in the box against the (defendant). Printed and signed and will then email over to court and the defendant.

 

Sorry, Im being thick here when you say "Obviously click on the "Return Receipt" tab" where's that

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whatever function is on your e-mail programme to show that the court has read the mail.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you FTMDave I did think that was what you meant - sorry been a long day.

 

Anyway, all been sent off now and I would like to take the opportunity to thank you so much for all your patience and help you have given me, dont know what I would of done without your help. You're a star.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

ring and check they got it?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the face of it, yes.

 

Courts are understaffed and overworked and it takes a while for them to read communications.

 

I think you should phone the court as soon as practicable.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it a Proposed Notice of allocation with a Directions Questionnaire (N180) or have you already completed and filed a DQ ?

 

 

.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

:cheer2:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Campervan deposit Court Claim - got default Judgement under wrong name! **CLAIM DISCONTINUED**
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...