Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Shein has been linked to unethical business practices, including forced labour allegations.View the full article
    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CPS UK/Gladstones PCN Claimform - Spring Street, on 02/03/2022 ***Claim Discontinued***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 278 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Having a nightmare explaining all this guys. This is what i've got so far. I know i've probably made a dogs dinner of it but can anyone advise a better way to explain the poor contract? 

 

  1. I am the defendant in this claim. I represent myself as a litigant in-person, with no formal legal training. Everything in the following statement is true to the best of my knowledge. I have attached evidence referred to as exhibits in this witness statement.  

 

  1. At the time of the event, I confirm I was the registered keeper of (reg number). I had several family members on the vehicles insurance policy at the time. The driver at the time of the event is unknown. Shortly after the date of the event, I moved home The claimant continued to send correspondence to the old address despite updating my details with the DVLA. I missed all correspondence due to this. I received the court claim form when visiting the old property to collect a miss delivered parcel. I then requested a subject access request and received all previous correspondence. 

 

No Locus standi :-  

 

  1. The first page of the contract provided in the SAR (Exhibit 1) is between JS Management and consultancy LTD and ferensway hotels LTD. JS Management and consultancy LTD are now known as Complete parking services (CPSUK) limited company number 10212042 (Claimant). 

 

  1. The rest of the pages in the contract (Exibits 2, 3 & 4) are all shown to have a footer of “Company Reg No 11229186 Complete parking services Limited” and page 4 of the contract (article 4) appears to be signed by Complete parking services limited.  

 

  1. Complete parking services limited (company no 11229186) are a dissolved company as of 4/1/22. Therefore, the contract is illegitimate due to having a dissolved Companys number and name on it.  

 

  1. It appears Complete parking services (CPSUK) have taken on a similar name to the former contract owners. I put to strict proof CPSUK have an up to date contract with Ferensway hotels LTD.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think you've made a dog's dinner at all.

 

I've made a few tweaks in red just to make things crystal clear for the judge, plus tidied up some of the punctuation & style.

 

Forum regular LFI is very knowledgeable about "contract stuff" and will no doubt make comments.  I remember LFI mentioning the matter of the contract signatures is vital so I've split that bit off into its own paragraph.

 

 

1.  I am the Defendant in this claim. I represent myself as a litigant in-person, with no formal legal training. Everything in the following statement is true to the best of my knowledge. I have attached evidence referred to as exhibits in this witness statement.  

 

2.  At the time of the event, I confirm I was the registered keeper of (reg number).  I had several family members on the vehicle's insurance policy at the time.  The driver at the time of the event is unknown, however I was not the driver.  Shortly after the date of the event, I moved home.  The Claimant continued to send correspondence to the old address despite me updating my details with the DVLA.  I missed all correspondence due to this.  I received the court claim form when visiting the old property to collect a miss-delivered parcel.  I then requested a subject access request and received all previous correspondence. 

 

No Locus standi :-  

 

3.  The first page of the contract provided in the SAR (Exhibit 1) is between JS Management and Consultancy Services Ltd and the landowner Ferensway Hotels Ltd.  JS Management and Consultancy Services Ltd are now known as Complete Parking Services (CPS UK) Ltd., company number 10212042.  There was a name change on 26 October 2018.  This is the Claimant

 

4.  The rest of the pages in the contract (Exhibits 2, 3 & 4) are all shown to have a footer of “Company Reg No 11229186 Complete Parking Services Ltd”.

 

5.  Page 4 of the contract (article 4) appears to be signed by Complete Parking Services Ltd (company number 11229186).  This is a completely separate company and is not the Claimant in this matter. 

 

6.  Complete Parking Services Ltd (company number 11229186) are a dissolved company as of 4 January 2022. Therefore, the contract is illegitimate due to having a dissolved company's number and name on it, and being signed by representatives of that company, a company which is not the Claimant.  

 

7.  The Claimant has not produced a valid up-to-date contract with the landowner Ferensway Hotels Ltd although I requested the same as part of a CPR request.  Indeed they have produced a contract signed by representatives of a completely different company.

Edited by FTMDave
Typo

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. Much appreciated! I will continue and will also wait on more opinions. Can’t thank you enough, there’s plenty more about the contract to add I think too, the fact the postcodes are wrong and there is no mention of being allowed to take people to court 

Edited by TS6014
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ho!  Ho!  Ho!

 

So they've wet themselves and ran away.

 

You, sir or madam, are are a complete pain in the backside, and a bloody-minded git.  And I mean that as a compliment!!! 

 

Well done on all the work you put in to cause these utter charlatans as much grief as possible.  Many thanks to @miley_bob for coming onto the thread and helping.  So few people bother to hang around after the help they've been given to give some back.

 

CAG 2 Retards 0. 

 

It's superb that your efforts will continue indirectly, with Hull City Council now onto them about lack of planning permission.  That's a crime, Kev & Jamie, we know you're reading.

 

The rubbish contract will be here for future users to see, too.

 

Pat on the back time all around.  Well, except for the chuckle brothers & Gladdys of course 🤣

  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • FTMDave changed the title to CPS UK/Gladstones PCN Claimform - Spring Street, on 02/03/2022 ***Claim discontinued***

Well done CAG.....

 

please dont forget to donate....

 

we are free

we don't get paid 

we are volunteers

but our service provide and our server hosters still charge us....

 

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

TS, why not get in touch with Hull Daily Mail. They're always struggling to find interesting news and you never know, it might prompt others to make gdpr claims...

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

Date on the discontinuance notice is 15th...

 

That's the same day DX opened the can of worms about the dodgy looking company registrations. (It looks like there were far more than his original list).

Think they're worried about more incriminating stuff coming out??

Or, am I just a closet conspiracy theorist?

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Nicky Boy said:

Date on the discontinuance notice is 15th...

 

That's the same day DX opened the can of worms about the dodgy looking company registrations. (It looks like there were far more than his original list).

Think they're worried about more incriminating stuff coming out??

Or, am I just a closet conspiracy theorist?


Personally I think the lot of them are just in it to bully people out of money. The landowners and CPS. All these companies with the same address, can’t get in touch properly with any of them. I reckon there will be loads of dodgy stuff about them all it’s just hard to investigate when there’s so many names, addresses and no response from any of them. 
 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, FTMDave said:

Many thanks to @miley_bob for coming onto the thread and helping.  So few people bother to hang around after the help they've been given to give some back.

 

Glad to have helped. Its always good to see these clowns get a good kicking. I have seen their signs on a few other car parks in & around Hull and they are all equally badly signed. I have heard of them operating further afield in the West Midlands as well. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well TS,

If you can be bothered to pursue it, the unauthorised address info here might be of interest...

 

COMPANIESHOUSE.BLOG.GOV.UK

News and updates from Companies House

 

  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent well done, they must be rather worried about their machinations being tested in court,  Sadly they will be off to mug some poor unsuspecting parker, when they should be driven out of business for dodginess.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The other way you have helped motorists in the future who will come across these deviants is this.

 

I haven't been able to find details of any other court action by CPS anywhere on the Web.

 

Now, from that it's a leap too far to conclude you're the first person they've actually sued.  Others may be sorting out their own defence away from the forums.  Sadly some motorists might have caved in in fear after receiving a court claim and coughed up.  Still, yours is the only defended court claim anywhere to be found on the Internet.

 

And what a start for Kev & Jamie!  They weren't beaten in court.  They never got there.  They ran away with their tails between their legs well before.  They stupidly paid the "experts" at Gladdys to represent them ... who were too lazy to read a rubbish contract properly before supplying it, and now its right here on CAG for the whole wide world to see 🤣🤣🤣

 

Think about how much money you cost them - whatever debt collector fees they paid, £35 for the court claim, and all of Gladdy's fees.

 

They tried litigation.  They must have been so smug taking you on with their "expert" (aye, yeah) solicitors backing them up.  And they got a hammering!  Your victory will make them at least think more than twice in future.  Well done!

  • Haha 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you trying to wind them up FTM?

You know they're reading this thread now...

Hi losers!

  • Haha 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, FTMDave said:

 

 

Now, from that it's a leap too far to conclude you're the first person they've actually sued.  Others may be sorting out their own defence away from the forums.  Sadly some motorists might have caved in in fear after receiving a court claim and coughed up.  Still, yours is the only defended court claim anywhere to be found on the Internet.

 

 

Likewise I have been unable to find any other mention online of these clowns issuing claims. They got as far as a Letter before claim with my brother, but the snotty letter treatment seems to have had the desired affect. I'm not sure how they ever hoped to win that one if they were stupid enough to go to court as the PCN was not POFA compliant and their case would have been about as water tight as the Titanic.

  • I agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • AndyOrch changed the title to CPS UK/Gladstones PCN Claimform - Spring Street, on 02/03/2022 ***Claim Discontinued***
  • 8 months later...

TS,

Just wondering if Hull Council ever came back to you about the lack of planning permission?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...