Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, Firstly, and most importantly I am sorry for your loss. I would go back to the bank with the death certificate and ask them to step in. Remind them firmly but politely that there is no limit for DD claims
    • My wife is the named person to his bank account with him having Dementia being his daughter (I say named person she still is but he recently passed away and the deputyship application has now being stopped by the solicitor as it's no longer needed) We've only just got the Death Certificate so the bank will be the next step informing them. She went to the bank and explained the situation but even being his named person the bank said she didn't have the power to stop DD without any legal documents (virgin money) was the bank. She could have copies of bank statements that was about it.
    • I see you said you tried to stop the DD but it seems that didn't work. May I please ask why that didn't work? You should be asking your bank to cancel the DD and I don't see why they would have objected, hopefully you can clarify this. I agree that you should be making a claim here against your bank and ask them for a DD refund. There is no timeframes for this.
    • Thanks DX,   I wasn't aware we could do that for that length of time. I'll ask my wife to check with the bank this week
    • Yeah That's correct. We left rent payment coming out of his bank account from January 2023 - August 2023 until we could find somewhere to sort out his belongings which was fine. I tried to give notice a few times from August 2023 asking for advice from Sanctuary housing how we went about this explaining his condition and that he was in a Nursing home from December 2022. I explained we don't have any legal powers to his account like POT but were in the process of going for Deputyship and that I was the named person to act on his behalf to speak with Santuary housing. I said we could provide details of his condition and proof he was now in a nursing home with date he moved in. This went ignored despite repeated attempts to contact them until a housing manager contacted us end of February 2024 and notice was finally accepted with his tenancy coming to an end March 22 2024. Although they have continued to take rental payments for the flat despite someone else living in it from the 1st April. I wasn't aware payments were still being taken till I checked his May banks statements. I had asked them to back date rental payments to August 2023 when I gave notice rather than just giving notice in March 2024 but they've ignored that bit. I don't see why they shouldn't give it back they've taken money they shouldn't have.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Parallel Parking Ltd ANPR PCN PAPLOC- Rear of property High Street


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 454 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The deadline for them to reply to the SAR is 13 November.  The deadline to reply to the Letter Before Claim is ... 13 November.

 

They won't take you to court the very first day after the deadline.  You might as well hold on and see if there is a reply to the SAR.

 

Come back here when they reply to the SAR, or if they don't on 10 November, and we can draw up an appropriate snotty letter.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Such a letter has to be disparaging and mocking in tone use the advanced Google Search box to search on Snotty Letter

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

use our enhanced google searchbox not the top red banner one .

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Parallel Parking seem to be a small company.  Yours is the only thread we have on them.

 

Good news!  This wasn't an ANPR capture.  Some  creep has spied on your car.  So they haven't respected the POFA timescales with their PCN.

 

Also, what the heil does "unauthorised parking" mean?  It could be anything.

 

Did you find a ticket affixed to the windscreen?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

There was no windscreen ticket at all !!  I did wonder about the images, as there are about 5 of them taken from all angles & of the windscreen?? 

Edited by TheCat08
To add content
Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing at all Nicky

My intended letter for Gladstones.  

My Name & Address

Gladstones Solicitors

Unit 8, First Floor

210 Cygnet Court

Centre Park

Warrington

WA1 1PP 4th Nov. 2022

 

Dear Gladstones

Ref: Your Client - Parallel Parking Ltd - Reg. No. *****

Clearly & most definitely you are not the best solicitors in Britain. However, as comedians go, you are pretty good.. Your letter certainly gave me & others a good laugh out loud,, which as we know is a positive for general health. .

Have you read the new Code of Practice?  The £70 you have added for "time and resources spent" [yeah right ] has been described in the Regulations as a "rip off".     Your avarice truly exceeds your legal knowledge by miles. 

May I suggest you consult with a competent solicitor, so you are able to understand the content of this letter. 

With Sympathy 

My intended letter to Parallel - I'm glad to have made this forum aware of this company, as I'm sure I am not the only one to have been contacted by them. 

Any tweaks / amendments will be very welcomed.  Thank you. 

My name & Address

Parallel Parking Ltd

P.O.Box 7401

Walsall

WS1 9TP

PCN*********

Firstly, my empathy on your instructing Gladstones Solicitors.  

Clearly & most definitely they are not the best solicitors in Britain. However, as comedians go, they are pretty good. Your letters & Gladstones  certainly gave me & others a good laugh out loud, which as we know is a positive for general health.

You nor Gladstones have evidently not read the new Code of Practice?   To your alleged “Unauthorised Parking Charge” of £100, they are trying to add a further £70 for "time and resources spent" [yeah right ], which has been described in the Regulations as a "rip off".     

Your’s & Gladstones avarice truly exceeds your legal knowledge by miles.

 May I suggest you consult with a competent solicitor, so you are able to understand the content of this letter. 

With Sympathy 

 

pixs.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, how about this -

 

 

Dear Will & John,

 

cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in mirth at the idea you actually thought I'd take such tripe seriously and cough up!

 

Now you know and I know and now you know that I know the million reasons why your country bumpkin client's invoice is total pants.  It's no surprise that following simple legal instructions is a tad too difficult in the hamlets of Shropshire .

 

On top of that the greedy retards have invented £70 Unicorn Food Tax and you've been telling porkies about solicitors' fees again.  Letter to the SAR in the post!

 

Your client can either see sense or I will look forward to thrashing them in court, obtaining an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g) and spending it on a nice foreign holiday while laughing at your client's expense. 

 

I look forward to your defeating silence.

 

COPIED TO PARALLEL PARKING LTD

 

 

If none of the other regulars have comments, invest in two 2nd class stamps tomorrow and get two free Certificates of posting from the post office.

 

EDIT: our letters "crossed in the post"!!!

Edited by FTMDave
Typo

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dave, I think you mean SRA in para  4, 

The Cat08 Change SAR to SRA in Para 4.  (Solicitors Regulation Authority. not Subject Access Request. 🥸

  • Like 1
  • I agree 1

My time as a Police Officer and subsequently time working within the Motor Trade gives me certain insights into the problems that consumers may encounter.

I have no legal qualifications.

If you have found my post helpful, please enhance my reputation by clicking on the Heart. Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

@GickGick is spot on!  Sorry about the typo.  SRA is right.

 

@TheCat08I was going to post to compliment you on the level of your snottiness!  However, send either your letter or mine or a mixture.  The important thing is that the fleecers know you would be big trouble for them in court, and are therefore more likely to leave you in peace and instead go after some mug who will be scared and who will just cough up.  No need to write two versions for Gladdys and PP, just address it to Gladdys (which is why I wrote "Dear Will and John", these being the two spivs who run the company) and send a copy to PP.  

 

The bit about the SRA is because Gladstones regularly lie about solicitors' costs.  For a £170 claim they are allowed to include £50, but have put £80 to try to scare you.  If you have time on your hands then really do complain to the SRA.  They're an old boys' network and will do nothing, but it will annoy Will & John and will reinforce their picture of you as a complete pain in the backside who is best left alone. 

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they know they will get spanked for the £80 so is good tolet them know you know its a no no, yes a mixture of Yours and FTMDaves will do nicely.

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

How does this look:-

 

Dear Will & John,

 

I would like to thank you  for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in mirth at the idea you actually thought I'd take such tripe seriously and cough up!  

vdEyVKI8FL4p6VcpwKFfxVtPZOg4oGrFTjjnT81Xfdx8uoZ8noP-F4mpDDzS4M0ACyH6jCVF91Iw9ZF-_DhNAiVpvGd2__QC1C-5HOD34C61i72r-nOzUXhwOTkn8gTwASFlpO_bT04G0Dpva21x4t7LTJVZTmb5Tb6BSo7rcOJDhzgr9mJaN2R0aPWP4g

Clearly & most definitely you are not the best solicitors in Britain. However, as comedians go, you are pretty good. Your letter certainly gave me & others a good laugh out loud, which as we know is a positive for general health. .

 

Your avarice truly exceeds your legal knowledge by miles.  Now you know & I know the million reasons why your country bumpkin client's invoice is total pants.   It's no surprise that following simple legal instructions is a tad too difficult in the hamlets of Shropshire .  Clearly you have not bothered to read or are unable to comprehend the new Code of Practice?   The £70 you have added for "time and resources spent" [just a short a nano second of a nano second] has been described in the Regulations as a "rip off".   The invention of this Unicorn Food Tax just shows you’re not adverse to telling real porkies in attempts to scaremonger.  

 

Zm2ojuY1P7ewLHgEly62XfQUT89zqsX95odYK4p9pgz3CwEk4zmqRAOEU3v67OfnjtTUfR6bDuk8BCe4Zs8DsxIJcWjeCzIqZ3nCtjAkniE95Pw25GpkymqXntjeCEukVWDooZY0OSz5fHQ3yn9VLeIT2SwctaCltUa8SZbALRFrcoS1rEkqJgnFGR2c1g

 

Letter to the SRA in the post!

 

Your client can either see sense or I will look forward to thrashing them in court, obtaining an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g) and spending it on a nice foreign holiday while laughing at your client's expense.  

 dsHAF1hKwC0EsZ6rZDM-nFrR_mUtEu0w7S4ZXCgj4qyJxmv1UOILhIiQ_WbpaT7LWjt53JmteHwr32eR-0YBXFUthK1TmaYrz8Bi3iN-voMA-0ScgVp3wIqMRBgn33Tv7PeSAyDIMbiuDeX5ac6P8UVY0lNO_2E0WpKa2vDmsXTjIEQWX40I2EZRu_opEw

I look forward to your defeating silence.

 

COPY SENT TO PARALLEL PARKING LTD

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is superb - well done.

 

Just one change.  Add a bit to the sentence

 

The invention of this Unicorn Food Tax just shows you’re not adverse to telling real porkies in attempts to scaremonger. 

 

instead

 

The invention of this Unicorn Food Tax plus inflating solicitors' costs just shows you’re not adverse to telling real porkies in attempts to scaremonger

 

That's because Parallel Parking added the £70 Unicorn Food Tax and then it is Gladdys lying about solicitors' costs.

 

Also at the end it should be "deafening silence" - my typo above.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes with FTMDave's changes thats brilliant, copied by snail mail to fleecers as well  excellent.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...